Document NNE33yQ1wY4aBw0bkQZaoqkzV
Please print or type in the unshaded areas only.
EPA l.D. number (copy from item 1 of torm l)
LAD990683716
Form Approved OMB No. 158-R0173
ZGFORM &EPA
NPDES
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER
EXISTING MANUFACTURING, COMMERCIAL, MINING AND SILVICULTURAL OPERATIONS Consolidated Permits Program
I. OUTFALL LOCATION
For each outfall, list the latitude and longitude of its location to the nearest 15 seconds and the name of the receiving water.
A. GUTTPaLL NUMBER (list)
B. LATITUDE
1. DIO.
1. MIN.
8. SIC.
C. LONGITUDE
i. oee,
2. MIN. s. sec.
flume/D. RECEIVING WATER
'
001 30 14 18 93 16 40 Bayou Verdine
002 30 14 25 93 16 40 Bayou Verdine
003 30 14 23 93 15 26 Westlake drainaqe ditch
II. FLOWS, SOURCES OF POLLUTION, AND TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES S
A. Attach a line drawing showing the water flow through the facility. Indicate sources of intake water, operations contributing wastewater to the effluent,
and treatment units labeled to correspond to the more detailed descriptions in Item B. Construct a water balance on the line drawing by showing average
.. flows between intakes, operations, treatment units, and outfalls. If a water balance cannot be determined ie.g., for certain mining activities), provide a -
pictorial description of the nature and amount of any sources of water and any collection or treatment measures.
- --
B. For each outfall, provide a description of: (1) All operations contributing wastewater to the effluent, including process wastewater, sanitary wastewater,-
. cooling water, and storm water runoff; (2) The average flow contributed by each operation; and (3) The treatment received by the wastewater. Continue
on additional sheets if necessary.
/|
^
1. OUT* FALL.NO
(list)
2. OPERATION(5) CONTRIBUTING FLOW
a. OPERATION (list)
b. AVERAGE FLOW
(include units)
3. TREATMENT a. DESCRIPTION
b. LIST CODES FROM TABLE 2C~1
Desalters
138.000 lbs/hr
Closed Coker Blowdown
22.500 Ibs/hr See Attachment C
001 Ballast and Crude Tank Draws 15,000 lbs/hr
Miscellaneous Users
63,000 lbs/hr See Attachment B
Cooling Tower Filter Backwas h 18,500 Ibs/hr
Boiler Blowdown
102.100 lbs/hr See Attachment C
001 105F Pit Overflow
169.800 lbs/hr
Coolinq Tower Blowdown Sanitary Sewer
296.600 lbs/hr 10.000 lbs/hr See Attachment C
Fire Water Pond
75.000 Ibs/hr
001 Storm Water Diversion Pond 32.000 Ibs/hr
Storm Water Runoff from 002 Process Area
58,400 lbs/hr Sedimentation
1-U
Storm Water Runoff from Tani 58,000 lbs/hr None 003 Farm Area
NOTE:
The above rates do nc t reflect recyc led streams and evaporation losses. See the line drawing (Attac hment C) for clarification.
_
official, use ONLY (effluent guidelines sub-categories) EPA Form 3510-2C <6-801
pacf i nr a
"itfCD oovu-
CONTINUE ON REVERSE
CONTINUED FROM THE FRONT I" C. Except tor storm runoff, leak*, orspiilLareanyofthedischarges describedinitemsTl-AarB intermittent or seasonal?
yes (complete the following tabfe)
00 NO (goto Section III)
1. OUTFALL NUMBER
(list)
2. OPERATION/^ CONTRIBUTING FLOW
(list}
3. FREQUENCY
a. DAYS
PER WEEK
(specify average)
b. MONTHS
PER YEAR
(specify average)
B. FLOW RATE
(In mgd)
4. FLOW
tx TOTAL VOLUME
`(specify with unite)
t. LONS TIRM . MAXIMUM DAILY
C DUR
ATION
(In days/- >
HI. MAXIMUM PRODUCTION
A. Poes an effluent guideline limitation promulgated by EPA under Section 304 Qf:tbt:6feari Water Act apply to your facility?
