Document LJwbyvN4Xv7X8O7ypVQMVmYkX
/IRVi-
BIODEGRADATION
TEST SUBSTANCE
Identity: Perfluorodecanesulfonate, ammonium salt; may also be referred to as PFDS, FC-121-X, or 3M Sample E2112 and E2566-1. (1Decanesulfonic acid, 1,1,2,2,3,3,4,4,5,5,6,6,7,7,8,8,9,9,10,10,10-heneicosafluoro-, ammonium salt, CAS # 67906-42-7)
Remarks: Test sample is a mixture of the test substance in water and 2propanol, 1-(1,1-dimethylethoxy). This mixture contains approximately 2226% test substance, 33-37% propanol, 1-(1,1-dimethylethoxy), 0.5-1.5% perfluorononanesulfonate, ammonium salt and 38-42% water). All values reported relate to this mixture. No calculations were made to adjust for the actual concentration of the test substance in the test sample. Test material was from 3M production lot 1.
METHOD
Method: Standard methods #507 for BOD, standard methods #508A for COD
Type: Aerobic GLP: No Year completed: 1987 Contact time: 20 days Inoculum: Source of inoculum not recorded
RESULTS
5-day carbonaceous BOD: 5,800 mg/kg
10-day carbonaceous BOD: 8,000 mg/kg
20-day carbonaceous BOD: 11,000 mg/kg
COD:
870,000 mg/kg
Remarks: This material has a perfluorinated moiety and a nonfluorinated moiety. Current knowledge of these chemistries suggests that all biodegradation indicated in this study is likely due to reduction of the non-fluorinated moiety, propanol, 1-(1,1-dimethylethoxy)
Testing was conducted on the "as-sold" mixture of the subject material in water (~22-26% subject material). The values reported apply to that mixture and not directly to the subject material.
000174
CONCLUSIONS This testing indicated that the propanol, 1-(1,1-dimethylethoxy) moiety is likely to be biodegraded in aerobic environments capable of supporting biodegradation. This study cannot rule out the possibility that conditions could be found that would allow for biodegradation of the fluorochemical component, nor could it exclude the possibility that a microorganism could eventually be enriched that could metabolically alter this chemical.
Submitter: 3M Company, Environmental Laboratory, P.O. Box 33331, St. Paul, Minnesota, 55133 DATA QUALITY Reliability: Klimisch ranking 2. This study lacks sufficient documentation, characterization of the test substance purity, and analytical measurement of test concentrations. Because a mixture was tested, the biodegradation of the solvent could not be differentiated from biodegradation of the fluorochemical component. REFERENCES Study conducted at the request of 3M Company by Pace Incorporated of Minneapolis, MN, Lab Request number E2112, 11/3/87 OTHER Last changed: 5/18/00
0 0 0 1 .7 5
pace laboiatories, ne
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
Offices: Minneapolis, Minnesota Tampa, Florida Coralville, Iowa
3M Environmental Laboratory 935 Bush Avenue Bldg. 2-3E St. Paul, MN 55133
Attn: Mr. Wade Scheil
E2112
Date Sample!s) Collected: By Client Date Sample(s) Received: 09/16/87
PACE Sample Number:
November 03, 1987 PACE Project Number: 870917504
159240
Parameter
Units
Biochemical Oxygen Demand, Carb 5 Day(l) Biochemical Oxygen Demand, Carb 10 Day(l) Biochemical Oxygen Demand, Carb 20 Day(1) Chemical Oxygen Demand(2)
mg/kg ing/kg mg/kg mg/kg
MDL E2112-1
600 600 600 15000
5800 8000 11000 850000
E2112-2
-
890,000
MDL Method Detection Limit (1) Analysis for biochemical oxygen demand was performed in accordance
with standard methods #507
(2) Analysis for chemical oxygen demand was performed in accordance with standard methods #508A
The data contained in this report were obtained using EPA or other approved methodologies. All analyses were performed by me or under my direct supervision.
Thomas L. Halverson Inorganic Chemistry Manager
000176
1710 Douglas Drive North Minneapolis, MN 55422 Phone (612) 544-5543 an equal opportunity employer
ANALYSIS:
CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND, DATE ANALYZED:
COD ANALYZED BY:
. C O D - L O W ___
TIME:
DATA REVIEWED BY:
ENTERED BY:
FOR CLP USE ONLY? T
CLIENT NAME: PROJECT NUMBER: PROJECT NAME: FILE #: DATE RECEIVED: DATE COLLECTED:
------------ 1------------- analysis SAMPLE # ! results UNITS
COMMENTS
SaMpl T O nF "SAMPL TilRanT TITRANT
VOL (mis)
BEG END [TTl NORMALITY
AB
N
r ik <50 ~ n JT
S O 35.5 0*0 <35.5 >C5.5 o.a5
1B1 K < $0 <w H*? 151 S (1 190,ooc
>f
jjrjjjT^
S O J j 0X>
ZlSrfe
'TV'- N5 rtw-iJj
S O 25*5 t o <3/.?
