Document BrYx5m2Gr3zg1mgJ0kG2ZyNk

jean B. Sw. Staff Vice F' es 3M Environmental, Health and Safety Operations QcWq-qp- 3 ? 3 Certified Mail AUX-, - 900 Bush Avenue, Building 42: 2E-26 PO Box 33331 St. Paul, MN 55133-3331 651 778 5488 O December 15, 2008 Document Processing Center EPA East - Room 6428 Attn: Section 8(e) Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics US EPA 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington DC 20460-0001 No CBI RE: TSCA 8(e) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION SUBMISSION for Sulfonate-based and Carboxylic-based Fluorochemicals: Docket No. 8EHQ-1180-373 To whom it may concern: Enclosed please find the presentation Analysis o f the Homologus Series ofPerfluorocarboxylates - Perfluorobutanoate (C4) through Perfluorododecanoate (Cl2)from American Red Cross Adult Blood Donors, 2006, by Geary Olsen, Mark Ellefson, and William Reagen. This presentation was prepared for the SETAC North American 29thannual meeting and presented on November 19, 2008. The data provided in the presentation focus on plasma C4 - C12 perfluorocarboxylate levels in samples collected in 2006 from donors in six different US locations. Comparisons are made to a similar set of data from samples collected in 2000. Declines were previously noted from 2000 - 2006 for perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS) and perfluoroooctanoate (PFOA) (see Olsen et al. ES&T 2008; 42:4989-4995). In the presentation submitted herein, plasma concentrations for perfluorononanoate (PFNA), perfluorodecanoate (PFDA), and perfluoroundecanoate (PFUnDA), appeared to have increased. Strong correlations were also observed between higher chain lengths and weak correlations were observed between higher and lower chain lengths. Perfluorobutyrate (PFBA) was also measured and appeared to have declined between 2000 and 2006. ' Please note that 3M historically did not manufacture, and does not currently produce, the higjher homologs or their precursors. 3M does not believe that any of these data taken alone or cumulatively meet the "substantial risk" reporting threshold as defined by EPA., We nevertheless recognize the on-going work of the U.S. EPA to assess fluorochemical exposure pathways. Therefore, we are placing these results in the 8(e) docket as a supplement to previous submissions. If you have any questions or would like any additional information, please contact Deanna Luebker at (651) 737-1374 or diluebker@mmm.com. ^ l^ (A toS ) COW W ISNOC Jean B. Sweeney Staff Vice President, 3M Environmental, Health and Safety Operations TSCA CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION DOES NOT CONTAIN NATIONAL SECURITY INFORMATION (E.D. 12065) av'la i1"'- f yfi Analysis of the Homologous Series of Periluorocarboxylates - Perfluorobutanoate (C4) through Perfluorododecanoate (C12) from American Red Cross Adult Blood Donors, 2006 - r2 C'J setac North America 29thAnnual Meeting Tampa Bay, Florida November 19, 2008 CD Geary Olsen1 Mark Ellefson2 William Reagen2 123M Company,1Medical Department, Environmental Laboratory Acknowledgements 3M - John Butenhoff - Sue