Document 1gDOBKMwnOEwY2ZJ8Z1J6M3nm

A w m t t t N. r . Iv o ry and M. I.. Jahnara t l T L : WHTFR SAWCrNT. ANALYSTS o rI Monsanto MONSANTO COMPANY / DAYTON LABORATORY / DAYTON, OHIO 45407 ESC/Dayton____________ (Departaent/faction) Saaplinq t Analytical (Typa of Report) REPORT NO. JOB/PROJECT NO. DATE PERIOD COVERED TITLE AUTHORS: N>A 472 484.20S0 April 13, 1984 received APK 2 j #M I M0NSAN1O I ST. UlM WATER SAMPLING & ANALYSES OF CARONDOLET PLANT Robert. F. Ivory^ Mark L. Johnson' ABSTRACT: Water aaaiples were taken fro* five well* at the Carondolet Plant. The saaples were analyzed for their organic priority pollu tant content and for the other U.S. EPA designated priority pollutants. The results of the saapling and analyses are shown in this report. 3 3 J APPROVED BY: CV- r ako-ube..r.t Fa--. IIv__o_r_y_______/-J ESC Project Service Maiinager M M 472 COMPANY CONFIDENTIAL This BewRt In tkt property of RcoMAtB Cisfiisy w4 Um is rsspssslBls fsr Its ssfsksspinf Bisyssltissl St CMttlM COVINNTIAL IMPOMUTIOM Mtlck wm\ Wt to rsproBoesB, rmilsi to snsuttorlss* psrssns or osnt outoiB* Hsnsonto C--piny without propsr suthorisotlsn. HONS 022823 COtf NUMBER 1 R. Tower, Carondolet 2 w. Kirk, Carondolet 1 I. r. Ivory 4 M. Johnson 5 Central riles 4 Technical Reports Library ABSTRACT ONLY H. A. Woltermann NOTE: Distribution of this report is restricted. Requests (or additional copies should be Made through the principal contact at the Monsanto location involved or the Manager. Environmental Sciences Center. Dayton Laboratory. Dayton. Ohio. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Contributions of the following Dayton Laboratory personnel to this project are gratefully acknowledged: Sampling: M. Johnson C. Athmer C O V r A i\ \ CO\F [J t\l A 1 When no longer needed, or upon request, return this report, to Central Files. Dayton. MOMS 022824 1. SAHFllHC Cr>w^Ur loplfi were a the Ciroi^ela flMt fey 8SC m the 9tb m4 10th of Fttrwry, 191*. Plant aonitoring well He. 2 mi saapled fer aNily, loKl or|Mic carbon, yirt Mtili, fluorides, ortho ptMiylutn analyses. fleet iMiUrli| wells He. 7. I, 9 4 10 were iiaylH fer parts A, 4 C yariwtm (priority pollutants) analyses. Field blank saaples were alto collected for analysis a yulity control aessure. tacK well wat stapled using a PYC bailer. After tbe bailer had been used to evacuate three well water volumes to ensure sanple represents ivity, the bailer was rinsed in distilled, de*ionized water and the bailer rope was replaced with a new* one, to ainiaize the chances for cross*contaaination between wells. Field aeasureaents and observations were aade at each site and were recorded on field foras which appear in the appendix. These include aaong others the saaple's appearance, teaperature, specific conductance, and pH (aeasured by plant personnel!. Chain of Custody foras were not filled out, since the saaples were obtained, preserved, packed, transported and logged in at Dayton laboratory by the saae CSC eaployee. The saaple bottles were all labeled, their caps were secured with sealing tape (following addition of preservatives), and cooled to approxiaalely 4C prior to transport. The saapling aethodology was altered slightly froa well to well due to the varying conditions encountered. Veil No. 2 was evacuated and saapled using the hailer, and produced very low- aaounis of silt. In line with prescribed aethods for orthophosphate analysis, a portion of the saaple