Document 82YLG1eYrQapgmgEJDZ1GVqN5

auv ,4 4 ' itftSfl '/. r-' r*M iR- 1 ! ' i'f1: ' I1 life*:! i; f| . '| y Cancer ana ; i ''I *lf I 1 . it i ' ! ' M | :|it i ?j 1! siana JL be cancer maps pubbshed 1 y the Nationaj Cancer Institute have given Louisiana tl e dubious distinction of displaying some of the highe it cancer ratei in `the nation.1, * This excess is only t ue for males, is mostly concentrated in the southern pc rtion of the state and is especially prominent for the n spiratory organs. Ageadjusted death rates for respirato for 1950-1968 have been calculated for each of the 3,056 counties of the United States. rThe top 18 in that list include the following 10 Louisiana parishes: St. Bernard, Tensas,\ Terrebone, Cancordia, Drleans, Jefferson, Ibe ria, St. Martin, Evangeline and SCharles.3 More recent data on death rates for Louisian a parishes (prepared by Thomas Ballinger, Department of Health and Human Resources) show the following ra ik order for the parishes with highest lung cancer death rates in white males, 1960-1976^ Evangeline, West C irroll, Bossier, St. Ber nard, Assumption, Acadia, St. K\ artin, Richland, Tensas, Iberia, Franklin, Terrebone, S . Mary, St. Tammany, Washington and Orleans. i1 j : '' rj | Lifestyle is one of the (acton suspected to; be linked with cancer causation! The run li north of Lou: has respiratory cancer rates which t re Approximately^ h*lf of those of the more industrialized south. As a first approx imation to investigate' the possi >le link between Icancer risk and lifestyle, we conducted isuWeyfofourfcJutfrern and five northern Louisiana p^ isbes whose death ptcs from respiratory cancer are sbo m inTablel.'*A rirndom sample ofall males ov^r 30 year ofage wps ^lepfod from i! il From the Department of Pathology ad Biometry, Louts! aa Sute i Vnlv^uity Mescal Canter, New Orlei is, La. 1 i' T PELAYO CORREA, h D )VILUAM D. JOHNSOj* New prler holders ofdriver's licenses with addresses in the \ selected. With the help of die American Cancer__ volunteers, a questionnaire was mailed to them inqu about their lifestyle. The positive results are summaairiced in Table 2. All responses to the questionnaire are expressed in terms of the age-adjusted percent oi'the re- i-: -1 J TABLE 1 ^GE-ADJUSTED MALE DEATH RATES PER 100,OdO ,FOR RESPIRATORY CANCER FOR 1950-1969 IN SELECTED PARISHES FROM NORTH AND ' ' SOUTH LOUISIANA* South Iberia Lafourche St. Terrebone White 62 , 58 61 69 Black 42 S3 53 41 Average 63 47 'I r Bienville \ *', Natchitoches.1-I, fled River M' Sabine : ft', North 35 32 37 23 33 10 19 10 19 26 32 17 [ X ,# race-location category.Response re- t l^to ipods/^h^ drinks showing any inter-groups di fer- ' shown kj Table 3. 1 . ^Li'Tesult^ jydipate (hat the differences'll) thi<[ life! tyle r rhshleDtjqfareAj with 'cbnxrastijng lung cancer trial sin \.x- riling,.: I ,> ljf Vh * j$'i Ma-chl983-YoL 125, M.3 -i v : ! .1; O'- >\ f./'j? |.- V) URL 04312 \ TABLE 2 RESPONSES TO LIFE STYLE QUESTIONNAIRE FROM MALES OF NORTH AND SOUTH LOUISIANA > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -L 1 i1 , White South North Black ! South Nort . Number of responses % college graduates % current smokers % smokers starting after age 20 % smokers using filter cigarettes % whose father smokes % whose mother smokes % employed in offshore oil inland oil refinery petro-chemica] other chemicals ship building fishery construction farming sawmill white collar % drinking water from: river private well % spraying home for insects daily or weekly l 1 777 , 680 ' 92 ! 137 i 15.5 19.9 5.3 6. 1 38.7 34.7 54.0 46. i 17.4 20.2 19.3 19. 75.9 S4.9 73.8 74. ! 39.3 , 28.0 29.7 28. T 6.5 . 5.2 1 3.9 5.9 1 10.7 ' ' 4.0 9.7 1.7 1 1 3.7 3.4 0 0. 11 3.5 ; 0.8 12.8 ; i. 0.7 0.8 1.2 0. 1.8 1.3 1.1 O' 4.6 0 3.0 0 6.0 0 1.1 0.6 10.0 12.5 16.3 8.2 9.5 19.0 515. 4 12. 1.4 17.9 1.8 21.8 17.3 13.2 I4.3 6. 