Document MGVQB7nNqQyrOyZKMa3JJKbLj

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH. EDUCATION. AND WELFARE PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE HEALTH SERVICES AND MENTAL HEALTH ADMINISTRATION Cincinnati, Ohio 45202 December 21, 1971 National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health James E. Peavy, MJD. Commissioner of Health Texas State Department of Health 1100 West 49th Street Austin, Texas 78756 Attention: Mr. Martin C. Wukasch, P.E., Director Division of Occupational Health and Radiation Control Dear Dr. Peavy: Enclosed is a report of an industrial hygiene and medical survey of the PittsburghComing Corporation plant in Tyler, Texas. This study was conducted on October 26 - 29 by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health at the request of the Texas State Department of Health, and Local 4202, Oil, Chemical, and Atomic Workers International Union. The principal objectives of the study were to determine the levels of asbestos dust in the working environment, to evaluate the existing environmental controls for asbestos, and to perform medical examinations of the workers. The results of the study revealed exposures to asbestos considerably in excess of present standards, which, coupled with the medical findings* represent an extremely serious occupational health problem. The report contains recommen dations for correction of the situation which we feel should be implemented immediately in order to assure that the health of the workers in this plant is adequately protected. Tour cooperation in this study is greatly appreciated. If we can be of further assistance, please feel free to call. Enclosure q c. v>os. Acting Deputy DirectX1, Division of Field Studies and Clinical Investigations t ASBESTOS SURVEY PITTSBURGH-CORNING CORPORATION TYLER, TEXAS PROJECT NO: 71-45 DATE: 12/7./71 L ' Project 71-45 N.I.O.S.H. SURVEY PITTSBURGH-CORNING CORPORATION TYLER, TEXAS OCTOBER 26 - 29, 1971 Study requested by: Martin C. Wukasch, P.E., Director Division of Occupational Health and Radiation Control Texas State Health Department Austin, Texas Local 4202 * Oil, Chemical, and Atomic International Workers Study conducted by: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Cincinnati, Ohio 45202 Division of Technical Services Thomas L. Anania, Acting Chief Industrial Hygiene Services Branch Steven F. Alder, Engineer Francis J. LaPallo, Engineer Harry Markel, Industrial Hygienist Region VI Division of Field Studies and Clinical Investigations William M. Johnson, M.D., Acting Deputy Director Richard Spiegel, M.D. Richard Lemon, Epidemiologist Other persons present: Charles E. Van Horne, Plant Manager Pittsburgh-Corning Corporation Tyler, Texas Horace Adrian, Chief Industrial Hygiene Program Texas State Department of Health V -2- SUMMARY OF REPORT During the week of October 26 - 29, 1971, the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health conducted a comprehensive industrial hygiene and medical survey of the Pittsburgh-Corning Corporaticn amosite asbestos thermal pipe insulation plant in Tyler, Texas. The survey pointed out major industrial hygiene deficiencies which included a grossly inadequate ventilation system and poor housekeeping practices. Per sonal air samples yielded grossly excessive fiber concentrations. One hundred seventeen of 138 samples exceeded 5 fibers/ml for fibers >5p in length. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health medical question naires and examinations for rales and clubbing were conducted on 63 male employees in order to complement the X-rays and pulmonary function tests performed by Dr. George Hurst at the East Texas Chest Hospital in August 1971. Even without benefit of interpretation of the X-rays, 7 of 18 workers with 10 or more years employment meet at least 3 of 4 criteria for asbestosis, and reduced pulmonary function was observed in a few workers with less than 5 years employment. In conclusion, an' extremety serious and critical occupational health situation exists at this plant. Immediate corrective action is necessary to reduce asbestos exposures to conform to existing standards. Appropriate recommendations are presented in this report. In all areas and operations except the office area, average and maximum concentrations of dust greatly exceeded the presently existing Threshold Limit Value of