Document DdBJpkk1LLMjXrdERXxj3MGq5
FDA 72-116 Fourth Quarterly Report
' June 1, 1973
Further refinements in analytical chemistry have been pursued and analytical capability is being expanded. No further progress has been made on the svine chronic toxicity study as analytical efforts have been directed'toward the kinetic studies. Some significant species variations in the kinetics of Aroclor 1254 are becoming apparent in swine and sheep. 2he pilot swine reproduction study is near completion and the contract modification involving blood and backfat kinetics has been initiated.
I. Analytical Chemistry
A. Extraction technique
Extraction of all tissues with hexane-saturated acetonitrile ap
pears to be more efficient than the hexane extraction originally pro
posed. Recovery from fat samples has been demonstrated to be more
complete using a method similar to the blood extractions reported in
the Ibird Quarterly Report.
B. Column Chromatographic Evaluation
Silica gel (grade 950> Davison Chemical) has 6hown promise in
sample# clean-up. Separation of chlorinated* pesticides and detector contaminants in feces, fat and feed is improved by using 12 cm Eilica
gel in a 6 mm i.d. column; an elution volume of JO ml hexane is ade
quate to remove all PCBs and leave most contaminants behind. Alumina
is still used for blood clean up, but silica gel will probably replace
alumina in the processing of feed, feces and tissue samples.
OSW 037516
STLCOPCB4021340
-2-
C. Gas-Liquid Chromatographic Quantitation Quantitation by digital integration has been somewhat inconsistent
for low-response peaks when concentrations fell below 0.3 ppm Aroclor. Separate standard curves have demonstrated that, at low concentrations of the smaller peaks, peak height/amount injected is a more consistent parameter than integrated area/amount injected; at higher concentrations and for larger peaks (e.g. n, o, p) the integrated area remains the most satisfactory measurement. In addition, peak-height measurements allow quantitation of the later peaks ( q, r, s end t) which wbb not practical in the earlier studies. II. Pilot Swine Reproduction Study. Although the number of animals was too small to warrant definitive conclusions, the study does show some trends. Residue end histopathology data are not complete, but the performance data, while of a pilot nature only, do show some apparent detrimental effects of low level feeding of Aroclor 1242. 5he treated sows were bred in the order of presentation (numbers 2 through 6). Sows 2, 3 and 4 received treated feed for 4-5 weeks before breeding; sow 5 was mated after eight weeks on the diet but came into heat and was ma#ted again three weeks later; sow 6 was unsuccessfully' mated after 7 weeks on the diet and subsequently confined with the boar for 3 weeks, isolated for 2 months, then returned to the boar for an additional 3 weeks. Ihis sow never farrowed end was terminated, excluding her data from the experimental group; the lack of fertility may have been due to PCB'e, how ever, since she had farrowed three times prior to the experiment. Close
DSU 037517
STLCOPCB4021341
Table II. 1. Farrowing Records of Sows Receiving Control Rations . or Rations Containing 20 ppm Aroclor 1242.
Sow Treatment
2. 1242
3. 1242
4. 1242
5. 6.3)
1242 1242
Means
Weight3-) (lbs.)
590-547
580-513
595-495 635-550 630-660
No. No'. Matings Pigs
No. Stillborn
1 13
2
1 11
1
17 25 30
1 0 --
9*o 3.7 1.0
Mummified2) Fetuses
0
1 8
1
Number and Mean Weight of Live Pigs
11 2.6 lbs.
10 3.3 '
6 3.0
5 3.4
mm
2.5 8.0 2.9
7. 8.
9* 10. u. Means
Control Control Control Control Control
590-445 610-446 585-450 570-433 580-444
1 18 1 12 1 11 1 11 1 12
12.8 3.0
51*) 0 1 0 1 1.4
0 0 0 0 1 0.20
13 '2.4 12 3.3 10 3.6 11 3.2 11 3.3 11.4 1.1
1) Farrowing weight; second number, when present, is weaning weight of sow. 2) Hot included in number of pigs born. 3; Rot included'in means.