was passed through a 0.45-ailcron filter (and the associated stainless steel filtering apparatus) prior to collection. A field blonk was collected in the saae aanner after tbe apparatus had been double-rinsed with the blank water. Veils Ko. 7 and 10 also produced low aaounts of silt, and were saapled directly froa tbe bailer following evacuation. A field blank for priority pollutants was collected at well 10; tbe saaples being poured directly froa the blank water reservoir. Veils Ko. 8 and 9 produced water with extreaely heavy aaounts of silt. Well 8 was also very sluggish in recovering, probably due in part to screen ond grovel pock si Hation. Tbe saaples froa each of these wells were allowed to ,settle in a 10-lilre coapositing reservoir prior to traosfer to saaple bottles. At well 8 settling over a 30 aioute period proved to be an effective aeans of substantially reducing tbe saaple's silt cooteol prior to transfer. This success was not duplicated at veil 9 however, as settling of the sediaents was negligible after 30 almiles, and the bottles were consequently filled ond preserved with ainiaal tilt content reduction. HONS 022825 imrowcrion thii report (MUtai the analytical malts m ysr water samples. It is designed u isdirff enfrtMMive data (ra the entire analytical process la srder to satisfy Ike wHs of various lewis of review. The results obtained from your sanple are presented is tabular format. Quality assurance data ii tabulated along with the appropriate sample results fur verification. Depending on the analyses ordered, the quality assurance data nay include results from blank, spilled blank, spiked sanple (i.e. natris spike) and replicate sanple as veil as results Iran surrogate coapouod analyse*. Quality assurance data for verification of proper instrument performance is also included where appropriate. The procedures used in the analysis of the saaples are described in this re purl * s methodology section. All analytical procedures within our laboratory are performed within a strictly enforced Quality Assurance Protocol. A de scription of this Protocol is included in the report. CC/MS ANALYSIS OF PRIORITY POLLUTANT COMPOUNDS The methods enployrd in the GC/MS analysis for priority pollutants are estab lished CPA methods. Rigid compliance with the instrument parameters and per formance criteria of the published methods was achieved. In some r*se, the precise amounts of sanple used and the sample handling procedures vary with the complexity of the sample matrix. Qualitative identification of the prior ity pollutants was performed using the relative retention times, the relative abundance of three characteristic ions and the abundance ratios. The entire mass spectrum vis reviewed to confirm each identification. Quantitative analysis was performed using an internal standard with a single characteristic ion. Compounds, in addition to those on the priority pollutant list, were identified through s computer-aided search of the KIS-EPA spectra library- After review the identifications are included in a separate tabulation and labelled "tenta tively identified". Volatile Priority Pollutant Compounds For the analysis of Volatile priority pollutants, CPA Method 624 (Federal Register, December ), 1911, page 6*532) was used. The method cau be sum marised as follows: Helium is bubbled through a S ml water sample contained in a specially designed purging chamber at ambient temperature. The