^^yes (complete Item III-B)
Q^io (to to Section IV)
.:
;. .. .. .
8. Are the limitations in the applicable effluent guideline expressed in terms of production (or other measure of operation}?
K"~l YES (complete Item IIJ-C)
7 >: PI NO (go to Section IV)
.... .
'Zaz&P
C. If you answered "Yes" to Item ill-8, list the quantity which represents an actual measurement of your maximum level of production, expressed in the terms
and units used in the applicable effluent guideline, and indicate the affected outfalls.
--
. L"
1. MAXIMUM QUANTITY - . _
C. erCRATlON, fNOBUCT, MATINUL, STC. i--.. (specify)
i - * '< .
l \ * .......
AFFECTED
i"-'' OUTFALLS " f " (listoutfall numbers)
164.0 164.0
69.0 30.6 11.8 56.2
1,000 bbl 1,000 bbl 1,000 bbl
1,000 bbl 1,000 bbl 1,000 bbl
Atmospheric Distillation Crude Oil Desalting Vacuum Distillation Fluid Catalytic Cracker Thermal Cracking Delayed Coking
001,002 001,002 001,002 001,002 001,002 001,002
, Are you now required by any Federal, State or local authority to meet any implementation schedule for the construction, upgrading or operation of waste*-
water treatment equipment or practices or any other environmental programs which may affect the discharges described in this application? This includes,
but is not limited to, permit conditions, administrative or enforcement orders, enforcement compliance schedule letters, stipulations, court orders, and grant
_ or loan conditions.
| | yes (complete the following table)
fXl NO (go to Item IV-B)
t, IDENTIFICATION OF CONDITION,
2. AFFECTED OUTFALLS
AGREEMENT, ETC.
a. NO. b. IOURCK OF OISCHANOI
3. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
.4 FINA_
PLIANCE
PCAOTME-
WCD 00002293
i
B. "OPTIONAL: You may attach additional sheets describing any additional water pollution control programs lor other environmental projects which msy affect your discharges) you now have underway or which you plan. Indicate whether each program is now underway or planned, and indicate your actual or
planned schedules for construction. Q]mark "x" if description of additional control programs is attached
EPA Form 3510-2C (6-801
PAGE 2 OF 4
CONTINUE ON PAGE
CONTINUED FROM PAGE 2
t Iepa i.d. NUMBERfcopy from Jtem 1 of Form 1)
`j LAD9906837I6
V. INTAKE AND EFFLUENT CHARACTERISTICS
Form Approved OMB No. 168-R0173
A, 8, & C;^ Sea instructions before proceeding -- Complete one set of tables for each outfall -- Annotate the outfall number in the space provided. Tables V-A, V-8, and V-C are Included on separate sheets numbered V-1 through V-9.
D. Use the space below to list any of the pollutants listed in Tabla 2c-3 of the instructions, which you know or have reason to believe is discharged or may be
W discharged from any outfall. For every pollutant you list, briefly describe the reasons you believe it to be present and report any analytical data in your
possession.-: - \
.
t. POLLUTANT
Cyclohexane Xylene Naphenic Acid
2. SOURCE
A1 1 three of these sub stances are present in the products from the reformer unit. !t is, therefore, possible that at times these may be found in the process waste waters as a result of upsets.
1. POLLUTANT
2. SOURCE
VI, POTENTIAL DISCHARGES NOT COVERED BY ANALYSIS .
A. Is any pollutant listed in Item V-C a substance or a component of a substance which you do or expect that you will over the next S years use or manufacture 'v^y at an intermediate or final product or byproduct? .
"- *
. |~lYE8 flirt oil' tuch pollutanti below) '
\ V -i-A V. *\ r"'ttO (go to Item VI-B) ' ';.
