Document GX879wxbQjBobRZMX6V2Baxv
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA SOUTHEASTERN DIVISION
ANDREW HENJUM,
Plaintiff.
)
)
)
.
vs.
)
)
The CelotexCorporation, et al,
) )
) Defendants. )
_______________ )
ANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES
Carey Canada Inc., for answers to interrogatories and response
to request for production, states as follows:
1. Give the full current name of your company, its state
of incorporation (if a corporation), the full street address of
its principal place of business, its agent for service of process
in the State of North Dakota (other than the Secretary of State),
and state whether your company is registered to do business in
the State of Minnesota.
Answer;
Carey Canada Inc. was incorporated in Quebec, Canada, in 1955; however, it did not begin operation of its mining facility until 1958. Defendant's address is Post Office Box 190, East Broughton Station, Quebec, Canada. There are no other places of business. Defen dant has never been authorized to do business in the State of North Dakota and does not maintain a registered agent in North Dakota. Defendant sells its fiber F.O.B. Quebec, Canada, and, therefore, does not conduct business in the United States.
2. If you claim insufficiency of service of process and/or
lack of personal or subject matter jurisdiction as a defense to
all or any part of this action, state all facts in support of
such defense or defenses.
Answer:
As discovery is still continuing in this case. Defendant is not presently able to state the requested information. Defendant intents to assert any and all defenses properly raised in the pleadings.
3. Identify all companies (defunct or extant) which are or
were related to you in any way (for example, as parent, subsidiary,
predecessor-in-interest, successorin-interest, surviving or
non-surviving company in a merger, etc.) and which at any time
mined, milled, manufactured, sold or distributed asbestos or
products containing asbestos, and state in full detail the cor
porate history of those companies, including their corporate
relationships with each other. (In this context the word "corpo
rate" should be understood to include any form of business entity,
not only business entities technically formed as corporations.)
Answer:
In 1958 Defendant began operating as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Philip Carey Manufacturing Company under the name Carey-Canadian Mines, Ltd. As of June 1, 1979, the corporation has been known as Carey Canada Inc. Carey Canada Inc. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Celotex Corporation.
4. State fully all information available to you concerning
your direct or indirect sale or distribution of asbestos products
to or in Minnesota and North Dakota including identity of products;
identity of purchasers, franchisees and distributees; and dates
and quantities of delivery.
Answer:
Defendant has never manufactured any finished asbestoscontaining products. It has only been involved in the mining and milling of raw chrysotile asbestos fiber. The majority of its fiber is medium to short in length and grayish white in appearance.
-2-
5. If you deny that your company named as defendant in
this action can be-held liable for plaintiff's exposure to the
asbestos products of one or more of your related companies identi
fied in your Answer to Interrogatory Number 3 above, state all
facts in support of such denial.
Answer:
As discovery is still' continuing in this case. Defendant is unable to state the requested information at the present time. However, Defendant intends to assert any and all defenses properly raised in the pleadings.
6. For each asbestos containing product manufactured
and/or distributed by you state the following:
(a) The brand name of the product;
(b) The inclusive years of manufacture and/or distri
bution;
(c) The type of asbestos fiber used in each product
and the content by weight for each product for each year manufac
tured;
'
(d) The dates on which caution labels were first
placed on each of the asbestos containing products and the date
of first shipment of such products with the caution label thereon;
(e) The actual wording of the caution label with a
representative size thereof on each product by year;
(f) Whether any such product was labeled with the name
" of a company other than yourself and if so, for what years and
under what name to reflect that they were manufactured or distrib
uted by another entity;
-3-
(b) Name and last known address of person with disease,
if other than claimant;
,
(c) Date and manner of first notification of claim;
'
(d) Nature of disease alleged;
(e) Manner of exposure (e.g. insulation worker, factory
worker, etc.) and number of years exposure;
(f) Full case titles and file number if a formal
proceeding of any type was commenced;
(g) Name and last known address of claimant's attorney;
(h) Resolution of claim (settlement or verdict; amount
paid, if any).
Answer;
Defendant objects to answering this Interrogatory, as any workman's compensation claims made by employees at Defendant's mines, where workers are exposed to 100% raw asbestos fiber, is irrelevant to the issues of this lawsuit, nor is it reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.
28. If you have ever taken any measures (such as warnings,
cautions, provision of masks or respirators, enhancement or
ventilation, x-ray or other physical examination, etc.) to reduce
asbestos disease and exposure to asbestos among your employees in
mining, milling, manufacturing, selling or distributing, state in
detail what measures were taken, where they were taken, when they
were taken, who recommended or suggested that they be taken,* and
who ordered that they be taken.
Answer:
Defendant objects to this Interrogatory, as the working (and environmental) conditions at Defendant's mine, where workers were exposed to 100% raw asbestos fibers, has no relevance with respect to insulators or others who were exposed to asbestos-containing products (wherein
-10-
asbestos was encapsulated in a finished product and typically, such industrial products contained 15% or less asbestos fiber).
In an attempt to be responsive and without waiving its objection. Defendant states that since the early 1960's, certain employees in dusty areas have been required to wear respirators. Respirators are worn by the driver of the bulldozer and by employees who have occasion to work in the area where the tailings are dumped or in the dry rock storage area.
Defendant uses respirators approved by the Provincial Government for pneumoconiosis-producing dust at its mining operation in East Broughton, Quebec, Canada. Prior to 1974, Defendant used the Willson & Dustfoe respirators. In 1974 Defendant purchased the 8710-3M respirators from Lynn MacLeod Engineering-Arkon, Inc., and in 1975 the Air Stream Helmet System from Desco Inc. In 1976 Defendant purchased the 800-248-00 respirator and White Cap Helmet System from Safety Supply Company.
According to the best scientific and medical information available. Defendant believes that regular use of such protective devices will prevent the development of asbestos-related diseases in those persons exposed to asbestos.
Furthermore, Defendant states that between 1959 and 1974, Defendant took dust counts with the "Midget Impinger." A description of this technique is attached, marked Exhibit B. During 1973 and 1974, dust counts were taken with the "Midget Impinger" and "Membrane Filter." Beginning in 1974, dust counts have been taken only with the "Membrane Filter", a procedure based on NIOSH: USPHS/NIOSH Membrane Filter Method for Evaluating Airborne Asbestos Fibres. Please contact NIOSH for a description of the procedure.
Various studies have been conducted to determine proper
ventilating systems at Defendant's facility. However,
ventilating systems must be selected after a complete
review and analysis of the specific location under
consideration. Since the ventilating systems selected
and installed at Defendant's facility bear no relevance
to the working conditions of the Plaintiff involved in
this lawsuit, Defendant raises objection to this Inter
rogatory and declines to answer further.
.
-11-
In addition, workers were periodically sent safety bulletins prepared by Quebec Asbestos Mining Association (QAMA), such as those marked Exhibit C, regarding the suspected hazards of asbestos exposure. The exact
dates of distribution are unknown, and further inquiry should be directed towards QAMA.
Chest x-rays have been provided as part of the pre employment physical given to new employees since 1958. Annual chest x-rays have also been given to employees since 1958.
29. If any employee in your mining, milling, manufacturing,
contracting, selling or distributing operations has ever been
diagnosed by any physician as having asbestosis or any cancer
related to asbestos exposure, the name, address, date of diagnosis,
and general circumstances of exposure as to any person so diagnosed
before you ceased (if you have) sale or distribution of asbestos
products in Minnesota and North Dakota.
Answer: Refer to Response No. 27 above.
30. If you have ever conducted, funded, commissioned,
requested, or in any way participated in any studies, tests,
research, experiments, or the like, concerning the health effects
of inhalation of asbestos fibers, set forth all dates, organiza
tions and persons involved, sources of funds, results and related
publications.
Answer:
Defendant has not directly conducted any study concern
ing asbestos and its relationship to health and safety
concerns. However, as a member of the.Quebec Asbestos
Mining Association (QAMA), Defendant has been indirectly
involved in efforts of this nature. The Association
should be contacted for specific information concerning
these studies. Carey Canada Inc. does not have copies
of the reports for the various studies undertaken by
QAMA and its suborganizations.
