To: Cc: From: Sent: Subject:
Hupp, Sydney[hupp.sydney@epa.gov] Dickerson, Aaron[dickerson.aaron@epa.gov]; Wagner, Kenneth[wagner.kenneth@epa.gov] Paul Walker Thur 6/8/2017 6:20:52 PM Re: PUC Coordination Meeting
Wow. That's really unfortunate -1 just told six PUC commissioners from across the U.S. yesterday that we were confirmed.
Is there no way to meet on the 16th, as planned?
Paul Walker
On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 7:40 AM, Hupp, Sydney <hupp.sydney@epa.gov> wrote:
Unfortunately it looks like the 16th will no longer work for us. Could we potentially look at the week of the 19th?
Thank you!
Sydney Hupp Executive Scheduler Office of the Administrator 202.816.1659 (c)
From: Hupp, Sydney Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2017 11:59 AM To: 'Paul Walker' <pwalker@conservamerica.org> Cc: Dickerson, Aaron <dickerson.aaron@epa.qov>; Wagner, Kenneth <wagner.kenneth@epa.qov> Subject: RE: PUC Coordination Meeting
Would 9:15 at our office work?
17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA
ED_001523B_00005164-00001
Sydney Hupp Executive Scheduler Office of the Administrator 202.816.1659 (c)
From: Paul Walker (mailto:pwalker@conservamerica.org1
Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2017 4:12 PM
To: Hupp, Sydney <
>
Cc: Dickerson, Aaron <
>; Wagner, Kenneth
Subject: Re: PUC Coordination Meeting
Hi Sydney.
Sorry for the delay. 16th looks better for the PUC folks
That still work?
Paul Walker
On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 9:45 AM Hupp, Sydney <hupp.sydney@epa.gov> wrote:
Good afternoon Paul,
Hopeful that this finds you well! Ken sent over the below email from you about getting a meeting set up in June. As it stands now, it looks like the morning of the 16th or the
17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA
ED_001523B_00005164-00002
19th we could find some time. Would either of those work? I'll look forward to coordinating with you!
Thank you!
Sydney Hupp Executive Scheduler Office of the Administrator 202.816.1659 (c)
From: Paul Walker [mailto:pwalker@conservamerica.org1 Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2017 4:40 PM To: Wagner, Kenneth <wagner.kenneth@epa.gov> Subject: PUC Coordination Meeting
Ken,
Great talking to you today. Looks like we are all on the same page.
Here's the proposed agenda for the first meeting.
We are all available in the second half of June.
As far as agenda items for the first call, we identified several points to consider.
17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA
ED_001523B_00005164-00003
1The economic impact of the regulation proposed under the Obama administration and what the changes would be under the new version of the regulations current being proposed by EPA, 2. Discuss ways to increase the involvement of state commissions and state environmental and energy offices in the rule making process and ensure that it happens early in process. 3What does the EPA Administrator wish to accomplish by establishing this group? What would be process for adding new topics as issues arise? 4. What does the framework look like going forward? 5. What are the EPA's current thinking or plans for dealing with Coal Ash?
Paul Walker Conserv America
Paul Walker Conserv America
Paul Walker Conserv America
17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA
ED_001523B_00005164-00004
To:
Hupp, Sydney[hupp.sydney@epa.gov]
From: Kingston, Jack
Sent: Wed 4/5/2017 2:52:14 PM
Subject: BIO meeting with Administrator Pruitt
EPA External Meeting Request Form.docx
46 Offices in 21 Countries
This message is confidential and may be legally privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, please telephone or email the sender and delete this message and any attachment from your system; you must not copy or disclose the contents of this message or any attachment to any other person.
Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP is part of the international legal practice Squire Patton Boggs, which operates worldwide through a number of separate legal entities. Please visit www.squirepattonboggs.com for more information.
#US
17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA
ED_001523B_00005165-00001
To:
Hupp, Sydney[hupp.sydney@epa.gov]
Cc:
Dickerson, Aaron[dickerson.aaron@epa.gov]
From: Thomas Hebert
Sent: Wed 4/5/2017 2:51:19 PM
Subject: RE: Invitation to Administrator Pruitt to Offer a Keynote Address to the Nation's Egg Producers
in DC on May 17, 18 or 19, 2017
Thanks so much for your reply Sydney. We certainly understand. As an alternative, would it be possible for 3 to 5 grower leaders in at some point to meet the Administrator over that period? These would be the people responsible for some of the largest egg producing operations in the country with multiple farm sites and more than 50 million laying hens under production.
Best!
Tom Hebert
From: Hupp, Sydney [mailto:hupp.sydney@epa.gov] Sent: Wednesday, April 5, 2017 10:48 AM To: Thomas Hebert <tom.hebert@bayardridge.com> Cc: Dickerson, Aaron <dickerson.aaron@epa.gov> Subject: RE: Invitation to Administrator Pruitt to Offer a Keynote Address to the Nation's Egg Producers in DC on May 17, 18 or 19, 2017
Good afternoon Mr. Herbert,
Thank you for reaching out to me and thank you for the invitation for Administrator Pruitt to keynote! Unfortunately, we are unable to participate this time due to conflicts on the schedule those days. Please do not hesitate to reach out to us in the future though! Hopeful you have a great rest of your week.
Best, Sydney
17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA
ED_001523B_00005168-00001
Sydney Hupp
Office of the Administrator- Scheduling
202.816.1659
From: Thomas Hebert [mailto:tom.hebert@bayardridge.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2017 11:16 AM To: Hupp, Sydney <hupp.Sydney@epa.gov> Cc: Hale, Michelle <hale.michelle@epa.gov>; Woodward, Cheryl <Woodward.Cheryl@.epa.gov> Subject: Invitation to Administrator Pruitt to Offer a Keynote Address to the Nation's Egg Producers in DC on May 17, 18 or 19, 2017
Dear Ms. Hupp,
I hope you are well and settling in nicely at EPA.
Please see attached a letter inviting the Administrator to offer a keynote address to the nation's egg producers at a meeting being held by United Egg Producers (UEP) here in Washington, D.C. on May 17, 18 or 19, 2017. Details are included in the letter.
UEP's farmer members raise hens that produce about 95% of the nation's eggs, and most of that egg production will be accounted for by the 150 or so egg producers in the audience listening to Administrator Pruitt's address should he decide to do this. These producers and UEP have been at the forefront of several US EPA rulemakings and policies that are central to how farmers operate today; Clean Water Act matters involving the Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations (CAFO) rule, WOTUS rule and the Chesapeake Bay TMDL as well as Clean Air Act and CERCLA/EPRCA matters as they relate to ammonia and other air emissions. These are tremendously important issues that relate directly to how egg producers can continue to proudly meet their environmental responsibilities and the growing demand for eggs, and in general make their contribution to the nation's safe, wholesome and abundant food supply.
17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA
ED_001523B_00005168-00002
These farmers would appreciate hearing about Administrator Pruitt's plans for US EPA s environmental programs so they can better understand how they could contribute to the success of his efforts and what these plans might mean for their farms and businesses.
Please let me know if you have any questions or if the Administrator can accept this invitation. Thank you in advance for your consideration of this request.
Best!
Tom Hebert On behalf of the United Egg Producers 202-441-0570
17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA
ED_001523B_00005168-00003