the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists and the Emergency Standards of the U. S. Department of Labor (see Table I). \ \ 1 INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE On October 26 - 29, 1971, at the request of Mr. Martin C. Wukasch of the Texas State Health Department and Local 4202, Oil, Chemical, and Atomic Workers International Union, an environmental and medical survey was made of the Pittsburgh-Corning Corporation plant in Tyler, Texas. The survey was made to determine the level of asbestos dust in the working environment, to evaluate the existing environmental controls for asbestos and to conduct medical questionnaires and examinations for rales and finger clubbing. The study was conducted by the Division of Technical Services and the Division of Field Studies and Clinical Investigations of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). Previous industrial hygiene surveys for asbestos dust were made of this plant in March 1967 and January 1970. On both occasions the levels for asbestos dust greatly exceeded the threshold limit value (TLV) for asbestos dust as set forth by the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH). In this study the asbestos dust was also grossly in excess of the existing TLV's (see Table I). DESCRIPTION OF PLANT AND MANUFACTURING OPERATIONS The plant occupies two large buildings approximately 1000 ft. long and 50 ft. wide and covers approximately 100,000 sq.ft. The buildings are approxi mately 30 ft. high with corrugated metal roofs, a wooden shell, and concrete floors. The plant employs 74 persons, including 62 hourly and 12 salaried employees There are four major departments: 1. Production 2. Finishing 3. Shipping, Receiving and Warehouse *. 4. Maintenance  ( '* -4- With the exception of the production department which operates three full shifts, the plant operates only one shift. In this plant asbestos insulation/ for pipe is manufactured from a variable mixture of asbestos (approximately 90%) and varying amounts of natural diatomaceous earth, sodium silicate and mineral wool. The amosite asbestos used by Pittsburgh-Coming is mined in East Africa. It-arrives at the Tyler plant by railroad cars packaged in polyethylene lined hissian bags with each bag weighing 110 lbs. After the materials are received they are stored and used as needed. There is also a large inventory of "governmental surplus" amosite asbestos in the warehouse. This material is stored in burlap bags without the polyethylene liners. All types of used asbestos bags are sold to nursery companies to wrap trees or they are disposed of in the local dump. When the materials are ready for processing they are placed in material feeders. There are 3 feeder lines with each line having 3 stations. Each station contains different materials. The first station contains the virgin amosite; the second contains mineral wool (at times the final formulation con tains approximately 5% mineral wool). The third station contains scrap. (Scrap is regenerated asbestos and is approximately 25% of the formula.) The new bags of asbestos are placed on top of the feeder and cut with a knife and allowed to fall into the feed hopper. The scrap is removed from metal containers using a large fork and placed in the feeder hopper. Both systems generate excessive amounts of dust. The diatomaceous earth used in the formula (7%) is placed in large hoppers and fed by auger to the conveyor system. I l' 1 -5- After the material is placed in the feeder hoppers it is transported by conveyor belts to the attrition mill which opens the amosite fibers and blends all the ingredients together. From the attrition mill the material is transported through ducts to the cyclone where the heavy material is separated out and the light material is recycled to the attrition mill. From the cyclone the heavy material goes to the building machines. In the building machine, through a system of spiked belts and lay belts, t a lap is formed. The lap is a dry mass of the total blend of the raw materials. Controlling the speed of the spike belt determines the thickness of the lap. The material then goes through a mechanical rake to smooth the lap; it is then sprayed with sodium silicate. After the lap is sprayed it exits the building machine and is rolled on a mandrel to desired size. Sand or Perlite is applied at the beginning