'
-12-
31. .If you know of any tests, studies, research or experi
ments concerning the effects of inhalation of asbestos fibers,
conducted at any time since 1900 by any member of the asbestos
products industry (miners, millers, manufacturers, sellers, etc.)
or by any group or organization of or related to that industry,
give the titles, dates, participating company(s) or organizations)
and responsible individuals.
Answer; Refer to Response No. 30 above.
32. State the names of all industry or trade association
periodicals to which you subscribed, or which you received without
subscription, at any time from 1928 to the present, giving the
period of subscription or receipt of each.
Answer:
Defendant has been a member of Quebec Asbestos Mining Association (QAMA) since 1958. Defendant has received various publications since 1958, but has no records reflecting exactly which publications were received or when they were received. Defendant has also received Asbestos magazine since 1958.
33. Identify by name and date all medical texts, treatises,
journals, studies or reports, whether privately or publicly
circulated, which you received or obtained at any time from 1900
to the present and which concerned in any way lung disease or
occupational health subjects.
Answer:
Defendant objects to this Interrogatory as unduly burdensome and irrelevant insofar as it refers or relates to listing, describing or indexing medical literature and other documents relating to the asbestos litigation. These documents were recently gathered in anticipation of, or during, litigation. These documents do not, therefore, represent Defendant's or predecessors' knowledge of the contents of the documents at' or near the document's alleged publication date.
-13-
34. Give the names and last known home and business addresses
of all physicians who were employed, contracted, or otherwise
engaged by you at any time from 1900 to the present, and give the
dates and purposes for which each such physician was engaged.
Answer:
None; however, any employee experiencing any pulmonary problems was referred to the L'Institute de la Medicine Industriel de Thetford. Dr. Richard Lambert is in charge of the Institute. The Institute is funded by Defendant and other asbestos producers. The cost of hospital care is underwritten by the Quebec Government through the Province-wide Medicare Plan.
35. Give the names and last known business and home addresses
of all persons employed, contracted, or otherwise engaged by you,
as an industrial hygienist at any time from 1900 to the present,
giving dates and purposes for which each such person was engaged.
(For purposes of this Interrogatory, an industrial hygienist is
one who performs engineering or.health studies or other services
to identify, evaluate or attempt to eliminate potential occupational
health hazards.)
'
Answer:
Defendant objects to this Interrogatory on the grounds that any report from an industrial hygienist studying mining employees* exposure to 100% raw chrysotile asbestos fiber is not relevant to an insulator's or bystander's exposure to asbestos products.
36. If you have ever been a member of the Asbestos Textile
Institute, the National Mineral Wool Association, or the Asbestos
Cement Products Group, state the years of membership; identify
all meetings or conferences attended; and identify by date and
title all publications received which related in any way to the
dangers of asbestos exposure.
Answer: No.
-14-
37. .If you were a member of the Air Hygiene Committee of
the Asbestos Textile Institute, state when and identify all
meetings of that committee attended by your representative.
Answer: Not applicable.
38. If you have ever been a member of the Industrial Health
Foundation, give the years of membership, identify by names and
current addresses any of your employees or representatives who
were present at the 20th annual meeting of that organization in
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, in November of 1955, and state whether
you received that organization's monthly publication known as the
Industrial Hygiene Digest.
Answer: No.
39. State whether the defendant ever requested officials at
the IHF to:
. (a) Perform a search of the medical literature to
determine whether any scientists or doctors were reporting cases
of insulation workers with asbestosis and/or cancer or discussing
the potential hazards incident to use of asbestos containing
insulation products.
(b) Perform any studies or research into potential
health hazards incident to the use of asbestos containing insula
tion products.
'
(c) Review governmental publications of Great Britain
toward the end of determining whether any research was being
conducted by the British Government into any potential health
-15-
hazards incident to the use of insulation products containing
asbestos.
.
(d) Review governmental publications of Great Britain
to determine whether the Chief Inspector of Factories or any
other British Government agency had issued any regulations or
published any findings relative to potential health hazards
incident to the use of insulation products containing asbestos.
Answer: No.
40. If you have ever been an associate or correspondent of
the Asbestos Research Council of England, list meetings attended
and identify by dates and titles and other pertinent identifying
information all correspondence or publications sent to that
organization or received from it.
'
Answer: No.
41. For all insurance companies which carried your Workers
Compensation coverage at any time from 1900 to the present, give
name, address and dates of coverage. .
Answer:
Defendant is a Canadian corporation, and workman's compensation insurance is provided by the Quebec Govern ment.
42. If you deny that plaintiff has (or that plaintiff's
decedent had) a disease caused entirely or in substantial part by
asbestos exposure, set forth in detail all information in support
of your contention.
Answer: Refer to Response No. 14 above.
43. Identify by date, author, recipient and subject all
documents obtained by you or any other defendant from Asbestos
Workers Local which you claim support any of the defenses asserted
in your Answer. .
Answer:
As discovery is still continuing in this case. Defendant is unable to state the requested information at this time.
44. Identify by names, addresses, titles, positions and
functions all persons who have participated in preparing Answers
to these Interrogatories.
Answer:
It is impossible for Defendant to respond to this Interrogatory with specificity, as various persons from many departments were consulted in answering these Interrogatories.
The Responses to these Interrogatories are prepared by the Legal Department of the parent corporation of Carey : Canada Inc. They are signed by Robert W. Emerton, III, Senior Litigation Counsel, as authorized representative of the corporation and not on the basis of his personal knowledge of the facts stated herein.
45. If, in answering these Interrogatories, you have not
reviewed any documents in your possession, custody, or control,
which might contain information sought by these Interrogatories,
specifically identify those documents, their location, and their
custodian, and state why you did not review them.
Answer: Not applicable.
-17-
- RESPONSE OF CAREY CANADA INC. TO REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS
1. Produce copies of all documents containing any of the information sought by the above Interrogatories, separately identifying each of those documents by the number(s) of the Interrogatory(s) to which it pertains. Answer: Refer to Exhibits A through C in Response to Plaintiff's
Interrogatories.
18-
The undersigned, ROBERT W. EMERTON, III is Senior Litigation Counsel for the parent corporation of Carey Canada, Inc., East Broughton Station, Quebec, Canada G0N-1H0, and signs these Answers to Interrogatories as such. However, he has no personal knowledge of the facts as set forth herein. And further, such facts are the result of'the investigation by attorneys on behalf of Carey Canada Inc. and he affirms these Answers for purposes of taking necessary official action by Carey Canada Inc. only.
I l a)
Robert W. Emerton, III CAREY CANADA INC. Senior Litigation Counsel
STATE OF FLORIDA . COUNTY OF HILLSBOROUGH
Before me the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the County
aforesaid, this day appeared Robert W. Emerton, III, who stated he is
authorized to execute the foregoing Answers to Interrogatories on behalf
of Carey Canada Inc., and that the matters stated in said Answers are true
and correct to the best of his knowledge, information and belief.
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME, this
day of MuV.UU.TM-,
s
Notary Public in and for State of Florida County of Hillsborough
\
Notary Public State of Florida at un,t
iJty Commission Expires Au. 15,19d5.
The undersigned, ROBERT W. EMERTON, III is Senior Litigation Counsel for the parent corporation of Carey Canada Inc., East Broughton Station, Quebec, Canada G0N-1H0, and signs these Requests for Production as such. However, he has no personal knowledge of the facts as set forth herein. And further, such facts are the result of the investigation by attorneys on behalf of Carey Canada Inc. and he affirms these Answers to Requests for purposes of taking necessary official action by Carey Canada Inc. only.
CAREY CANADA INC. Senior Litigation Counsel
STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF HILLSBOROUGH
Before me the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the County aforesaid, this day appeared Robert W. Emerton, III, who stated he is authorized to execute the foregoing Answer to Requests for Production on behalf of Carey Canada Inc., and that the matters stated in said Answers are true and correct to the best of his knowledge, information and belief.
Notary Public in and for
SSSx&&aa.tte ooff FFlloorriiddaa
Notafy Public State of Florida at Lar^s
County of Hillsborough * My Commission Expires Aug. 16,1985,;
The Insurers covering Carey-Canadian. Mines, vith policy numbers and terra
of coverage, arc:
Insurer
Policy No.