purgeable volatile organic compounds are transferred from the aqueous phase to the vapor phase. The vapor is swept through a sorbent column where the organic components are trapped. After the purge cycle is complete, the sorbent column is heated and backflushed with helium to desorb the organic purgeables onto a gas chroma tographic column, the gas chromatograph is temperature programed to soporato the purgeable mixture. The separated purgeahle components are then ideetified and quantitated using a'computerised mass spectrometer. HONS 022826 Acid. |if/lktril iM Pesticide Priority ftIImatt Compquids far tkf eoalysis tf tbe Acid. Im/Rntnl tad pesticide priority polleteets it at mwm liquid motrix, SPA Hr(M 125 (federal ftegister. December ). ItN; fat* AtSAO) vii eaed. The method cat be summsrited aa follows: A measured volume el sample. approximately 1 liter, it adjusted it a yd greater that 11 tad attracted vith eelbylene chltride. The fH tf the aatfle it adjusted to a value let! that 2 aad attracted vith at aliquot tf freah methylene chltride. A secretary funnel or ctatitett eilractor It Med to perform the extraction!. The two ettraclt are dried and concentrated to a 1 si final volwe. tact attract it injected into a GC/HS instrument tfecifically configured far the correct fraction. QUALITY ASSUUWCE/QUALITY CWfTAOL PHOCEDWES ( QA/QC) Quality atturance protocols are hated on the following government guidelines: ''Handbook for Analytical Quality Control in Voter and Waste* water Laboratories'*, EPA-600/4-79-019, March 1979; national Cnforcenent Investigation Center Policies, and Procedures manual; EPA-330/9/79/OOI-ft, October 1979; The recommended guidelines for EPA Methods 624 and 625. (federal register, December 3, 1979, pp. 69532-69559); and Manual of Analytical Methods for the Analysis of Pesticides in Huauns and Environmental Samples, **EPA 600/8-60-036, June I960. Determination of 2,3,7,6*TCDD in Soil and Sedinent "EPA, Region VII, Kansas City, September >963. However, the protocols have been modified to provide o higher level of QA/QC than the guidelines require, for example, v* analyse a higher than required number of quality control samples and pay especially careful attention to the certification of the **refereoce standard** compounds used in analysis, below are listed the hey QA/QC elements for ihe methods used. Analysis of Volatile Ornanlc Compounds (EPA Method 624) - Each bath of I) samples consists of 9 customer samples tat maximum), one blanh sample, one spibtd blank, one spiked sample and one replicate sample. This amounts to a 361 quality control factor. - Three surrogate compounds are added to each sample in the batch of 13. - At least omo blind quality control sample is introduced to tbe laboratory for asolysis for tick hundred samples analyzed. HONS 022827  t*ck SC/NS U cktckvd ni rttwwd, t( McttMry, mtj I kwn ti msarv tlMt 111 pnliniKi M kroMf lvr*kweM (in) MU tte ir* crlurlt. - A c*llkr,llo, curve for fuMiutlM ii prepared iMlof a alatvre af Volatile Orpaalc Priarltp Pallalaat "atMdirdv* at a aiaiaua af 3 different concent ratioaa and aaiag a alatvre af 3 internal atnadardn at a taaatant c#MtnUM. The (i)ibritiM curve it verified vith a nixture of priority pollutant limtfirfa every I hatiri. Results ore roupsred to the oereptsnee rriteris given in Method 624; sny that do not seet the criteris sre re-analyzed. Analysis of Organic Compounds Extracted in Acid or lase/Keulral