Chang - Larry Zobel American Red Cross - David Mair - Theresa Boyd - Ross Herron - Zahra Medhdizadehkashi - John Nobiletti - Jorge Rios University of Minnesota - Tim Church Methods (Olsen et al. ES&T 2008;42:4989-4995 Study design - Total of 600 plasma samples collected 100 plasma samples were collected between May and July 2006 in each of six locations - Boston, MA; Charlotte, NC; Hagerstown, MD; Los Angeles, CA; MpIs-St.Paul, MN; Portland, OR. - 10 samples per each sex and age group >20-29 > 30-39 >40-49 > 50-59 > 60-69 Methods Analytical - PFOS (perfluorooctanesulfonate, c 8f 17s o 3-) - PFOA (perfluorooctanoate, C7F15C 0 2) - PFHS (perfluorooctanehexanesulfonate c 6f 13s o 3-) - PFBS (perfluorobutanesulfonate, C4F9S 0 3) - Me-PFOSA-AcOH (N-methyl perfluorooctanesulfonamidoacetate, C8F17S 02N(CH3)CH2C 0 0 ) - Et-PFOSA-AcOH (N-ethyl perfluorooctanesulfonamidoacetate, C8F17S 0 2N(CH2CH3)CH2C 0 0 ) N a of adults Distribution of PFOS Concentrations (ng/mL), American Red Cross Blood Donors, 2000 - 2006 PFOS (ng/mL) No. of adults Distribution of PFOA Concentrations (ng/mi_), American Red Cross Blood Donors, 2000 - 2006 PFOA (ng/mL) Geometric Mean (95% Cl) Concentrations CDC NHANES 9> Q. and American Red Cross Studies, 1999-2006 Calafat et al. ES&T 2007;41:2237-2242 Olsen etal. EHP 2003;111:1892-1901 Calafat et al. EHP 2007;115:1596-1602 Olsen et al. ES&T 2008;42:4989-4995 40.0 INHANES (1999-2000) IAm Red Cross (2000-2001) INHANES (2003-2004) IAm Red Cross (2006) Concentration (ng/mL) PFOS PFOA PFHS Me-PFOSAAcOH Et-PFOSAAcOH 95th Percentile (upper bound), CDC NHANES and American Red Cross Studies, 1999-2006 Calafat et al. EST 2007;41:2237-2242 Olsen et al. EHP 2003;111:1892-1901 Calafat et al. EHP 2007;115:1596-1602 Olsen et al. ES&T 2008;42:4989-4995 ion (ng/mL) p. 10 PFOS PFOA PFHS M e-P F O S A AcOH Et-PFOSAAcOH Age- and Sex-Adjusted PFOS Concentrations (ng/mL) American Red Cross Blood Donors, 2000 - 2006, by Six Geographical Locations PFOS (ng/mL) o Ol o o o A to Is) 04 to cn o Ol O Ol o oooo Ol Ol o> Ol o Ol o oooo __ i__ __ i__ __ i__ __ i__ __ __ __ __ i__ __ __ Boston 2000 Boston 2006 Charlotte 2000 IT* -- 4 ^ ------- X Charlotte 2006 V Hagerstown 2000 Hagerstown 2006 Los Angeles 2000 Los Angeles 2006 Mpls-St. Paul 2000 Mpls-St. Paul 2006 Portland 2000 Portland 2006 _A~ "t * fr* X X coo <D ocu3. S X 3c 3 <03D) s 3 3 C 3 Ois <"Di 0c g <D o Age- and Sex-Adjusted PFOA Concentrations (ng/mL) American Red Cross Blood Donors, 2000 - 2006, by Six Geographical Locations PFOA (ng/mL) oo o-- oN ao c oo - i o^ mc-- on mO o' J oO 'o Portland 2006 p. 13 Methods Current Analysis Target Analytes - PFBA (perfluorobutanoate, C3F7C 0 2') - PFPeA (perfluoropentanoate, C4F9C 0 2") - PFHA (periluorohexanoate CgF^CO^) - PFHpA (perfluoroheptanoate, c 6f 13c o 2-) - PFOA (perfluorooctanoate, ^7^15^02') - PFNA (perfluorononanoate, C8Fi 7C 0 2') - PFDA (perfluorodecanoate, ^9^ igC02') - PFUnA (perfluoroundecanoate, C 10F21CO2 ) - PFDoA (perfluorododecanoate, C h F23C02') Methods Analytical - Target analytes extracted by protein precipitation in acetonitrile - Perfluoro-n-[1,2,3,413C]octanoic acid spiked into