Document 5b1eRGjkeq1ozMxjNEbv6Qq5R

Download
To: From: Sent: Subject: Jackson, Ryan[jackson.ryan@epa.gov] American Enterprise Institute Thur 10/5/2017 11:49:29 AM AEI Today: Should President Trump recertify the Iran deal? Bad diplomatic agreements may win prizes, but they do not bring peace. Often, they hasten conflict. AEl's daily publication of independent research, insightful analysis, and scholarly debate Reuters Should President Trump recertify the Iran deal? Michael Rubin | Washington Examiner Bad diplomatic agreements may win prizes, but they do not bring peace. Often, they hasten conflict. When it comes to hard diplomacy with rogue regimes, there are never any shortcuts. Should President Trump walk away from the Iran deal? Probably not. But he should make its 90-day continuance contingent on implementation of all parts of the deal, including rapid Sierra Club v. EPA, 1:17-cv-01906 ED_001523_00002844-00001 inspection of Iranian military bases where nuclear weapons work might continue. Hey, Democrats: Ifs OK to get behind tax Just because President Trump supports an idea doesn't mean it's terrible. This is a problem for Democrats. It wasn't so long ago that they also wanted to cut corporate tax rates: In 2015, President Obama proposed axing tax breaks and loopholes to pay for slashing the corporate rate to 28 percent from 35 percent. Of course, it's hard to blame Democrats for developing a knee-jerk revulsion given how badly Republicans are distorting the issues. Sierra Club v. EPA, 1:17-cv-01906 ED_001523_00002844-00002 The Republican base is beyond President Trump's control Judge Roy Moore's victory last week in a runoff against Sen. Luther Strange (R-AL) may signal that the base is not President Trump's army to command. The president endorsed Strange, and it didn't help. There's remarkably little substance to this populist fever: Strange was more conservative than Moore but less bombastic. Republican politicians can't ignore the anger, but stoking it is pointless. Eventually, politicians have to govern. Sierra Club v. EPA, 1:17-cv-01906 Testimony: The American interest in Iraq today Every year since 2003, knowledgeable Americans have been warning that the current year is absolutely crucial in Iraq. They have been right every time, and 2018 will be no exception. But as always at seminal moments like this, it's important to remind ourselves of what our interests are in ED_001523_00002844-00003 Iraq. After 2003, an endless parade of American mistakes produced a dangerous set of internal threats to US interests. MORE FROM AEI Puerto Rico needs a Marshall Plan Daron Acemoglu: The changes coming in the next 20 years shouldn't surprise anyone, but we're totally unprepared Robert Bork on what to do about the First Amendment (1995) 60-second take: What Americans of all stripes think about PACA The Catalonian bell tolls for Europe Intellectuals tend to exalt the free market for ideas and spurn the free market for goods. They miss the point. (1974) Around the web: Amid another tragedy, don't forget the legacy of Tom iWt. r-- i t cl' .u AEI cares about your inbox. Want to tailor your AEI subscriptions? 'j*' ' u` 1' 7r- 7 - American Enterprise Institute 1789 Massachusetts Avenue. NW. Washington. DC 20036 202.862.5800 I Sierra Club v. EPA, 1:17-cv-01906 ED_001523_00002844-00004 This message is for: Sierra Club v. EPA, 1:17-cv-01906 ED_001523_00002844-00005