Team
Aetna life & Casualty CNA/Assuranee
II II . If It u it it it It It 11 It
Lumbermen's Mutual it tt
Employers of Wausau General Accident
It II it it
985 LG-305S4SCA
CCP 248-3280
CC1> 248-3414
834-0276
822-5714
822-5714
822-4673
822-3476
OYL 295175
9YL 295175-
27904021047
GIA .36-748-15
ICG 427410
All Prior Coverage
11/15/76 - 10/1/77 10/1/76 11/15/76 10/1/75 10/1/76 10/1/74 10/1/75 10/1/73 10/1/74 10/1/72 10/1/73 4/18/72 10/1/72 1/1/71 - 4/18/72 i/1/70 - 1/1/71 1/1/69 - 1/1/70 1/1/68 - 1/1/69
1/1/67 - 1/1/68
1/1/64 - 1/1/67
Foreword.
* - Those who v/ill encage in dust sampling end counting will
" find the various techniques .much easier to understand if they realize
at the outset that we have no absolute or precise method of deter- .
mining the total number of particles in a given sample of air. Most
of the sampling methods do not collect all of the particles and if
they did, all of the particles could not be-counted by any known
method. (The electric precipitator, which will be shortly.discussed
in another article, has, for all practical purposes, a collection
efficiency of 100 per cent}.
.
..
Iri making dust counts, -the most important consideration is
that the method should yield results which can t-e compared with, those
obtained by other workers, under similar conditions. That is to say,
it should give the same results (within about 10 per cant) for
different operators sampling the same concentrations of a given dust
so that the conditions as found can be compared with similar con
ditions where observations over a longer period cf time have per
mitted an evaluation of the hazards involved by a continuation of
engineering and medical -studies.
`
. * . THE IKPIEOSR. ..
. ..
. The word "impinge-"' means to strike or dash against. In
the' impinger method of dust collection, the sample of..air is sicked
tor drawn into, a nozzle shaped tube and on into the flask at high
velocity. The flask .is partially filled with a liquid and as the
dust, particles strike against a plate or the bottom of the fjusk;
they- are wetted and retainsu in the' liquid while the air bubbles
'through the liquid and escapes.
'_
''
'
Hie Sruenburg-Smith. or large Tmpinger was developed during
a study of available dust sampling devices started in IS1*? at the
Pittsburgh 3ursau cf Mines Experiment Station (1) b (2). As finally
adopted, the Impingar sampled at a rate of 1 pu. ft. per minute into
a flask 50 mm. in diameter and 300 mm. in length. The source of
suction was either a motor driven pump, an air ejector, or a rather
heavy find bulky hand-operated pump mounted on a tripod stand. This
impir.gor was found to meet the requirements for a dust semniing
method more satisfactorily than the other methods studied and with
light-field counting, in the microscopej comparable results could
bq obtained by different workers.
::
.'
Distilled .water was first used as the collecting mediae
but alcohol has been used recently because most inorganic dusts-*
less soluble in alcohol, some dusts us coal are wet by the olccnS.
.. m<?re readily, there is' no trouble from bactei'ia and mold confusr?-.
the counting, and the apparatus is more easily cleaned with alccsSl
Alcohol has also been found more desirable for sampling whore tbe
air is contaminated with oil mist as in rock drilling as the. oils
soluble and does not agglomerate the dust or-otherwise confuse tis.
count. Ethyl Alcohol is satisfactory but, is very expensive tecsse
'of high taxes so either normal-propyl or iso-propyl alcohol has has.
substituted; normal-propyl being more desirable because of the oik-.
jectionabla odor of iso-propyl alcohol.
..
'
..
THE MIDGET IMPINGER. *
'
. The USA Midget Impinger is, as its name implies, similar
in principle to the Oreonburg-Smith or large impinger, but is smsusm
in size and collects a smaller sample, The Midget Impinger was
d'eveloped at the Bureau of Mines (3) & (4).
*
. The USA Midget Impinger apparatus consists of a case wir
. a four cylinder radial pump using the crank case as a surge tank. "
Each stroke of a piston pushes air from the crank case, maintains
a vacuum reflating chamber which maintains a constant vacuum on tie
impinger to which it is connected by a short hese. Any crank spead
above about 50 R.P.U. gives a constant flow. A nut on the baek'cf
' the regulator varies the tension of a spring which maintains the
correct vacuum, and a gouge on top of the case indicates the
in inches of water. The entire apparatus with nine complete
impingers (flask and nozzle only complete with stoppers) in a
removable block, an inlet guard, holster and carrying straps waigpa-
but nine pounds.
'
Dust Sampling with the MSA Midget Impinger.
**
.
"Cleaning, the Apparatus-
. . .
' * .. Vn* '
. . A most important part of any dust sampling technique is-a
. thorough cleansing of the apparatus. The 1.beratory room used for
'this.preparation should be kept, clean and.free of dust and a large
glass plate should be provided on'a bench next to the sink, and
should be polished each time it is used as a work piece. The
impingers (see figs. 1 t 3 in El 3360) are removed from the block,
one at a time, and the cap, side arm stopper and largo stopper am?
removed. Each part is rinsed in water, scrubbed with'a brush ushg
a detergent such as ''Draft" which does not form precipitates with
hard water, rinsed with warn water, then with distilled water* and
finally with dust-frae alcohol. The flask should be filled with
.about S ml. of the alcohol, then the large Stopper and nozzlo *
washed and put into the flask-and the end of the nozzle adjusted ts.
the 5 mm. mark. Then the cap, and finally.-the side .arm storjper mr
put in place. The flask is dried on the outside and a strip of
^friction tape or cellulose scotch taps is.placed over the joint .
between the largo stopper und the flask.
~
Checking the apparatus
.
' '
-|
* .
'
Unwind the hose from the spool on the back of the regpatr
bring it thru the slot at the end of the case and connect the *
end to the side arm of an impinger flask-containing about 8 ml.
alcohol. Remove the cap on the impinger nozzle and.stand the
impinger in the block which is removed from the case. Turn the air-
fast enough to hold the gauge needle steady (about 50 r.p.m.)
. note whether the vacuum reading is 12 inches of water. If it isSt.
tighten the nut which is at the back of the regulator on the pnmj-
if it is too high* loosen the nut until the needle holds steady^
' 12. If it is desired to check the flow thru the impinger* the
apparatus should be set up as described and the inlet (top) con
nection of the nozzle connected to the outlet of a small wet meter
: (0.1 cu. ft. per revolution) and the time. for * several revolutions':.
. the meter pointer is measured with a stopwatch.
.
1 ? 5 ;
; !' :
;
Collection o Samples:
. The parts are placed in the case and the apparatus is oestready for collection of samples. The case is worn-at the left 23?' with the strap over the right shoulder and the crank away from fir . body. When it is desired to operate the .apparatus > the left ar^ar drawn through the loop of ,the strap and the csss is rotated lS-T clockwise so- that the end farthest from the gauge is against end the crank is in a position for .operation with the right hand-
.
Open the case* unwind the hose and remove an impinger.Se
move the cap and side arm stopper and .connect the hose to the sis--
arm (wetting the end with saliva if necessary). , The impinger rsrps-
held in the left hand which also. supports the far end of the csss.
If a stand or table is convenient* the block can be removed fresfit
`case and placed up >n the stand with the flask in it. If a sstaple"
required near a workman's face to determine, bis exposure* the nsa&'
con be put in the holster and pinned to his jacket with the hose--_
brought over his shoulder to the apparatus.. Wherever there is 2* "
possibility of material dropping from overhead* th9 inlet of ths flask should be protected with the Z-shaped guard.
\
[
' ; The crank cf the pump is turned (either \ra-j) for the r.r
I i1
' ling period at sufficient speed (50 or more rcvolutic-s per minnsp. to keep the gauge at 12 inches of. water. * The sampling period shfiS
be 10 or more minutes in length for concentrations which are ezasE-
to be 10 million particles .par cubic foot and five minutes for
f1
concentrations. Where only one or two million particles per ctssr foot-is expected* the sampling- time should be 15 or 20 minutes. A
soor* as the sample is collected* the hose should be removed endfi
\ cap and side arm -stopper replaced.- The flask should be numbered
with o gloss marking crayon so that the results can be correlate,
with notes describing the location and -conditions.
