Document Qg7bYejL3nE87ywLOGqammro5

Message From: Sent: To: CC: Subject: Daguillard, Robert [/0=EXCHANGELABS/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=BBE9682B940C4F2C90732E4D37355DD4-DAGUILLARD,] 2/1/2018 6:46:50 PM Jon Hurdle [_________Ex. 6________ j Press [/o=ExchangeLabs/ou=Exchange AdministrativeGroup (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/cn=Recipients/cn=b293283291dc44eOb5dlc36be9281d8a-Press] RE: radium in drinking water Jon, On the record and for attribution to "an EPA spokesperson," please: "EPA sets limits for radionuclides, including radium, in public drinking water through the Safe Drinking Water Act. Local water suppliers must follow these limits and are required to inform citizens about the level of radionuclides in their water." - EPA spokesperson On background: More than 300 million people depend on 50,000 community water systems across the country for safe, reliable water every day. Over 91 percent of the population receives drinking water from community water systems that meet all health-based standards. Off-the-record: The rule has not been updated since 2000, for more information please visit: https://www.epa.gov/dwreginfo/radionuclides-rule. Thanks, R. j From: Jon Hurdlej_____ ______ Ex._6___________ Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2018 12:51 PM To: Daguillard, Robert <Daguillard.Robert@epa.gov> Subject: Re: radium in drinking water hi Robert, yes please, by close of business today; sooner if possible. Jon On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 12:49 PM, Daguillard, Robert <Daguillard.Robert@epa.gov> wrote: Good afternoon Jon, Thanks for reaching out. Are you looking for a response by, say, COB? Best, R. Robert Daguillard Office of Media Relations U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Washington, DC Sierra Club v. EPA 18cv3472 NDCA Tier 13 ED 002061 00021022-00001 +1(202)564-6618 (O) Ex. 6 From: Jon Hurdle j____________ E x - 6____ Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2018 12:48 PM To: Press <Press(5)epa.gov> Subject: radium in drinking water To whom it may concern, Can you respond to report below which says millions o f Americans are exposed to hazardous levels of radium in drinking water? Does EPA support its conclusions? If so, does that argue for tighter rules on radium levels? If not, is the EPA health level (which is much lower than the California advisory level cited in the report) adequately protective of public health? I'm writing today on the New Jersey portion o f the report, which says that 369 water utilities in that state carry water that exceeds the California level. thanks Jon Hurdle for NJ Spotlight 215 236 3436 Ex. 6 https://www.ewg.org/research/17Q-million-us~drink-radiotidive-tap-water~trump~nominee-faked~data~hide-Ctjincer" risk#.WnNPaK6nHX4 Sierra Club v. EPA 18cv3472 NDCA Tier 13 ED 002061 00021022-00002 Sierra Club v. EPA 18cv3472 NDCA Tier 13 ED 002061 00021022-00003