Document 5kdQrMgOwE20OnQ8L2M9z30Kz

Message From: Sent: To: Subject: Peter Brodhead LTMx7Vp^^ 1/25/2018 1:40:05 AM Beck, Nancy [/o=ExchangeLabs/ou=Exchange Administrative Group (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/cn=Recipients/cn=168ecb5184ac44de95a913297f353745-Beck, Nancy]; Morris, Jeff [/o=ExchangeLabs/ou=Exchange Administrative Group (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/cn=Recipients/cn=55c34872e6ea40cab78be910aec63321-Morris, Jeff]; Corado, Ana [/o=ExchangeLabs/ou=Exchange Administrative Group (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/cn=Recipients/cn=9bb9257919594061b763f306c2f8be60-ACorado]; Parsons, Doug [/o=ExchangeLabs/ou=Exchange Administrative Group (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/cn=Recipients/cn=b0a745542b2e4fa894e877ccf8b83957-Parsons, Doug] Methylene Chloride review, action Ms, Beck, Mr, Morris and Ms, Corado, My friend E F E F F E E '] recently passed away after using a methylene chloride-based paint stripper. I'm very troubled by reports that the EPA has indefinitely postponed its ban on methylene chloride (EPA-HQ-OPPT-20160231-0001). Protecting American consumers and workers from dangerous chemicals is at the core of your agency's mission. The longer these rules are delayed the more workers and consumers will be needlessly exposed to chemicals with serious, well-documented health risks. Action on this toxic chemical is long overdue. I urge the EPA to reconsider its decision to delay the rule making process. You should finalize the proposed ban on methylene chloride as soon as possible. The dangers of the product are well known. There is a causal link to fatalities from using the product. There is no need to tolerate even one more. Peter Brodhead, concerned citizen Sierra Club v. EPA 18cv3472 NDCA Tier 12 ED 002061 00038530-00001