B. Are your operations such that your raw materials, processes, or products can reasonably be expected to vary so that your discharges of pollutants may during , v . the next S years exceed two times the maximum values reported in Item V? ...v. . . ,
Q YES (complete Item V7-C below)
iXl NO (go to Section VII)
: C. If you answered "Yes" to Item Vl-B, explain below and describe in detail the sources and expected levels of such pollutants which you anticipate will be discharged from each outfall over the next S years, to the best of your ability at this time. Continue on additional sheets if you need more space. :
EPA Form 3510-2C (6-80)
PAGE 3 OF 4
MCD 000002294 INUE ON REVERS
OUIMUNUEO FROM THE FRONT
Prepared by:
Environmental Science and Aquatic Bioassay Services Gainesville, Florida ESE No. 79-311-021 June 30, 1980
Engineering,
Inc.
Flow through and static bioassays were conducted at the Continental Oil Company Refinery (Conoco), Lake Charles, Louisiana. The bioassays were conducted from January 11 through January 18, 1980, to determine the lethality to sheepshead minnows (Cyprinodon variegatus)
and mysid shrimp (Mysidopsis bahia) of the waste water from the plant's No. 001 outfall.
s
MCD 000002295
IX. CERTIFICATION
/ certify under penalty of law that / have personally examined and am familiar with the information submitted in this application and all
attachments and that, based on my inquiry of those individuals immediately responsible for obtaining the information, 1 believe that the in
formation is true, accurate and complete, 1 am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the
possibility of fine and imprisonment.
-,.-H i':-'/
A. NAME & OFFICIAL TITLE (type or print)
0. phone NO. (area code & no.)
0. T. Zeien, Vice President, Refining
C. SIGNATURE
/--V U
`
,
EPA Form 3510-2C 16-80)
PAGE 4 or 4
713-965-1640
O. DATE SIGNED
12-3-82
CONTINUE ON PAGE V-5
HU ,
0c<Jiwn 'z <>
PAGE V-4
si
Zh
u0<c .H 0 JlA X0 <w
U 3
J
< >
aS
<1
li
fN
0
Z
0
J
J
S3
r35:
5 < z
*3*
c: c Q o o
TT7
;s
TB--
*S
jiSc c3-
H
Z' '
<V>K 3
K<W aueo 5 'Jq2 3
!<z
U*i _f-
ao -nt
CCO
CD.?T
W CN
0<?
CQ
in
cm
>z
CM --
v (i ^ $ s
-v m
in~ --f'*
>
WCD 0002299
3QCQ
*3* 3" *3 ao Q Q O Q C o Q o o
Z
^
o
2n
I?
Ev
O CM nC
o>s--.
9
or o UJ
S >9 Wt 5cfms >*2
n U (0 > fi
6c o
15 ^ qj _
It
- E^
OON
g2
2>6o i*n >*
2lS
k0 A
on
4
un
^Q irn>
r- A
0 --.
o2
2o ?in
<?
in
Do 9~
CM C
*-* ac
i>n 2 > ?
-.io
vC
a o2w o^ac^mM
^*o^6
55
o CM CD
efi?.
CO
H
VA
52
>5 - CM U
EPA Form 3510-2C (6-80)
CONTINUED i A THE FRONT
MCD 000002300
^5'
; ;
o co
--wo
<
nj 0 o
(~ o
X X XXXXXXXXX
-3" -3- -3- -3" -3* -3* -3- -3* -3- -3- -3" OQ QO aOOQOQo z Z Zz zzzZzzZ
CONTINUED FROM PAGE V-4
EPA I.D . LAD
Z 0 b < X
--Z 'el y
z 0 u
WM > ?! X
X X < s
l35 Jim f "
1. POLLUTANT
AND CAS NUMBER
J a. M A X IM U M D A IL Y V A L U E
a < I
( if available)
-|G C /M S FRACTIO N V O L A T IL E COMPOUNDS (co n tin u e d )
22V . Methylene C hloride (75 09-2)
yz
<
2
p< "--Zbtz
at r-
*
Z0
mo So
orS
&<ao
a< S
3
J
< >
bf
m b e r (copy from Item 1 o f Form I) o u t f a l l n u m b e r
10683716
001
3. E F F LU E N T
dv
J
Ti*
---Z u
(9
Z
0
z0 <
ttS Si
< I
-3* -3- -3" -3* -3* -3- -3- -3- -3" -3" QOaOQ oQQ O Q Zz z z Z zZZz Z
XX XXX XXXXX
e e s
** *"
Oo-t^oi,
t <*>
>2*
o r fs.
