Document 1Q2VLVbXN3m9N77LEyL4mrGpj

p r r: a A R 6 _ !\6 G OHIO RIVER WATER SAMPLING RESULTS DUPONT WASHINGTON WORKS FACILITY AND THE LETART LANDFILL o-*0:?-) '--CiOm O p r, OO Date: November 2002 Project No.: D6WW7423 18983635.14000 18983632.00021 10? CORPORATE REMEDIATION GROUP An Alliance between DuPont and URS Diamond Barley Mill Plaza, Building 27 Wilmington, Delaware 19805 CONTAIN MO CBI M H2 DRAFT Ohio River Water Sampling Results Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction...................................................................................................................1 2.0 C-8 Analyses and Analytical Reporting......................................................................3 3.0 Ohio River Water C-8 Results Near The Washington Works Facility....................... 5 4.0 Ohio River Water C-8 Results Near the Letart Landfill............................................. 7 5.0 Ohio River Parameters................................................................................................. 8 6.0 References.................................................................................................................... 9 Table 1 Table 2 Table 3 Table 4 TABLES Ohio River Water Sampling Plan, DuPont Washington Works Facility, and Letart Landfill GPS Coordinates and Field Parameters for Ohio River Water, DuPont Washington Works Outfall 005 C-8 Results Ohio River Parameters Figure 1A Figure IB Figure 2 FIGURES Ohio River Water Sampling Locations - Upstream, DuPont Washington Works Facility Ohio River Water Sampling Locations - Downstream, DuPont Washington Works Facility Ohio River Water Sampling Locations, Letart Landfill Site APPENDICES Appendix A Ohio River Stage Data from USGS Gaging Station 03150800, Ohio River near Marietta, Ohio Appendix B Local Climatological Data from NOAA for June, July and October 2002 riverresuits.doc Nov. 19,02 Wilmington, DE I 000023 DRAFT Ohio River Water Sampling Results Introduction 1.0 INTRODUCTION A multi-media Consent Order (Order No. GWR-2001-019) was entered into between the West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection (WVDEP), the West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources - Bureau for Public Health (WVDHHRBPH) and DuPont on November 15, 2001. The Consent Order identified a series of requirements and tasks to be performed by the parties (WVDEP, WVDHHR-BPH, and DuPont) in order to determine whether there has been an impact on human health and the environment as a result of releases of ammonium perfluorooctanoate (C-8), CAS Number 3825-26-1, to the environment from DuPont operations at the Washington Works facility (facility) and the associated landfills (Local, Letart, and Dry Run). The Consent Order established the C-8 Groundwater Investigation Steering Team (GIST) to oversee investigations and activities that will be conducted to assess the presence and extent of C-8 in drinking water, groundwater, and surface-water at and around the facility and the Local, Letart, and Dry Run Landfills. Pursuant to Attachment A of the Consent Order, three primary tasks will be performed by DuPont and evaluated by the GIST. These tasks (Tasks A, B, and C) are described briefly below: Task A: Conduct Groundwater Use and Well Survey/Groundwater Monitoring -this task involves evaluating C-8 in groundwater initially within a one-mile radius from the facility and the landfills and public water supplies upstream and 10 miles downstream of the facility along the Ohio River. Currently, four reports have been issued documenting the surveying activities (DuPont 2002a; 2002b; 2002c; and 2002d). These reports provide the results for one-mile radius surveys around the Washington Works Facility/Local Landfill, Letart Landfill, Dry Run Landfill, and in Washington County, Ohio. In addition, results for the two-mile radius survey around the Washington Works Facility/Local Landfill and for public water supplies along the Ohio River are presented. A two-mile survey in Washington County Ohio has recently been completed, and a report documenting these activities is in preparation. Quarterly monitoring of C-8 at three public water supplies (Tuppers Plains, Lubeck, and Little Hocking) is ongoing. Task B: Assessment of Existing Groundwater and Surface Water Monitoring Data - this task comprises three subtasks: Compile historical C-8 data. Sample monitoring wells and outfalls at the facility and associated landfills. Develop a Groundwater Monitoring Plan for the facility. The first and third subtasks were completed and submitted to the GIST for review. Subtask 2 is an ongoing task conducted monthly for required surface-water sampling points and quarterly for groundwater and for non-required surface-water sampling points. Sampling results are submitted monthly and/or quarterly to the GIST. riverresults.doc Nov. 19, 02 Wilmington, DE 000039 1 DRAFT Ohio River Water Sampling Results Introduction Task C: Plume Identifkation/Groundwater Assessment - this task includes evaluating the vertical and horizontal extent of C-8 impacted groundwater and specifically includes an assessment of C-8 impacted groundwater at the Letart Landfill and its impact on the Ohio River and public water supplies along the river. Drilling of new monitoring wells has been completed at the Washington Works Facility and at the Local, Letart, and Dry Run Landfills. C-8 sampling of the all monitoring wells