of the roll to ease the mandrel from the finished roll. It then goes to the finishing mill. From the finishing machine it goes to the coating machine where a clay coating is applied. At the building machine in the roll-up process, small amounts of the material cling to the lap belt and are scraped off the bottom side of the turn around drum. This material is gathered up, loaded on a truck and dumped in a large field adjacent to the plant as waste. At the present time no provisions have been made to bury this material. This practice has been carried out for at least 15 years. This produces a serious air pollution problem. After the rolls have been claj' coated they are removed from the mandrel and put into a drying room. From the drying oven the rolls go to the finishing department where the ends are sawed off, split down the middle, bound together with string, packaged and then removed to the warehouse for storage. / -6- ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY PROCEDURES AND INSTRUMENTATION Atmospheric samples for fiber count were collected on Millipore filters, Type AA*, encased in three-piece plastic Millipore aerosol field monitor with face cap removed and filter completely exposed. The samples were taken at the operators' breathing zone using battery powered Mine Safety Appliance (MSA) gravimetric pumps, Tjpe G. The pumps and samplers were worn by the employees. The pumps were calibrated to operate at 1.7 liters/minute with each sample being taken for one hour. Each employee on each shift was sampled at least twice, with some emploj'ees on the first shift being samples three times. Ventilation measurements were made using pitot static tubes and a magnehelic gauge. A ten-point traverse was attempted on the larger ducts with a six-point traverse on ducts six inches or smaller. A more detailed report of the ventilation system will appear later in this report. Face velocity measure ments were made on hoods using a thermal anemometer. Noise measurements were also made of the plant using a General Radio sound level meter. Type 16G5-A, calibrated at the time of this study. No read ings were found to be above 85dBA. TOXICOLOGY AND HYGIENIC STANDARDS Asbestos is a general name given to a variety of fiberous minerals. The major asbestos minerals are chrysotile, crocidolite, amosite and anthophyllite. Asbestos is, lung cancer, pleural and peritoneal mesotheliomas may follow exposure to asbestos. The risfcls related to the length of exposure and the dust concentration. I Registered trade name of the Millipore Corp., Bedford, Massachusetts. ( .L -7- The Threshold Limit Value (TLV)* for asbestos dust, as listed in the Threshold Limit Values for 1971 of the ACGIH is 5 million particles per cubic foot of air. In 1968, the U.S. Department of Labor (Walsh-Healey Act) pro mulgated a standard limit of 12 fibers per ml of asbestos, for fibers >5/j in length. On December 7, 1971, the U.S. Department of Labor established an "Emergency Standard for Asbestos Dust Exposure of 5 fibers per milliliter, >5p in length for an eitht-hour weighted exposure. The ceiling exposure con ditions shall not exceed 10 fibers per milliliter >5/x in length." RESULTS OF STUDY A total of 138 personal samples were taken of the various operations at the Tyler plant. These samples were analyzed in the Cincinnati laboratory of NIOSH. Each of the membrane filters were rendered transparent using a 50:50 mixture of dimethyl phthalate and diethyl ozalate and counted using a 4 mm (43X) phase contract objective 400X magnification and phase contrast illumination. Counts were recorded for all fibers >5p. Of the total of 138 samples taken, 117 exceed the presently accepted Hygienic Standards of 5 fibers/ml of air and >5n in length. In all areas and operations, except the office area, average and maximum concentrations of dust greatly exceeded the presently existing TLV of the ACGIH and the Emergency Standard of the U.S. Department of Labor, (see Table I.) The plant was in very poor condition including housekeeping, health hazards, ventilation, and storage and disposal methods. Each aspect will be discussed below. *TLV Booklet. Threshold limit values refer to airborne concentrations of sub stances and represent conditions under which it is believed that nearly all workers may be repeatedly exposed, day after day, without adverse effect. Because