E' lVsH-3 * C-en. bfckof.rt . *10^ O.OMep.
O.O^tc^.
m
13*33(6 2 ,300
`wi-Tun
10
0*0 13.? 3 .7
1511? 150 1 5 *3 ? 5,4oo \V
isiicH ?50.600 n / u f k j ^qo.ooc
i-ssss* I5 S S ? <?.lo
iqq-IS IS O
'f
trj 11 I_`I'"nrReaocwlrJ-drCfb_bM+_aethicmoH^dour),
E3U3-I
'
e am-!___ ^t
__________________________
2S
It
0.0, ,5 fJ O.ol I2y I
o. aT q. f
)0 3S d
103.0X121.J,4 I3- .A h 5`, 33,?
1>,2 20. ( IS?
toX 2o? 0` 0 c?3,5 <33.5
33S 3/./ h _ I--
o *0 75- / 15-1
L O.o i r t ll/l
A = SAMPLE VOLUME USED (mis OR gins)
B = TITRANT VOL USED FOR BLANK (rais)
C = TITRANT VOL USED FOR SAMPLE (mis) N = NORMALITY OF TITRANT
B-C x N x 8,000 mq COD/1 OR
1T "" ^
mg COD/kg
NOTE: WHEN PERFORMING A COD ON AN EP LEACH SAMPLE, THE COD OF THE ACETIC ACID MUST BE SUBTRACTED TO OBTAIN THE FINAL VALUE. 1 ml OF 0.5 N ACETIC ACID IN LEACHATE EQUALS A COD OF 16 mg/1
0189W
000177
ANALYSIS:
5 DAY BIOCHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND, B0D-05 SOLUBLE BOD, SOL-BOD CARBONACEOUS BOD 5 DAY, C-B0D-05 DISSOLVED OXYGEN, DO CARBONACEOUS BOD 10 DAY, C-B0D-10 CARBONACEOUS BOD 20 DAY, C-B0D-20
"T>
DATE ANALYZED:
IN
ANALYZED BY:
TIME:
DATA REVIEWED BY:
SEED VOL USED ml/1
DO DROP
m-'LOUT
!= T 3 .0
FOR CLP USE ONLY
CLIENT NAME: PROJECT NAME: FILE #: DATE COLLECTED: DATE RECEIVED:
-- (-M
.. DI INITIAL DO, D2 = FINAL 5 DAY DO. F % SEED IN Dl/t SEED IN CONTROL
SEED CORRECT (SC) SEED CONTROL DO DROP x F
0 0 0 178
Ill
ALYSIS:
FOR CLP USE ONLY
5 DAY BIOCHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND, B0D-05 SOLUBLE BOD, SOL-BOD
DATE ANALYZED: ANALYZED BY:
IN 16-2 OUT 1 0 - T * P CLIENT NAME:
T PROJECT NAME:
CARBONACEOUS BOD 5 DAY, C-B0D-05 DISSOLVED OXYGEN, DO
____
TIME: DATA REVIEWED BY:
FILE #: DATE COLLECTED:"
CARBONACEOUS BOD 10 DAY, C-B0D-10
SEED VOL USED ml/1
DATE RECEIVED: ~
CARBONACEOUS BOD 20 DAY, C-B0D-20
ANALYSIS
SAMPLE RSUl TS I U'NITS
COMMENTS
DO DROP
5 ftjl & ^ 3
-)
SAMPLE BOTTLE
F SEED DIFF (OIFF)(303).
VOL (mis)
#
D1 D2 D1-D2 FACTOR CORRECT (Dl-D2)-SC SAMP VOL
5^24
5**00
OO 1 .3
SO
_2L
S i 1M
1.2
1.
lO S l jlI
ASL
7.M
2S. v l m 1 3
tt-
S O 1S c l
I
2W1>'\ 3 1 ^ 6 0 0
\ ---------^ I O O /o
l . - 3 b
I%
U s ?.3 S 3
1
iS l
2 2 SU
2 .3 ^
J lL
24
(ob 2 k
5 ^
r 2.1W 'I
IC^O
1
J_
lu | ------^
_L
IOo
SQ
\5l.i'i-JL Y~
AS. 2 1 S~.1i
1 l\o 6 .\
15" n -
h S 1 n.