was recently completed, and C-8 analysis is underway. In addition to the tasks described above, the GIST also recommended that DuPont conduct a river investigation to assess if C-8 impacted groundwater at the facility is impacting the Ohio River. DuPont agreed with this request and the Ohio River Water Sampling Proposal for the Washington Works facility and the Letart Landfill was submitted in February 2002 to the GIST. This proposal was subsequently approved by the GIST. Shortly after approval, the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency (Ohio EPA) reviewed the proposal and recommended slight modifications. DuPont agreed to change the proposal as recommended by Ohio EPA (DuPont letter to Ohio EPA, dated April 1, 2002). Sampling activities were conducted in June, July, and October 2002. This report presents the results of the Ohio River water sampling and is organized in the following manner: O Section 2 provides information on C-8 analyses and analytical reporting. Section 3 presents the Ohio River water C-8 results for locations upstream, adjacent to and downstream of the Washington Works Facility. O Section 4 provides the Ohio River water C-8 results for locations sampled adjacent to Letart Landfill. Section 5 presents the Ohio River parameters. Section 6 provides references. riverresults.doc Nov. 19. 02 Wilmington, DE 2 000031 DRAFT Ohio River Water Sampling Results C-8 Analyses and Analytical Reporting 2.0 C-8 ANALYSES AND ANALYTICAL REPORTING The Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP; DuPont, 2002e) discusses the procedures and protocols developed to ensure that project information, data, and decisions derived from or based on data acquired during the C-8 investigation at Washington Works Facility and associated landfills are technically sound, usable, and properly documented. The QAPP was submitted to the GIST in January 2002. Specifically, Sections 5, 6, and 10 present sampling protocols, sample and document custody procedures, and internal quality control checks that were followed during the field sampling activities associated with the groundwater well and water-use survey. The QAPP also presents information on quality assurance, calibration procedures and frequency, analytical procedures, data reduction, verification, and reporting. Information on the analytical method and the precision criteria used for the C-8 reporting are summarized below. In October 2001, Exygen Research, Inc. (Exygen), located in State College, Pennsylvania, developed and tested a new analytical method that utilizes Liquid Chromatography/Tandem Mass Spectrometry (LC/MS/MS). DuPont adopted this method (LC/MS/MS) for analyzing C-8 in water in November 2001. Currently, Exygen performs all C-8 water sample analyses for DuPont. Exygen reports C-8 results for the laboratory replicate of each field sample. These results are evaluated for precision by comparing the field sample result to the corresponding laboratory replicate result: If both results are less than the practical quantitation limit (PQL), the replicate sample for that analyte is considered to have passed the precision criteria. If one or both results are between one and five times the PQL, the replicate is considered to have met the precision criteria if the two results differ by less than the PQL. If one result is less than the PQL and the other is not and if the two results differed by a value less than the PQL, the replicate is said to have met the acceptance criteria. If both results are at least five times the PQL, the replicate is considered to have met the criteria if the relative percent difference (RPD) between the two results is less than or equal to 20%. The RPD is the absolute value of the difference of two measurements divided by their average. When the precision criteria outlined above are met, Exygen reports the average of the field sample and the laboratory replicate results reported. If criteria for precision are exceeded, Exygen reports the higher of the sample and laboratory replicate results. Finally, when one result (from the sample/laboratory replicate pair) is above the PQL and one below, the result that is above the PQL is reported. C-8 results are recorded in the Corporate Environmental Database (CED) and are reported as FC-143 for consistency with historical results. riverresulls.doc Nov. 19, 02 Wilmington, DE 000032 3 DRAFT Ohio River Water Sampling Results C-8 Analyses and Analytical Reporting An aliquot of each field sample is also analyzed as a matrix spike (MS). Results of the MS analysis are used to assess accuracy. The MS recovery value must fall between 70 to 130%, unless the sample concentration is at least four times the amount spiked. The maximum amount used to spike field samples is 500 ug/L. All data packages generated by Exygen are reviewed in-house for compliance with the laboratory Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) and data usability, using the checklist provided in the QAPP. Results of the in-house review indicate that data reported by Exygen have been generated in compliance with the laboratory SOP, with few exceptions as noted in the individual review summaries. All data reported by Exygen have been judged usable for the purposes of the project. In addition, 13 river-water samples and two blanks were submitted to Environmental Standards Incorporated of Valley Forge, Pennsylvania, for quality assurance review. Results