NUV
,* Offl o*T t r* oN <0 "
|I
me
25V . Toluene (108-88-3)
o
s|
~8g " o <o
SqC
27V. 1,1,1-Trtchloroethane (71-55-6) 28V. 1,1,2-Trichloroethane (79-00-5)
|
29V. Trichloro ethylene (79-01-6)
30V. Trichloro1lu o ro m e th a n e (75-69-4)
31V. V inyl C hloride (76-.0K-4)
|GC/MS F R A C T IO N -A C ID COMPOUNDS
1A. 2-Chloropheno (95-57 8)
2A. 2,4-D ichlorophenol (120-83-2)
3A. 2.4-Dim ethylphenol (105-67-9)
4A. 4,6-D initro-O Cresol (534-52-1)
5A. 2.4-D initrophenoi (51-28-5)
6A. 2-N itrophenol (88-75-5)
7A. 4-N itrophenol (100-02-7) 8 A. P-Chloro-MCresol (59-50-7)
9A . Pentachlorophenol (87-86-5)
10A. Phenol (108 95 2)
|
---- ------ -------- 1
< >
J
3
u
d
.IfW-
-
-- -- -----------
b. o.ivi i'cw
1
</) t Z D
*
5
s < --
i u 0z 55
S o
<5 S
a. C O N C E N T R A T IO N
Vi V)
<
S
a
zo*< u,
>
fihi
| 5. IN T A K E (optional) |
h.
co nw
--
a <
QC
s*
o
\> h
is
(V
0.jm
CONTINUE ON PAGE V-7
o o
k,
0x J<(uA
si
Zh
0u<c
H OJill * <W 2|?
2
at*
PAGE V-
So
O CO <N
o oo oo Qo
>ft
-r TB"
-3T -4ao
-4* -4oQ
-4* -4" QQ
-4- -4* CQ
-4" -4- -4". QO
V) E
< Li
urn .
os
Z3 <Z
X
cK> CD
<N
I? S-i" S wj8<0
o.^
*8
oC0--
CO cp
58
i5 u2tno
3 to
-sW<9
oS o
6H 1
C C rj
CO-C*^
-
_L *5 m
o o_CTJ . iS~ es*
CJ CoO
J2 -- cd >*cr>
- tu 4
>"
ccoo a`.
o a 3a
IS
ffl aiiC 05*., *" 5 *-
*j *--
o5*** --
n
6 >40
.^"S-5Q.f^*
m49 * >7
O *-m
O" K^i-
c --
ID B
-- aui
00
coS
40 - a.
n
.(<4
6 >r.
c
-|0 --.
5w .c
0*5 r* (JCL
S_
>0J1
Nto af
tO +
- 2
r
fC*D a6.S9
wo CmD03
2"
X
Op
56
10
*
Q lO
Ob C
CO S
*- B
CN
EPA Form 3510-2C (6-80)
CONTINUED FROM THE FRONT
Form Approved OMB No. 158-R0173
1k 0.(JWtt
s'!i?
"t5r 0
2 6. M
k1 *
B*
< h ou
Z in
z* o; ju >
<
i v zo *p SJ
e p a i .d . n u m b e r (copy from Ite m I o f Form 1) o u t f a l l n u m b e r
LAD990683716 001
CONTINUED FROM PAGE V-6
1. P O L L U T A N T AND CAS NUMBER (if available)
|G C/M S FRACTIO N B A S E /N E U T R A L COMPOUNDS (continued)-
i*trm
MVI < WX bd
z
D w
^0
Zb
0< OK
lb 0.J<A
cw
si
*
u
3
J < >
< z
S3
x z0
jfe (3
--_..*b<z
Z 0J
Vuz0
<s u
III
b Z U
D J < >
3 J
>
< J
k. li.
