Document 8N8EdGkOnvKJ1a98Q8mYR3Va
>'tt o y - 5
feaii oohns-Manvie
Snie-na! C o r r e s p o n d a n c e
CONFIDENTIAL - LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
To: R. S. Lamar - R&D Ctr
Dato: August 28, 1973
From: V. E. Wolkodoff - R&D Ctr
Copies:
Subject: DETERMINATION OF CHRYSOTILE BY TEM IN COMMERCIAL TALCS
1. Fourteen commercial talcs were examined by TEM for the presence of chrysotile. The samples are identified in Table NO. 1, which also lists individual TEM plate num bers.
.2 The presence or absence of chrysotile is based on scanning
from 20 to 25 fields for each sample. Three electron
micrographs were taken of typical fields in each sample.
These electron micrographs, a total of 42 prints, are
attached.
":
3, The results are listed in Table No. 2. If chrysotile was detected in a sample, a percentage is listed and, at best, is qualitative. However, these percentages are relative to each other. Data on tremolite or tremolite-like amphibole are also listed but are based mainly on qualitative petrographic work as a frame of reference for future optical work by recent FDA proposal.
Results:
A. Chrysotile was not detected in:
Mistron Vapor Mistron Monomix Pfizer Emtal 599 Cyclo-Fil
B. If the chrysotile content was determined to be 1000 ppm or less, the chrysotile at this stage of the study has to be considered a contaminant. These include :
Yellowstone Mistron Super Frost Johnson and Johnson, Vermont Cyclo-Sorb Johnson and Johnson Baby Powder
PLAINT fFFS EXHIBIT
CAM-266
CRMC-Talc-Micro-001371
"V m Page 2 R. S. Lamar
August 28, 1973
C. The only samples which contain chrysotile believed to be part of the mineralogical system at this stage of the study arei
Fibrene 0400 Asbestine 5X Nytal 300 Italian Cosmetic Talc
5. In many of the electron micrographs, distinctly fibrous material appears, even though chrysotile and tremolite are not reported. These "fibers" are talc verified, either during process of scanning or by reviewing TEM plates under a binocular microscope.
\J. '. V. E. wolkodoff
jmw Attachment
cc:
J. M. Sharratt 2 West
w. L. VanDerbeek - 2 West
p. A. Martinson - 2 West
X M. Hutchison - 2 West L. Pundsack - R&D Ctr
s. Speil
- R&D Ctr
w. C. Streib
-- R&D Ctr
J. P. Leineweber - R&D Ctr
Notebook No. 4393, p. 4,5
CRMC-Talc-Micro-001372
Table 2
Detection of Chrysotile by TEM in Commercial Talcs .
Sample Mo.
I Chrysotile, Product_______ by Volume, ppm
Remarks on Chrysotile
Tremolite % by Volume1
1 Yellowstone
500 Contamination 0
2 Mistron Vapor
0--
0
3 Mistron Monomix 4 j Mistron Super Frost
0 <100
______ ~ _______ !_____ 0 ________
Contamination
trace?
5 | Fibrene C-4-0
1500
--
5-101
6 | Pfizer
-
1 j Asbestine SX
0 >3000
0
--- 30%
8 Nytal 300 9 Emtal 599
>5000 0
.. " " .......... .
present 0
10 J and J, Vermont
__ ______
11 i Italian Cosmetic .i..... .......
12 j Cyclo-Fil
<1000
3000 0
May be Contamination
--j
---
0
trace? 20-30%
13
14 . V-
| Cyclo-Sorb
1
; J and J Baby Powder i ' ___
approx. 1000 approx. 1000
May be Contamination
May be Contamination
5-10% 0
1 Although tremolite determination is not intent of this report, crude percentages Chased mostly on petrographic examination} are presented to account for log-like fibers in some of the electron micrographs. Unlike chrysotile, tremolite has no particular distinguishing feature other than morphological in some cases when examined by TEM.
CRMC-Talc-Micro-001373
Table No. 1 IDENTIFICATION AND TEM DATA ON COMMERCIAL TALCS
4
Sample
TEM
No.____________________ Product_________________________Reference No.__________Plate Numbers
1 Yellowstone, United Sierra, Montana
D.M. Inc. No. C-38
2144 A, B, and C
Mistron Vapor, United Sierra, Montana
D.M. Inc. No. -104
2145 A, B, and C
3 Mistron Monomix, United Sierra, Montana
D.M. Inc. No. -25
2146 A, B, and C
4 Mistron Super Frost, United Sierra, Montana D.M. Inc. No. -124
2147 A, B, and C
5 Fibrene C-400, United Sierra, Death Valley D.M. Inc. No. -108
2148 A, B, and C
6 Charles Pfizer Talc for paper industry
D.M. Inc. No. -68
2149 A, B, and C
7 Asbestine 5X, International Talc
D.M. Inc. No. -95
2150 A, B, and C
8 Nytal 300, R. T. Vanderbuilt
D.M. Inc. No. C-19A
2151 A, B, and C
9 Emtal 599, Englehard
D.M. Inc. No. -13
2152 A, B, and C
10 Johnson & Johnson, Green Mt., Vermont
D.M. Inc. No. --14
2153 A, B, and C
11 Italian Talc e Grafite Val Chisone
J-M No. RE-73166-18
2154 A, B, and C
12 Cyclo-Fil, J-M for paper
D.M. Inc. No. Std. 70-3' 2155 A, B, and
13 Cyclo-Sorb, J-M for paper
D.M. Inc. No. Std. 70-3: 2156 A, B, and C
14 Johnson & Johnson Baby Powder
J-M NO. RC-73219-1
2157 A, B, and C
NOTE: All TEM prints are at magnification of 20,000 X (2 cm equals 1 micron).