4) Last five in litter; delivered 28-36 hours after first pig.
DSW 037518
STLCOPCB4021342
Table II. 2. Performance Records of Pigs From Pilot Reproduction Study
Treatment
1242 1242 1242 1242 Means
Number of live pigs and mean weiffots (lbs)
1 week
3 weeks
7 weeks
ti weeks*7
No. Wt.
Mo. Wt.
No. Wt.
No. Wt.
7 6.1
7 11.1
6 31*6
6 36.5
7 5*5 6 7.4
7 11.8 6 14.8
7 33.9 6 38.0
7 39.4 6 42.2
5 7.3
5 15.2
5 37.8
5 42.2
39.9 - 5.6
Total Pounds sow
219 276 253 211 240
Control
7 5-6
6 15.8
6 32.7
6 41.2
* 247
Control
10 5.6
10 15.6
10 37.5
10 44.8
. 448
Control
62) 6.5
6 15.I
6 39.7
6 43.8
263
Control
11 6.4
11 16.9
11 35.8
11 4o.l
44l
o
Control
10 5.1 ..... 10 10.2 ........ 9 32.6
9 37.2.........
335
C/5
sc Means
41.3 - 6.6
347
oGUJij 1) Mean and standard deviation calculated from individual weights for each litter. >0 2) Sow 9 only six functional teats.
STLCOPCB4021343
Hfeble II. 3* Grgan/Body Ratios for Sows and Pigs Organ Weight/Body Weight (mean x 10^)
GroupLiverKidneySpleenHeart.___________ BrainThyroidAdrenal
Pigs 1242 Control
25.20 l.TO 24.23 .97
4.39 *70 5.08 .35
1.27 .13 1.72 ,2k
k.ko .35 4.82 .51
3-TO .J>k 3.55 .44
.076 .008 .111 .015
.068 .012 .080 i .010
Sows
1242 Control
14.50 1.68 11.37 .08
2.02 .40 1.71 -33
1.19 .19 1.09 .05
2.53 .22 2.64 .40
57 .06 70 .40
.050 .003 .055
.056 i .008 .070 i .002
STLCOPCB4021344
(GA st OfUvUoM1ii
Group
1242
Control
Illinois Average
n 8 15
Crushed
25* 40*
30.9*
liable II. 4 Causes of Death of Live-Born Pigs
Starvation
0 33-3*
Cause of Death and Occurence
Born Weak
Diarrhea
Septicemia
37.5#
6.6*
12.5* 0
12.5* 13.3*
17.6
14.7
12.9
Congenital
12.5*
' 6.6*
-3-
observation in confinement revealed no evidence of abortion and post mortem examination revealed enlarged ovaries vith cystic follicles. Treated sows had somewhat larger livers than control sows (Table II. J).
Stable II. 1. indicates that the number of pigs farrowed decreases in the treatment group with length of exposure to PCB. Although the compari sons between treated and control litters may not be highly significant, longer exposure may exaggerate these differences. The number of mummified fetuses 1b quite large for the treated group, and, since the sows were con fined within close proximity, factors such as brucellosis and other communic able diseases can be discounted.
After the first week, few pigs were lost and the mean weights of the surviving pigs did not vary to any great extent between groups (Table II. 2) nevertheless, if all these subtle differences are summated, the treated group produced on average of 2^0 pounds of eight-week pigs per sow while the control group performed nearly 50$ better with 3^7 Poun<ls of pig per sow. Thus It appears that reproductive efficiency is decreased in swine ae well as mink and chickens with exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls.
Ik-om a limited number of milk samples, it is estimated that the sows generally excreted about 2 ppm PCB in the milk, a level not approaching the 50 ppm in cow's milk detected after a similar feeding level. This indicates a definite species variation and perhaps should be pursued further. III. Swine Chronic Toxicity Study.