of wide variation in individual susceptibility, however, a small percentage of workers may experience discomfort from some substances at concentrations at or below the threshold limit, a smaller percentage may be affected more seriously by aggra vation of a pre-existing condition or bjr development of an occupational illness. -8- HOUSE KEEPING The housekeeping was very poor. At the time of our arrival, when a walk through survey was made, the floors, ceilings and rafters had an excessive amount of dust on them. The drinking fountains and eye bubblers were very dirty as were the rest rooms. There were also small piles of dust around the machines that had been swept there by the operators using push brooms. Thus, asbestos dust Was re-disbersed into the work atmosphere. VENTILATION The ventilation system, as a whole, was found to be grossly inadequate. Some of the deficiencies are listed below. 1. Blast gates were closed. 2. Small ducts on all three feeder stations were plugged. 3. Large holes in main and auxiliary ducts and in the bag collectors. 4. Conveyor system from feeders to attrition mills have large separations in the facility. 5. Many of the ducts are disfigured, probably caused by bumping by machinery. 6. Holes in ducts were repaired by applying Permagum, a putty like substance: 7. Too many 90 entries were attached to the main ducts, which can cause excessive air turbulance and static pressure losses. An attempt was made to do a pitot traverse of the ventilation system. This was impossible since the ducts on each of the three feeder stations were plugged. Static pressure reading could not be made due to holes in the blower housing and the bag collectors. \I -9- SCRAP GRINDER The scrap grinder is located north of the feeder stations. Scrap from various operations are ground up to be reused in the process. The operator must lift the pieces of scrap above his head to feed the grinder. After the scrap is ground up it is deposited in a metal container approximately 4'x4' with wheels. After the container is full it is removed and then taken to the feeder stations where it is reintroduced into the process. The grinding opera tion was very dusty and the ventilation was insufficient. Velocity across the face of the opening was only 20-30 ft./minute (fpm). A slot at the floor level was pulling approximately 200 fpm but is incorrectly placed; it should be located above and close to the metal container. MATERIAL FEEDERS The material feeders consist of three lines with each line having three stations. The ductsused to ventilate these stations are located approximately 2 ft. from the opening of the feeders with each having a 90 entry. The ducts are 4", 5", and 6" in diameter, depending on the location to the main duct. Face velocities across each station ranged from 0-15 fpm. A fan located in the area contributed to the turbulence and redispersion of dust in the work atmosphere at the feeder stations. There were openings on the feeder stations that allowed the operator to see into the feeder. Although they were equipped with plexiglass they were left open. This also contributed to the dust buildup in the area. The scrap grinder and the feeder stations are on the same collec tion system. This collecting system, consisting of three units of canvas bags with 16 bags in each unit, is located inside the plant. These bags are cleaned by mechanical shaking with the asbestos falling into 55 gallon drums located beneath the bags. There is a large opening between the bags and the drums and when the bags are shaken a large portion of the dust is released to the work area. The spillage, like the spillage from the scrap grinder and the feeders, is swept up by using a push broom. Although the plant has a vacuum cleaner it was not used in these areas. BLOCK SAW OPERATION The exhaust on this operation was in the best condition of any in terms of removing the dust at the source. However, the blower assembly and the collector bags had holes in them and the dust exhausted from the operation was released into the work area. LARGE SAW OPERATION Li this operation the larger sections of pipe insulation are trimmed. The pipe is put on a conveyor and both sides are trimmed simultaneous^ using a band saw. At the base on each side of the saw there is a 6" duct to exhaust the dust. The face velocity at these ducts was measured at 200 