of the additional quality assurance review also indicated that the quality of the data is acceptable and qualification of the data was not warranted. riverresults.doc Nov. 19, 02 W ilmington, DE 000033 4 DRAFT Ohio River W ater Sampling Results Ohio River Water C-8 Results Near the __________Washington Works Facility 3.0 OHIO RIVER WATER C-8 RESULTS NEAR THE WASHINGTON WORKS FACILITY Near the facility, Ohio River water was sampled to measure the concentrations of C-8 in the Ohio River. The sampling investigation was designed to meet three main objectives: Characterize background C-8 concentrations in river-water upstream of the facility. Assess C-8 concentrations in river-water along the facility reach. O Evaluate C-8 concentrations in river-water downstream of the facility. Ohio River water upstream of the facility, along the facility, and downstream of the facility was sampled during this investigation. In total, 49 river-water samples were collected, including two duplicate samples. At selected sampling areas, as many as three river-water samples were collected along a single transect across the river and as many as three depths were sampled (dip, mid-column, and bottom). All river-water samples were analyzed for C-8 in accordance with the Standard Operating Procedure approved by the GIST and the Quality Assurance Project Plan (DuPont, 2002e). During the same time period that the river-water was sampled, effluent from Outfall 005 was also sampled to evaluate dispersion downstream of the outfall. Historically, Outfall 005 has shown the highest concentrations of C-8 and discharged a larger volume of effluent compared to the other outfalls and outlets at the Washington Works Facility. However, the C-8 concentration at Outfall 005 has been steadily decreasing in 2001 and 2002 following the installation of a carbon adsorption treatment system in the flouropolymers process. Table 1 summarizes the Ohio River Water Sampling Plan including: O A description of the sampling transect locations on the river The number of sampling points along each transect The sample type, dip (surface), mid-column and/or bottom collected at each sampling point In addition, for each sample collected, the following information is provided: The transect number O The location of the individual sample along the transect (WV-side, center, or OHside) The type of sample (dip, mid-column, or bottom) The sample identification The C-8 result (in ug/L) The date of sampling 000034 riverresults.doc Nov. 19, 02 Wilmington, DE 5 DRAFT Ohio River W ater Sampling Results Ohio River Water C-8 Results Near the __________Washington Works Facility Figures 1A and B present the Ohio River water-sampling results graphically. At each transect location, a summary table of C-8 results is shown. Table 2 provides the Global Positioning System (GPS) coordinates of each sampling location and the field parameters monitored during collection of each sample (temperature, pH, and specific conductance). Table 3 provides the C-8 results for Outfall 005. riverresults.doc Nov. 19, 02 Wilmington, DE 000035 6 DRAFT Ohio River Water Sampling Results Ohio River Water C-8 Results Near the Letart Landfill 4.0 OHIO RIVER WATER C-8 RESULTS NEAR THE LETART LANDFILL Adjacent to the Letart Landfill, Ohio River water was also sampled to measure the concentrations of C-8 levels in Ohio River. Two locations were sampled. One sampling location was positioned in the river near the point where the ravine originating at the landfill discharges surface-water into the river. The other sampling point was located approximately 1000 feet downstream of the first location. All samples were collected near the shoreline (approximately 100 feet east of the shoreline). Dip and mid-column samples were collected at both locations. In total, five river-water samples were collected, including one duplicate sample. All river-water samples were analyzed for C-8 in accordance with the Standard Operating Procedure approved by the GIST and the Quality Assurance Project Plan (DuPont, 2002e). Sampling information and C-8 results for the Ohio River water sampled near the Letart Landfill are summarized in Table 1 and are presented graphically in Figure 2. At each transect location, a summary table of C-8 results is shown in Figure 2. Table 2 presents the GPS coordinates and field parameters (temperature, pH, and specific conductance) for all samples near the Letart Landfill. riverresults.doc Nov. 19, 02 Wilmington, DE 00003C 7 DRAFT Ohio River Water Sampling Results Ohio River Parameters 5.0 OHIO RIVER PARAMETERS Table 4 provides the Ohio River stage data and the daily resultant wind direction and wind speed for the time period that sampling was conducted. River discharge is not monitored at the USGS Gaging Station 03150800, Ohio River near Marietta, Ohio. Therefore, this data is not available for the time period that sampling was conducted. Appendix A provides the Ohio River Stage data from USGS Gaging Station 03150800, Ohio River near Marietta, Ohio. Appendix B provides the complete spreadsheets of daily Local Climatological Data for June, July, and October 2002 recorded at the Wood County Airport weather recording station. riverresults.doc Nov. 19, 02 Wilmington, DE 000037 8 DRAFT Ohio River Water Sampling Results References 6.0 REFERENCES DuPont. 