0 ' 24.0 1.7 17.1 12. ) 9.6 45.2 10.1 12. $T t12.1 13.6 36.6 41. | ` ] $ ' TABLE 3 AVERAGE CONSUMPTION OF SELECTED FOODS AND BEVERAGES BY NORTH AND SOUTH LOUISIANA MA^ES ; White Black ! i South North South North Mean number of times per month shellfish - pork beef Mean units (glasses or cups) drunk per month coffee I tea beer wine other alcohol 4.4 4.0 14.7 106 15 35 5 99 1.3 6.5 15.4 103 30 14 2 , 67 32 4.1 0.7 59 6 35 18 93 1 L9 6.1! n.o i 41 i 12 23 6 66 URL 04313 I TABLE 4 PERCENT OF CIGARETTE SMOKERS AMONG SUBJECTS INTERVIEWED ACCORDING TO THE l SMOK1NC HABITS OF THEIR PARENTS, BY RACE White subject smokes Yes No Black subject smokes Yes No March 1983 - Vol. 135, No. 3 1 !' 1: 1 ' '' 1 ! Father Smokes Yes No 43.7 56.3 . , t ' 26.9 73,1 ,: i 6L7 j t3. 1 44.4 i 55.6 : , : Mother Smokes ! Yes No 46.5 53.5 56.8 [ 43.2 j 1 35.1 64.9 47,4 52.6 -------1------- !5 Riverland Med cal Center LaPlace, La. 'Beautiful new medical plaza - just completed j 'Ideal for new practice! or second office location J "Located in one of the fastest growing areas of the state *12,000 square feet of total space | , "Attractive two story b rick construction "Oversize paved parking "Elevator and handicapped access "Suites finished to lessee's specifications "Fully landscaped "Only three blocks to (tewly completed LaPlace Hospital 2840 West Airlin'. Highway LaPlace, La. 0068 For further information call; \ (504)469-7755 or (504)536-4567 Ask about Incentive leasing program for, 1903 * /*;*:!* i 1* Louisiana are multiple, One pfthe more marked differ ences refers to the occupation; about one-thiid the white labor force in the southern parishes und?r study works in oil and shipbuilding industries while! farming and sawmill predominate in tjie north. Fishery also pre dominates in the south. Moje river water is used for drinking purposes in the south and more private weljs in the north. The proportion of smokers, the proportion using non-filter cigarettes and the proportion starting to smoke before age 20 are higher in the south. In Whites, a remarkable excess of parents who smoked is repotted from the south, apparently indicating that the habit has been more widespread in the south for severa^ genera tions, It appears that the smoking habits of the,parents influence the smoking habits of their children, as shi>wn in Table 4. A greater proportion of smokers is found among subjects whose father or mother smoke as com pared to those whose father or mother did not smoke. The difference is higher in whites than in blacks. Lifestyle features apparently related to race rather than geography are; education, spraying of home for insects, work in farming, construction and white collar occupations and consumption of coffee. This type of correlation study does not allow definitive causal inferences but does serve as a basis for further scientific inquiry. An association between lung cancer and certain occupations has been suggested.3 The inter pretation of such correlations should take into account existing differences in smoking habits between occupa tion categories.4-8 In our survey we found a higher pro portion of smokers among workers of certain industries: while the average proportion of smokers for all industries was 41 percent, the corresponding figure for fishery workers was 48 pprcent and for offshore oil workers 47 percent. More in-depth studies of the lifestyle of cancer patients and controls are underway. I References 1. .Burbank F: Patterns in cancer mortality in the United States: 1950-1967. Nat Cancer Inst. Monograph No. 33. P.H.S. U. S. Govt. Printing Office, Washington, 1971 2. Muon T gpd McKay FW: U. S. Cancer mortality by county 1950-1969, DHEW Publication No. (NIH)74-615. U. S. Govt. Printing Office, Washington, 1974 1 5- Blot WJ, Davies J^, Brown LM, NordwallCW, Buiatt K, Ng A and Fraumeni JF: Occupation and high risk of lung cancer in northeast Florida. Cancer 50:364.371, 1982 4. Covey L$ and Wynder EL: Smoking habits and occupatlpnal Itatpa. J.Occup Med 23:537-542. 1981 (, :5-j^Vpinberg CE, Kuller LH and Redmond CK: The relationship between1 the geographic distribution of king cancer incidence and cigarette; smoking In Allegheny County, Pennsylvania.1 Am J Epid 1982 f',,. |j I ' ! j'| ' . i ' *4- i *.! ' >y I || t *! Acknowledgment work was supported by a grant froomm the America^' Cancer Society, Louisiana Division. .4March 1983 - Voi N(. 3 c. p s w