Oo
y eMSO rn X*
0z
r- b<
k < x
jQ
--T>zai uut0
u
D J <
w
>Z
> J
<
0
X zo
3 X *
*"b?<e
< X
o'
y0z0
> k -3 <:
X K
y |f
< iii*"
X
N *iT:c
40
3 1
-d- sT -d- ' -d* -d- -d* -d- -T -d- -d- -d" -d* -d* -d- -d ^r -d" -d- -t -d- -d-
Q Z
Q Z
Q Z
o0 zZ
O z
0
z
O Z
0
z
Q Z
Q Z
Q Z
o z
o z
cQ zZ
Q Z
o z
o z
oo zz
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X XX
308. 1,2-Diphenylhydrazine (as Azo~ benzene) (122-66-7;
23B. 3,3'-Dichloro benzidine (91-94-1)
69
dS
IS
si si IL9c ?4` 9c9
<CNO
Sis 2 Cl
SC3
fas
> O e ?
> 3 CD
o. -Sl i1o0 5
"l*
yN"fJlS4>n
1M0O__2
Sj CN 0. w
.N *24 4r* C *55!
.! CCMD. CO3
Ss
.N
26 .d 9 c <0
t
0
0_
Q ZoO
<qT
cCDT.
c 93
(CMO 20
0^ H<9 0(cN)rOi-S.--_t'
co
0o u2.*
52
oc9
9C
ooc
2 aS
`5
3 fv
u.. nf* CO <0
Sa
-
A
X o c* co 5" n u-Tp-
2 3 SV? *2S
X c? I. ao ttfnflo>rf-i
o-- oo fJx --to X. ec (o0 tS
oc
*o0 T--O' in cVS IS
oc ao--*
--.i<nJ) 0
oec o art z. oCN ffi yw
s
c
N
oc
Co
O - >
d rt Z.ion>
ST Z. E irn-
5-''
>T
O'^cij
SS
Mm
arses'jin':
VALUE
6 o n.
zsS o 0. <s 9 2^
9 C 0
0 a-- o *7 --o
. in aQc"b o
MCD 000002311
CONTINUED FROM PAGE V-6
NOUVH1N13NOD 1
____ ILL_____
ju.t
X*
:;i
< Jiw
N T'jii a
1. POLLUTANT AND CAS NUMBER
2j
X ft
|
I 8. M A X IM U M D A IL Y V A L U E
rt' 3
( if available)
M * <
2
-IG C /M S FRACTIO N B A S E /N E U T R A L COMPOUNDS (c o n tin u e d)
XX X
2 2 B . 1 ,4 -D ic h lo ro benzene (106-46-7]
2 3 B . 3 ,3 '-D ic h lo ro -
b e n z id in e (9 1 -9 4 -1 )
2 4 B . D ie th y ) P h th a la te (8 4 -6 6 -2 )
2 5 6 . D im e th y l P h th a la te (1 3 1 -1 1 -3 ) 2 6 B . D i-N -B u ty l P h th a la te (8 4 -7 4 -2 )
2 7 B. 2 ,4 -D in itro to lu e n e (1 2 1 -1 4 -2 )
XXXXX
2 8 B . 2 ,6 -D in itro to lu e n e (6 0 6 -2 0 -2 )
2 9 B . D i-N -O c ty l P h th a la te (1 1 7 -8 4 -0 )
j. . r* >* io *$ 9 C CM Q. a CM
9 ~ PM "2" r-.* N C
m -o c o > n a
X X XX
i . i1
1
3 1 B.
F lu 'o r a n t h e n e
1 (2 0 6 -4 4 -0 )
3 2 B . F lu o re n e (8 6 -7 3 -7 )
33B . Hexa-
c h lo ro b e n z e n e
(1 1 8 71-1)
II
34B . Hexac h lo ro b u ta d ie n e
I (87-68-3)
3 5 B . H e x a c h lo ro c y c lo p e n ta d ie n e (7 7 -4 7 -4 )
3 6 B . H e x a c h lo ro e th a n e (6 7 -7 2 -1 )
3 7 B .In d e n o (1,2,3-cd) P y re n e (1 9 3 -3 9 -5 )
-
XXXXXXX
j 3 9 B . N a p h th a le n e (9 1 -2 0 -3 )
40B. N itro b e n z e n e (98-95-3)
t
4 1 B. N - N it r o softim o th y la m in e (62-75 9)
XX
zZ
0 u
<
Do S Wq z Si 0
3ttr < rK
5 --2
* E
V. 0 ** g * g
A
NO
0
e rr\ " oo " M5 1
s
< -* a. u
u
3 J
<< >2
6u
J0
u z
z II
0 --z
< _I
s z 0
>2
<<
Jtfi (U
1?