2002a. One-Mile Radius Survey and C-8 Sampling Report and Ohio River Public Water Supply Sampling, DuPont Washington Works (December 2001February 2002), April 2002. DuPont Corporate Remediation Group and URS Diamond. ______. 2002b. One-Mile Radius Survey and C-8 Sampling Results, Washington County, Ohio (March - June 2002), August 2002. DuPont Corporate Remediation Group and URS Diamond. ______. 2002c. Two-Mile Radius Survey and C-8 Sampling Report, DuPont Washington Works Facility/Local Landfill, West Virginia (March - May 2002), August 2002. DuPont Corporate Remediation Group and URS Diamond. ______. 2002d. Public Water Supply Results, West Virginia and Ohio, DuPont * Washington Works, Washington, WV, August 2002. DuPont Corporate Remediation Group and URS Diamond. ______. 2002e. January 2002 Groundwater Investigation Quality Assurance Project Plan for Washington Works Plant Washington, WV, January 2002. DuPont Corporate Remediation Group and URS Diamond. USEPA. 1994. Region HI Modifications to National Functional Guidelines for Organic Data Review. riverresults.doc Nov. 19, 02 Wilmington, DE 00003* 9 000039 TABLES 000040 r: : River Water Invaatigatlons Washington Works Facility Letart Landfill 11/19/2002 } Upstream Near Facility Downstream Near Landfill Downstream Table 1 Ohio River Water Sampling Plan DuPont Washington Works Facility and Letart Landfill Transect Location Description ' 26 Miles Upstream of the Washington Works Facility 10 Miles Upstream of the Washington Works Facility Upstream of the Washington Works Facility - eastern end of Blennerhasselt Island Along Washington Works Facility - North of Outfall 001 Along Washington Works Facility - East of Outfall 007 Along Washington Works Facility Downstream of Outfall 005 1 5 Miles Downstream of the Washington Works Facility 3 Miles Downstream of the Washington Works Facility 10 Miles Downstream of the Washington Works Facility 18 Miles Downstream of the Washington Works Facility Adjacent to the Letart Landfill Downstream of the Letart Landfill 000041 Number o i , Sampling : Points 1 1 3 p io ta i ^ Sample^ Number of T y p e (s )i .Samples Dip and Mid column 2 Dip and Mid column 2 Dip, Mid column and Bottom 3 Dip, Mid column and Bottom 9 ' " i ,f . 4. . Transect Number 1 1 2 2 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 Dip, Mid 9 column and Bottom 4 4 5 5 5 5 3 Dip, Mid 9 column and Bottom 5 5 5 5 5 5 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 2 Dip, Mid 6 column and Bottom 1 Dip and Mid 2 column 1 Dip and Mid 2 column 1 Dip and Mid 2 column 1 Dip and Mid 2 column 1 Dip and Mid 2 column 6 6 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 10 11 11 12 12 12 1 of 1 Location - . on>h^ Transect Sample;' Type center center center mid-column dip mid-column center dip center bottom center mid-column center WV-slde WV-side WV-side center center center OH-side dip bottom mid-column dip bottom mid-column dip bottom OH-side OH-side WV-side mid-column dip bottom WV-side WV-side center center center OH-side OH-side OH-side OH-side WV-side WV-side WV-side center mid-column dip bottom mid-column dip bottom mid-column dip dip bottom mid-column dip bottom center center OH-side mid-column dip bottom OH-side OH-side WV-side WV-side WV-side WV-side center center center center center center center center center mid-column dip bottom mid-column dip dip bottom mid-column dip mid-column dip mid-column dip mid-column dip WV-side WV-side WV-side WV-side \A/V-side mid-column dip mid-column dip dip ` X'i- ' Santole ID WWK-R-TS 1-2M WWK-R-TS 1-2S WWK-R-TS 2-2M WWK-R-TS 2-2S WWK-R-TS 3-2B WWK-R-TS 3-2M WWK-R-TS 3-2S WWK-R-TS 4-1B WWK-R-TS 4-1M WWK-R-TS 4-1S WWK-R-TS 4-2B WWK-R-TS 4-2M WWK-R-TS 4-2S WWK-R-TS 4-3B WWK-R-TS 4-3M WWK-R-TS 4-3S WWK-R-TS 5-1B WWK-R-TS 5-1M WWK-R-TS 5-1S WWK-R-TS 5-2B WWK-R-TS 5-2M WWK-R-TS 5-2S WWK-R-TS 5-3B WWK-R-TS 5-3M WWK-R-TS 5-3S WWK-R-TS 5-3S-2 (DUP) WWK-R-TS 6-1B WWK-R-TS 6-1M WWK-R-TS 6-1S WWK-R-TS 6-2B WWK-R-TS 6-2M WWK-R-TS 6-2S WWK-R-TS 6-3B WWK-R-TS 6-3M WWK-R-TS 6-3S WWK-R-TS 7-1B WWK-R-TS 7-1M WWK-R-TS 7-1S WWK-R-TS 7-1S-2 (DUP) WWK-R-TS 7-2B WWK-R-TS 7-2M' WWK-R-TS 7-2S" WWK-R-TS 8-2M WWK-R-TS 8-2S WWK-R-TS 9-2M WWK-R-TS 9-2S WWK-R-TS 10-2M WWK-R-TS 10-2S WWK-R-TS 11-1M WWK-R-TS 11-1S WWK-R-TS 12-1M WWK-R-TS 12-1S WWK-R-TS 12-1S-2 (DUP Z O O o o' o Q Z C-8 ug/L NO (<0 010) ND (<0 010) ND (<0.010) ND {<0 010) NQ ^<0 050) ND (<Q 010) ND (<0 010) ND (<0 010) ND (<0 010) ND (<0 010) ND (<0 010) ND (<0 010) ND (<0 010) ND (<0 010) ND (<0.010} ND (<0 010) NQ (<0 050) ND (<Q 010) ND (<0 010) ND (<0 010) ND (<0 010) ND (<0 010) ND {<0 010) ND (<0.010) ND {<0 010) ND (<0 010) ND (<=0 010) ND (<0 010) ND (<0.010) ND {<0.010) NQ (<0 050) ND (0.010) ND (<0.010) 0 113 0.131 0.113 0,138 0 123 0 0949 0 104 0.999 1 09 0.292 0 298 0.236 0 239 0.109 0.101 0 0971 0.118 0.128 Date 6/25/2002 6/25/2002 6/26/2002 6/26/2002 10/17/2002 6/26/2002 6/26/2002 6/28/2002 6/28/2002 6/28/2002 6/28/2002 6/28/2002 6/28/2002 6/28/2002 6/28/2002 6/28/2002 6/27/2002 6/27/2002 6/27/2002 6/27/2002 6/27/2002 6/27/2002 6/27/2002 6/27/2002 6/27/2002 6/27/2002 6/27/2002 6/27/2002 6/27/2002 6/27/2002 6/27/2002 6/27/2002 6/27/2002 6/27/2002 6/27/2002 10/17/2002 10/17/2002 10/17/2002 10/17/2002 10/17/2002 10/17/2002 10/17/2002 7/10/2002 7/10/2002 7/10/2002 7/10/2002 7/10/2002 7/10/2002 7/11/2002 7/11/2002 7/11/2002 7/11/2002 7/11/2002 ohioriver xls Table 2. GPS Coordinates and Field Parameters for Ohio River Water DuPont Washington Works > - * Sam lie ID ' .,,f-lrv'4fi'1 W W K -R -T S 1-2M W W K -R -T S 1-2S W W K -R -T S 2-2 M W W K -R -T S 2-2S W W K -R -T S 3-2B W W K -R -T S 3-2M W W K -R -T S 3-2S W W K -R -TS 4-1B W W K -R -TS 4-1M W W K -R -TS 4-1 S W W K -R -TS 4-2B W W K -R -TS 4-2M W W K -R -TS 4-2S W W K -R -TS 4-3B W W K -R -TS 4-3M W W K -R -TS 4-3S W W K -R -TS 5-1B W W K -R -TS 5-1M W W K -R -TS 5-1S W W K -R -TS 5-2B W W K -R -T S 5-2 M W W K -R -T S 5-2S W W K -R -T S 5-3B W W K -R -T S 5-3M W W K -R -T S 5-3S W W K -R -T S 5-3S-2 (DUP) W W K -R -TS 6-1B W W K -R -TS 6-1M W W K -R -TS 6-1S W W K -R -T S 6-2 B W W K -R -T S 6-2M W W K -R -T S 6-2S W W K -R -TS 6-3B W W K -R -TS 6-3M W W K -R -TS 6-3S W W K -R -TS 7-1B W W K -R -TS 7-1M W W K -R -T S 7-1S W W K -R -T S 7-1S-2 (DUP) 11/19/2002 .