'
Determination of Count. (5)
'
.
.
The samples are returned to the' laboratory where th r%-
ere thoroughly washed on the outside before the tape and stopjex
ere removed. Always remove the side-arm stopper first or presses
built up by increased temperature msy force some of the sample
of the intake tube. Then wash the inside and outside- of the iosssr
tube (the intake to the nozzle), using a wash bottle with dust-hs
.alcohol and making sure all the washings go into the flask. Ties
add alcohol until the volume in the flask (with the nozzle removal
is 20', 25* or 3 ml; the lower volumes only- for very low counts.
The flask is then a coppered with the large stoppers with nozzle*
' the cap, and lastly the side-arm stopper,.or a solid stopper momis
used in place of the one with the nozzle. The stops to be followE,'.
after the sample is collected and prepared as described above will
`be listed briefly.
`
. .*
The sample is counted in a Sedgwick-Rafter cell which
* be made with a. cement insoluble in alcohol. This cell is glass,
1 mm. deep and with a capacity of about 1 ml. (the volume is un
important) . The cell is rinsed with alcohol after use and kept xct?-
its cover glass in a beaker of .clean alcohol. About 6 cells can ss~
`kept in a 250 ml. beaker.- When' needed, a cell is removed and dr-isr
with linen or silk which is clean and free, of lint. It is then
brushed out with a clean camel-hair brush and the cover glass whies
is m3de from a- standard clean microscopic slide by cutting down to
.2-3/8" length is cleaned' similarly and placed upon it so that two
corners are open about l/4".t;
'
.
The sample is shaken thoroughly and a clean 2 ml. pipetfc
is filled quickly with it and emptied again into the flask. The
stopper is replaced and the flask is again shaken well after uhica
the pipette is again filled and .the sample is run into one of the -
open corners of the cell until it is filled; the fluid remaining 5n
the pipette is desesrded and. the cell is closed. Be sure the
-
pipette is not placed on a dirty surface in this procedure and **
generally avoid contamination of the sample.*
The sample in the cell is allowed to 3tand on a flat sur face for 25 minutes, after which it is placed upon the microscope
stage end five fields of 1/4 sq. millimeters each are counted, ccnsfe-
ingtbe particles on the bottom of the cell in this area.
'
.'
**
*.
*
' ' .The microscope for counting should have a magnifies tionxfT
ebout 100 diameters using a 10 x objective and a 10 x eyepiece. 3.
the eyepiece there is a Whipple Disc which is a' glass disc upon
is marked off a square subdivided into 100 small squares, one of
which 13 again divided into 25 smaller squares. The draw tube sbnffi.
be adjusted so that thi3 large square includes an area 1 nrn x 1 n at the point of focus on the stage; a stage micrometer is used to
get this adjustment. (The miscroscipes supplied by the MSA Co. sss.
properly adjusted at the factory.)
..
'
-
J+
: The-light is placed about 8 ittShe3 from she mirsar
' end the.iris diaphragm is closed to a small aperture and tie-
eyepiece is removed. Then the mirror (plane surface) is ts-,
until the spot of light is centered in the microscope tuie.
(with the eye directly above it). T! e eyepiece is replaces
and the bottom of the cell is found by focusing on a corns-
where a large amount of dirt, inevitabl present, helps last:
the surface upon which the dust has settled. New one of tie
five fields is selected, at least 3/8 inch from an edge cr2r
a bubble which may get in the cell, and using the fine adJsaEfe.
* the particles to be counted are brought into focus. At this
pqint. it is desirable to lower the condenser (beneath the -
stage) and adjust the iris diaphragm for a comfortable liga.
intensity (too much light is very tiring on the eyes). CosaC
with both eyes open, using a dark cardboard shield around fis-
eyepiece and keeping the room slightly darkened.
-
j
. Each field should include 1/4 of the large squares- t
25 of the first subdivisions and while counting the fine ad- - !
Justment should be turned back and forth as only the partidile . f
which go an and out of' focus are cotinted to exclude any par=.- :
cles which may be on the/.-/hippie disc. The five fields mays*- ' '
counted in five minutes so cells can be filled on a 6 - 1C
f
minute schedule. A hand tally is helpful in making the corns: ?
and the eye should follow a regular ' course so that the posit
is not lost. Some whipple disco., as modified by Page haves.
. a 1/4 square millimeter, marked off> so in this case the whose
'area is counted. '
.
: )
.*
t
Each.day one c-r more blanks should be counted, us^u. :
the alcohol provided for sampling and diluting. This blank
should not exceed an average of 7 or 8 particles per field as' .'
is subtracted frum the counts found. The alcohol reservoir... .
should not be disturbed and is best provided with a glass sat.
at least one inch above the bottom. The siphon should end 5sv- * ,
a piece of clean gum rubber tubing with a glass nozzle and a
l
spring clamp c-n the rubber tube for opening and closing.
-=
. * When the Whipple disc becomes dirty, it should be
i 1
cleane-d with several thicknesses of lens paper and brushed
with a camel-hair brush. Never touch the surfaces with the _ ;
hands ox* trie surface of the'lens paper used for wiping. Oil
'
from the skin makes streaks, and helps the dirt to stick. Aleg-
handle the disc by the edge and replace it with the sane ~ >'
surface uo.
'
' "i
' Sample Calculation: '
*
. *
i
.. '
Suppose we' collect a 10-minute samole of 0.1 cu. per minute, dilute to 30 ml, and get counts of 47, 49, 50 ad 48 for one cell; 46, 50,51,45, and 44-for a second cell, asx have a blank count of 5 per field. We average the counts: -
1
j* L*1
6
* 47
49
...
45 '
50 . jLi.
'46'
. 50
51
.
.45 44
" -
5) 233 (48)
5)' 236 (47)
^
` Av. - 48 -- blank of 5 - 43
43 x 4 = 172 particles per eu. rcillimetee.
.. '
172 x 1000 = 172,000 per milliliter
' 172,000 x 30 = 5*160,000 total particles
.
in sample collected.
' .
.
Sampling period was 10 min. at .1 ru. ft. perm ' or 1 cu. ft. of air was sampled so dust conces` tration is 5*2 million per cu- ft.
' ' (Usually the amount after the decimal is not
significant).
. .
`
More simply the calculation is:
_
43 x 4 x loop x 30 *
'
' . 5.2 million per cu.3,
lx 1,000,000
.....
_
*t
In general, .the count per field should be 40 to St
particles where it is much above this, part of the samcle,3ar;
10 ml. should be further diluted in a 23, or 100 ml. voliaaS.
flask.
.
*
.
(1) U. S. Public Health Bulletin #144, "Comparative Tests2?
Instruments for the Determination of Atmospheric DustJij.
'S. K. Katz, C. VJ. Smith, Wm. Myers., L. J. Trostel, Maggpt
Ingels, Leonard Sreenburg Jan. 1325* .
(2) U. S'. Public Health Bulletin-#217, "The DeterminationaB''-
. Control of Industrial. Dusts", J. J. Bloomfield, & J. 5.
' Delavaile, April 1935-
,.
.*
.
(3) Dept of the Interior, Bureau of Mines Report of IvvesJasb.. 33o0, "Bureau of Hines Midget Impinger for Dust Sample
by J. B. Littlefield and K. H. Schrcnk, December 1937.
(4} Dept, of the Interior, Bureau of Mines Report of Invest
. .gdtions 3387, "Dust Samoling with the- Bureau of Mines2S-
ImpSnger, using a new Hand - Operated Pump" by J. B.
Littlefield and K. H. Schrenky March 1938.
-
(5) The technique- Tor making dust counts is best desorttsSfe Tept. of the interior. Bureau of Mines Information Car. 702o "A Technique for use of the Impinger Method" bgr Carlton 3. Brown and H. H. Schrenlc, June 1933.
(6) This equipment is described in Bureau of Mines 1. Cf3E' referred to `abL.ve and in Bureau of Mines R. I. 3373, "Microprejec tion Method for counting Impinger Dust Sample? :by Carlton 3. Brown, Lester A. H. Burem, William P. Yant,a&H. H. Schrenlc, Jan: 1933.
rt
i
CAREY CANADA INC
^.