all samples and the matrix-matched fetal bovine serum calibration curve prior to extraction for use as an internal standard -Quantitation accomplished by HPLC/MS/MS using Applied Biosystems MDS Sciex API 5000 triple quadrupole mass spectrometer p. 15 Methods Analytical - Quality control elements for each batch of samples extracted Spiked control human plasma at two levels Spiked control bovine serum at three levels MPFBA, MPFDA, and MPFDoA spiked into each sample pre-extraction to determine extraction efficiency MPFOA spiked into each sample pre-extraction as an Internal Standard Matrix-matched calibration curve and solvent calibration curve prepared with each batch Methods Analytical -Q uality assurance Split samples (n = 60) Reanalysis of 2000 Am Red Cross serum samples (n = 78) using 2006 methods American Red Cross 2006 Plasma Samples (N = 600), Percent Above (blue) and Below (red) LOQs PFBA PFPeA PFHA PFHpA PFOA PFNA PFDA PFUnA PFDoA American Red Cross 2006 (N = 600), Measures of Central Tendency in Plasma Concentrations (ng/mL) PFBA PFPeA PFHA PFHpA PFOA PFNA PFDA PFUnA PFDoA Arithmetic Mean 0.80 0.07 0.07 0.14 4.40 1.04 0.36 0.22 0.04 Geometric Mean 0.33 0.06 0.06 0.09 3.44 0.97 0.34 0.18 0.03 Range 0.04 - 8.63 0.03 - 0.96 0.04-1.53 0.02 - 2.030 0.78 - 53.70 0.12-5.10 0.05 - 5.270 0.02-3.17 0.04 - 0.44 Comparison of CDC NHANES 2003-2004 (Serum) and American Red Cross 2006 Plasma Concentrations (ng/mL) Geometric Means with 95% Cl (or Median when LOD) Compound_______ CDC* Am Red Cross (95% Cl) PFHpA PFOA PFNA PFDA <0.3 (LOD) 3.9 (3 .6 -4 .3 ) 1.0 (0.8-1.1) <0.3 (LOD) 0.09 (0.08-0.09) 3.44 (3.30-3.59) 0.97 (0.93-1.05) 0.34 (0.33-0.35) PFUnA <0.3 (LOD) PFDoA <1.0 (LOD) *Calafat et al. EHP 2007 0.18 (0.17-0.19) 0.03 to.03-0.04) Multivariate Scatterplot Matrix 4- , * 3-j 2-| 1-j PFBA i4 t - . i. -7i 0.4^ sa 0.1=1 - PFPeA # b- ' :L 4V S i*.,. . k - # % k -i " L , . . . i i4 m i4 m j 20 4 i-.. - PFHA % # r ... . - * fc - PFHpA f t - -- - .1 fe e - - - 5- j 3-I fc -51 L ||k : PFOA i L: a PFNA $ * L .t - .1 . .L . a" * / fc -s q -fe . 1 t lc-. fe *-*-* PFDA J 3 fe -- - b . . - fe -'-.' K - . PFUnA 0.3-f v> 0.1-1 1 12 3 kfcr-r. TTin'ii -v--ri l " -1111" . r . 1........... 4 .1 .3 .5 .7 .9 1 *L % # . * am a % A* * : , * - *1i n r | T " T ' ; ii i it tttt r " | " i |' i q 'T rrr * 10 20 30 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 .51 2 PFDoA 3 .1 .2 .3 .4 p. 20 Multivariate Scatterplot Matrix i L is ta k i ' * !* a p. 21 In PFBA In PFPeA )' i !k \ - -S ' 1 s A- AA fe . - . ----- in PFHA ; *I k/ - v" A - & In PFHpA J j- g; li w t 1 %1 fe - # m m il- In PFOA # # .J K - o In PFNA / S - f .A IT * > In PFDA # i* ' j^ F ? :-- f w* ^---- 1] > t #- \ m . f e r i - | \y - . : * 0 # -O * In PFUnA if # In PFDoA Multivariate Correlations In PFBA In PFPeA In PFHA In PFHpA In PFOA In PFNA In PFDA In PFUnA In PFDoA In PFBA 1.0000 0.2648 -0.0239 0.0701 0.0781 0.0887 0.0450 0.0116 0.0660 In PFPeA 0.2648 1.0000 0.0715 -0.1117 -0.1463 -0.1941 -0.2156 -0.1129 -0.1709 In PFHA In PFHpA -0.0239 0.0701 0.0715 -0.1117 1.0000 0.0431 0.0431 1.0000 0.0222 0.4406 -0.0026 0.3773 0.0249 0.3635 0.0689 0.1451 