Document V3pdGp1yxLwYov60m3ZOE5o7j

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES Pubffc Health Service Eli Granek McGivney & Kluger 80 Broad Street 23rd Floor New York, NY 10004 EC - 2 2009 Food and Drug Adm inistration Rockville MO 20857 Dear Nr. Granek: F09-8987 In response to youc request of October 30, 2009 for information pertaining to the presence of asbestos in talc* XX Enclosed ace the records you requested. We have searched our files and find no responsive information, ___Y ouc request, is a ls o b ein g referred to one o f our component: o f f ic e s , ddpbtkmwtFy_ohaeenro_rieaeyetoulf^penkllesawirCuedcwmcmffbooioetriililhinmlnoinrrilntimcsmtaaswaahiltordytaeiayaritfnlevoihpldttrryInehepiminensteedthdnfagcaahoeeanpletleornae.tdrwmmetorsireiewictaoaasgodhelttfohiefstyoeuahttstoinnrflahntdooud,soecslrflHllbaotrloirrhepeekseefwatcepefeqstt-oniedpeun3Fdrra.oed,dg5DlinsIess,itftadAcflhe-id5ilyfnwanotod6otetdgsorer0uduied0actrdsrdeonaehesocoFytc:oieyiiosnrrssodFonineohouronqstten.othoiaurhrd.dslat(eeeleftAascaLrorytptennehaafoipfdycvnenuutroeehyordDlr,detepadehpirtRrlpssteuarieeporraegrtrfeutetcscueivoptdkAcoreiovfnunodiFniidlFnsumlsaDsielDfhsrdeenoilAe,neydAirdiarimMnewsah'llstttaeaotrDiivhttsaptovihiatyrnoiotiltheoa2oinnlaeutk0ni,einmile8m,xspdbdn5pliDeen7enilcitonaaiahfpavwtisfrietunioeyshrsrisretieiheamlohoqepoaidnutaanpwg,ituorreiw3oseofnt0odanecc,ytho The following charges for this request to date m a y be included iu a moatiily invoice: Reproductions 23 *50 Search^ 90*00 Reviews 90.00 OthcrS 0 ___ Tolal:$ 203*50 TPHLEEAASBEODVOE NTOOTTASELNMDAPYANYOMTENRETFULNF.LCETSTSHYEOUFINRAECLECIHVAERAGNEISNEVOORtCTEH.IS REQUEST. Enc losuce FGt OEEtCER V / EJceotit ive Opera tio als S taff Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition PLAINTIFFS EXHIBIT WCD-33 HHS00000001 KU ' memorandum of meeting March 22, 1976 at Environmental Sciences Laboratory Mount Sinai School of Medicine City University of New York BETWEEN: Members of the Staff of Environmental Sciences Laboratories Arthur M. Langer Arthur N. Rohl Division of Cosmetics Technology, FDA Clifton H. Wilson Ronald L. Yates SUBJECT: Analytical Methodology for the Detection and Determination of Asbestos Minerals in Talc Upon arriving at the laboratory, Dr. Wilson and Mr. Yates were greeted by Dr. Rohl. He stated that Dr. Langer would be present as soon as possible. Mr* Yates gave- Dr. Rohl the cosmetic talc samples that Dr. Langer had agreed to analyze. In turn we requested and received subsamples of the 10 cosmetic talcs in which Dr. Langer reported the presence of tremolite and/or anthophyllite. These are: 1. Body powder, Cashmere-Bouquet 2. Rosemary talc 3. Brut for Men, Faberge 4. Air Spun 'Face Powder, Coty 5. . Baby talc, Bauer and Black 6. Black Label, Yardley 7. After Shave talc, English Leather 8. ZBT Baby Powder 9. Invisible talc, Yardley 10. Shave talc, Mennen Dr. Langer arrived approximately 30 minutes after our arrival. Mr* Yates presented him with the covering letter concerning the cosmetic talc samples DOST had provided for his analysis. HHS00000018 -2- Dr. Langer, Dr. RGhl, Dr. Wilson and Mr. Yates then discussed the following topics: Sample Preparation and Instrumental Conditions for Analysis of Talc by x-ray Diffraction. - Dr. Langer stated that he did not believe it possible to prepare a sample for x-ray analysis that had a completely random orientation of the chrystal lattice. He did not think that random distribution was important if sample preparation techniques were consistent. Mr. Yates informed Dr. Langer that in the proposed CTFA method, preferred orientation was inevitable because the sample was pressed hydraulically. Dr. Langer thought the technique acceptable if consistent results were obtained. Dr. Langer demonstrated the sample preparation technique used by his group. After preparation was completed, sample was step-scanned in increments of 0.02 through the area ^of interest until a count of 2000 was obtained at each step. Divergence slits of 4 are frequently, although not always, used. When Dr. Wilson asked Dr* Langer about the possibility of scatter and high background from the use of a 4 slit, Dr. Langer stated that the use of a smaller slit would probably increase resolution and sensitivity.