3. E F F L U E N T
0
OUTFALL NUMBER
002
Q >1
J
3
U
| 4. U N ITS Id. N O . O lr a. C O N C E N
T R A T IO N
lA
>2 1ft <
2
1
S<
0 u
(.y
| 5 . IN T A K E (optional) |
8
2 u S;
z VZ je u 0
12
<
m u
a, O<Jmw
0 * <A R *<> * JD
CO NTINUE ON PAGE V-9
CM
O O
u w o*2|CI"M
?A
. hi <
1b1
*
1 N
<
<3U
z
A
0j* w
s r ve
5 o
< l
j
4. U N ITS
|
PAGE V-8
3. E F F L U E N T
M < z
d
I
Zb 0< UC
*" lb 0.J*
c hi 2 1?
A
hi
a
j < >
**< s
"l
>t
g X0
j*=
15 Z 0 J0 ou
hi
3 J < >
mm< 1
<a
na Zo
0X
sr <t
X < i 13
_Za u 0xu
U
a j <
<m
>S
> j
<
Q s
t0
a 2j
fK
X < I
-lz 0z1
u0
!>* k -?! X c < *5" % N lss|s
*0
XX X
o
|L
? gw Z. jQio.O "SlO "32
Co ' Cce _ ja. f-
.o
2 >o 3s
0C
0
--o
a>. o6
sS
*0 --
X
X X > X X X X X X X X X
c0 c0
,E?r
sg 4 CT) A
SJ 2?
Sis
"S JCO- --
u j?
"S ^CD `O C3>
0cp
--
0 3r
* U r*
H Q jQ ~n
CN
Ui Q a-- . a XwiSD
a SiS
sil n.*
Q a Q~ . co **
c
2 ^ Dr*
2
0
o c
r.
*<?>
3M O *c0 r*
CQ.CN
4* If)
. id
?s 2o --r*
Qo O<0
a:
<L*
CN
46B. 1 ,2 ,4 - Trlchlorobenzena
(12082-1) -
IGC/MS FRACTION PESTICIDES
MCD 000002312
XX
2 1? Ui o
. CN
JrCN
* r**
XX
o O co X. <^y a. tb 2?
CONTINUED FROM THE FRONT
1. P O L L U T A N T | AND CAS NUMBER ( if aifoitablc)
|G C /M S FR A C TIO N B A S E /N E U T R A L COMPOUNDS (continued)-
13P. Endosulfan S u lfa te (1031-07-8) 15P. E ndrin A ld e h y d e (7421-93-4) EPA Form 3510-2C (6-80)
e p a i.d .
LAI
CONTINUED FROM PAGE V*8
m b e r (copy from Item X o f Form 1) o u t f a l l n u m b e r 306837^6 002
3. E F F L U E N T
|
___ .____________________ A CONCEN
TRATION
Form Approved OMB No, 168-R0173
0I*0k<ZJMuM
."c5 n*<>
s. U j
u 11
tt.
<
K ou
Z
in
*<
3>1u<,
tu
y
zo
5:
Mh
V05<1I 13'
Z
3
W
I00~k <J2VuV)I
5S>
3uJ<> IW
Si
z|
F
e z0Ju
--.
10p< 2HVuk20
3Ju>< 2<
<s
3MO
late r *< z
"-- 0PLzHuzz8
PAGE V-9
^ when th e re is flo w .
than the minimum d e te c ta b le lim it o f th e method.
1977.
e fflu e n t data from the period May, 1981, through A p r il, 1982.
!' 1
-
3 4-J
O 3
05 a)
i- T03)
CuO
-- oi -- ru
U _Q
co oc
o --
Q.
c
au)
2<U CL)
-o CO
a) L CD
u 3
(fi (0
o
--yi
L. 0) 4J
4->
c
a;
oc o
(J
c
"O 0)
c2t/u> u 4<a-D)i
Ecu
C
r3Lo*
O
CL
t/> sz
<u 4-J CU
E o CL
<0 L. TO
CL
c/1
tn
<D hM
O.