Solutions flFA Method iffl-------- "=---------- --------------------------------- 1------------ Each hatch of 20 samples consists of 16 customers (at sasisus), one blank sonple, one spiked blank, one staple spiked with the priority pollutant standard nixture and a duplicate customer sonple. This anounts to a 20% quality control factor. - Five surrogate conpounds are added to each stable in the batch of 20. - At least one blind quality control saaple is introduced to the laboratory for analysis for each hundred saaples analyzed. - Each CC/HS is checked and retuned, if necessary, every eight hours to ensure that its performance on decafluorotriphenylphospbine (DFTPP) aeels the EPA criteria. - A calibration curve for quantitation is prepared using a mixture of standards coaposed of either the Organic Acid or Base/Reutral Extractable Conpounds at a minimum of 3 concentrations and using 2,2'*difluorobipfeeayl as an internal standard. The calibration curve is verified with a nixture of priority pollutant standards every eight hours. Results are conpared to the acceptance criteria given in Method 625; any that do not meet the criteria are re-analyzed. Analysis of Pesticides, herbicides and PCR'a (EPA Method 606) Pesticide, herbicide and PCt sanples are grouped in batches of 16 customer sanples or less according to the type of analysis to be performed. The QC program for each of these three types of analyses is a niaimum of 20% and consists of analysing: HONS 022828 I Mill sample; - I i|IIH IImI I replicate saaplt; I replicate spiked pic; al - I llial QC laaplt for at least each IPO Map)** analysed. Tit* CC instrument* are tuned daily to aeet performance criteria in Method 606 Hetol Analyses All metal analyte* were performed by Atomic Absorption (aA) spectroscopy using the direct aspiration method (I) with the exception of arsenic, chromium, lead, and mercury. Arsenic analysis is performed by AA spertroscopy using the carbon rod furnace method, and mercury by AA spectroscopy using the cold vapor method (I|. Other Analysis and Tests All other tests and analyses, as designated by the I'.S. EPA for testing ground* water quality and possible contamination, were conducted in accordance with EPA*epproved or designated methods |2). RESULTS Samples results, and associated quality assurance data, are always tabulated in one or more of this report's Quantitative Results Tables. The format of each table varies with the class of analysis. Priority Pollutants The priority pollutant compounds and elements are listed with their NP0E5 (Pationel Pollution Discharge Elimination System) numbers, and the Method Detection Limit (HDD published in the Federal Register, December 3, 1979. When a compound or element ia present below its published MIL it is reported as MIL (lelow Method Detection Limit). Vlhen a compound or element is not present at any detectable concentrations it is reported as ND (Not Detected). Matrix spike and replicate analyses, where included, were performed on samples randomly chosen within each qualify assurance batch and are therefore not necessarily spikes and replicates of this report's sample. Surrogate compound recovery data and instrument calibration data are included in the Method Performance Data Tables. Tables 1*5 show the Method Performance Data for the CC/NS data. Tables 6*25 bom the analytical results obtained for the organic priority pollutonts, while Tables 26 and 27 show the analytical results for the nooorgamic priority pollutant*. .Tables 21 and 29 show the analytical results for the priority pollotoDt motels. MOWS 022829 RtniEKtS 1. Nolkodt Ur CkoaUal kaolvioo ( Wolor Vooito, U.S. IM-WO/4-70-020, OBI, CiKlMMti, Oklo, (torch l7. 