Document 7RORwa3YzYvewYzkQLkLkZe6j

COMPETITIVE EMTER PRISE INSTITUTED A A AMERICAN ENERGY ALLIANCE May 8, 2017 The Honorable Donald J. Trump President of the United States The White House 1600 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W. Washington, D.C. 20500 Dear Mr. President, We, the undersigned, write in enthusiastic support of your campaign commitments to withdraw fully from the Paris Climate Treaty and to stop all taxpayer funding of UN global warming programs. We were heartened by the comments you made at your 100-day rally in Harrisburg and agree that the treaty is not in the interest of the American people and the U. S. should therefore not be a party to it. AMERICANS FOR PROSPERITY Withdrawing from the Paris Climate Treaty is an integral part of your energy agenda. The Obama administration's Nationally Determined Contribution (or NDC) to the Paris Climate Treaty commits the United States to take actions that will reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 17% below 2005 levels by 2020 and by 26% to 28% below 2005 levels by 2025. Paris then requires a more ambitious NDC every five years in perpetuity. FOR AMERICA 60 6 iwsass cmion ' CFACF roilijiucFltMJCYEESEAlcil FOR icmziis AGAINST GOVERNMENT [WASTE The NDC cites specific policies undertaken by the Obama administration as part of the NDC. These include: the greenhouse gas emissions rules for existing (the "Clean Power" Plan) and new power plants; Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards for vehicles; methane emissions rules for the oil and gas sector and for landfills; and energy efficiency and conservation standards for buildings and appliances. Environmental pressure groups and several state attorneys general have begun to prepare lawsuits in federal court to block withdrawal of the "Clean Power" Plan and other greenhouse gas rules. One argument that they have already put forward is that these rules cannot be withdrawn because they are part of our international commitment under the Paris Climate Treaty. Failing to withdraw from Paris thus exposes key parts of your deregulatory energy agenda to unnecessary legal risk. The AGs revealed in a recruiting letter that they also plan other lawsuits "ensuring that the promises made in Paris become reality." Some officials in your administration are relying on recent statements from former Obama administration officials that the U. S. can withdraw its NDC and submit a new NDC that makes far less ambitious commitments to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. The clear language of Article 4 of the Paris Climate Treaty contradicts that claim. Section 11 states: "A Party may at any time adjust 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008164-00001 Em Legal its existing nationally determined contribution with a view to enhancing its level ofambition" (<emphasis added). Even if the U. S. were to be cleared by UN officials to submit a less ambitious NDC, this is not the end of the threats posed by the Paris Climate Treaty to your pro-energy agenda and to the economic future of our country. Article 4 requires each party to submit a more ambitious NDC at least every five years in perpetuity. This commitment to reduce fossil fuel use every five years cannot be wished away by those who argue that the U. S. should keep a seat at the negotiating table in order to advocate for fossil fuels. In urging you to keep your campaign commitment, we recognize that there are several options for you to withdraw the U.S. from Paris. Of the three options listed below, we think the first two are preferable to the third. TAXPAYERS PROTECTION ALLIANCE First, you could submit the Paris Climate Treaty to the Senate for its advice and consent with a recommendation that the treaty not be ratified. Submitting the treaty to the Senate would return us to and restore the proper constitutional method for treaty-making and require a future administration to go through proper procedures if it were to attempt to rejoin the treaty. ForAmerica Second, you could withdraw from the underlying UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). This action would also achieve your commitment to "stop all payments of the United States tax dollars to UN global warming programs," including the Green Climate Fund, which is a part of the UNFCCC. Third, you could announce your intention to withdraw the U. S. from the Paris Climate Treaty according to the four-year schedule specified in the treaty and continue the process of repealing the regulations that the previous administration submitted as part of its NDC. This option is the least preferable because it runs the risk of legitimizing the Obama administration's false claim that the treaty is merely an executive agreement. Cornwall Alliance For Ihe Sumorebhip OfCt The undersigned organizations believe that withdrawing completely from Paris is a key part of your plan to protect U.S. energy producers and manufacturers from regulatory warfare not just for the next four years but also for decades to come. We will strongly support your decision to keep your campaign commitment to withdraw from the Paris Climate Treaty. Sincerely, Myron Ebell, Director, Center for Energy and Environment Competitive Enterprise Institute Thomas J. Pyle, President American Energy Alliance Joseph Bast, President The Heartland Institute 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008164-00002 Grover G. Norquist, President Americans for Tax Reform FREEDOM The Conservative Caucus, a project of Americans for Constitutional Liberty Chrissy Harbin, Vice President of External Affairs Americans for Prosperity Michael Needham, CEO Heritage Action for America EAGLE FORUM f-mcAiiON & Legal DrrLNSt I cm> Michael Costigan, Senior Advisor, Strategic Outreach The Heritage Foundation INDEPENDENCE INSTITUTE.ORG James L. Martin, Founder and Chairman 60 Plus Association Craig Rucker, Executive Director Committee For A Constructive Tomorrow Rio Grande Foundation hit vr, > h p> >!]!" "i' * i'O rrv David Ridenour, President National Center for Public Policy Research Thomas Schatz, President Citizens Against Government Waste Craig Richardson, President Energy and Environment Legal Institute # C I V I TA S i HSTI T U TE Tom DeWeese, President American Policy Center Richard Manning, President Americans for Limited Government FAITH & FREEDOM FOUNDATION Phil Kerpen, President American Commitment David Williams, President Taxpayers Protection Alliance Mario H. Lopez, President Hispanic Leadership Fund David Bozell, President For America Kenneth Haapala, President Science and Environmental Policy Project Craig D. Idso, Chairman Center for the Study of Carbon Dioxide and Global Change William Happer, President The C02 Coalition E. Calvin Beisner, Founder and National Spokesman Cornwall Alliance for the Stewardship of Creation John Droz, Jr., Founder Alliance for Wise Energy Decisions Timothy Lee, Senior Vice President of Legal and Public Affairs Center for Individual Freedom Peter J. Thomas, Chairman Americans for Constitutional Liberty Ed Martin, President Eagle Forum Education and Legal Defense Fund Amy Oliver Cooke, Executive Vice President Independence Institute (CO) David T. Stevenson, Director, Center for Energy Competitiveness Caesar Rodney Institute (DE) Paul Gessing, President Rio Grande Foundation Kory Swanson, President and CEO John Locke Foundation Francis De Luca, President Civitas Institute Forest Thigpen, President Mississippi Center for Public Policy Eldon Alexander, President Faith and Freedom Foundation 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008164-00003 'ST'p-'^ar t 'Yi^Ch mo *seKtt' Lynne Roberts, President Americans United for Freedom Rich Johns, President Liberty Tree Alliance Aileen Milton, President The Villages Tea Party Debbie Gunnoe, President Navarre Patriots Sam Mullins, Co-Founder Santa Rosa Tea Party Patriots Hon. Mike Hill, Founder Northwest Florida Tea Party Stephani Scruggs Bowen, COO Coalition for a Strong America Alan Moran, Director Australian Environment Foundation 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008164-00004