Performance data have been reported previously, indicating that both Arodors exert a detrimental effect on swine production; the difference van greatest in the groups receiving a normal ration and somewhat reduced
DSW 037522
STLCOPCB4021346
lbble III. Organ-Body Ratios for Swine Chronic Toxicity Study
_________________ Organ Weight/Body Weight (mean x 10^)
Diet Normal Normal Normal
Treatment Control
1242 123b
Liver 16.4 1.24 15.2 1.1 15.3 2.0
Spleen 1.43 .43 I.63 .38 I.56 .36
Brain 1.15 .08 1.19 .12 1.05 .12
Heart 3.99 -40 3.94 .29 3.84 .14
Kidneys 3.63 .45 3.50 .33 3.45 .51
Thyroid .063 .016 .054 .007 .058 ,0o6
Adrenals .037 .009 .052 .013 .055 .009
m fat Hi fat Hi fat
Control 1242 1254
14.4 .66 15.8 1.09 16.5 1.12
1.55 .30 1.8l .35 1.54 .25
1.09 .40 1.06 .15 0.97 .12
3-97 .23 3.83 .39 3.45 .23
3.21 .41 3.63 .38 3.47 .65
.064 (n=*l) .063 .016 .063 .008
ND ND .052 .012 .047 .008
Lo Pro Lo' Pro Lo Pro
Control 1242 1254
17.1 1.2 17.7 i 1.6 17.7 1.2
1.57 .32 I.67------1.75 *20
1.48 .25 1.36 .35 1.15 .24
3.82 .26 4.17 .31 3.73 .49
2.97 .33 3-41 .50 3.13 .60
ND ND .061 .014 .063 .008
.062 .010 .056 .009 .043 .010
(oS) ar
oU) \lU\XJ>\
STLCOPCB4021347
-4-
in the groupB receiving a high fat ration, vhile the control plge on a low-protein ration performed more poorly than those on low protein treat ed rations.
Organ to body ratios have been calculated (Tfeble III). There appear to be no significant variations in any of the groups. This Is an unex pected result, especially for the livers since PCB's have been shown to cause hepatic enlargement in other species and in the sows from the re productive study described previously. The lack of significant variation may be due to the relatively low dose (20 ppm) which the animals received. IV. Pharmacokinetics of Aroclor 1254 after Intravenous Administration in
Sheep and Pigs. Three cross-bred sheep and three cross-bred pigs were administered in
travenous doses of Aroclor 125k In propylene glycol. The dosage in both species was 5 mg/kg given as an I.v. bolus. Blood samples were collected for 24 hours following injection. In the sheep, injections were made by needle and syringe into a Jugular vein and samples taken from the opposite Jugular vein. The pigs were fitted with indwelling venous cannulas for injection as well as sampling.
The three sheep (5-8 year old ewes) weighed JO, 58, and 8l kg and the average dose was 208 mg. The three pigs (2 gilts and 1 barrow 10-12 weeks old) weighed 29, 29, and 58 kg and the average dose was 96 mg.
Blood samples were extracted with hexane-saturated acetonitrile and analyzed for PCB with electron capture gas chromatography as previously described. Individual PCB components were quantitated on the basis of the relative anounts normally present in the commercial mixture (ie. component concentration is given as "1.0 ppm" at level present in 1 ppm Aroclor 1254);
DSW 037524
STLCOPCB4021348
-5-
components were also quantitated on the basis of actual component concen
tration by utilizing the percentage contributed to the commercial mixture
by that component. The relative concentrations of components (ie. as
Aroclor) can be used for estimation of all rate constants and for comparing
relative accumulation or depletion of components.
The i.v. data was fit to a two-compartment open model by a high speed
computer program for solution of the general least squares problem (Moore
and Zeigler, 1959).
The general two-compartment open model:
hB
Central
Peripheral
h
V
elimination metabolism
h
The mathematical two-compartment open model:
dA * KgB - K^A - K^A
dB * KjA - KgB dt
The equation for the open two-compartment system, derived by inte
grating the model differential equations:
I
Dose (a.
+ j)ose (Kg - p)e"a^
WA (aT-p)
VA (p - a)
or CA - Ae"at + Be" ^ A or
C. log A -at + log B - p t
A 2.3
2.3
DSW 037525
STLCOPCB4021349
-6-
vhere:
CA * Blood concentration at time t.