~
25/XI/81
by: J. Sztdbe
ASBESTOS DUST CONTROL
..
at QUEBEC ASBESTOS CORP.
and Carey Canadian Mines Ltd ** CAREY CANADA INC.
DATE
1952 - 1956
1959-VI to
197A-V 12/11/73
PROCEDURE at Q.A.C.
UNITS
Midget Impinger
{ MPPCF (a)
see enclosure (1)! and (2)
-------------- ---------------------p
at CCM Ltd = C.C.I.
Midget Impinger
MPPCF (a)
MEMBRANE FILTER (b) f/cc
PERFORMED bv:
t
QAMA - M. Lachance
-W
do do
29/XI/73 ' to
Midget Imp. MEMBRANE FILTER
MPPCF f/cc
.. do
CCM - R. Shearer
9/1/74 to '
6/V/7A 1974 to 1976
30/IV/76
1976 - on
Midget Imp. MEMBRANE FILTER
MPPCF f/cc
Midget Imp.
MPPCF
MEMBRANE FILTER I f/cc -about 226 tests performed.
Quebec Dept of Nat.
Resources - G. Gabaas;.
CCM - R. Shearer --------------------------------
3#
QAMA - M. Lachance
Hi
ICCI MT
1st half yearly (l/XI/75 - 30/1V/76) - AIR SAMPLING
presented to Que.- Gov. Authorities
MEMBRANE FILTER
! f/cc
: CCM Ltd.
MEMBRANE FILTER
' f/cc
I CCI
Half yearly reports covering* the.-whole MINE, plus
MILL sampling at bi-monthly intervals, plus testing
of problem areas and jobs when needed.
c,
m& sf
A'
NOTE:
(a) MPPCF ---million of particles per cu.ft.
(b) MEMBRANE FILTER, a procedure based on NIOSH:
USPHS/NIOSIl MEMBRANE FILTER METHOD for EVALUATING
AIRBORNE ASBESTOS FIBRES.
. '
UNITS:. `
f/cc - FIBRES LONGER than 5 microns per cc..
Enel. (1)
* (2) JS/khg
d(VBn Jim Walter
a Jim Walter company
4 `%
-!*M%a Q*>
-
:
dOt>
V
,m %
t ft
*%
to %
* 5. * 5
-tv to 1 1'
i t1 %*
N V %
%
%*
CO * <
Vd
%%
dr^ 5
Vi *
5.-
<3
%
d o
`V*
>
f; 5Os "> a c, o aS5 r<V: x>Q4 %0
Q-v
V<+
s*_
<SC<J33>3" -*t
0 v_
V| 0o>>
5 * oCl d? 2o5
*3
3<3 O*
V<=<k30r-. .
^^
.-
!`s _tv>
5* t*
f>3 .to 03
to N
$ d
<--o to
#A to c3 d $ q
'ix u to d to
03 d
Jo fv
V^ 5-* Co
A
$
to
%d to
5 tu
%N Qj CO <0
S3 tu
*
_
-
'- --
d to d
d Qj tr
*d ro
to d 3
tn 2^
to to -tv
sC3 -d
as-
.to to
i*
d V?
d d
to -tv
5* d
CO
.Ct d
P> d
N N>
yt' ***
d
d d . tM
d
'd
A to
.d d
.d to
J
d
P d
'yt
tu
> v- a <0 co N>
N>
ffcb -tv
fo
rt\3
rd
d
to d
>% o>
> N
53 d
S3 to
$ to $. to < to 5d
f
<T> d
ta
yt
to
t\3 ft3 tv 0.
to .t-o**
K>
> 03
V. N>
Nx
c-~ d
.>{ d
d
.N> d
yt
d
d
d>^ Rd S^
Nj
to Co
fo tv
*ft3 o. tv
t to
y*
03
*V3 tv 'tv
> d
*d
a
d
?! d
A 5o to d d tv
'vs
yt
*d
*Oj
~N
yt
o>
N> *-<v
-tv to
ftt*l d
t\C3k
to
d d
ddd
d
.d d
`-tv
Qi
.^ > dd
\>
tu o
-tV d
5* M
A to
yt
d
*0 tv
yt
c>
yt
d
> d
d d
d ,,d to
rs d
3N to d
li
d to dd . M t4 d to dri d-tv
d d d
d d
V. 5)
.N to
,0> o: C>
to *-o.
to `tv
yt $ y>
d Oi d
y>
d
d Co
A
d
P>
N
N d
.d d
d>* Sd
^
d* d
o
a
N
5*
to
-0. 5* 03 .to
y*
**%
yt
to
y*
to
i'i
Co
ttuv
> d
d .d
to
to d
io d
-s. N
d
y*
d
^ to -5. N r* d
> N
b N
.Cl
to
to to
oT 0. <v b>
5*
t*i
to d
tli
tv
Cv >
d. N
d
d d CO
5*
t*j
d
tv
A Vi
.d d
d^ dn
M^
A
"l
I
*tu
d
1
-tv
5*
d
d
t^
to
d tv
ft N .x d
-
'n 55 - d. n
a
N .'* ' At
Co to d to
yt > *
rva t^3 t* N
d u r*
d
d
-tv
*d
iv
yt ,d uV
ft; _i
i^v
^.
tN-tov
i
5 la
<o d
Cl 5j d
d. d
d 53 d.
Id d N>.
v.
5d
d
*d-^
to
[d d *0
d
'O d.
5 dd
fn
t> to
d. d" d'
'dn' d <b
*->
. 'Asbestos gamii.txal fibre; a hydrated
;.': Vj^-Vt^iJtaasneiiutn silicate.There are several d
: 'varieties of asbestos. Of these, commercially
i . . {:
the most valuable one is chrysotile. The worlt
i` Y^Cjy-three leading producers of chrysotile asbestos r
Canada. Ute USSR and Southem-Africa.:
TOfthe 4.5 million tons mined tn.the world each. 1
-s w..
uw,,,uCncc or. -
-i
' ^.-Sri^hkiard to the general public from the minute 'y T:;|
;_wij .-;s>-'rti(..:amountsof asbestos that may be present in ' \y -*|
J. : '"J.
.j
Hardly any.--tr sYudy.b'y'the U.S. Public^..
'.'7;
Service shows that only a 1iriy.fracn0n\:rj \\t
___-.
___ _^it r_
.;**
j.';-^V--Jf'S;"/"-?-\v'* 7- 'c'v'*''*r~'
; -- long-term medical studies of workers who r^?;.yi?/are'exposed to asbestos in their jobs show that:,'
!~Sf
Becauseof the long latent perioibf asbestos-
'..^frVJ^^'felateci dls'eases', some cases still occur among
"^''A-w' fong-s'eryiceemployees whose exposures began
' a' time,when little was known, of the amount ''i/Zofasbestos-a human could tolerate, and when '
'
Y-Y'/v^.'u; believe that thes'e'cases will decrease in the ` 1
___ j ,,_i,,___ __ ____ , J:____
___ - 1
t se serrdepuis une centime a ounces p; 'U'.-.matiriauxqui n'ont pasete mis alepreuve
et done bn ne connait pas les etfets sur Iasants.,*::-j
: Beaucoup. L'industrie canadienne del
.l-'.J/.'a commandite au eours des annees-
unesdes premieres etudes faites en
du Nord sur !es maladies causees par ramiante..... . j
' Ces etudes ont fourni des renseignements qui
. v; -..:.-ont etc a la base des programmes ue'
_
IV '.' controle de I'environnemenl que I'industrie a
7.1 .-perrecttbnnes et etendus avec le temps. On a "
~ - consacre des millions de dollars a {`acquisition
materiel et de techniques rafHr.es pour -
proteeerles travailleursdes mines tTamiante- .
