Document Lp1aZK0qkKQjpG9R2DKDng757

To: Cc: From: Sent: Subject: .Jackson tRyanJiackson..rYan^epaJgoyj.___ Ex. 6 - Personal Privacy "Dravis, Samantha Thur 3/23/2017 6:30:30 PM FW: Distributional analysis From: McGartland, Al Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2017 2:29 PM To: Dravis, Samantha <dravis.samantha@epa.gov> Cc: Rees, Sarah <rees.sarah@epa.gov>; Nickerson, William <Nickerson.William@epa.gov> Subject: Re: Distributional analysis Yes. Shall we ask robin to set up a time? This is an area that needs to be better represented in our Economic Guidelines that govern how we do economic analysis. Sent from my iPhone On Mar 23, 2017, at 2:18 PM, Dravis, Samantha <drayis.samantha@cpa.gov> wrote: Can you explain to me when you get a moment, please? From: Benton, Donald Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2017 12:56 PM To: Dravis, Samantha <dravis.samantha@epa.gov> Subject: FW: Distributional analysis I was at a meeting yesterday where this issue came up and I asked the guy to email me specifics. I thought we could use them! Helpful I think. Don 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008720-00001 Don Senator Don Benton Senior White House Advisor Office of the Administrator 202.564.4711 <image001.png> From: Phil Kerpen [mailto:phil@americanconimitmerit.orQl Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2017 11:39 AM To: Benton, Donald <benton.donald@epa.goy> Subject: Distributional analysis Under OMB circular A-4 proposed regs are supposed to include a distributional analysis but it's almost never done. It would be great for us to follow it and show the impact of onerous regs on lower income brackets, and on the flipside the distributional benefits of rolling back regs. Could also take next step and show statistical health/mortality impacts of job/income losses at lower income brackets. Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone on the Verizon Wireless 4G LIE network. 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008720-00002