A Bloodconcentration contributed by compartment A at t=0.
B Bloodconcentration contributed by compartment B at t0.
Of First order rate constant of elimination from compartment A.
0 First order rate constant of elimination from compartment B.
V. * Volume of the central compartment. ii '
Ihe following relationships are used to calculate pharmacokinetic
parameters for an open two-compartment system.
;
Co (Blood concentration at t*0) = A + B
t^A (central compartment) ** .693 Ct
t^B (peripheral compartment) .693 .0
- a+0-Kg-Kj
Kg * ap/K^ K, C0/A + B
p a0
VA " Dose/A + B
Vd (apparent volume of distribution) **. Dose B
TBC (total body clearance) 0Dose
B
9.
The values for A, B, cct and 0 are generated by the computer program.
Tables IV.l. and IV.2. contain calculated pharmacokinetic parameters
for the designated components of Aroclor 125** in sheep and pigs. The var
ious components have previously been designated by letter and character
ized by mass spectrometry and GC fractionation to provide information on
percent chlorination and percent of each component to the total PCB in
QSW 037526
STLCOPCB4021350
-7-
the standard solution* Pharmacokinetic information was not obtained for components m, q, end
r in sheep because of insufficient data. Component m was not seen in sheep blood three hours after injection. ^ Components q and r, relatively small fractions of Aroclor 1254, were not detected with enough consistency in sheep blood to permit proper data analysis.
She values for apparent volume of distribution (Vd) and total body clearance (TBC) are based on component values relative to the standard Aroclor 1254.
Tables IV.J. and IV.4. contain the blood concentrations of each com ponent of Aroclor 1254 for 24 hours in sheep and pigs. Total PCB concen trations for each sampling time are obtained by summing values on indivi dual components.
Figures IV.l. through IV.4. are representative semi-log plots of data for two components in sheep and pigs. Solid dots represent the actual mean values. Circles represent the calculated functions. Bars represent stan dard deviations of actual means. Solid lines represent the fitted curve and broken lines represent extrapolations of calculated functions.
The slopes, representing elimination from compartments A and B are indicated by - Q/2.5 and - P/2.5, respectively.
Figures IV.5* and IV.6. contain the semi-log plots of fitted curves for each component relative to the standard Aroclor 1254 in sheep and pigs. Blood concentrations are given as ppm.
Figures IV.7* and IV. 8. contain the semi-log plots of fitted curves for each component of Aroclor 1254. Blood concentrations are given as ppB.
The slopes for each component remain the same whether it is shown in
OSW 037527
STLCOPCB4021351
-8terms of 1254 or actual concentration, but the positioning on the graph relative to the other components varies because the components are pre sent at different percentages in the standard mixture and they are eli minated at different rates. For example, at 24 hours in sheep, there is more of components o and p relative to the amounts injected, but there is more of component K in absolute quantity.
Figure IV.9 shows the disappearance of total PCB (summation of all components) from blood for 24 hours in sheep and pigs. In the sheep, the concentrations of components m, q, and r were used where available for total PCB concentration, even though these components were not fit to the model.
DSW 037528
STLCOPCB4021352
Table IV 1. Estimated Pharmacokinetic Parameters for Aroclor 125*+ Components in Sheep (3.0 mg/kg IV)
A ppm .
a Hr-1
B
ppm
t^A Hr-1 Hr.
t|B Hr.
Vd
Li.
TBC
Li/Hr.
J
.647
.584 .103
.107
1.188
6.492
2019.42
216.08
k .664 .455 .129 .028 1.524 25.106
1612.42
45.15
1 .794 .731 .077 .050
.948 13.767 ; 2701.30
135.07
n .612 .394 .134 .045 1.758 15.399 ; 1552.24
69.85
0 .628 .494 .202 .042 1.404 16,400
1029.70
43.25
P .638 ..253 .142 .029 2.733 23.970
1464.79
42.48
Table IV. 2. Estimated Pharmacokinetic Parameters for Aroclor 1254 Components in Pigs
(3.0 mg/Kg IV)
A
aB
8 . t^A
t^B
ppm
Hr-1 ppm
Hr"1
Hr.