fpm. This does a good job at the bottom but the dust generated at the top of the cut is released to the work area. When the ends are trimmed, the pipe then goes to a splitter which makes a cut along the length of the pipe. For exhausting the dust from this operation there is a side draft or suspended hood arrangement. It does a good job of exhausting the dust around the outside and along the cut, but the dust is not removed from the inside of the pipe. When it is removed it is inverted and the dust is released to the work area. There is a considerable amount of dust in this part of the operation. This was the only operation in which the dust collector was located on the outside of the building. RESPIRATORS In 1971, the wearing of respirators was made mandatory in all areas of the plant. Respirators used in the plant were MSA Comfo Mask with BM21B-90 filters. Although they have a definite application, respirators should not be worn as a regular means of protection. Respirators should be used only as an emergency or for backup protection. This does not seem to be the intent at this plant. Unless properly fitted, correctly used, and properly maintained, a respirator may become a hazard because it gives the wearer a false sense of security and permits him to become careless and may add to his exposure. If respirators must be used they should be controlled through a company operated program providing for proper selection, fitting, maintenance and cleaning. This part of the program is lacking Since many workers were seen with straps too loose, and straps not connected. There is no maintenance and standardization program for the respirators. HEALTH HAZARDS In addition to the health hazard from the amosite asbestos, the following potential hazards were noted: 1. The lunch room is located too close (approximately 40-50 ft.) to the dustiest operation in the plant. 2. Workers are allowed to go into the lunch room wearing clothes contaminated with asbestos. 3. There is a potential health hazard from the diatomaceous earth handling operation. 4. The scrap material that is dumped into the open field may cause a serious community health problem. 5. The sand, used on the floor to enable cartons to be moved more easily, may present a silica dust problem. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS Some additional potential hazards were observed as follows: 1. There are 6 homemade natural gas heaters located throughout the plant. Since they are vented into the plant this may cause carbon monoxide or fire and explosion hazard. II I -12- 2. Compressed air outlets operating at 90 psi are located throughout the plant for the purpose of blowing excess dust off employees. This is not only a hazard to the employees but it reintroduces the asbestos dust to the working environment. MEDICAL PROGRAM The company has no in-plant medical facilities or first aid room. Two first aid cabinets were stocked inadequately, and one first aid cabinet had a door with broken glass. Occupational health consultation is available from corporate headquarters in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Dr. Lee Grant, Medical Director of PPG Indus tries, Inc., is Medical Consultant to the Pittsburgh-Corning Corporation. Employees are sent to the Tyler Medical and Surgical Clinic for X-rays, physical examinations, and emergency care. Pulmonary function and X-rays were performed on all male emploj'ees in August 1971, at the nearby East Texas Chest Hospital by Dr. George Hurst, an internist and specialist in chest diseases. . Diffusion studies and arterial blood gases were obtained on those male employees with greater than 5 years employment. At the present time the workers do not receive pre-employment X-rays due to the high turnover of new personnel; however, after 60 days employment chest X-rays are taken. In August 1971, U.S. Bureau of Mines approved respirators were made mandatory throughout the plant concomitant with an application to the Occupa tional Safety and Health Administration, U.S. Department of Labor, for variance from the asbestos standard. In the finishing and batching area of production (feeders and scrap grinders), the use of respirators has bsfen mandatory since 1965. Safety glasses are required. No protective clothing is issued to employees, and there are 5 air hoses operating at 90 lbs/sq.in. and located throughout