Document MMRKg439oXaRRpGbGZ6ZB8jwj

To: From: Sent: Subject: Jackson, RyanOackson.ryan@epa.gov] Elizabeth Thompson Wed 5/24/2017 2:48:42 PM Re: invitation Hi there. When would be a good time to talk? Elizabeth Sent from my iPhone On May 23, 2017, at 10:59 AM, Jackson, Ryan <jacksoii.ryan.@epa.gov> wrote: Perfect. Thank you. From: Fred Krupp [mailto:flcrupp@edf.org] Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2017 10:10 AM To: Jackson, Ryan <jackson,ryan@epa.gov> Cc: rdenison@edf.org: Joanna Slaney <jslaney@,edf.org>: Elizabeth Thompson <ethompson@,edf.org> Subject: RE: invitation Ryan, Thanks for your outreach. It has definitely been good to begin to get to know Senator Inhofe, and I admire his leadership on the Lautenberg Chemical Safety Bill, and appreciate your constructive role on that as well. I would suggest that you and Elizabeth, copied above, discuss next steps re your invitation. All best, Fred 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00004415-00001 From: Jackson, Ryan ["mailto:jackson.rvan.@epa.gov] Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2017 2:20 PM To: Fred Krupp <fkrupp@,edf.org> Cc: Richard Denison <rden.ison.@edf.org>: Joanna Slaney <jslaney@,edf.org> Subject: invitation All, Administrator Pruitt asked me to reach out to you to check on your availability to meet for coffee to establish a relationship between EDF and him. He appreciated me recounting the story of when I was working for Senator Inhofe, how Senator Inhofe called Fred unexpectedly prior to an EDF board meeting simply to report on the status of negotiations at the time of the TSCA update. It's a much broader environment here now than negotiating the Lautenberg Act, but the Administrator was interested in meeting to try to build a relationship and identify common ground and items on which we can work together. I appreciate your consideration. I can also be reached at! Ex. 6 - Personal Privacy anytime. Ryan. Ryan Jackson Chief of Staff U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Ex. 6 - Personal Privacy 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00004415-00002 This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential and privileged information, if you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, delete this e-mail and destroy any copies. Any dissemination or use of this information by a person other than the intended recipient is unauthorized and may be illegal. 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00004415-00003 To: From: Sent: Subject: Jackson, RyanOackson.ryan@epa.gov] Marc Himmelstein Wed 5/24/2017 2:09:48 PM Fwd: Tribal FIP Here it is Brooke of Newfieid and Shane Schulz of QEP may chat with you at AXPC Brooke says they support this approach Sent from my iPhone > > > The Tribal FIP is a national two-part registration process for new and minor modifications of true minor oil and gas production and processing facilities. The Tribal FIP's registration process presents a streamlined permitting mechanism that stands in place of the requirement to obtain source-specific New Source Review (NSR) permits. The Tribal FIP requires registered facilities to comply with eight (8) existing federal air quality standards, including the New Source Performance Standard (NSPS) OOOOa for oil and gas, and address threatened and endangered species and historic properties. > > As it stands, the Tribal FIP does not apply in nonattainment areas. EPA should revise the Tribal FIP to allow application of this streamlined registration process in nonattainment areas until a local or reservation-specific permitting program (FIP/TIP) is finalized. > > > > 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00004421-00001