(S
\.S
\1
Nf
1*24.
, ^ 0. npc*>
DI =. INITIAL DO, D2 = FINAL 5 DAY DO, F a % SEED IN DI/X SEED IN CONTROL
SEED CORRECT (SC) - SEED CONTROL DO DROP x F
0 0 0 179
0182W
ANALYSIS:
FOR CLP USE ONLY
5 DAY BIOCHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND, BOD-05 SOLUBLE BOD, SOL-BOD CARBONACEOUS BOD 5 DAY, C-B0D-05 DISSOLVED OXYGEN, DO CARBONACEOUS BOD 10 DAY, C-BOD-IO CARBONACEOUS BOD 20 DAY, C-B0D-20
SAMPLERESULTS
ANALYSIS
M its| COMMENTS
SjOCfc
A \ --> looo
1S<\Z5
E 7.U3-1 U j b O D ^ A
looo
DATE ANALYZED:
IN
ANALYZED BY:
TIME:
DATA REVIEWED BY:
SEED VOL USED ml/1
DO DROP
10*1 OUT xv.r
233
1 0 -VZ-'PCLIENT NAME: PBROOAJIEPCPTt NLlAAMMEP: FILE I: DATE COLLECTED:' DATE RECEIVED: ]
Q A (C-23 '
lE. 13
SAMPLE
-------- 1--BOTTLE |
VOL (mis) #
Dl
D2
1>\ S A 3 5 2 7 3 n.s
1S- 2 S
12. on. A S
D1-D2
i,b
F SEED FACTOR CORRECT
jbi. z %
DIFF (DIFF)(303) (P1-P2)-SC SAMP VOL
1.3^
5Q_
7.3
z z i D <[
Jd337 L < 1 SO H H . 3 3 .
3.02
CO
b fc? 1 2
iSbzc* G 2 U H - 13 ^
| ----- V 10oQ T
j o ,C?.!L l b 5 .2 2 3
3 2 7 5>G i a
i i.(* Cy.Z
A 12 j
2.0*2 LkiL
12 M
N
.,,>1 = INITIAL DO, D2 FINAL 5 DAY DO, F X SEED IN Dl/% SEED IN CONTROL
XSEED CORRECT (SC) SEED CONTROL DO DROP F
000180
FOR CLP USE ONLY
5 DAY BIOCHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND, B0D-05 SOLUBLE BOD, SOL-BOD CARBONACEOUS BOD 5 DAY, C-B0D-05 DISSOLVED OXYGEN, DO CARBONACEOUS BOD 10 DAY, C-B0D-10 CARBONACEOUS BOD 20 DAY, C-BOD-20
"MLYSIS SAMPLE RESULTS 1 UNITS
COMMENTS
\^ Z V \ E
hjbOT*
IO O O
DATE ANALYZED:
IN l b -2 OUT
ANALYZED BY: TIME:
____ 3 j J C
____
DATA REVIEWED BY: ____
SEED VOL USED ml/1 ____ ~7ZT~
DO DROP
33
CLIENT NAME: PROJECT NAME: FILE I: DATE COLLECTED:'
fJj (0-2DATE, RECEIVED: 3"
------------ 1-----
SAMPLE BOTTLE I
F SEED DIFF (DIFF) (303!
_L VOL (mis)
#
Dl 02 D1-D2 FACTOR CORRECT (Dl-D2)-SC SAMP VOL
7^
2 t\
.2<it>
H
3 Z\0 n k
ih.
i.loM
U
1.3 z & c .
71
E -2.U3-1
I
h
3
to o o "13
)5c\T-<
2 U H -I
I I
noo
I" V ^ lI
\-- ^ \DOO
7^
5b
3$
5
so
3 S' 15
75 cl
ZF\ O H c I
n s l i J5i 7
x .\ *) l 1 " 2 H A
el
P
I 1
7 5 H -S
~7u51c ,.3
r^
2Jji l l
2 .t
3 .H V I
2 .5ov)
? .3 o M
15.
2
Di = INITIAL DO, D2 = FINAL 5 DAY DO, F * t SEED IN Dl/t SEED IN CONTROL
X- SEED CORRECT (SC) SEED CONTROL DO DROP F
0 0 *