2. Iwrfiri IktMi for the UmiMIIm of Voter n< Voalovotcr, AHW-AWWA-VTCr, IStk Edition, ItlO. HONS 022830 AftOvM NI t Hcovt'y u*n -f*#* *** s* IfilM-M-t )# i!(#WK*W *M/*tVl*K ***CtX>* l-f * **?. t1 He *N 200 04 ISO lit 155 103 209 I0J 159 S ISO 3 to V 9 96 9 50 19 OS to 71 ;i i:? i) . >*9 M , !6 15 ' -:i to , i ) ; i; 0 : 100 25 . <J 57 : tCI 5! >03 67 i 143 I 1 TAIU I. Sorrete Recovery - GC/ltS Dote (0R20) HONS 022831 w* "irsor IH tfc* tot* Hal 1 Ji-4A il .** . Km Puk, tM pvIaiiv* mwMmi Ltll 'kM^I'lCilM *Mk Iffiiir than SR af IN bast neat at net* IM IS Cniu' in* $n tf the bate mm In l*n af tan if# l ') s TiMf 2. Twain* Dali - IraMflwrabeaiana (BFft) for Volatiles Analysis (Q921) laa Abaadaata VI Criuna SI )4*I0I ef aata If# II itu t*a* 2% *f aan o n;ot Lett the* 21 af aatt 49 :*. if aatt 199 Lett lh*n 11 tf aatt 19# in fate taa*. *#C1 nlitivi abe*aa*ce S*n ef ett 199 LH'Si ?) at ati 199 "eater the* it af aett 199 141 .ets !** tait 44) 442 G^aatar thee 401 af aatt 191 44) m CW ef aatt 44? *bu*e**<e {X late 44 22 *9 '1 '040 20 } 49 9 Table 3. GC/HS Twain* Data - Decafliaarotriplieaylpliesptne (DFW) far Acid* Analysis (Q922) lea *M4itca Ae*'!t<e *1 Criteria (1 late 'eat> SI M*40S af aatt <99 # Lett *>* 21 a* aatt #9 19 let* the# 21 af aatt 49 2! 49>tet ef aatt 199 9T Lett the* 11 af aatt 19# 91 lata aea. SOCX reieti.e aa*9a*ce $91 at aatt 199 $ ;#) af aatt "*| frtiter thaa 11 af aatt 199 441 Lett thaa aatt 44) i Greater thaa 401 af aatt 199 44) 17-2)1 af aatt 442 47 , 2i 42 i too 0 *1 7 47 9 t Table 4. GC/ttS Tuning Data Decafluorotripbenylphospiae (Drrrf) far Adda Analyses (4*22) HONS 022932 |M> *><-- :* Mil'll Si N-ut f nii in lilt ta* It *ari A? * leti th* It 11 nan 4* !*r* lv*Mt el Nil III less IN" *t s* ness 1*S 'V las* tea*. lOCt re.aims evs*Mer.:e m {VI at nets 191 4HM4S1i it-m if mu m I'seter tbaa It a* nasi IW less tne* ness 44) . 442 treatsr than 491 cf mss Iff 413 ei mis 44: Aa#aa*:e 41 4c 1.3 4 3 9 4? 12 Table S. GC/HS Tuning Data Decafluorotriphenylpbespine (DFTPf) fur leae/Neutrals Analysis (QR23) HONS 022833 i SiH in m m Tabic 6. Volatile Coapowidi - CC/WS Aoalyaia Data (Q80I) Saople W-7 MONS 022834 TiMr I. Arid Co^awidi CC/DS Aiulyiii Oati (0*02) Snylr v-7 MOMS 022835 IlHNltlM** IAdcltM*itlMtH*v*(** ".t..y. 1ssr- f9flHtvtr#* ^SSSSlfCrl !*" MtMltfMtM HHWim IfHWIHI it*tttftt MNUH ta5!ir.qr: t.4*6tftl!tltlt*# I* I* IItt It It It It It (m*Oc It It It It It OC mTmiI* |t tt**t M4 t*H# aiMl lU | C>*!N<H< , #_ /l --t I :n K *%# !* t itt itt, ii itt; Itt IH Itt Ttfcle S. itte/Hritrl CMfotNi - GC/HS Analysts bl (QRO)) Sanple y-7 HONS 022836 Table I. Pesticide Compounds - GC/HS Analysis Bala (QMM) Saayle V-7 HONS 022837 Table 10. Volatile CeapooaOa - GC/MS Analyala Data IQOOI) Sample V-l HONS 022838 Table II. Arid CoafoumlB GC/IB Aaelyaii Data (QM2) Saaplr W- HONS 022839 Table 12. Bese/Hrmral Cofo< CC/HS taalyala Dale <QOJ) Saople V- HONS 022840 HONS 022841 Tahlt It. Volatile Coopotmdi - GC/ttS Analyaia Data (QMI) Saapte V- HONS 022842 Tkle IS. Ari4 Co-foywl* - GC/ltS Aiuly.if DjU (QR02) Saaplr w-4 MOWS 022443 haKw.qsji1 Wm(?I immhu InrSrm 'tW>m test______ ll.FJc.4lM'*** |MI *9/1 III#*t 1149 II II 19 19 1199 19 19 1I9t 19 19 1199 19 19 19 19 19 :: 1199 19 It 19 19 It I1199t 1199 It Ot ilHi (< Ifiiti iim 9C Ntn* tolM tt tMll | N M/I M/l { *9/1 S 3.IP IP IP if ' Si :s u Ml IN ! Tahlt It. bir/lntnl Cvmm4 - CC/HS Aaalj.U Data (QUO)) Saaplt W-9 HONS 022844 Tafcle 17. Pesticide CmihmihIi - GC/KS Analysis Data (<JH04) Sanple V-t HONS 022845 Tab!