Document B53pzrEOwO06d2RzDOOvYVR7L

Download
To: From: Sent: Subject: Dravis, Samantha[dravis.samantha@epa.gov] EPA Press Office Mon 8/21/2017 10:55:01 AM DENVER POST: EPA chief Scott Pruitt right to pursue funds for Gold King Mine victims THE DENVER POST EPA Chief Scott Pruitt Right to Pursue Funds for Gold King Mine Victims Editorial August 19, 2017 The EPA notoriously denied around 70 claims that were filed in the aftermath of the spill, amounting to $1.2 billion in damages for things like harm to the tourism industry that relies on the river, farmers who were unable to water their crops, ranchers who had to treat water before giving it to cattle, and countless other impacts. The government claimed sovereign immunity -- the long-held principal that the federal government cannot be sued. It's an infuriating rule, but one that exists for good reason. The EPA employees who triggered the Gold King deluge were trying to help. They were working on privately owned property to help clean up historic contamination from decades of mining operations. Opening up the EPA for lawsuits in such situations sets a dangerous precedent. But sometimes the government's negligence is so egregious that hiding behind sovereign immunity -- as the EPA did under President Barack Obama -- becomes shameful. Lawmakers in Colorado did the right thing by approving $4.3 million in settlement payments with families who lost loved ones and homes in the Lower North Fork Fire. That fire was started by a government agency controlled burn. There are times when sovereign immunity, or limits on government liability, are unjust and lawmakers are wise to realize that and compensate victims for their losses. We are glad Pruitt has committed to re-reviewing the claims that were denied under Obama. Sierra Club v. EPA, 1:17-cv-01906 ED_001523_00006573-00001 lliil|i||gf|^ilJliJillSI*^ Sierra Club v. EPA, 1:17-cv-01906 ED_001523_00006573-00002