Hr.
Vd
Li.
i 1.284
.768 .189
.058
.903 ' 11.991
508.47
k 1.136
.400 .188
.029
1.732 23.561
511.17
1 1.123 .425 .110 .033 1.630 21.178
873.64
XU
n 1.438 o 1.4o8 p 1.309 4 1.230 r 1.818
.534
.583 .521 .402
.805
.287 .344 .489 .370 .806
.054 .044 .037 ;028 .072
1.298 1.189 1.329 1.725
.861
12.731 15.886 18.582 24.517
9.668
334.84 279.36 196.52 259.73 119.23
TBC
Li/Hr. 24.49 14.82 28.83
18.08 12.29
7.27 7.27 8.58
DSW 037529
STLCOPCB4021353
Table IV. 3. Concentration of Individual Components of Aroclor 1254 in Sheep Blood After 3*0 mg/Kg IV
Mean ppb each Component
Time
(hours)
.i
k
1
m
n
o
p
q
r
1 72 90 44 36 94 79 54 16 17 2 ' 48 66 27 19 69 60 4l 11 12
3
27 45 l4 12 45 4o 35
8 11
4
24 4l 13 -- 45 39 30
7 10
6 . 12
25
6
27 28 21
5--
8
7 20
6
20 24 17
3--
12
5 15
4 -- 14 16 11
1--
24
11
2 ----
8 11
6 ...
mmm
Table IV, 4, Concentration of Individual Components of Aroclor 1254
in Pig Blood After 3*0 mg/Kg IV
__________ Mean pob each Component
Time (hours) -d ... k l m n o J> _ ..q r
1 125 165 89 91 185 152 102 27 32
2 69 . no 57 54 127 104 72 17 20
3
48 83 4o 39
87 73 60 l4 16
4
34* 66 32 30
70 58 49 13 14
6
26 45 20 20
46 47 34 9 11
8 17 33 n 8 32 32 30 6 8
12 17 22 10 5 27 31 29 6 7
24 8 15 5 4 13 16 16 4 3
Total PCB (pnm) .502 .353 .237 .209 .124 .097 .066 .038
Total PCB (nnra)
.968 .630 .460 .366 .258 .177 .154 .084
DSU 037530
STLCOPCB4021354
SCMl-LOGAnUUMtC 4G 4 9 7 0
2 CYCL.ES X 7 0 O lV lC tO H S K IM m * % .*. K E U FFC L ft ES- ER CO*
SEM I-LO G AR ITH M I
c
v' / sv or-
c--o/<- t
-7--
/<2O/vJ /3 0 /^ aS7- a 4 $
/JZi> < /
SEMl-LOCARITHMtC 4 6 4 9 7 0
U: ^ c /v/ ' ^ Wf '
t-/n, r~.
Cor,Jro7~J or
CT O & /Jt. V-
rt/?0CCo/2
STLCOPCB4021360
SEM I-LO G ARITHM !
c.:c> "'/A'a'^y <-- ^ / t vr f-TA_ CJCL-C. cjxlt -.* v
<20'77/9>aS~*S7~
/^ /9
STLCOPCB4021363
C 6LM I.LOGARITHMIC 4G 4970
9Em Z CYCLES X 70 DIVISIONS uKIl *.*..
K KCUFFEL ft KSCR CO.
'
/
r>07.o 0,7/v
Projected Progress Most of the samples and data from the 1254 kinetic studies have heen collected and the data are being analyzed statistically for presentation. Information has been accumulated which should permit more rapid assess ment of the kinetics of Aroclor 1242. We have expanded our analytical capability and soon should be able to analyze tissue samples from the chronic and reproduction studies along vith the weekly influx of blood samples. Hie contract modification funded by the Bureau of Foods has been initiated and data should be complete by the next reporting period. Chicken and catfish studies are to be initiated during this quarter and the synthesis of purified PCB analogs will begin.
DStt 037540
STLCOPCB4021364