the plant to blow off excessive dust. ! -13- Also, the variance request sets forth the requirement: "Continuing health education program on asbestos will be provided." However, dur ing the present survey, many employees apparently were unaware of the serious implications of asbestos exposure. MEDICAL DATA AND RECOMMENDATIONS Asbestos is a general name given to a variety of fibrous minerals. The major asbestos minerals are chrysotile, crocidolite, amosite, and anthrophylite. Amosite is used exclusively at this plant in the pro duction of thermal pipe insulation. Asbestos-related diseases have been well documented in the medical and occupational health literature. The risk of developing asbestosis or pulmonary fibrosis varies directly with length of exposure and concentration of exposure. The association between occupational exposure to asbestos and lung cancer, pleural mesothelioma, and peritonial mesothelioma is recognized. NIOSH industrial hygiene surveys in 1967 and 1970 yielded grossly excessive fiber concentrations compared to current and proposed standards. Again, the present survey yielded grossly excessive fiber concentrations in all production, finishing, and shipping areas. r L -14- NIOSH medical questionnaires and examinations for rales and finger clubbing were conducted by our survey team on 63 male employees in order to complement the X-rays and pulmonary function tests performed by Dr. George Hurst of the East Texas Chest Hospital in August 1971, at the request of the Pittsburgh-Corning Corporation. Several films were read as possible pulmonary fibrosis. Dr. Lee Grant, Medical Consultant to Pittsburgh-Corning Corporation, has delayed release of these films to NIOSH and its expert panel of radiologists pending his personal review of the X-rays. Even without benefit of X-rays, 7 of 18 workers with 10 or more years employment at the Tyler plant meet at least 3 of 4 criteria for asbestosis. These criteria include: 1. Forced vital capacity below 80% of predicted. 2. Dyspnea. 3. Finger clubbing. 4. Rales. Positive X-rays could increase further the number of cases oi asbestosis. Reduced pulmonary function was also observed in a few workers with less than five years employment. In conclusion, the following medical recommendations are set forth: 1. Chest X-raj's obtained in August 1971, should be forwarded to NIOSH and its expert panel of radiologists for the benefit of the Tyler employees. * 2. Reduction of asbestos exposure levels to conform to existing standards is imperative in oi'der to prevent any irreversible pulmonary damage. 3. Following a review of the X-rays, further and more specific medical recommendations will be made. 4. Medical follow-up of present and past employees is indicated. Certainly asbestosis has been reported to progress following cessation of asbestos exposure. -15- * DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS Inhalation of asbestos dust has long been recognized as a serious occupational health hazard. Asbestos-related health effects were detected in many Tyler employees. This plant has been in operation since 1954. NIOSH surveys in 1967 and 1970 yielded excessive fiber concentrations, and again, this survey yielded fiber concentrations grossly in excess of current and proposed standards. Housekeeping practices and the ventilation S3?stem were inadequate. According to the AIHA Industrial Ventilation Manual, a minimum capture velocit}' of 200 fpm at the face of the material feeders and a duct velocity of 3500 to 4500 fpm should be maintained. Since the open area of the material feeders is approximately 9 sq.ft., the minimum effective air movement would be 8 ft. x 200 fpm * 1600 cfm. The carrying velocity in the main duct should be approximately 3100 cfm. The present system does not meet these criteria. The respirator program is inadequate and does not offer sufficient pro tection. In conclusion, immediate measures should be taken to insure the employees a safe and health work environment. Further asbestos exposure could result in irreversible pulmonary damage. Immediate corrective action is mandator}' and the following industrial hygiene recommendations are set forth: 1. A complete redesign of the ventilation system. 2. Locate all dust collectors on outside building and equip collectors with automatic shakers. 3. Appoint a safety committee to educate employees to hazards of asbestos. 