. -rlruciirysoiile. des usines de broyage el des
'
" ;_~I- -fabriques:de produits contenant de "
Par l'emremise de Hnscitut de
."Travail et des Ambiances de Montreal,
'J7 Tlndustrial Hygiene Foundation a
*etdc divers hopitaux et universites
v parlour dans le monde. I'industrie continue
__ ~7l
..I ^
. -. ~'~*i>~-Non;dej prelivements fatts dans la'ville do "'.. ! -'i^;..^'.:New Yorker dansd^autres regions-urbainesdesy.^. ` ."i^S^.Etats-Unis par tin sroupe.de chercheurs de ,,' 'Y*3?CiCi'H6pital Mount:Sinai de New-Ydrkrmohtrent
' i-.V-.-^'que les hiveaux.de pplluiioaso'ru de beaucoup' V: '.^'^.inferieurs aux'niveauxjuges inoffensifs pour.les**. -^r-'?. travailleurs'de rimiante. De plus; il a e(e'::;,,'.;:^::;.;-j : >1=.-.,'!- : lTM,Ve.'recemment;qUe de petites-quantttes'de_\"v:'i . ^ d'amiante pro'venant de sources naturetles,'
. ircdmme la degradation des affleiiremerits, ;.vT'-ri^. ^ . JCse.'ust'enLprbbablemcncdanJ Patmosphere 'depuisjf:' ; y-:'h?.i<Tdei millions tTannecs-Ainsi, revolution du..;. ; ' `i5,;S?'^;fgenre:humain a sans doute pris place 'dans une t`~o
' ^.atmospherecoritenant.de Pamiante.-: v''*"''
................
.. . .
,'on peut contrfiler de fa?on satisfaisante le
1
.f'A- peine. Une etude du Service "de la
..._... ...
PubIique des Etats'-Unis demqntre'que lefaiti'..*^
>r';:*-:;vV'.r-
niveau des concentrations dans ies chantiers et jdans les localitesl Du point de vue de la sante .
.'i^osjd'appliquer les freins ne libere soussa forme
ssf m : :'.-.^;..v''S;:-publiquer, ii n'existe done aucune raison pour -'r'
'. .Olav'voriginale qu'une ihfime fraction'de I'amiante '
-vi^^&interdire Pemploi des produits continent de
-r'.X-Sj^que contiennent les doublures de freins. Sous;-._V ^X'V.i'action de lachaleur. le reste se-.convertit en ^'I-t'Sforsterite. matiere non fibreuse,'inerteet- .
$r<~ .m
.'En verite, e'est a son detriment que la ^ tsepriveraitde la 3rar.de variete des
produits de I'amiante servant i prpteger la. -.
a
...
: :s5^.T\inoffensivei}
s!;i-
:#6a
'sante,'la'vieet la propriete. ' I
"J
i ti.*-'-:a-; -
ri
'' -.m.
`S}< .
2;"-Non. il n'existe aucune preuve,; ^'r-autre, que quiconque aitjamais contracte une* _
'. ".'SrX.maiadie pour avoir etc expose aux infimes.
- 'v-'-i^quantites d'amiante qui se trouvent dans :. -y.yy: Patmosphere par suite de Pemploi. de Pusure- '
;:4|
?r'-ou lie la degradation des produits de I'amiante.' .-'
........ .....
ue pertode de latence des -
' .'.`>j:.M?i"'aladies attribuables i I'amiante. bn voit .
T-jg
encore certains cas se diclarer ch des : ,
4
';:.':i'-;''P employes de vieille date ayant commence k '' . /' v.'.?*.
j ' r'.T^'l^travailler 1 iine epoque ou Ton ignorait les _ & le.?--.!. ^-^.'concentrationssupportable* et ou le materiel
j pour le controle des poussiires n'etait ni aussi
ni aussi'repandu que maintenant.
*'{.
.:!m!
medicates et l'amelioration des V. -l. 'jCJ
de contrdle, on a toutes raisons de . ' . 'j-hj;
<-: r.-,-. .. -J'.t.v.'croire que ces cas diminueront h I'avenir et que ' %: -^tje*maladiesreliees 1 i'amiantecesserontde. .. -
* 7 '.e Non. des enquetes medicates
Petat de sante des travailleurs
./Vt.Vr'pousjieres d'amiante montrcntque . .
' A~Vi'v concentrations peu elevees n'amenent aucune ' :'l
'-'-/vV augmentation du taux des ` '
-iL'omfame esrrnie fibrtrnrinerale. tm silicate de-..
magnesium hydrates II existe plusieurs varietes-...
' d'amiame- parmiltesquclles la chrysotile est la - '.-. :
`plus precietisedu pointde vue commercial; Les'
. trois principaux pays producteurs d'amiante x.;.'
'. chrysotile sonMe Canada, la Russie. I'Afrique _p
'.du Sud et la Rhodesie; La.Russie est le .
-principal producteur et leprincipal consom--.
fmateur desiquatre-millionset demi de tonnes
7 d'amiante produites chaqueannee, tandis quede- .
Canada est le principal exportateur et les
'Etata-Unis, leprincipal importateur. Le Canada
- fournit 35 pour cent de.Ja production inondiale-7'.
annuelle d'amiante. soit l.6 million de tonnes, i'apportanr ainsi i I'economie.canadienne presj7 ."'d'un quart de milliard de dollars par annee;,;v'.
-Vdi-- \?
permet de croirc pouri '~.;Aj-'>-Ti('que les infimes'quanu'tes d'amiante qui se..
. '.V* "` .'' .;''";-`: trouvent dans fair presentent un danger *'
,;-;v '^'-j quelconque pour la population'. DanJ une' .
!1 v*-U1 Ii '-*<.:t ii:4c' !1<;!' <' = ..
i i\-V- v't- *' \'5
'publication en'date d'octobre 1971 et intitulee.' ; jV.t ' ''Asbestos-- the Need for and Feasibility of . -'.':.rf;'r;/Air Pollution Controls. iL'amiante-- Necessite
tyei. possibility d'un contrdiede la pollution -
, '.v f I'.airmosnheriaue). 1'Aeademie nationals (
-.Presque tout lemOnde. H.esuimpossfbie de ' v*/ '.'
conduire L'ii'vehicuIe,.depiloterun'r.2virirbu':
un.avion qui'n'eh'comienne pas. On s'eirserr,;r..'
' pour les dou'olures de frein, les toiiures. ies.
-systemes d'egouts. Ies carriages, I'isolation ' - J..
des installations electriques". les cloisons' '.[ ''
' icnifuges. lesrevetements exterieurs, les
: veiements ignifuses. les lubrifiants et les -I-,-,
-matieres pour le calfeutrage. I'asphalte des'Y--V.; -
' grandes routes, les fusees et les engins spatiaux,
les carreaux acoustiques de mime que les .
.turbines igazou i.vapeur et les-moteurs de
fusee. Les gratte-ciel reposent sur des coussins
en plomb et en amiante.Des tuyaux er.'charge
.fails d'amiante-ciment transportent de I'eaii' .
. fraiche. On trouve aussi de I'amiante chrysotile..
dar.s Ies immeubles prefabriques. les navires, les
trains de metro, les avions et les sous-marins. II '..;
.a licteraiement des douzaines d'applications au-'
bureau. 1 I'lisine-. dans la maison de banlieue.-.-,,"
comme dans I'appaftement du centre-ville'.
Sans amiame. le papier sur iequel est imprime .. _
ce feuillet n'aurait pu etre fabrique. Tous les v
jours; on se sert d'amiante sous une forme ou.7"'i
sous une autre.-
.-..
; T"*1
ina (jp. ..
- **%**'!tfJ--J 71^i'w11.*' *
*
;v K-.'-'i-
'* quantile de fibres .que i'on trouve chez une
- *V. grande partie de la population ait une influence
:v:vV.d 7V.quetconquesur la-santeou Ixlongevite."
.................................... ..........
.
-Ui"
>; '
-i t -..j:3.5ri!- \ J r: i U; H I:; x1
:i
U1.
........'............................
M :u
'M i-t-i- 11
V.srJ-.
.; .1
.Hi*} Oui, on saildepuis plusieurs annees que
'
;i;.. certaines maladies respiratoires sont causees
;-'rV:';Par I'amiante.Cependant. on sailegalemenl .
'''.V.--qua ces maladies n'apparaissent qu'apres une
.- exposition prolongee a des quantiles excessives
de poussiire d'amiante. Une etude receme faite
'--'iJvpar 1'Universite McGill sur I'etat de sante de. .