* II. Valatilr Cfa--I* - CC/RS laalytla Dala (QMI) laavl* W-l# HONS 0228*6 Tillr II. hU COf !> - ec/IC Aitolyolo Itoto (0M2) Soflr V-10 HONS 022847 Table 20. lase/Netftral Coapewdi CC/HS Analysis Data (QR03) Saapte V-IO HONS 022846 Table 21. Prilirldf Cm|nhw4i GC/HS Analysis Oat* <Q004) Saaple V-IO MOHS 022849 Table 22. AcW Co^muihIs - CC/HS Analysis Oats <Q*02) Saaylc Blank HONS 022950 Table 23. iase/llrutral Conponnds - CC/NS Analysis Data (0*03) Saaplr: blank HONS 022651 Table 24. lase/Nentral Coapomda * GC/MS Analysis Data (QK03) Staple: flank HONS 022852 Table 2S. Peaticide Coapouada - CC/HS Aaalytia Data (QK04) Saaple: Hank MONS 022653 .j: .1." Il8*k ' ?Mt 4*1*1* Cartaa IWlKlMU TlaariAr Tr*l Califata 4*1 4 ((Nlf fat*l SaliAa (lw Mliu tniuiM) Mill* Mil CfMi* 4 *n ) at/L <0.41 H MAS/l 24 a/l ? at/L <7/144 al 7 at/l <1 a*/l <M ATM <4 M/L <2 at/L <.41 at/L 44 at/L Amnii 1M*I *!!( llllHn Talal fWlfillMI t>lliifti|A< <4.4S af/L <2.4 af/l <4.4J af/l *4.41 at/L TABU 74. HOH-OHttNlC rtt04ITY POUtfTAirTS ------ --- ---1------------------------ IjwTVIi --------wrj -- li------------ ------------yri---------------------- fftr -- * 1.4 at/L 4 Vt/L 41 at/L 1 Hi/l 1.4 at/L 4 at/L 212 at/L 1 m/L U.J at/L M >1 at/L M HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA 41 at MAS/L W4 at/L <4.24 at/L <2/144 al 1 at/L 12 at/L <4 41 at MAS/L <4 24 af/l <4.24 at/L <2/144 al 2 at/L / at/L 41 at MAS/L <4.24 af/L <4.24 at/L <2/144 al 1 at/L 4,42* at/L <4.41 at H4AS/L <4.24 at/L <4.24 at/L <7/144 al 2 ag/L 141 m/l 44 ATM 441 at/L 144 ATHA 441 at/L M ATHA IU /l m mi <1 m/L *2 at/L <.1 at/L 44 at/L <7 at/L <4.42 at/L 44 at/L 14 at/L <4.42 at/L 141 at/L <2 at/L t/i 171 at/L HA 44 at/L 4.44 af/L 1.44 at/L 7.4 a|/L BA <24 at/L '2.4 at/L I.S4 at/L 2 4 at/L HA 3.42 m/I 1.41 at/L 1 47 at/L 1.4 m/L l.i It1 /! BA HA HA A Hal MlyH HONS 022854 TABLE 27. Reference Standard QL'ALITT CONTROL DATA TOR NOX-ORGANIC PRIORITY POLLITANTS Analyte Observed Value, t/l . True Value. bi/L Percent Recovery ---- ERA Deatand 8701 ERA Demand 870! Tu.N *0798 PCS 169 PCS JOS ERA Deaand 8701 PCS 40832 PCS 303 PCS 60798 PCS 301 ERA 8701 ERA 8701 PCS NIAS 40791 COO TOC TON r. so , p CN Phenol SH, P0, Oil 8 Create TSS Surfactants ::6 68.9 8.83 8.18 11 4.79 0.09 0.096 1.28 0.6 6 19 0.15 186 74 10 8 10 5.0 095 094 1.20 0.6 25 30 0.20 121.5 93.1 88. 3 102.) no 95.8 96 100 107 too 24 63 75 HONS 022855 Analyte Mercury Boron Al-in-- l*riuk CoNll Iron H*(M>iWI HulyMeauB Wont--toe Tin TlUnlua Blank <0.3 <0.25 ng/L <100 <200 <20 <20 <10 <200 <10 <1 x I03 <1 I II)3 TABLE 28. METALS V-2 NA* 0.28 t/t 1.1 X 10* <200 IIS 5.8 x I04 1.9 x 10s <200 7.2 x 10* <1.0 x 10* <1.0 x I03 Sample ID. Ml/l y-7 w-I----- <0.3 0.44 a|/L 850 <200 50 1.9 X I04 2.2 x I04 <200 770 <1 x 103 <1 x 103 <0.3 0.33 t/L 1.9 l I04 <200 600 30 x I04 7.0 x I04 <200 6.J x I03 <1 x I03 <1 x I03 W- 1.7 0.33 t/L l.)i 10s 1.9 x I03 no 2.0 x 3 6.2 x I04 <200 1.9 x I03 <1 X 103 1 x 103 w-io <0.3 <0.25 m/l 2 x 10s <200 <20 6.6 i I04 6.1 i I04 <200 2.6 x I03 <1 x I03 <1 x l3 HA Not Analyzed k x Severe Interference HONS 022056 TABLE 29 QUALITY CONTROL DATA TOR METAL ANALYSES Rfference Si jndards ERA 8/01 PCS 305 ERA 8701 PCS ERA sroi ERA SiOl ERA 8701 ERA 8701 PCS PCS PCS Analyte flercury ftoron Aluainu* Biriua Cobalt Iron ftolvb^enua Hanganete tin Tiuniun tUgnesiuai Obsfrvfd Value pg/l 3.85 0.38 1140 1.0 X 104 370 330 *95 LBS 9100 9500 948 True Value pg/L 4.40 0.40 1022 1.0 x 10* 370 526 500 476 1.0 x I04 1.0 x 104 t.O x I03 Perceni Rrcovei 87.' 