- He was somewhat noncommittal about the. effect of a 4 slit oh quantitative results* Dr. Langer summed up by stating that if good standards are used and sample preparation is reproducible and consistent, reliable analytical results should be obtained. He said that all of the 10 samples.found to contain tremolite and anthophyllite by x~ray diffractometry were examined by transmission electron microscopy using selected area diffraction to verify x-ray results. Dr. Langer was somewhat disgusted by the talc industry1s attitude. He said the results of his work has been known to the industry for several years but nothing was done until the analytical results became public. Tremolite. - Dr. Langer stated that tremolite and talc fibers can be easily differentiated using light microscopy. The cleavage of tremolite and anthophyllite is 90 to the crystal axis while talc has an angular cleavage. There is also a difference in refractive index. Tremolite and anthophyllite can be differentiated by the difference in aspect ratio. Dr. Langer demonstrated by preparing a slide of Cashmere Bouquet talc. Under the microscope tremolite was observed as short particles with 90 cleavage. Anthophyllite had the same cleavage but was definitely fibrous, having aspect ratios typically 30 or 40 to 1. Talc fibers appeared to have a cleavage of approximately 60. Dr. Wilson asked Dr. Langer to examine a sample of tremolite he had brought along* Dr. Wilson said that he had been using the sample as a standard but that x-ray analysis indicated impurities. Dr. Langer examined the sample using HHS00000019 -J- optical microscopy. He stated it contined anthophyllite, tremolite, quartz and talc. X-ray analysis of the sample indicated talc, anthophyllite and tremolite. He had a microscopist on his staff examine the sample using optical microscopy* His analysis confirmed Dr* DangerTs results. Dr. Langer stated that our tremolite standard was very impure and probably originated from New York, He gave Dr. Wilson the address of the Cape Asbestos Co. in London, a firm that could provide samples of Korean tremolite, considered to be the purest available. Dr. Langer said detectability levels for tremolite was approxi mately 0.1% by x-ray diffractometry. If tremolite particles had aspect ratios of 3 to 1 or greater they were considered fibrous. Chrysotile, - According to Dr. Rohl, detectability by x-ray fluorescence was 0.25% depending on size and crystallinity. Dr. Rohl had some photographs taken of chrysotile fibers (fibrils) using transmission electron microscopy (TEK), Photograph showed fibers containing several fibrils and individual fibrils. Aspect ratios were extremely high. When examining talcs by TEM a count of 3-5/grid square is considered background. In two of the 19 commercial cosmetic talcs examined, fiber counts of approximately 24 fibrils/grid square were obtained. Dr. Langer considered this to be quite low and probably not hazardous. In general he did not think that chrysotile was a real problem as far as cosmetic talcs were concerned. He refuted claims made by some that asbestos fibers were not present in the environment due to use of asbestos brake shoes in automobiles. He stated that they have analyzed dust obtained from auto brake drums and have identified asbestos fibers. Nickel. - In reference to the high amounts of nickel present in some talcs, Dr. Langer said that nickel replaces magnesium In the talc lattice and becomes a nickel hydroxy silicate complex. He Is not convinced that nickel Is harmless in this form because of its similarity to nickel hydroxide, which has been found to cause rhabdomyosarcomas in rats when injected. Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) . - Dr* Rohl demonstrated the use of TEM for the analysis of talcs using previously prepared samples. Using a prepared sample of unknown identity, he pointed out structures typical of talc and tremolite. He also demonstrated that use of selected area diffraction. The crystal to be examined Is centered on the screen and the beam Is then passed through the area of the crystal desired. The diffraction pattern is displayed on the screen as a series of dots quite similar to a Laue photograph. The pattern can then be compared with those of standards for characterization. HHS00000020 In general^ the Environmental Sciences Laboratory is well equipped for mineralogical analysis having two transmission electron microscopess two scanning electron microscopes, an x-ray diffractometers an optical microscope and a differential thermal analyzer Ronald h * Yates HHS00000021