**-'t Date Weather Global Position System $h J Temp. ' v1 - f f 5 * * $ (F) Conditions Northutv T' West- 6 /2 5 /2 0 0 2 6 /2 5 /2 0 0 2 90 90 C le a r 3921.295 C lear 39 2 1 .2 9 5 8 1 -2 2 .9 5 7 8 1 -2 2 .9 5 7 6 /2 6 /2 0 0 2 82 C lo u d y 3 9 2 0 .7 8 1 -3 3 .0 3 6 /2 6 /2 0 0 2 82 C lo u d y 3 9 -2 0 .7 8 1 -3 3 .0 3 1 0 /1 7 /2 0 0 2 48 C loudy/R ain 39-1 6 .1 0 8 8 1 -3 5 .3 7 7 6 /2 6 /2 0 0 2 82 C lo u d y 3 9 -1 6 .1 0 8 8 1 -3 5 .3 7 7 6 /2 6 /2 0 0 2 82 C lo u d y 3 9 -1 6 .1 6 3 8 1 -3 5 .4 4 2 6 /2 8 /2 0 0 2 81 C lo u d y 3 9 -1 6 .4 3 2 8 1 -3 9 .6 9 6 6 /2 8 /2 0 0 2 81 C lo u d y 3 9 -1 6 .4 3 2 8 1 -3 9 .6 9 6 6 /2 8 /2 0 0 2 80 C lo u d y 3 9 -1 6 .4 3 2 8 1 -3 9 .6 9 6 6 /2 8 /2 0 0 2 81 C lo u d y 3 9 -1 6 .5 0 0 8 1 -3 9 .7 0 8 6 /2 8 /2 0 0 2 6 /2 8 /2 0 0 2 82 82 C lo u d y 3 9 -1 6 .5 0 0 C lo u d y 3 9 -1 6 .5 0 0 8 1 -3 9 .7 0 8 8 1 -3 9 .7 0 8 6 /2 8 /2 0 0 2 82 C lo u d y 3 9 -1 6 .5 6 9 8 1 -3 9 .7 0 2 6 /2 8 /2 0 0 2 6 /2 8 /2 0 0 2 82 82 C lo u d y 3 9 -1 6 .5 6 9 C lo u d y 3 9 -1 6 .5 6 9 8 1 -3 9 .7 0 2 8 1 -3 9 .7 0 2 6 /2 7 /2 0 0 2 82 R a in /W in d 3 9 -1 6 .3 8 2 8 1 -4 0 .3 6 3 6 /2 7 /2 0 0 2 82 R ain /W in d 3 9 -1 6 .3 8 2 8 1 -4 0 .3 6 3 6 /2 7 /2 0 0 2 80 R ain /W in d 3 9 -1 6 .3 8 2 8 1 -4 0 .3 6 3 6 /2 7 /2 0 0 2 80 R ain /W in d 3 9 -1 6 .4 2 5 81-4 0 .3 3 4 6 /2 7 /2 0 0 2 6 /2 7 /2 0 0 2 80 R ain /W in d 3 9 -1 6 .4 2 5 81-4 0 .3 3 4 80 R ain /W in d 3 9 -1 6 .4 2 5 81-4 0 .3 3 4 6 /2 7 /2 0 0 2 80 R a in /W in d 3 9 -1 6 .4 8 7 8 1 -4 0 .3 9 6 6 /2 7 /2 0 0 2 80 W in d /C lo u d y 3 9 -1 6 .4 8 7 81-4 0 .3 9 6 6 /2 7 /2 0 0 2 82 W in d /C lo u d y 3 9 -1 6 .4 8 7 81-4 0 .3 9 6 6 /2 7 /2 0 0 2 82 W in d /C lo u d y 39-16.487 81-4 0 .3 9 6 6 /2 7 /2 0 0 2 82 C lo u d y 3 9 -1 6 .2 7 2 8 1 -4 0 .7 6 /2 7 /2 0 0 2 82 C lo u d y 3 9 -1 6 .2 7 2 8 1 -4 0 .7 6 /2 7 /2 0 0 2 82 C lo u d y 3 9 -1 6 .2 7 2 8 1 -4 0 .7 6 /2 7 /2 0 0 2 82 C lo u d y 3 9 -1 6 .3 3 4 8 1 -4 0 .7 4 5 6 /2 7 /2 0 0 2 82 C lo u d y 3 9 -1 6 .3 3 4 8 1 -4 0 .7 4 5 6 /2 7 /2 0 0 2 82 C lo u d y 3 9 -1 6 .3 3 4 8 1 -4 0 .7 4 5 6 /2 7 /2 0 0 2 85 C lo u d y 3 9 -1 6 .3 7 7 8 1 -4 0 .7 7 3 6 /2 7 /2 0 0 2 6 /2 7 /2 0 0 2 85 85 C lo u d y 3 9 -1 6 .3 7 7 C loudy 3 9 -1 6 .3 7 7 8 1 -4 0 .7 7 3 8 1 -4 0 .7 7 3 1 0 /1 7 /2 0 0 2 1 0 /1 7 /2 0 0 2 1 0 /1 7 /2 0 0 2 48 C loudy/R ain 3 9 -1 5 .0 4 5 48 C loudy/R ain 3 9 -1 5 .0 4 5 48 C loudy/R ain 3 9 -1 5 .0 4 5 8 1 -4 1 .6 1 3 8 1 -4 1 .6 1 3 8 1 -4 1 .6 1 3 1 0 /1 7 /2 0 0 2 48 C loudy/R ain 3 9 -1 5 .0 4 5 81-4 1 .6 1 3 Sample Tyotal . ; Depth/ ,5u ;5w i V ./ - Specinc : Temp Conductance Depth (ft.) ^ (ft;> v # p H *- ` (C) :i :f> (mS) - 15.1 7.36 28 324 1 7.48 28.1 333 18.9 9.5 6.91 2 6 .6 403 18.9 1 7.21 27.4 402 27.9 26.9 6 .4 9 17.7 415 31.2 15 7.27 2 7 .7 383 31.2 1 7.48 2 7 .7 379 27 6 .8 8 2 5 .5 402 14.5 7.3 25.5 395 1 7 .3 8 2 5 .9 392 18 7.38 2 5 .7 394 10 7.41 26.1 390 1 7.42 26.4 391 29.1 27 7 .3 5 2 6 .3 383 29.1 14.5 7.4 26.2 383 29.1 1 7.33 26.4 383 25 7.49 2 6 .6 380 13.5 7.5 26.4 382 1 7.49 2 6 .7 385 24 7.53 2 6 .6 278 12 7.47 2 6 .5 383 1 7.46 2 6 .8 389 26 7.51 2 6 .5 387 13 7.58 2 6 .9 384 1 7.58 2 6 .8 387 1 7.58 2 6 .8 387 24.5 6 .7 7 26.4 384 13 7 .2 8 2 6 .2 377 1 7.43 2 6 .4 382 30.4 7.49 26.4 381 16 7.52 26.4 380 1 7 .4 8 26.6 379 27 7.52 26.7 379 14.5 7.41 26.6 383 1 7.51 26.8 382 2 0 .6 5 19.65 7.86 18.6 433 2 0 .6 5 10.3 7.87 17.3 436 2 0 .6 5 1 7.87 18.8 431 2 0 .6 5 1 7.87 18.8 431 000042 Page 1 ohioriver.xls Table 2. GPS Coordinates and Field Parameters for Ohio River Water DuPont Washington Works .*r -"Sam dIb 7* ID ^ `11 fS*' W W K -R -T S 7-2B W W K -R -T S 7-2M W W K -R -T S 7-2S W W K -R -T S 7-2M W W K -R -T S 7-2S W W K -R -T S 8-2 M W W K -R -T S 8-2 S W W K -R -T S 9-2M W W K -R -T S 9-2S W W K -R -T S 10-2M W W K -R -T S 10-2S W W K -R -TS 11-1M W W K -R -T S 11-1S W W K -R -T S 12-1M W W K -R -T S 12-1S W W K -R -TS 12-1S-2 (D U P) s k u * Weather ... Global Positlon System Temp. -i*u - ' ^ D a t e W Conditions 1 X IP K North lp` 1 0 /1 7 /2 0 0 2 7 /1 0 /2 0 0 2 7 /1 0 /2 0 0 2 1 0 /1 7 /2 0 0 2 1 0 /1 7 /2 0 0 2 7 /1 0 /2 0 0 2 7 /1 0 /2 0 0 2 7 /1 0 /2 0 0 2 7 /1 0 /2 0 0 2 7 /1 0 /2 0 0 2 7 /1 0 /2 0 0 2 7 /1 1 /2 0 0 2 7 /1 1 /2 0 0 2 7 /1 1 /2 0 0 2 7 /1 1 /2 0 0 2 7 /1 1 /2 0 0 2 48 C lo u d y/R a in 3 9 -1 5 .1 4 5 85 C loudy/R ain 3 9 -1 5 .1 4 5 85 C lo u d y/R a in 3 9 -1 5 .1 4 5 48 C loudy/R ain 3 9 -1 5 .1 4 5 48 C loudy/R ain 3 9 -1 5 .1 4 5 85 C loudy/R ain 39-1 3 .8 2 4 85 C lo u d y/R a in 3 9 -1 3 .8 2 4 84 C loudy/R ain 3 9 -0 9 .7 1 4 84 C loudy/R ain 3 9 -0 9 .7 1 4 84 C lo u d y 3 9 -0 4 .9 5 4 84 C lo u d y 3 9 -0 4 .9 5 4 84 C le a r 3 8 -5 4 .1 0 5 84 C le a r 3 8 -5 4 .1 0 5 84 C le a r 3 8 54.255 84 C le a r 3 8 54.255 84 C le a r 3854.255 8 1 -4 1 .7 2 4 8 1 -4 1 .7 2 4 8 1 -4 1 .7 2 4 8 1 -4 1 .7 2 4 8 1 -4 1 .7 2 4 8 1 -4 1 .3 6 0 8 1 -4 1 .3 6 0 8 1 -4 4 .9 4 4 8 1 -4 4 .9 4 4 8 1 -4 8 .3 4 0 8 1 -4 8 .3 4 0 8 1 -5 5 .7 3 8 8 1 -5 5 .7 3 8 8 1 -5 5 .5 8 7 8 1 -5 5 .5 8 7 8 1 -5 5 .5 8 7 sample Depth Depth(ft!) 3 1 .8 30 30 3 1 .8 3 1 .8 33 33 2 4 .7 2 4 .7 3 4 .6 3 4 .6 3 9 .8 39.8 3 9 .8 30.8 15 1 15.5 1 16.5 1 18.5 1 12.5 1 17.5 1 20 1 1 'V v K `I f . specific' Temp Conductance ; < c k i V r - ( m 8 K . V `. 