4. Remove all homemade gas heaters from the plant. I -166. Do not allow employees to use compressed air to remove dust from clothes. 6. Establish a company operated and controlled respirator program providing for proper selection, fitting, maintenance and cleaning. 7. The lunch room should be located in a clean area of the plant and employees should not be allowed to enter with dirty clothing. 8. All employees should be issued protective clothing such as coveralls and cotton caps and these clothes should be removed before eating and before going home. 9. All scrap materials should be buried. 10. Used asbestos bags should be buried also and not sold to nurseries or removed to the local dump. 11. Do not use sand on floor to transport cartons. REPORT PREPARED BY: Thomas L. Anania r REFERENCES -17- 1. Documentation of Threshold Limit Values, American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, Committee on Threshold Limit Values, Cincinnati, Ohio 1971. 2. Threshold Limit Values of Airborne Contaminants and Physical Agents, * American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (1971). 3. Industrial Ventilation - A Method of Recommended Practice. 11th ed. r TABLE I ANALYSIS OF PERSONAL SAMPLES PITTSBURGH-CORNING ASBESTOS PLANT. TYLER. TEXAS ASBESTOS PIPE-INSULATORS OPERATION SAMPLE CONC. (FIBERS >5u/mn Mixing Feeder Feeder Feeder Feeder Scrap Feeder Feeder Feeder Feeder Feeder Feeder Feeder Maximum Concentration Average Concentration 45 139 117* 99* 106 60* 12* 57 82 132 29 54.04 105.83 101.71 169.7 9.58 188.91 92.77 26.4 9.14 22.5 37.6 189 75 Forming Builder Builder Builder Builder Builder Builder Builder Relief Builder Builder Builder Builder Builder Relief Builder Builder Builder Builder Builder Builder Relief Builder Builder Builder Builder Builder Builder 18 91 103 88 119 83 85 105 89 121 54 25 71 90 92 120* 110 107* 111 16* 20 14 17 53 40.93 26.11 14.61 7.45 9.42 25.79 42.77 22.33 6.67 25.53 12.28 57.72 35.24 17. 37.54 90.9 70.36 103.97 30.43 134.41 53.23 44.31 59.58 42.99 Page 2 - Pittsburgh-Coming Asbestos Plant Forming ' Maximum Concentration Average Concentration Relief Builder Builder Builder Builder Builder Builder Builder Builder Builder Builder Builder Builder Relief Builder Builder Labor Maximum Concentration Average Concentration 27 74 15 24* 131 136 122 101 124 65 95 58 56 102 52 Curing Oven Tender Oven Tender Oven Tender Oven Tender Oven Tender Maximum Concentration Average Concentration 47 140 112 93 84 Finishing Supervisor Wrapper Wrapper Finishing Laborer Utility-Finishing Utility-Finishing Wrapper Utility-Finishing Finishing Laborer Saw Operator Saw Operator Saw Helper Saw Operator Saw Operator SRL Saw Cutting Saw 68 130 98 1 3 66 8 4 22 30 126 78 76 94 118 51 134 42 72.12 9.74 64.35 111.15 13.8 9.9 ' 14.8 26.9 8.44 56.45 36.41 14.75 24.27 31.2 11.26 134 36 23.5 5.08 6.89 19.87 16.40 29 14 20.38 11.43 37.45 30.43 48.53 12.03 94.81 55.11 22.83 27.36 19.38 14.18 31.23 21.9 1.73 91.76 Page 3 - Pittsburgh-Corning Asbestos Plant Finishing SSL Cutting Saw * Saw Feeder Pine Machine Oper. Saw Labor Saw Labor SSL Saw SSL Saw Saw Labor SSL Labor Maximum Concentration Average Concentration 55 35 006* 007 116 134 141 109 26 Inspection Box Marker Weigher Fork Lift Operator Packer Packer Shipping Supervisor Packer Fork Lift Operator Labeler Inspector Weigher Inspector Packer Packer Weigher Maximum Concentration Average Concentration 86 59 2 21 42 43 10 62 63 69 5 23 9 44 .25 Miscellaneous Maintenance Utility Utility Maintenance Utility Maintenance Maintenance Maintenance Maintenance Sweeper Maintenance Maintenance Janitor Shipping Guard 75 135 133 108 39 11 13 50 64 97 123 127 129 40 73 40.28 2.30 208.42 97.26 6.59 25.97 1.96 11.62 91.52 208 41 20.71 34.49 11.71 9.5 1.84 2.18 13.08 20.42 20.72 92.26 29.45 73.62 3.83 .71 6.8 92 23 32.08 2.09 8.36 18.12 30.38 42.28 26.81 28.43 37.54 3.61 2.10 0.94 2.29 1.36 1.94 1 Page 4 - Pittsbu^h-Corning Asbestos Plant Miscellaneous Guard Guard Supervisor Supervisor Supervisor Supervisor Supervisor Supervisor Supervisor Maximum Concentration Average Concentration 113 72 128 080 19 79 77 104 115 Office Workers Maximum Concentration Average Concentration 154 152 158 155 * Approximate (too many to count) Samples taken on October 26, 27, 28, 29, 1971 4 58 0, 64 1 57 14 92 29 91 6 28 24 25 25 2 2 28 42 14 0 04 0 04 0 03 0 66 66 22