Document JvxYJ80E6e5znbop96DBrr82a
ARW.-03N5
BOILING POINT
TEST SUBSTANCE_____________________________________________________
Identity: N-ethylperfluorooctane sulfonamidoethanol; may also be referred to as N-EtFOSE Alcohol, FC-10, or FM-3422. (1-Octanesulfonamide, Nethyl-1,1,2,2,3,3,4,4,5,5,6,6,7,7,8,8,8-heptadecafluoro-N-(2hydroxyethyl)-, CAS # 1691-99-2)
Remarks: Material is an off-white, waxy solid.
METHOD:_____________________________________ _________________________
Method followed: The boiling point was determined as a part of the OECD Guideline 104, "Vapor Pressure Curve, Dynamic Method" study.
GLP: No Year study was performed: 1998 Remarks: Material is stable at room temperature. Sample was indicated to be 99% pure in the vapor pressure study.
RESULTS_____________________________________________________ _________
The following table summarizes boiling points measured during vapor pressure testing of the N-EtFOSE Alcohol material, plus the extrapolation value at atmospheric pressure.
Pressure Boiling Temp
(mm Hg)
(C)
42 174.6
55 179.0
67 187.2
81 190.2
96 197.0
760*
474*
1^=0.9902
* Extrapolated values
Pressure^ BoilingTerpv
(mm H g ) \
f!C>
37 172.2
48 176.4
68 188.2
83 191.6
93 195.8
760*
482*
f - 0.9908
Remarks: No note was made if any decomposition was occurring.
CONCLUSIONS____________________________________________
Testing should be conducted to record an empirical value to replace the extrapolated ones.
006127
DATA QUALITY Reliability: Klimisch ranking = 3. The boiling point was not obtained empirically. Boiling point values were extrapolated from data obtained during vapor pressure testing. REFERENCES_______________________________________________________ __ Determination of Vapor Pressure Curve by Dynamic Method for U1463 (ET FOSE), AScI Report # 044-VP.R3M, AScI Study ID #5030-044-01, November 6, 1998. Conducted at the request of 3M Company. O T H E R ________________________________________ :________________________ Submitter: 3M Company, Environmental Laboratory, P.O. Box 33331, St. Paul, Minnesota, 55133 Last changed: 5/15/00
006128
PROM : AScI Corp.
*
PHONE NO. : 218 722 2592
Nov. 30 1998 04-.31PM P2
A C S w*W -- w w PSv m
November 30, 1998
ASc/ Corporation
4444 Airpark Boulevard, Duluth, Minnesota 55811
(2,8) 722*4040
(2181722-2592
Ms. Susan Beach
3M Environmental Technology & Safety Services 93S Bush Avenue St. Paul, Minnesota 55133
Dear M s. Beach:
I am writing in response to your request of boiling point information for test items U1463 and U1464. Unfortunately we did not obtain empirical values for the boiling point of either item. Although experimental values were not obtained, we did extrapolate values using the temperature and pressure curves obtained for both items. The tables below summarize the extrapolations.
I gt Rsm..m462
r " Boiling T&np. <C) 42 174.6 55 179.0 67 187.2 81 190.2 96 197.0 760 474
*2=0.9902
Pressure (min Hg)
Boiling Temp. (Cj
37 .
172.2
48 176.4
68 1 8 ^
83 191.6
93 195.8
760 482
0 .9 9 0 8
1
|
J
Test Item U1464
masamksmag g g = <: : 42 58 68 83 94 760 -0 .9 9 6 1
^ ' * ' *** *
171.6 178.8 181.8 186.4 190.2 423
47 1 7 4 . 4
75 183.8
86 188.0
95 191.0
106 193.0
760 407
-0 .9 9 6 0
|
008129
FROM * fScI Corp.
November 30, 1998 Ms* Beach - 3M Co. Page - 2 -
I apologize that the extrapolated values were all we can provide. The boiling point for both compounds should have been determined before vapor pressure determination. Please call if you need further information.
Sincerely,
Joe Amato
____
Deputy Director, AScI-ETD