7 .1 8 7.1 7.24 7.7 7.8 18.3 2 7 .5 2 7 .6 18.5 18.9 426 442 441 427 427 7 .4 2 7 .4 5 27.4 2 7 .3 435 441 7.41 7 .5 2 6 .9 27.1 424 421 7 .3 3 7.41 2 7 .3 2 7 .6 403 399 7 .0 6 7.31 2 6 .2 2 6 .7 383 382 7 .2 9 7 .3 7 7 .3 7 2 6 .9 27.1 27.1 379 380 380 11/19/2002 000043 Page 2 ohioriver.xls Table 3 Outfall 005 C-8 concentration (ug/L) DuPont Washington Works Sample ID ** WWK-Z- OUTFALL 005 WWK-Z- OUTFALL 005 WWK-Z- OUTFALL 005 WWK-Z- OUTFALL 005 WWK-Z- OUTFALL 005 WWK-Z- OUTFALL 005 WWK-Z- OUTFALL 005 WWK-Z- OUTFALL 005 WWK-Z- OUTFALL 005 WWK-Z- OUTFALL 005 Date C-8 ug/L 6/24/2002 26.7 6/25/2002 17.9 6/26/2002 47.7 6/27/2002 79.3 7/1/2002 13.6 7/10/2002 37.8 7/11/2002 239.0 7/12/2002 12.5 10/16/2002 141.0 10/17/2002 18.0 11/19/2002 Page 1 0O#44 ohioriver.xls Table 4 Ohio River Parameters DuPont Washington Works V sDate 6/26/2002 6/27/2002 6/28/2002 7/10/2002 7/11/2002 10/17/2002 K/.: `Ohio River Stage* 582.63 582.62 582.74 582.95 580.78 583.22 . Wind Resultant Speed Resultant Direction 5.2 mph 230 degrees 7.4 mph 230 degrees 2.5 mph 290 degrees 4.5 mph 30 degrees 7.3 mph 50 degrees 2.6 mph 250 degrees *Data from USGS Gaging Station 03150800, Ohio River near Marietta, OH 11/19/2002 Page 1 0 0 0 (M 5 ohioriver.xls 00004G FIGURES 000947 sV- LETART LANDFILL PERIMETER - i TRANSECT LOCATION SAMPLE S NUMBER ON TRANSECT TYPE SAMPLE ID C -8 ug/L 1 12 \ 12 WV-side mid-column WWK-R-TS-12-1M WV-side dip WWK-R-TS-12-1S 0.0971 0.118 12 >> WV-side dip NWK-R-TS-12-1S* 0.128 DUPUCATE DATE 7/11/02 7/11/02 7/11/02 X \^ TRANSECT LOCATION SAMPLE NUMBER ON TRANSECT TYPE SAMPLE ID C-8 ugA 11 WV-side mid-column WWK-R-TS-11-1M 0.109 11 WV-side dip WWK-R-TS-11-1S 0.101 DATE 7/11/02 7/11/02 LEGEND: OHIO RIVER WATER SAMPLING LOCATION, (DIP AND MID-COLUMN SAMPLES) SCALE 650 0 SO UKS: MAP T M B I F U I U U M NEV H A U . V 7 Jt i 650* Corporate Remediation Group A n A U ia n c t b e tw e e n D u P o n t a n d URS D ia m o n d B a rle y Mill P la z a , B u ild in g 27 W ilm ington, Deloware 19805 OHIO RIVER WATER SAMPLING LOCATIONS Letart Landfill Site Letart, West Virginia SCALE As shown QATE 1/30/02 OCMHCO CHECKED APWHOvTtDOL 000048 CMnu MO. 7420A01S 2.0 APPENDICES 000059 APPENDIX A OHIO RIVER STAGE DATA FROM USGS GAGING STATION 03150800, OHIO RIVER NEAR MARIETTA, OHIO 000051 SUSGS U8G8 03150800 OHIO RIVER NEAR MARIETTA, OH F*age 1 or i DRILY GRGE HEIGHT, FEET Provisional Data Subject to Revision 000052 http://waterdata.usgs.gov/nwis/dv/?dd_cd=02_00065 00003&format=ime&site no=03150800&set lopcmip u -n ^ h ^ m ,i->t,~orw: Keai-uine uaut ir ou jl luuUU OlriiO RI vcK Nb/\K MAkieTTA, u ri Page l ot Water Resources Data Category: G eo grap h ic Area:_____ I Real-time TJ |United States j] GO USGS 03150800 OHIO RIVER NEAR MARIETTA, OH PROVISIONAL DATA SUBJECT TO REVISION A vailable data fo r this site |Recent daily 3 GO This gaging station is maintained in cooperation with: The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Available Parameters All 1 parameters available at this site 00065 GAGE HEIGHT Mean (DD 02) Output format |Table Days |150 (1-548) get data | GAGE HEIGHT, FEET (DD 02), JUNE 09 2002 TO NOVEMBER 05 2002, DAILY MEAN VALUES DATE 11 2 Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov I 02 02 02 02 02 02 15.7 15.7 15.9 -- 16.3 15.7 15.5 16.1 15.8 15.81 3 15.6 15.5 15.9 15.9 15.8 4 15.6 15.6 15.9 15.7 16-2 000053 h ftn */ / u ;n tp rH n fn h c o q a n v / n w i c / H v 9 f h r m ii t = h l 'm1/frnfi r m H = l SH/rcitA n n - 0 ^ 1 5 0 8 0 0 //; /r\n Reai-ume data ror U uS 0 3 idu00 HiO RIVbR NEAR MARIETTA, Off 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 1 is 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 15.7 15.6 16.1 15.9 15.9 15.6 15.7 15.8 15.6 15.6 15.7 15.8 16.1 15.7 15.7 15.9 15.8 19.2 15.8 15.6 16.1 15.7 19.0 15.8 15.6 16.1 16.0 18.5 13.7 15.7 15.7 15.9 17.8 15.9 15.7 15.4 15.6 16.9 16.0 16.0 15.3 15.9 16.8 15.8 16.0 15.5 15.7 16.7 15.8 15.6 15.9 15.5 16.9 15.9 16.1 15.9 16.0 17.0 15.9 16.1 16.1 16.1 16.7 15.7 16.2 15.8 16.0 16.6 15.5 15.7 15.7 15.6 16.4 15.6 15.5 15.7 15.7 16.1 15.7 15.4 15.7 15.4 16.0 15.5 15.5 15.8 15.9 15.7 15.3 15.8 15.9 15.9 15.7 15.3 15.5 15.9 15.5 15.8 15.5 15.8 15.7 15.7 15.5 15.6 15.6 15.5 16.0 15.5 15.7 15.8 15.9 15.9 15.6 15.7 15.9 16.0 15.6 15.8 15.9 15.7 15.9 15.8 1 i i rA D 000054 1 rADAA Page 2 of 3 i i / /no Reai-ume data ior 031 jooOOd h iO RIvek NEa k MARIETTA, OH 30 15.7 15.8 15.7 15.9 15.7 31 15.5 15.6 16.1 COUNT 22 31 31 30 30 5 I MAX 19.2 16.0 16.2 16.1 16.1 16.3 MIN 15.5 13.7 15.4 15.3 15.4 15.8 Questions about data Feedback on this website Daily Data for USA http://waterdata.usgs.gov/nwis/dv? h2oteam@usgs.gov gs-w support nwisweb@usgs.gov Retrieved on 2002-11-06 10:16:46 EST Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey Privacy Statement || Disclaimer || Accessibility 0.81 0.78 Page 3 of 3 Rclum lo lop o f page 000055 !