Document 6541BY1vBDyGDdNwM67GnZ5Nd

Only saw a couple stories on how you work to save coal mining jobs and how you didn't write murray's 3 pager. Seems like it was successful. Ryan Jackson Chief of Staff _I.LS_.EPA________ Ex. 6 - Personal Privacy i On Nov 8, 2017, at 8:00 PM, Wheeler, Andrew R. <Andrew.Wheeler@Fa im> wrote: FYI Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: "Bono, Mary" <Mary .Bono@faegrebd.com> Date: November 8, 2017 at 7:18:42 PM EST To: "Wheeler, Andrew R." <An.drew.Wheeler@FaegreBD.com> Subject: Lindsey At dinner with Lindsey Graham. He said he's looking forward to voting for you. Mary The Honorable Mary Bono Principal Faegre Baker Daniels Consulting Former Member of Congress 1050 K Street NW Suite 400 Washington DC 20001 USA +1 202 589 2857 Twitter: @MaryBonoUSA 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00004859-00002 To: From: Sent: Subject: Geoffrey Moody[GMoody@afpm.org] Jackson, Ryan Sat 4/15/2017 10:55:20 PM RE: AFPM Meeting Request Yeah, we are on it. It would be good. I know Chet. Good people. From: Geoffrey Moody [mailto:GMoody@afpm.org] Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 5:03 PM To: Jackson, Ryan <jackson.ryan@epa.gov> Subject: AFPM Meeting Request Ryan, I hope things are well. As we discussed last week, I would like to request a meeting for AFPM's president, Chet Thompson, with Administrator Pruitt in early May. Chet would like to reintroduce himself, discuss some of the issues that are top of mind for our refining and petrochemical members, and of course explore any ways AFPM can be helpful to the Administrator. By way of background, Chet was EPA Deputy General Counsel under President G.W. Bush. Separately, we also have our Executive Committee meeting on June 15th in D.C. If I'm not overstepping, would it be possible to explore a second meeting with Administrator Pruitt and senior executives from our companies for that afternoon? Thanks, Geoff Moody Vice President Government Relations American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00004860-00001 1667 K Street NW Suite 700 Washington, DC 20006 202.457.0480 office 202.552.8489 direct 202.457.0486 fax g moody@afpm.org Learn more about SFPM at afpm.org 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA 6/22 Production ED 001523 00004860-00002 To: From: Sent: Subject: louis.renjel@duke-energy.com[louis. renjel@duke-energy.com] Jackson, Ryan Thur 4/27/2017 1:04:38 AM FW: Request for phone call with Administrator Pruitt Can you help with this? From: Hupp, Sydney Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2017 12:43 PM To: Jackson, Ryan <jackson.ryan@epa.gov> Cc: Dickerson, Aaron <dickerson.aaron@epa.gov> Subject: FW: Request for phone call with Administrator Pruitt Can I set up? Sydney Hupp Executive Scheduler Office of the Adminsitrator 202.816.1659 (c) From: Ghanta, Venu G [mailto:Venu.Ghanta@duke-energy.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2017 12:20 PM To: Hupp, Sydney < > Cc: scheduling < > Subject: Request for phone call with Administrator Pruitt Hi Sydney- Hope this note finds you well. Duke Energy's CEO, Lynn Good, met with Administrator Pruitt 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00004861-00001 at CERAWeek back in March. They had a great discussion, and we wanted to schedule a follow up call to go into more detail on some of the issues raised. Would either May 18 or May 22 sometime between 2:30 and 5 pm work? I think 15-30 minutes for the phone call would be sufficient. Thanks, Venu Venu Ghanta Federal Environmental & Energy Policy Director Duke Energy 325 7th Street NW, Suite 300, Washington, DC 20004 Office: 202-824-8013 Cell: 202-699-2337 venu.ghanta@duke-energy.com 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA 6/22 Production ED 001523 00004861-00002 To: From: Sent: Subject: Ariel Emanuei[AEmanuel@wmeentertainment.com] Jackson, Ryan Wed 6/7/2017 6:07:33 PM Re: I don't know how you get around the ICI conversion. However I'm in Cincinnati presently with the Administrator and will be in Italy at the G7 for the remainder of the week. Ryan Jackson Chief of Staff UA.EPA_______ i Ex. 6 - Personal Privacy On Jun 7, 2017, at 12:11 PM, Ariel Emanuel <AEmanuel@,wmeentertainment.eom> wrote: Anything going on? Ariel Emanuel | WME AEmanuel@wmeentertainment.com 310.248.3064 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00004862-00001 To: From: Sent: Subject: Nolan, Rich[RNolan@nma.org] Jackson, Ryan Sat 4/15/2017 10:42:11 PM FW: EPA to Reconsider ELG Rule FR notice Tuesday From: Bowman, Liz Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2017 5:59 PM To: Jackson, Ryan <jackson.ryan@epa.gov> Subject: EPA to Reconsider ELG Rule CONTACT: press@epa.gov FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE April 13, 2017 EPA to Reconsider ELG Rule EPA takes another action to implement President Trump's vision WASHINGTON - EPA announced the agency's decision to review and reconsider the final rule that amends the effluent limitations guidelines and standards for the steam electric power generating category under the Clean Water Act (ELG Rule), which has been estimated to cost $480 million per year and has a reported average cost of $1.2 billion per year during the first five years of compliance. "This action is another example of EPA implementing President Trump's vision of being good stewards of our natural resources, while not developing regulations that hurt our economy and kill jobs," said EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt. EPA issued an administrative stay to delay the compliance deadlines for the ELG Rule during the pendency of the ongoing litigation challenging the rule in order to give the agency the opportunity to consider and review the rule. EPA will also be sending a letter to the petitioners who requested reconsideration of the rule, to notify them that the rule has been administratively stayed and is under review. "Some of our nation's largest job producers have objected to this rule, saying the requirements set by the Obama administration are not economically or technologically feasible within the proscribed time frame. It is in the public's best interest to reconsider the rule and assess the wide-ranging and sweeping objections that the agency received," said Administrator Pruitt. R058 If you would rather not receive future communications from Environmental Protection Agency, let us know by clicking here 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00004863-00001 Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20460 United States 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00004863-00002 To: From: Sent: sek9@nyu.edu[sek9@nyu.edu] Jackson, Ryan Wed 4/26/2017 5:59:26 PM Dr. Koonin I think I've misplaced your cell phone. Could I reach out to you today to concerning scheduling? The White House is making demands on us which may take the Administrator to NY on Friday. Ryan Jackson Chief of Staff U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Ex. 6 - Personal Privacy 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA 6/22 Production ED 001523 00004864-00001 To: Johnston, A. Todd[atjohnston@cement.org] From: Jackson, Ryan Sent: Mon 6/19/2017 4:13:14 PM Subject: FW: Signed - National Emission Standards for HAPs from Portland Cement Industry Signed - Direct Final Rule - Portland Cement.pdf Signed P. goosed Rule Portland Cement.pdf 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA 6/22 Production ED 001523 00004865-00001