0.0702 0.1780 In PFOA 0.0781 -0.1463 0.0222 0.4406 1.0000 0.6805 0.5580 0.2884 0.2605 In PFNA 0.0887 -0.1941 -0.0026 0.3773 0.6805 1.0000 0.8538 0.6334 0.5563 In PFDA In PFUnA In PFDo/> 0.0450 0.0116 0.0660 -0.2156 -0.1129 -0.1709 0.0249 0.0689 0.0702 0.3635 0.1451 0.1780 0.5580 0.2884 0.2605 0.8538 0.6334 0.5563 1.0000 0.7281 0.7164 0.7281 1.0000 0.8250 0.7164 0.8250 1.0000 - p. 22 2000 American Red Cross Serum Samples (N = 645) Compared to 2000 QC Reanalyzed w/2006 (N = 78): 50 45 40 ^ 35 1 30 Geometric Means (95% Cl) 10 5 0 PFOS PFOA PFHxS Et-PFOSAAcOH MePFOSAAcOH 2000 American Red Cross QC Serum Samples (N = 78) vs 2006 Plasma Samples (N = 600): Geometric Mean (95% Cl) Concentration (ng/mL) p. 24 2006 American Red Cross Plasma Samples (N = 600) by Location: Geometric Means Boston Charlotte Hagerstown Los Angeles Mpls-St. Paul Portland Concentration (ng/mL) 2000 American Red Cross QC Serum Samples (N = 78) vs. 2006 Plasma Samples (N = 600): Percent Branched PFOS & PFOA Percent Branched PFOS PFOA 2006 American Red Cross Plasma Samples ,(N = 600): Percent Branched PFOS, by Location 60 2006 American Red Cross Plasma Samples (N = 600): Percent Branched PFOA, by Location 10 8 c6 p. 28 p. 29 Serum Elimination Half-lives in Humans Geo Mean ComDound Half-life 95% Cl PFBA PFOA 2.7 days 3.5 yrs 1 .9 -3 .8 3.0-4.1 Reference Chang et al. Tox Sei 2008 Olsen et al. EHP2007 PFBS PFHxS PFOS 25.8 days 7.3 yrs 4.8 vrs 16.6-40.2 5 .8 -9 .2 4 .0 -5 .8 Olsen etal. Toxicol 2008 Olsen et al. EHP 2007 Olsen et al. EHP 2007 PFOS Summary American Red Cross Studies 2000 - 2006 - Approximate 60 percent decline in PFOS serum concentrations between 2000 and 2006. No change in ratio of linear to branched isomers from 2000 to 2006 - Comparable percentage declines across age, sex, and locations - Consistent with serum elimination half-life of PFOS and phase-out time period * Long half-like likely due to saturable renal resorption CO Q. Summary (continued) PFBA - Average plasma concentrations of 2 ng/mL in 2000; 85% reduction by 2006 PFPeA - majority of 2006 values < LLOQ PFHA - majority of 2006 values < LLOQ PFHpA - 34% reduction in average concentration from 2000 to 2006; 1/3 values < LOQ in 2006 Summary (continued) PFOA - Decline in PFOA concentrations was also observed but lower percentage than PFOS. - 2000 samples had an average of 5.3% branched PFOA while samples from 2006 contained 3.2% branched PFOA isomers. - Suggests PFOA can not be solely attributed to POSF-based production activities despite the strong correlations between PFOS and PFOA Half-life of PFOA is less than PFOS p. 33 Summary (continued) PFNA - 100% increase in average concentration from 2000 to 2006. Consistent with CDC findings. PFDA - 100% increase in average concentration from 2000 to 2006 PFUnDA - 80 % increase in average concentration from 2000 to 2006 PFDoA - Majority of 2006 values < LLOQ Summary (continued) Strong Correlations - Observed between higher chain pe rfIuo roca rboxy Iates PFOA/PFNA PFNA/PFDA PFDA/PFUnA PFUnA/PFDoA p. 35 Summary (continued) Weak Correlations - Observed between higher chain and lower chain periluorocarboxylates