:10,42t mineurs ayant travaille et travaillant .I ;--";"T".;;j:.encore dans Ies-mines d'amiante du.Quebec
'v.monire que le taux de mortalite attribuable i
:-:!!'"Ces maladies est inferieur au taux prevu pour ie
.-.'.'I'.i'Jreste de la population quebecoise. Dans son
; '.r'v'. ..numero de juin 1971. la publication Archives of
Environmental Health mentionne que la
;''"; y.:.-:;'mortalite est plus elevee dans le seul cas des ' . .
Vlv;.'- travailleursqui. il y a30 ou 40 ans.ont ete
".-.":"r::';e.Tposes 1 de fortes concentrations de poussiere..
<. . ...;
v- ;.. J
Les fibres d'amiante s.ont uniques en leur '
'I
.1
genre. Combinees i d'autres materiaux--: et {
I'amiante n'est jamais, ou rarement employ e
seul -- eites donnent des substances ` .. '"j
,...j
. ininflammables qui absorbent la chaleur causee
par la friction, assurent I'isolation thermique et' ;
i'insonorisation. renforcent les matieres .;. - |
-I
'!
/
S'
e
F
fc
It's an ASBESTOS world
.
Mora than 80 countries the world over buy Quebec's
chrysotile asbestos.
,
They use these fibres to manufacture a range of
some 3,000 products. These include: -- asbestos- .
cement construction materials such as sheets and
shingles, water and sewage piping: conduits, floor
tiling, automotive brake linings and other friction
materials; asbestos papers used in electrical insula
tion and roofing materials; fireproof textiles, paints
reinforced plastic products, asphalt overlays for
highways, thermal and acoustical insulation materials
and a range of gasketing, putties, caulks, sealants
and surface coatings.
You'll find Quebec's asbestos in Scandinavian
homes. New Zealand high schools, Israeli irrigation
projects; in the disc-brakes and clutch-linings of
British racing cars, in a German welder's protective
clothing, in the insulation of a Japanese turbo
generator, in a Canadian paper machine ... It's
in Brazilian housing projects, U.S. jumbo jets and
gas stations, Indian pipelines and Central African
locomotives...
ITS PROPERTIES
The worldwide acceptance of Quebec's chrysotile asbestos and its immense range c? applications stem from five inherent characteristics of the mineral: --
It is non-combustible, inert 2nd resistant to heat generated by friction.
It insulates against heat, cold and noise. G Being a fibre that possesses greater tensile
strength than steel, it acts ns a reinforcement . for many materials, especially cement and
plastics.
G It resists corrosion and attack by alkalis and
most acids.
It has good dielectric properties.
What's more, chrysotile asbestos provides these
characteristics, or any combination of them, at
remarkably low cost.
Because of this unique combination of properties
-- not to be found in any other natural or man-made
substance - chrysotile asbestos finds its way into
hundreds of applications in which human safety is at
. stake.
..
It is indispensable in brake linings because it with
stands the high temperatures attained in braking.
Consequently road, rail and, to some extent, aircraft
safety depend on it.
It's the only mineral that can be spun and woven
into'cloth for such uses as firefighters' clothing and
fireproof theatre curtains.
Used as a thermal insulation material on the
structural steelwork of large buildings, chrysotile
asbestos helps prevent them from collapsing in the
event of major fire.
And. It's also the basis of fire-resistant partitions
in ships, offices, schools, hospitals, stores and other
locations where large numbers of people congregate.
In these and many other essential, life-saving
uses, there is simply no known substitute for
asbestos.
'
Yet. for all its varied uses, Quebec's chrysotile
asbestos is usually invisible in virtually all its applica
tions. Like the yeast in bread, asbestos is just a
small part of most finished products, yat it's
indispensable.
V
J
\
J
The Mineral
Like iron, copper, nickel or zinc, asbestos is a
mineral.
The chemical formula for chrysotile asbestos is
3MgO. 2SiOj. 2H,0. It is a hydrous magnesium
silicate, closely allied to soapstone, the rock
Eskimos use for their carvings.
` But unlike gold, copper, lead or zinc, asbestos is
not an element and it occurs in several different
varieties. In addition to chrysotile, there are types
called amosite, anthophyllite and crocidolite. As well
as being mined in Canada, the mineral is also
produced in the USSR, southern Africa, Cyprus,
Italy, the U.S.A., Australia, China, Japan and several
other countries.
Commercially, chrysotile is the most useful -- and
valuable - form of the mineral. In Canada, it comes
from Quebec, British Columbia, Yukon Territory,
Newfoundland and Ontario. It is the only variety to
be mined in Canada.
'
Over 80 per cent of Canadian chrysotile produc
tion -- or approximately 30 per cent of the world's
supply of all forms of asbestos - comes from a 60-
mile strip of Quebec's Eastern Townships between .
the St. Francis and Chaudi&re Rivers.
/------------------------
Its Production
The rolling hills of Quebec's Eastern Townships have
yielded chrysotile asbestos since 187S.
Today, some 6,500 men mine and mill the tough
but silky fibres. In the towns of Asbestos, Black
Lake, East Broughton and Thetford Mines, five
mining companies, created by Canadian, U.S. and
British interests, produce more than 1,500,000 tons of
chrysotile fibre a year.
By doing so. they inject each year some
$185,000,000 into the Quebec and Canadian
economies. Mined in much the same way as other minerals,
asbestos ore goes into a'mill, not a smelter. There
it Is crushed and screened; the fibre is then
separated, cleaned, graded and bagged ready for
shipment to fabricating plants around the world.
. Air is the muscle-power of this milling process. To
separate a ton of fibre from the 20 tons of crushed
mother-rock in which it is embedded requires
roughly 10 tons of air in the form of suction. Vacuum
is also the key to the complex and costly ventilating
and dust control systems that protect the workers'
health and the environment of the mining
communities.
..
A basic fact of life for Quebec's chrysotile pro
ducers is that all chrysotile fibre is not the same.
Some fibres are better suited than others for a
specific manufacturing process.
Because of the immense range of products that
contain asbestos, Quebec's asbestos mines produce
up to 150 different grades of fibre. Since the 1930's.
grading procedures are uniform throughout the
industry thanks to the Quebec Standard classifica-
tion system for asbestos fibre. On the basis of fibre length, the Quebec Standard divides chrysotiie asbestos into eight basic groups which are further sub-divided into grades and sub-grades, determined by color, absorptivity, density, strength and other characteristics.
These eight basic groups, which together with their grades and sub-grades make up the Quebec Standard classification system, are recognized the world over as a stamp of mineral integrity.
J
Each year, the Quebec asbestos mining industry pays its employees over S60,000.000 in wages and salaries as well as approximately S20 million in direct taxation to the Federal. Provincial and Muni cipal Governments.
Recent Federal Government statistics reveal that the citizens of Asbestos and Thetford Mines are among the highest net income earners in the Province. '
Their incomes, plus those of hundreds of em ployees in the array of locally-established secon dary industries which supply much of the equip ment, supplies and services needed to keep the mines in operation, are the economic mainstay of the prosperous communities, with a combined total population of approximately 55,000, in which they live.
Thanks to the overail prosperity which asbestos creates, the mining centres in the Eastern Town ships of Quebc contain cultural, educational and recreational amenities, ail of them citizen-run, which are second to none in Canada.
ASBESTOS CREATES JOBS
Approximately 6,500 men and women are employed in the mining and milling operations, maintenance shops and offices of Quebec's asbestos mines.
Over the past 15 years, the industry's output has risen by over 50 per cent. This has resulted in a gradual increase in employment despite the closure of four mines in that period.
The growing world demand for asbestos --
J
r~. \
rising by an average rate of three to four per
cent each year -- has led to the constant introduction
of new more efficient mining and processing equip
ment and control systems.
-
The result has been a shift in traditional employ
ment patterns. Until some 15 years ago, well over
half of a typical asbestos mine's work-force con
sisted of production workers -- men engaged In the
mining of ore and the milling of asbestos fibre.
Today, that same proportion of workers is respon
sible for maintaining in peak condition the produc
tion equipment and process control installations
that, ever-increasingly. are the muscle-power of the
modern asbestos mine.