95 112 100 100 101 139 102 91 95 95 HONS 022857 APPENDIX FIELD DATA SHEETS HONS 022858 Monsanto company (ROUNOUATER SAMPLING field data row MOJtCT NAME: C*K<JMi>0Lj.T SAMPLING POINT: lijcu. * 2. SAMPLED IT: roeOATE l $ Xico '1*/ TIME: HEATHER: /SW Vt- v TOP Of CASINO CLEVATlONfo,..^, T. --------- L. FEET DEPTH TO STATIC HATCH LEVEL: DEPTH TO HELL WTTOH: HEIGHT OF HATES COLUMN. H DIAMETER OF HELL CASING. 0 VOLUME OF HATER COLUMN, il h'x D> X 7.46 VOlUHE or WATER EVACUATED: DIO HELL READILY RECOVER? <? X ^2Z :S" FEET FEET /C2/ f< V ") FEET 0.33 FEET fro a^,) YES GALLONS GALLONS NO METHOO OF EVACUATION: METHOD OF SAMPLING: SAMPLE TEMPERATURE: SAMPLE H: ^ SL-i. */< /ff '2-.*T*/ :T7 *F SAMPLE SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE: */3 "BO umNos/cx SAMPLE COLON: SAMPLE TUMIDITY: __________ HIGH SAMPLE ODOM: OTHER OISESTATIONS: __________ MOOCRATC X __________ LOU J1L'JbUi. Z>-gyy^7Vcy> ADDITIONAL CONCNTS ON METH000L06Y. ETC.: TBC., f^icT/tt-, FL~, /}tJCALJA..ryi4 PaaFO F2>K-e: /-o< O - 72T "77j/ZfioaH Fit-TTK Pen. tAe~ifaemtry X?i/aj & y toa*si .0\/f r^v __ HONS 022859 HOKMTO COMPANY CNOUNOUATER SAMPLING FIELD DATA FORM PMJICY VK: {iw+;cgurr SAMPLING POINT: F^*> SAMPLED IT: /}r*,X, <} Fee '$-/ TIW: /OOjLrfrf WEATHER: r_ C/O 'F TOP OF CASING ELEVATION: DEPTH TO STATIC HATER LEVEL: DEPTH TO HELL BOTTOM: HEIGHT Of HATER COLUMN, H AJA AJA A.1 A A!A FEET FEET FEET FEET DIAMETER OF HELL CASING, D AJA VOLUME Of HATER COLUMN. >1 H I 0 X 7.B AJA VOLUME OF HATER EVACUATED: 4 AJA FEET GALLONS GALLONS DID HELL READILY RECOVER? YES NO METMOO OF EVACUATION: METHOD OF SAMPLING: SAMPLE TEMPERATURE: A!A AJ A -7 *c v<r F SAMPLE bH: 7 /2_ SAMPLE SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE: SAMPLE COLOR: SAMPLE TURBIDITY: </0 C' y ***jC /Joajs: vnhOS/CM IHQft MODERATE uu SAMPLE OOOR: OTHER OBSERVATIONS: ADDITIONAL COMMENTS ON MCTH000L06Y, ETC.: SJycrtL.^ F~-~^X T fr) r fZ*. o'/w<7sx>V/*7zr greet- FZ,c.r^K AjcTtVaA MQNS 022860 MONSANTO COMPANY GROUNDWATER SAMPLING FIELD DATA FOAM PROJECT HAW: Dm INC POINT: L^<-<- sahpleo T: F)-rwt*. <3MTE: /(? f~e:e, '*./ TIME: /3 e vwm-. r. 5^'^ TOP Of CASING ELEVATION: DEPTH TO STATIC MATER LEVEL: <72. / ~7c' ~ /7 ' FEET FEET DEPTH TO WELL BOTTOM: FEET HEIGHT OF MATER COLUMN, H -- /to ' OIAMETER OF HELL CASING, 0 VOLUME OF MATER COLUMN, I H l 0' X 7.48 VOLUME OF MATER EVACUATED: * -^2 f&r&J?* 3 6*. 7 FEET FEET GALLONS GALLONS DIO MEU REAOILY RECOVER? METHOO OF EVACUATION: METHOO OF SAMPLING: X Stt, jC </ NO SAMPLE TEMPERATURE: /</ *c *f SAMPLE pH: ___________ 7,^2.______________________ SAMPLE SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE: ________ (.`2,^0unhos/c* SAMPLE COLON: __________ _____________________ SAMPLE TUK0ID1TT: ____________________________ ___ HIGH MODERATE V 14tigy LOW SAMPLE 000N: 5*-/./Y/~ OTHER OOSERVATIONS: LjMte^nA.- r Ti ADDITIONAL CONCNTS ON NETHOOOLOGT, ETC.: C^A/Aji.Aje.i Gfr Or CZt***J HONS 022861 Monsanto companv CMUNMATER SAMPLING Fine DATA FOM FWJFCT MK: Q\\! SAMPLING POINT: 3 SAMPLED IT: /IrH.JerC 5wa,'.s*m OATE: '%/ TINC: /fT22- HEATHER: ^ tfC. TOP OF CASINO ELEVATION: *>?. </c. FEET OEPTH TO STATIC HATER LEVEL: -W<?' FEET DEPTH TO HELL BOTTOM: HEIOHT OF HATER COLUMN, H ~ <r FEET FEET OIAMETER OF HELL CASINO. 