EM2144A
20,000 X
CRMC-Talc-Micro-001375
CRMC-Talc-Micro-001376
Yellowstone Talc
EY2144C
20,000 X
CRMC-Talc-Micro-001377
as CRMC-Talc-Micro-001378
Clistron Vanor Talc
I::1214 TB
20,000 X
&
_
----
"
~^
.. ......... CRMC-Talc-Micro-001379
Mstroll Vapor Talc
EM214SC
20,000 X
CRMC-Talc-Micro-001380
Mistron Monomix Talc
EM2146A
20,000 X
/ /,
I-- 4
I
CRMC-Talc-Micro-001381
M 1 tron :IonomiX Talc
,`!2146B
20,000 y.
CRMC-Talc-Micro-001382
EM2147
20,000 X
CRMC-Talc-Micro-001384
CRMC-Talc-Micro-001385
Mistron Super Frost Talc
EM2147C
20 #000 X
------
> />. r -' -, -
CRMC-Talc-Micro-001386
CRMC-Talc-Micro-001387
CRMC-Talc-Micro-001389
CRMC-Talc-Micro-001391
EM2149C
Pfizer Talc 20,000 X
CRMC-Talc-Micro-001392
CRMC-Talc-Micro-001393
Asbestine 5 X T a l c
EM2150B
20,000 X
CRMC-Talc-Micro-001394
Asbestine OX Talc
EM215 0C
2U ,0 0
CRMC-Talc-Micro-001395
Nvtal 300 Talc
EM2151A '
20,000 X
f
. . ....... ..... ... ....................
.......... ...... CRMC-Talc-Micro-001396
CRMC-Talc-Micro-001397
CRMC-Talc-Micro-001399
CRMC-Talc-Micro-001400
CRMC-Talc-Micro-001401
J and J, Green M t ., Vt. Talc
EM2153A
20,000 X
CRMC-Talc-Micro-001402
CRMC-Talc-Micro-001403
J and J , Green Mt Vt. Talc
EM2153C
20,000 X
I
CRMC-Talc-Micro-001404
CRMC-Talc-Micro-1405
CRMC-Talc-Micro-001406
rSKSMB
CRMC-Talc-Micro-001407
CRMC-Talc-Micro-001408
CRMC-Talc-Micro-001409
CRMC-Talc-Micro-001410
CRMC-Talc-Micro-001411
CRMC-Talc-Micro-001412
CRMC-Talc-Micro-001413
CRMC-Talc-Micro-001415
J and J Baby Powder
EM 215 7C
20,000 X
CRMC-TTc-lvncro-UT4TD
AFFIDAVIT
I, Margaret J. Baumgardner, being o f full age and first duly sworn do hereby state:
1. Iam not a party to this action. I have personal knowledge o f the facts set forth in this affidavit, and if called as a witness, I could and would competently testify as to the truth of the matters set forth herein.
2. Ia m the Research Coordinator for the Claims Resolution Management Corporation ("CRMC"), a wholly owned subsidiary o f the Manville Personal Injury Settlement Trust ("Trust"). The CRMC was created in December 1998 and is staffed by former Trust employees. On January 1, 1999, CRMC began providing claims resolution facility services to the Trust.
3. In this position, I manage the Asbestos Claims Research Facility ("Facility"), a document and records repository located at 3390 Peoria Street, Suite 304, Aurora, Colorado. The Facility contains the business records including but not limited to correspondence, memoranda, reports, records and data compilations ("record") o f Manville Corporation or related entities ("Manville"), generally, as well as Manville records relevant to litigation o f asbestos liability. The records found at the Facility were transferred from Manville to the Trust beginning in November 28, 1988, the date on which the Manville bankruptcy plan was consummated. Additional records have been and continue to be transferred directly to the Facility. The Facility's records have been in the custody and control of counsel for the Trust or Trust personnel since the date of consummation.
4. My experience and familiarity with the documents at the Facility began in 1983 while working for Manville. In my work as a paralegal for Manville, I assisted in locating, indexing and packing many o f the records which became the foundation documents for the Facility. I continued to work for Manville until September 1987. From March 1988 to September 1 9 8 8 ,1 was hired to supervise and assist in the indexing o f the first 20,000 boxes which were turned over to the Trust in November 1988. From September 1988 to January 1989, I assisted in the privilege review of documents to be given to the Trust. From November 1988 to April 1994,1worked for Freeborn & Peters and was put in charge o f the Facility, managing all productions and "new" acquisitions. In September 1995,1was hired by the Trust to manage the Facility. In December 1998,1was hired by
Affidavit o f Margaret J. Baumgardner
Page 1
the CRMC to manage the Facility for the Trust. Accordingly, Iam personally familiar with many of the records stored at the Facility, as well as how the records have been gathered.
5. To the best of my knowledge, information and belief, or from information transmitted by a person with knowledge, I certify that these records were made at or near the date they are identified, were kept in the course o f the regularly conducted business activity o f Manville, and it was the regular practice and the business activity o f Manville to make the records.
6. Attached are documents found among the microfilm collections at the Facility. These documents, bates labeled CRMC-Talc-Micro-000001 through CRMC-Tulc-Micro-005259, are true and correct copies of documents found at the Facility.
STATE OF COLORADO COUNTY OF ARAPAHOE
) ) ss. )
Subscribed and sworn to before me this 27th day o f January, 2017.
AMYWBNHAM NOTARY PUBLIC 8TATE OF COLORADO
NOTARY 20064017385 MYCOMMISSION EXPIRESMAY23,2020
Affidavit o f Margaret J. Baumgardner
Page 2