-
' As well as providing steady employment for
skilled production, maintenance and clerical work
ers, the specialized needs and goals of Quebec's
asbestos industry offer careers for engineers,
accountants, research and industrial hygiene tech
nicians, marketing specialists, traffic experts,
security personnel, skilled craftsmen of all types,
ventilation technicians, computer programmers,
electronic repairmen and a host of other vocations.
More than 95 per cent of all asbestos industry
employees v/ere born, raised and educated in the
mining communities themselves.
. A measure of the stability of the employment
offered by the industry is that, at one mining
company at least, over 50 per cent of the em
ployees have 25 years or more service.
J
r Asbestos Pay-Cheques
Asbestos mining is a primary industry. As such, the mining companies must purchase from secondary manufacturers or suppliers the millions of dollarsworth of equipment, supplies and services needed to keep mines and mills in operation. There are consequently some 0.000 Canadians, the vast majority of them in Quebec, who benefit directly and indirectly from asbestos mining.
These are just some of the secondary industries whose employees are paid, at least in part, by "asbestos pay-cheques'': -- transportation compa nies, machinery and equipment manufacturers, structural steel fabricators, automotive companies and truck-builders, electrical power distributors, oil refineries, explosives makers, paper and plastic container manufacturers, rubber companies, con struction firms, consulting engineers, diamond drill ing contractors, lumbermen and lawyers.
The store rooms cf a typical asbestos mining company stock owe' 14,003 separate items -- from giant jaw-crusher components to carbon paper. Virtually all these items are manufactured in Canada. Whenever feasible, they are purchased from sup pliers in the asbestos communities themselves.
Dozens of secondary industries in Quebec's asbestos towns depend on the mines for their business: -- foundries, armature rewinders, bag suppliers, trucking companies, industrial caterers, tire repair firms, steel fabricators, hardware sup pliers, building contractors.
The total value of the equipment, supplies and services purchased by Quebec's asbestos mines is
Jestimated to have increased from $3,000,000 in 1937
V
r
to over S42.000.0C0 in 1972. In recent years, continuing capital investment in the
development of new mines and in the modernization
and improvement of existing facilities has run as
hioh as $100 million a year. Exploration expenses in
Quebec during the 1957-1971 period amounted to
S23.437.C00, while earnings reinvested in Quebec
totalled 3107,955,000.
V:J
The World is our Market Place
Per-capita consumption of asbestos in Canada is
roughly comparable to that in the U.S. As a result,
this country supports a small but vigorous asbestos
products manufacturing industry, based mainly in
the densely populated cities.
And here there's a paradox. Even though asbestos
fibre is ideally suited for themanufacture of con
struction materials -- worldwide some 70 per cent
of Canada s asbestos output is used for this purpose
-- there's only a limited Canadian market for these
products.
. In a highly developed country like ours, asbestos-
based construction materials must compete with a
wide assortment of non-asbestos building materials,
including brick, wood, steel, cemant, aluminum,
plastics and even paper.
The competition is chiefly based on delivered
price at the building site. Although asbestos-cement
is a high-qu3iity construction material, it contains
comparatively little asbestos -- average 15 per cent.
The rest consists of cement, a dense materia! which,
in finished form, is uneconomical to transport over
long distances. Moreover, the non-asbestos ingre
dients are available at low cost virtually anywhere
on earth.
Because .of high transportation costs, asbestos-
cement construction materials can only be eco
nomically manufactured where the manufacturing
plant is located close to the market it serves.
These economic considerations, then, compel
foreign manufacturers to purchase their fibre re
quirements from Canadian asbestos mines, have
them shipped to their plants and mixed there with
J
r -\
locally obtained cement.
If, for any reason, the export from Canada of raw
asbestos to overseas markets were to be restricted,
and an attempt made to ship Canadian-made
asbestos-cement products in its place, the high cost
of importing these products would simply reduce
the market for asbestos-cement materials in the
countries where raw Canadian asbestos is now sold. For the Canadian asbestos industry, now exporting
95 per cent of its annual output, the consequences .
in terms of production, sales and employment would
be disastrous.
,
Canadian asbestos manufacturers can operate
profitably in the export market, such as the U.S..
only by producing a limited range of items with a
high asbestos fibre content. Current transportation
economics, however, and the composition of
asbestos-cement materials make it impossible for
the Canadian asbestos products industry to export
finished asbestos-cement products or other,
materials with a relatively low asbestos content
i
J
In recent years there has been growing public
concern about the risks to health associated with
asbestos.
Quebec's asbestos industry has long shared this
concern. It see__ .red in the 1930s some of the first
studies in North America of ashestos-related disease.
In the intervening years, it has expended millions '
upon millions of dollars on sophisticated equipment,
.systems and techniques aimed at protecting the
health of workers and of community residents by
eliminating dust emissions both inside and from its
mines and processing plants.
Through the Institute of Occupational and Environ
mental Health in Montreal, similar industrial health
organizations and selected hospitals and universi
ties around the world, the industry continues to
SUpOOrt intpnciyo p-v*Hpraiotrin'i??3rV..irt
res=rrh
prolecis-- i nesc <*ie unsigned to ioerrmr nate asbestos-based health risks not solely for Quebec's asbestos production workers, but also for the worldwide fabricators and users of finished products containing asbestos.
Scientific evidence amassed to date clearly indi
catIets ttehhant:c--tnfi..nlla.l hpallh. riclfg flrp basiCSlIV
Confined to the inh Rpttinn Fvprv cfpr is hpinr)
taken to eliminate tnese neaitn risk?. 2) Asbestos-related diseases develop, generally,
only after the inhalation of substantial quan
tities of asbestos dust for a period of many
years. 3) There is at present no evidence:
That exposure to the minute amounts of
J
.. o ^
asbestos that may be present in community . air constitutes any hazard whatsoever to
the general public. That any member of the public has ever
contracted an asbestos-related disease as a result of the normal use of asbestoscontaining products, let alone of the oc cupation of building in which asbestos
is incorporated. In view of the dose-response relationship that, according to scientific evidence to date, exists with asbestos-related disease, it now seems reasonable . to suppose that, by reducing the dose to which workers occupationally exposed to asbestos are subject, the current extension and improvement of dust control methods will lead to a reduction in the already low incidence of these rare diseases. In short, ail evidence indicates that the public is not at danger. The persons who may be exposed to risk - that is, the workers occupationally exposed to asbestos dust, now enjoy the protection of effectively controlled conditions, in the development of which the Canadian asbestos industry leads the world.
(NOTE:
With the aim of informing the public about the true facts
relating to asbestos and the health risk, the Quebec
Asbestos Information Service published in 1972 and
reedited in 1974 a brochure entitled "Asbestos and
Your Health". For a free copy, please write to the
Quebec Asbestos Mining Association at the address
shown.
VJ
Published by the Quebec Asbestos Mining Asso ciation on behalf of its member-companies: --
Asbestos Corporation Limited, Thetford Mines and Montreal, Que.
Bell Asbestos Mines Ltd., Thetford Mines. Que. Canadian Johns-Manville Co. Limited,
Asbestos, Que. Carey-Canadian Mines Ltd., East Broughton
Station, Que. 'Lake Asbestos of Quebec, Limited, Black Lake,
Que.
Accurate and up-to-date information about Que bec's asbestos-mining industry is available from these companies or by contacting the offices of the Quebec Asbestos Mining Association at the follow ing addresses: -- Room 412, 5 Place Ville Marie, Montreal H3B 2G2 Telephone: (514) 873-3539
or. Room 320,580 Grande Allee East, Quebec G1R 2K2 Telephone: (418) 523-8168
LITHO IN CANADA E3M0774
J
Dated this 19th day of March, 1982
GUNHUS, GRINNELL, JEFFRIES, KLINGER & SWENSON
By __________________ ,
Richard N. Jeffries 512 Center Avenue, P. 0. Box 1077 Moorhead, MN 56560 Attorneys for Carey Canada, Inc. (218) 236-6462
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing has been
mailed by first-class mail to all attorneys of record in this case
on the 19th day of March, 1982.
'
Richard N. Jeffries