0 ____ <'**->______ O- !C>7 FEET VOLUME OF HATER COLUMN, il H X 0* X 7.48 4. VOLUME OF HATER EVACUATED: ~ <4.C DID HELL RCA01LV RECOVER? YES HETHOO OF EVACUATION: &j4U-# GALLONS GALLONS X NO METHOD OF SAMPLING: SAMPLE TEMPERATURE: SAMPLE pM: SAMPLE SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE: /5" *c 0.^2 /2.0 F nhot/ca SAMPLE COLOR: SAMPLE TUMIDITY: y 'Sex* MODERATE SAMPLE OCOA: LOW tJofjc L>tet-T*u> OTHER OGSCRVATIONS: AOOlTIQNAl CCWCHTS ON MCTMOOOIOCT. ETC.: *>**(*> C^Pai>rrx/> pJit,tAJi. 3orrt*&. Mo*r S"--r z>eirt-& U<sn uMci. t>AY l,Ai HONS 022862 MONSANTO COMPART GROUNDWATER umiw FIELD mi* ram PROJECT NAME: sampling point: $mCD BY: T Cl\J (/*?< < <j DATE: /0 Fk* VV time: /o'h. WEATHER: TOR OF CASING ELEVATION: 4ZO.</c, FEET DERTH TO STATIC HATER LEVEL: FEET DCRTH TO HELL BOTTOM: FEn HEIGHT of HATER COUIHH. H FEET DIAMETER OF HELL CASING, D _____________ a/c.7 VOLUME OF HATER COLU*. it H I 0> I .B (1. <57. VOLUME OF HATER EVACUATED: * 3.2. DID HELL REAOILY RECOVER? X YES FEET GALLONS GALLONS NO METHOD OF EVACUATION: METHOO OF SAMPLING: * tP /A , SAMPLE TEMPERATURE: 1*1 *c F SAMPLE *H: -7./^ SAMPLE SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE: -7-7^ Hos/ai SAMPLE COLOR: SAMPLE TIMIDITY: >*** ______________V Y_ _ _ _ _ _ \ZzKY WISH MOOCRATE LOW SAMPLE OOOR: Zj/-r*c.T-b _ OTHER OBSERVATIONS: ( ,|( y . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 'mi^T^Ti AMIT1ORAL CONCNTS OR METHODOLOGY, ETC.: <<!f S ^VAAS/T(Ei^ __ tZiTTTt^ 'S#A/772^- ^a-7- &7Te^.- Oi/77 HUNS 022Bfc3 muw CfMNlf gnounouater sampling no# mt raw MOJICT NAME: Os^OSi^r GvU SAMPLING POINT: u.>c.t- * /<? SAMPLED IY! = /V '3y TINE: (?S 1 WCAtMM: ^,a-ad^ TOP OF CASINO ELEVATION: V/Tf // FEET DEPTH TO STATIC HATE* LEVEL: -*-/o' FEET DEPTH TO HELL OOTTON: FEET HCISHT OF HATER COLUMN, H -^ '2.'? ' FEET DIAMETER OF HELL CASING, D __________ AO. 0 33 FEET X 4 X VOLUME OF HATER COLUMN, <IH D* 7.48 /<t. } GALLONS VOLUME OF WATER EVACUATED: ___________ jTC.r___ GALLONS DIO WELL READILY RECOVER? X yes NO HETHOO OF EVACUATION: fe A/t-.X METHOD OF SAMPLING: s*jC SAMPLE TEMPERATURE: SAMPLE pH: SAMPLE SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE: SAMPLE COLOR: /</ *c (- -"V-. / /4>(? A./oAJdT F unHos/cb SAMPLE TUROIOITY: HIGH ____ Yl____ NOOERATE LOW SAMPLE ODOR: K,o^ E>TZsn*:?> OTHER 08SERVATI0NS: _________________ __ ADDITIONAL CONORS OH METHOOOLOGY. ETC.: UMtU- fj&& MOMS 022864 NOKStffTO COWANT GNOUWWATEN SAMPLING FIELD DATA Fowl PROJECT RAW: /CML<TT Q&J SAMPLING POINT: umto It: /P-HMCK.OZnWS MU: Tntt: fO *m": TOF or CASING ELEVATION: DEPTH TO STATIC WATER LEVEL: DEPTH TO WELL DOTTOM: AJA A'/l HEIGHT OF HATER COLUMN, H AM DIAMETER OF WELL CASING. 0 ________A//I ______ A>AVOLUME OF HATER COLUMN. l H X 0* K 7.40 VOLUME OF WATER EVACUATED: ' AM DID WELL REAOILV RECOVER? HETHOO OF EVACUATION: METHOD OF SAMPLING: SAMPLE TEMPERATURE: VES aJa ... a/a -*F SAMPLE pH: SAMPLE SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE: 7./2. *./(? SAMPLE COLON: SAMPLE TUMID ITT: AJl>aJ6T FEET feet FEET FEET GALLONS GALLONS NO F aMos/ca SAMPLE OOON: AJn^/C ttjS.-Tirb OTHER OISEOVATIONS: ___________________________________________ ADDITIONAL COWENTS ON HETH000106T, ETC.: P/KT4 //,&. C- Strt7t^& p-j;i sl, PtKart.y' Ft<o** Ca*sr>rAAAtsc. MOWS otiats