_ / J. Of. *. O___ 1 <Ap,oto i cnonn I I !f%KY) 000*5 APPENDIX B LOCAL CLIMATOLOGICAL DATA FROM NOAA FOR JUNE, JULY, AND OCTOBER 2002 000057 LCL rumi rage i o i* UNEDITED LOCAL CLIMATOLOGICAL DATA Station Location: PARKERSBURG, WV (PKB)lat: 39 21', Ion: -81 26' [NOAA, National Climatic Data Center] MONTH: 06/2002 Elev(Ground): 863 Feet Time Zone: WBAN: 03804 d Temperature a (Fahrenheit) Deg Days Base 65 Degrees Snow/lce on Precipitation Pressure (inches of Hg) w ,n(,Speed=mpli Gnd(ln) (In) u Dir=tens of degrees .1 Max Min Avg. Dep Avg. Avg Healing Cooling t From Dew pt. Wet Normal Bulb Significant Weather 0600 1200 2400 2400 LST LST LST LST Depth Water Snow Water Equiv Fall Equiv Avg. Station Avg. Resultant Res Avg. mux Sea Speed Dir Speed 5-sec max 2-min ; level Speed Dir Speed Dir 01 86 64 75 02 79 60 70 0 80 52 66 04 91 60 76 05 87 64 76 06 68 60 64 07 76 57 67 08 83 53 68 09 87 60 74 10 86 65 76 11 87 65 76 12 85 70 78 13 78 68 73 14 75 61 68 15 71 55 63* 16 76 57 67 17 78 52 65 18 82 54 68 19 86 55 71 20 88 59 74 21 87 60 74 22 87 61 74 23 89 61 75 24 91 61 76 25 91* 64 78 26 88 70 79* 27 86 65 76 28 83 65 74 29 85 63 74 30 88 63 76 8 2 -2 8 7 -5 .0 -1 4 6 6 8 2 -3 -8 -4 -6 -4 -1 2 2 2 3 3 5 6 3 1 1 3 66 69 53 61 54 60 66 68 67 70 63 63 59 61 61 64 66 68 69 71 67 70 69 71 70 70 63 65 55 58 54 59 54 59 57 62 61 65 64 67 64 67 63 67 64 68 66 70 68 71 71 73 69 71 67 69 65 68 68 70 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 FG HZ 5 FG 1 11 TS TSRA GR RA FG HZ VCTS 11 TS TSRA RA FG 0 TS RA FG 2 FG 3 FG 9 TS TSRA FG+ FG VCTS II FG+FCi 117. 11 TS FG+ I G HZ 13 TS VCTS 8 TS RA FG+ FG VCTS 3 RA FG+ FG HZ 0 2 0 FG 3 FG 6 FG 9 FG HZ 9 FG+ FG BCFG BR HZ 9 FG+ FG HZ 10 FG HZ 11 FG HZ 13 FG+ FG HZ 14 RA FG HZ 11 TS TSRA RA FG VCTS 9 FG 9 FG+FG 11 FG+ FG HZ M - M 0.01 28.86 M - M 0.01 28.92 M - M 0.00 29.04 M - M 0.93 29.04 M - M 0.65 29.01 M - M 0.35 29.01 M - M 0.00 29.18 M - M 0.00 29.22 M - M 0.02 29.17 - - - 0.01 29.13 M - M 0.00 29.06 - - - T 28.93 - - - 0.53 28.86 - - - 0.05 28.75 - - - 0.02 28.81 - - - 0.00 28.89 - - - T 29.01 - - - T 29.18 M - M 0.00 29.31 M - M 0.00 29.42 M - M 0.00 29.43 M - M 0.01 29.36 M - M 0.00 29.26 M - M 0.00 29.20 M - M 0.00 29.16 M - MT 29.06 - - - 0.99 28.96 - - - 0.00 29.04 - - - 0.01 29.20 0.01 29.23 29.80 29.86 30.00 29.98 29.96 29.96 30.13 30.18 30.14 30.08 29.98 29.87 29.79 29.70 29.76 29.84 29.97 30.12 30.27 30.38 30.38 30.31 30.21 30.15 30.11 30.00 29.89 29.99 30.16 30.19 4.6 25 4.9 23 26 18 26 01 2.3 33 6.3 18 6 17 2 02 1.6 9 3.4 16 6 13 6 03 2.1 22 5.4 39 30 25 30 04 6.0 22 7.4 35 30 25 30 05 0.0 0 1.4 14 13 12 12 06 1.4 6 2.6 14 7 10 6 07 1.8 19 2.5 13 17 10 20 08 0.4 21 1.6 21 28 16 28 09 0.0 0 .8 9 1 7 26 10 5.7 23 6.3 20 28 15 25 II 6.2 25 7.4 20 26 15 27 12 2.2 22 3.9 14 22 12 22 1.3 7.3 26 8.4 22 29 17 30 14 7.4 25 8.7 2.3 27 18 28 15 7.8 27 8.4 25 31 21 29 16 2.8 25 4.2 20 27 15 27 17 0.8 3 2.7 12 2 9 3 18 1.3 7 2.4 12 7 10 6 19 0.2 12 1.2 12 17 9 14 20 0.4 II 2.5 13 10 9 14 21 0.4 7 2.5 13 8 9 II 22 1.0 18 1.8 13 20 10 20 23 0.3 32 1.0 8 1 7 33 24 0.2 19 1.7 10 10 8 12 25 5.2 23 6.5 17 25 15 20 26 7.4 23 8.9 33 34 22 34 27 2.5 29 4.2 15 30 10 29 28 0.2 12 1.3 12 6 9 II 29 0.3 23 1.5 10 26 8 29 30 83.5 60.8 72.2 63.4 66.5 2.0 l.l 1.4 Degree Days Monthly Season to Date Total DepartureTotal Departure Heating: Cooling: 3 -12 4461 -505 224 35 317 36 .1 < 7.5 (Monthly Averages Totals> 1.01 29.09 30.04 2.0 24.3 4.1 (Monthly Average -3.20 Greatest 24-hr Precipitation: 0.99date: 27 Greatest 24-hr Snowfall: date: Greatest Snow Depth: 0 date: Sea Level PressureDateTime Maximum: Minimum : 30.45 29.66 21 0900 14 0359 Max temp >= 90: 3 Min temp <= 32: 0 Number of Days w ith---- > Max temp <= 32:0 Min temp < = 0 : 0 Thunderstorms : 8 Heavy Fog : 10 Precipitation >= .01 inch: 3 Precipitation >= .10 inch : 1 Snowfall >= 1.0 inch : 0 000058 m m/n? L U l >r u r m * `b' W1 1 UNEDITED LOCAL CLIMATOLOGICAL DATA Station Location: PARKERSBURG, WV (PKB)lat: 39 21', ion: -81 26' [NOAA, National Climatic Data Center] MONTH: 07/2002 Elev(Ground): 863 Feet Time Zone: WBAN: 03804 d Temperature a (Fahrenheit) I Max Min Avg. e Dep From Normal Avg. Dew p1. Avg Wet Bulb Deg Days Base 65 Degrees Heating Cooling Significant Weather Snow/Ice on Precipitation Pressure (inches of Hg) u /.,,,.s P" d=`nPh Gnd(In) (In) Dir=dens of degrees lI a 0600 1200 2400 2400 LST LST LST LST Depth Water Snow Water Equiv Fall Equiv Avg. Station Avg. Resultant Res Avg. mux Sea Speed Dir Speed 5-sec max 2-min \i level Speed Dir Speed Dir ji 88 67 78 02 91 71 81 03 90 69 80 04 92 68 80 OS 85 65 75 06 83 54 69 07 85 56 71 08 89 60 75 09 87 68 78 10 83 66 75 11 79 55 67 12 83 52 68 13 70 64 67* 14 81 65 73 15 88 64 76 16 90 63 77 17 90 67 79 18 89 70 80 19 85 69 77 2(1 85 68 77 21 90 66 78 22 92 70 81 23 90 71 81 24 83 67 75 25 88 64 76 26 87 70 79 27 83 72 78 28 92* 74 83 29 92 74 83* 30 90 71 81 31 92 66 79 5 7 6 6 1 -5 -3 1 4 1 -7 -7 -8 -2 1 2 4 5 2 2 3 6 6 0 1 4 3 8 8 6 4 73 74 74 76 71 73 73 75 64 68 57 62 61 65 66 69 71 72 68 70 52 59 59 63 66 66 68 69 66 69 68 71 70 72 71 73 72 73 71 72 71 73 73 75 73 74 67 69 68 70 72 74 73 74 74 76 72 75 70 73 69 72 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 TS TSRA FG HZ VCTS 16 FG+ FG HZ 15 FG HZ 15 TS TSRA RA FG 10 FG+FG 4 FG 6 FG+FG 10 FG HZ 13 TS TSRA RA FG HZ VCTS 10 RA FG HZ 232 RA FG 8 FG 11 FG+ FG HZ 12 FG+ FG HZ 14 FG HZ 15 TS TSRA RA FG HZ VCTS 12 TS TSRA FG HZ VCTS 12 FG+ FG HZ 13 FG+ FG HZ 16 FG HZ 16 TS TSRA RA FG HZ VCTS 10 FG HZ 11 FG 