0) 4-J
<u *u
oac)
2
O
ro
M
o<0
O 3ta/>)
ru
-- CM
<
cl
UJ
CONTINUE ON PAGE V
PAGE V-2
003
ITEM V O CONTINUED FROM FRO NT
Ik ,
OJ
w
S5
M >
-CL.
Q SQ 'C bi
*5
< z
LI
*
< H
13U
z
20
c
in
<
> <
c 3-->z
M
U
z
0
u
<A V) <
(ft % H Jf
Z
3 Zz
<
sg-
Cl
CL
s-
-O N
in -O
E
Q. CL
E
Q. CL
'
-
E
E E EE
EE
E
CL
Q. CL CL a.
a. a
a
CL
CL CL a a
a CL
a
L
0.1 o:(;bl =:
V
Id
3
-1 <
* <
>i
Sa
-
vO LTV
21
Ht 0 p< C
0 2l
z 0 J
V z 0
<j u
-3-
to
CO c\] o o o o o
bi
H
2 U
3
3 J < >
< 2
-1
L. 8f
Il
Li 0^2
** 5 (T S5
Z 0
3^ ?
X<S'-r--"PZwu
s
0
o' u
Q o s
K 2 o QC u. 2 O -- cc u. Q LU 2 -K 2 `C <J ~Q - >
LLUT AND
NO. ila b le
u
3 J
*
< >2
> J
<
Q*
S0
3 s
? < . *p
--2
< s
J 0 z
0
u
*
X z
0 2 * --d------
< MW *
S >;*
N w*2
X
)
u II
AS ava
O T
rs U1
P N
I:*
i fC
(
1.
A
K
*23
ro <*\
-=r
U\ O
UN
X TCJ -- VI 53 JSO
--
--
X
X
>
Iffo<rL-nn
ooa oo
o a <
^3^ ac
X
to 9_ CD 52
X
3 to E 5
-- J
UN -- ON ,>C -
m
C3 z
XXX
03 n
E.2 2 T3 Ho
_6 2 -- r-
V
|o8
.5^? ?o 3
^c o. 3 sS J<vC "1
. m *7
<v\ CM
X a u tC3O c
CO LA
CM ON
0Q
a
Zz
X XX X X X X
.n CT 2n Is?
GO ?
C *
0Jr O
_*
TO n
5
5
ss
a
_ 0^ 1.-c0o Ccn 0n
O.k fW*
E
-3
3 T ^
5 in g 0
C 0> g-folD
i5 on
31--
<r CA 0
z
CA
a z
XX X
'a_ 0^
e
H.n* 1c n
6 2-6
-s
5--
0. A lum inum , Total <7429-90 S) I v. Manganese, I Total
| (7439 96 5)
EPA Form 35KF2C (6-80)
C
*O <Cu
ztc; 'i5w
n cr 3
o^
ry and this outfall contains proci -a for all such GC/MS fractions tl series, n o n --process wastewaterou\
" X " in column 2-c for each pollt
R IS E R E S U LT S
(# ) w rsxM /rret/r
Interoffice Communication
(conoco)
'f V'. rt.
Tech. Ccr. Lab.
JUN 2 0 iGS3
To W. J. Weisenborn, Westlake, Louisiana
From
K. L. Kennedy, Ponca City, Oklahoma
Oat* June 17, 1983
Subject
Lake Charles Refinery Waste Water Treatment--ThepEffect of the Heavy Crude Project
In my letter of November 12, 1982, the effects of the Heavy Crude project on the BOD and TSS levels of the final effluent were presented. Since that time, as you know, the water balance for this project has changed. You asked us to recalculate the effluent numbers. This letter contains the effluent numbers that were transmitted to you some time ago.
It now appears that the refinery effluent after the Heavy Crude project will meet the Federal Best Available Technology Effluent Guidelines (BAT) without any changes in the refinery waste treatment system other than the planned addition of pretreatment flotation and storm water diversion. The new permit will be based on the 1982 BAT guidelines which are equivalent to the present effluent guidelines.
Effluent values of ten pollutant parameters for the Heavy Crude project were calculated taking into account the effects of dissolved air flotation/ induced air flotation pretreatment and storm water diversion. These units may not be completed prior to the Heavy Crude startup but they will be required fairly quickly to prevent permit exceedances. In particular, the flotation units should be put into operation as soon as possible after the Heavy Crude startup.
Table I shows the maximum 30-day average effluent values (95 percent probable numbers) predicted for the Heavy Crude project, the calculated permit values for the project and the maximum 30-day average value from eighteen months of actual operating data for each parameter. The current plant effluent values are much lower than the predicted values for the Heavy Crude project partly due to the fact that the refinery has been operating well below design capacity.
The pollutant rates calculated for the Heavy Crude project are all equal to or below the BAT effluent guidelines values. The effluent value calculated for hexavalent chrome is equal to the permit value, however, the calcu lations reflect the fact that we do not know how higher levels of the metal will affect removal across the ASU. The value is necessarily conservative.
The BOD, effluent value calculated for the Heavy Crude project is less than 10 percent below the BAT daily average effluent value. The activated sludge unit will have a relatively short residence time after the Heavy Crude project is started up (approximately 14 1/2 hours) and the unit could perform poorly due to hydraulic overloading. This is particularly true if feed to the treatment system from the storm water holding pond is not controlled properly.
000002327 MCD
W. J. Weisenborn Page 2
Maximum 30-day average effluent values were also calculated for the plant assuming that the existing treatment system is improved. The improvements examined include: changing to non-chromate treatment of the cooling water so that the blowdown could be discharged directly, final filtration of the plant effluent, and a combination of the above. These alternatives have relatively low capital costs compared to building a totally new treatment system and would dramatically improve solids and BOD,, removal across the treatment system. The predicted effluent values for these cases are presented in Table II. If you need further information, please call.
Senior Process Engineer Engineering Services Division Process Engineering Department ke Enc CC: // RGG:JSD:LES:KH P. H. Lashbrooke - Westlake J. Myers - Westlake P. A. Madison - Westlake M. K. Sternberg - Westlake
Approved
File: EV-1192.16
mCD 00000232S
TABLE I EFFLUENT MAXIMUM 30-DAY AVERAGE VALUES
HEAVY CRUDE PROJECT LAKE CHARLES REFINERY
Parameter
BOD TSS3 COD Oil and Grease Phenols Ammonia (as N) Sulfides Total Chromium Hex Chromium TOC
MAXIMUM 30-DAY AVERAGE EFFLUENT VALUES,
LBS/DAY
Best Available
Plant
Heavy Crude
Technology
Effluent
Project(1)
Guidelines(2)
Data(3)
1,307 1,005
4,496 257 2.0 403 1.0 4.2 1.4
1,127
1,398 1,118
9,787 407 9.0 756 7.3 22 1.4
765 865 2,129 129
0.8 226
0.3 2.9 0.4 514
Notes: 1. Predicted for design production rates. 2. Calculated daily average values based on Heavy Crude project case No. 3. Data generated from June 1981 to December 1982.
44.
KLK:ke
MCD 000002329
TABLE II EFFLUENT VALUES WITH IMPROVED TREATMENT SCHEME
HEAVY CRUDE PROJECT LAKE CHARLES REFINERY
Parameter
BOD,. TSS3 COD Oil and Grease Phenols Ammonia (As N) Sulfides Total Chromium Hex Chromium TOC
PREDICTED MAXIMUM 30-DAY AVERAGE
LBS/DAY(1)
CTBD Bypass
CTBD
Final
And Final
Bypass(2)
Filtration
Filtration
654 1,005 3,188
257 2.0
403 1.0
-
-
797
1,074 224
4,028 115 2.0 403 1.0 2.04 1.42
1,018
420 224 2,720 115
2.0 403
1.0
--
--
687
Notes: 1. 95 percent probably number at design rates. 2. Bypass of cooling water around the activated sludge unit and lagoon.
KLK:ke
MCD
0000233o