14 FG HZ 13 TS RA FG VCTS 18 FG 18 TS FG VCTS 16 TS FG 14 FG+FG - - - 0.71 29.20 - - - 0.00 29.15 - - - 0.00 29.10 - - - 0.06 29.10 - - - 0.01 29.17 - - - 0.00 29.23 - - - 0.00 29.26 - - - 0.00 29.21 - - - 0.30 29.10 M - M 0.05 29.09 - - - 0.00 29.16 - - - 0.00 29.07 - - - 0.40 29.03 - - - T 29.05 - - - 0.01 29.10 - - - 0.00 29.14 - - - 0.00 29.14 - T - 0.12 29.05 M - M 0.52 29.00 - 0.00 29.08 M - M 0.01 29.13 M - M 0.00 29.10 M - M 0.11 29.11 M - M 0.00 29.19 - - - 0.00 29.11 - - - 0.00 29.07 - - - 0.02 29.06 - - - 0.00 29.03 - - - 0.01 29.03 - - - 0.00 29.09 0.00 29.08 30.15 30.09 30.05 30.03 30.10 30.19 30.22 30.16 30.05 30.03 30.12 30.04 29.99 30.00 30.06 30.09 30.08 29.99 29.93 30.04 30.08 30.04 30.05 30.13 30.07 30.00 30.00 29.98 29.96 30.01 30.03 l.l 21 2.9 25 28 18 27 in 0.7 23 3.2 18 20 14 20 1)2 0.3 35 3.1 15 2 12 1 1)3 1.3 23 3.4 18 27 14 27 1(4 4.5 1 5.9 17 1 13 1 15 2.7 4 4.6 17 35 14 2 [)6 0.0 0 1.8 14 13 12 9 07 1.1 25 2.9 15 29 14 29 1)8 3.7 24 5.8 32 31 22 32 09 4.5 3 4.9 20 3 14 3 10 7.3 5 8.6 20 2 16 2 II 3.0 11 4.2 16 9 14 9 12 0.5 13 1.5 9 17 8 16 13 0.9 1 2.7 10 6 9 7 14 1.0 28 1.8 15 27 12 27 15 2.3 30 3.3 16 31 13 31 16 2.6 25 3.7 15 23 12 26 17 3.1 25 4.5 23 33 17 32 18 3.7 23 4.5 28 33 21 36 19 0.4 21 2.1 12 27 9 26 20 0.9 18 2.1 12 24 8 17 21 2.9 21 4.7 17 19 14 20 22 3.1 22 5.1 22 2 15 36 23 4.2 4 4.8 14 2 12 5 24 0.5 1 2.8 10 24 8 23 25 3.4 22 5.0 15 25 13 27 26 5.6 23 7.1 22 30 17 29 27 8.9 23 9.4 24 24 18 24 28 9.0 24 9.4 25 29 20 21 29 3.4 25 4.9 16 25 12 21 3(1 0.4 22 1.9 16 24 10 24 31 86.8 66.0 76.4 68.5 70.8 2.6 1.4 1.8 Degree Days Monthly Season to Dale Total DepartureTotal Departure Heating: Cooling: 0000 362 64 6/y 1UU .0 11.7 cMonthly Averages Totalst 2.33 29.11 30.06 1.0 24.7 4.3 cMonthly Average <-- ------ Departure From Normal------------------ ---- > -1.87 Greatest 24-hr Precipitation: 0.71date: 01 Greatest 24-hr Snowfall: date: Greatest Snow Depth: 0 date: - Sea Level PressureDateTime Maximum: Minimum : .00 29.87 0 0000 19 1453 Max temp >=90: 12 Min temp <= 32:0 Number of Days with -- > Max temp <= 32: 0 Min temp < = 0 : 0 Thunderstorms : 9 Heavy Fog : 8 Precipitation >= .01 inch: 13 Precipitation >= .10 inch : 6 Snowfall >= 1.0 inch : 0 PittrW/nie rw'Hi' nrafl onv/r'ai-hin/nndc/pensub.cei 000059 10/28/02 LCu rorm Page i ot p UNEDITED LOCAL CLIMATOLOGICAL DATA Station Location: PARKERSBURG, WV (PKB)lat: 39 21`, Ion: -81 26' [NOAA, Nalional Climatic Data Center] MONTH: 10/2002 Elev(Ground): 863 Feet Time Zone: WBAN: 03804 d Temperature a (Fahrenheit) Deg Days Base 65 Degrees Snow/Ice on Precipitation Pressure (inches of Hg) vvjndSpeed=mp|i Gnd(ln) (In) Dir=lens of degrees d a e Max Min Avg. Dep From Avg. Avg Dew pt. Wet Healing Cooling Normal Bulb Significant Weather 0600 1200 2400 2400 LST LST LST LST Depth Water Snow Water Equiv Fall Equiv Avg. Station Avg. Resultant Res Avg. max max Sea Speed Dir Speed 5-sec 2-min level Speed Dir Speed Dit 01 84 63 74 02 84 61 73 03 84 64 74 04 86 64 75* 05 70 48 59 06 77 47 62 07 67 43 55 08 61 36 49 09 67 46 57 H i 63 55 59 II 64 60 62 12 70 58 64 13 65 46 56 M 58 34 46 15 61 38 50 16 53 45 49 17 49 38 44 18 M M 0* 19 58 50 54 20 56 40 48 21 60 35 48 22 65 34 50 23 59 35 47 24 54 41 48 25 63 47 55 26 59 50 55 13 12 14 15 0 3 -4 -9 -1 2 5 7 0 -10 -6 -6 -II 0 0 -6 -5 -3 -6 -4 3 3 62 65 65 67 68 69 66 68 53 56 53 57 43 51 38 44 51 53 58 59 61 61 59 61 50 54 35 41 44 47 48 49 40 42 -- 47 51 40 44 38 42 40 43 40 43 39 43 -- 0 0 0 0 6 3 10 16 8 6 3 1 9 19 15 16 21 0 11 17 17 15 18 17 10 10 9 TS FG HZ 8 TS FG HZ 9 TS RA FG VCTS 10 RA FG 0 TS FG+ FG 0 FG+FG 000 FG 0 RA FG 0 RA FG 0 DZ FG 0 RA FG+ FG 00 RA FG 0 RA FG 0 RA FG 0 HZ 0 RA FG 0 0 FG 0 TS FG+ FG 0 TS FG+ FG HZ 0 TS 0 FG 0 TS FG - - - 0.00 29.20 - - - 0.00 29.15 - - - 0.01 29.10 - - - 0.31 28.93 - - - 0.06 29.16 - - - 0.01 29.12 - - - 0.00 29.19 - - - 0.00 29.26 - - - T 29.21 - - - 0.40 29.22 - - - 0.75 29.11 - - - 0.01 29.14 - - - 0.21 29.26 - - - 0.00 29.33 - - - 0.43 29.00 - - - 1.05 28.86 M - M T 29.06 - - - 0.00 29.14 - - - 0.09 29.02 - - - 0.00 29.11 - - - 0.00 29.15 - - - 0.00 29.21 - - - 0.00 29.35 - - - 0.00 29.31 - - - 0.27 - 0.02 30.14 30.10 30.05 29.88 30.12 30.09 30.14 30.24 30.20 30.19 30.10 30.12 30.22 30.32 29.97 29.82 30.03 - 29.99 30.08 30.14 30.20 30.32 30.30 - 4.2 22 5.1 17 28 1 3 ! 25 01 2.2 25 3.5 15 22 13 24 [)2 2.3 25 3.4 28 21 22 21 03 7.4 19 8.9 33 18 24 16 1)4 3.1 30 5.4 24 26 16 30 1)5 3.2 22 7.1 26 27 20 26 06 4.9 30 7.0 21 27 17 27 07 2.3 5 3.9 22 9 17 8 08 0.2 22 .8 7 30 6 20 09 2.4 5 2.7 13 7 9 6 H i 4.9 4 5.4 13 6 10 5 11 l.l 2 2.2 9 24 7 10 12 3.6 32 6.0 21 29 16 30 13 3.0 7 4.0 16 2 14 7 14 1.3 17 2.5 14 19 10 19 15 3.8 32 4.8 20 31 14 31 16 1.3 28 2.2 14 32 10 31 17 5.8 21 6.1 24 24 18 24 18 6.7 23 8.0 24 23 17 24 19 2.1 34 3.6 14 31 10 30 20 1.5 8 2.5 14 2 10 3 21 0.3 21 1.9 14 27 12 26 22 2.7 3 3.9 17 10 10 4 23 7.5 4 8.1 15 2 12 5 24 - - 7.4 28 16 20 17 25 5.2 16 23 13 28 26 Degree Days Monthly Season to Date Total DepartureTotal Departure Healing: Cooling: < Monthly Averages TotaIs> <Monthly Average Greatest 24-hr Precipitation:date: Greatest 24-hr Snowfall: date: Greatest Snow Depth: date: Sea Level PressureDaleTime Maximum: Minimum : Max temp >= 90: Min temp <= 32: Number of Days w ith......> Max temp <= 32: * Min temp <= 0 : Thunderstorms : 8 Heavy Fog : 5 Precipitation >- .01 inch: Precipitation >= . 10 inch : Snowfall >= 1.0 inch : 0 000060 1i t ../_ /__i,,/_ ,,..u 10/78/0?