Document 0JY2NkYEjjXYD4yOB8j8pLz1m
Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences (2023) 22:1129-1176 https://doi.org/10.1007/s43630-023-00369-6
PERSPECTIVES
Changes in tropospheric air quality related to the protection of stratospheric ozone in a changing climate
S. Madronichl '241 B. Sulzberger3 K. R. Solomon7 S. R. Wilson8 0
J. D. Longstreth4 T. Schikowskis M. P. Sulbk Andersen6
Received: 19 December 2022 / Accepted: 13 January 2023 / Published online: 13 June 2023 The Author(s) 2023
Abstract Ultraviolet (UV) radiation drives the net production of tropospheric ozone (O3) and a large fraction of particulate matter (PM) including sulfate, nitrate, and secondary organic aerosols. Ground-level O3 and PM are detrimental to human health, leading to several million premature deaths per year globally, and have adverse effects on plants and the yields of crops. The Montreal Protocol has prevented large increases in UV radiation that would have had major impacts on air quality. Future scenarios in which stratospheric O3 returns to 1980 values or even exceeds them (the so-called super-recovery) will tend to ameliorate urban ground-level O3 slightly but worsen it in rural areas. Furthermore, recovery of stratospheric O3 is expected to increase the amount of O3 transported into the troposphere by meteorological processes that are sensitive to climate change. UV radiation also generates hydroxyl radicals (OH) that control the amounts of many environmentally important chemicals in the atmosphere including some greenhouse gases, e.g., methane (CH4), and some short-lived ozone-depleting substances (ODSs). Recent modeling studies have shown that the increases in UV radiation associated with the depletion of stratospheric ozone over 1980-2020 have contributed a small increase (-3%) to the globally averaged concentrations of OH. Replacements for ODSs include chemicals that react with OH radicals, hence preventing the transport of these chemicals to the stratosphere. Some of these chemicals, e.g., hydrofluorocarbons that are currently being phased out, and hydrofluoroolefins now used increasingly, decompose into products whose fate in the environment warrants further investigation. One such product, trifluoroacetic acid (TFA), has no obvious pathway of degradation and might accumulate in some water bodies, but is unlikely to cause adverse effects out to 2100.
This Perspective is part of the topical collection: Environmental effects of stratospheric ozone depletion, UV radiation, and interactions with climate change: UNEP Environmental Effects Assessment Panel, 2022 Quadrennial Assessment.
El S. Madronich
M@ucar.edu
El S. R. Wilson @ uow.edu. au
National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, USA 2 USDA UV-B Monitoring and Research Program, Natural
Resource Ecology Laboratory, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, USA
3 Academic Guest after retirement from Eawag: Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, CH-8600 Duebendorf, Switzerland
4 The Institute for Global Risk Research, LLC, Bethesda, USA 5 IUF-Leibniz Research Institute for Environmental Medicine,
Dusseldorf, Germany 6 Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, California State
University, Northridge, USA 7 School of Environmental Sciences, University of Guelph,
Guelph, Canada 8 School of Earth, Atmospheric and Life Sciences, University
of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
' l Springer
1130
Graphical abstract
Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences (2023) 22:1129-1176
1 Introduction
The protection of stratospheric ozone (O3) has had important consequences for the chemical composition of the lower atmosphere (the troposphere) and the quality of the air that humans and many other organisms breathe. Ultraviolet (UV) radiation plays an essential role in the generation of photochemical smog, exposure to which is associated with widespread health effects, reductions in life expectancies, damage to forests, and smaller agricultural yields. Given the number of populations and ecosystems currently affected by photochemical smog, even small changes in UV radiation are important, such as those associated with the few percent depletion of stratospheric O3 that occurred at mid-latitudes over 1980-2000. By limiting the depletion of stratospheric O3, the Montreal Protocol has avoided large increases in tropospheric UV radiation that would have exacerbated photochemical air pollution in urban areas.
On the global scale, UV-B radiation (280-315 nm) controls the self-cleaning capacity of the troposphere by generating hydroxyl radicals (OH). These radicals react with many chemicals emitted to the troposphere, including greenhouse gases such as methane, facilitating their removal from the
atmosphere and essentially determining their atmospheric lifetime. The Montreal Protocol has maintained the troposphere's self-cleaning capacity at near natural levels, but future changes remain a concern, especially if the intensity of UV-B radiation decreases substantially due to increasing stratospheric ozone under some future scenarios.
Actions under the Montreal Protocol have led to the introduction of new chemicals to the atmosphere as replacements to some of the ozone-depleting substances, including hydrofluorochlorocarbons (HCFCs), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), hydrofluoroethers (HFEs), hydrofluoroolefins (HFOs) and hydrochlorofluoroolefins (HCFOs). However, their atmospheric photo-degradation can lead to persistent secondary pollutants such as trifluoroacetic acid (TFA), whose ultimate fate in the environment remains unclear, requiring continued monitoring and assessment relative to other natural and/or anthropogenic sources.
We have reported on these issues in our previous assessments [1-6] and our objective here is to provide an updated overview and assessment of the scientific evidence. As will be presented in the following sections, our previous conclusions remain qualitatively unchanged and consistent with increasingly available observations and numerical
1 3
Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences (2023) 22:1129-1176
simulations. This assessment consists of two parts: The first part (Sect. 2) focuses on the effects of depletion of stratospheric ozone, solar UV radiation (particularly UV-B), and interactions with climate change on tropospheric air quality and how changes in tropospheric air quality affect human health and ecosystems. The second part (Sect. 3) assesses the known sources of trifluoroacetic acid (TFA), including those related to the replacement chemicals under the purview of the Montreal Protocol, and their potential risk to humans and ecosystems.
In conducting this assessment, we have searched the literature through PubMed, Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, and relevant journals to obtain peer-reviewed papers from the recent literature (2018-2022) as well as reports from recognized international agencies (e.g., World Health Organization) and government agencies (e.g., US Environmental Protection Agency). We have critically evaluated these papers and reports before including information from them in this Quadrennial Assessment.
2 UVdependent air pollutants and their effects on human health, plants, and the selfcleaning capacity of the troposphere
The importance of UV radiation to the formation of some types of air pollution has been known at least since the studies of photochemical smog in Los Angeles in the 1950s, when it was shown that ambient O3 was generated by UVinduced reactions involving nitrogen oxides (NOx) and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) [7]. Since then, many details of these photochemical reactions have been elucidated, such as the central role of UV-generated OH radicals in controlling the overall reactivity; and the formation of O3, peroxides, acids, and other harmful gaseous intermediates, including some that can condense to form particulate matter (PM). This gas- and condensed-phase chemistry is complex, involving hundreds of different chemicals, often with rapidly changing emissions and different environmental conditions.
A brief overview/summary of tropospheric chemistry, with emphasis on the distinct roles of UV-B and UV-A radiation, is provided in Sect. 2.1. The formation of photochemical smog, specifically its ground-level O3 and UVsensitive PM components, is discussed in Sects. 2.2 and 2.3, including an assessment of the possible effects of changes in UV radiation related to the recovery of stratospheric ozone
1131
over the coming decades. Exposure to photochemical smog can have large impacts on human health, particularly in vulnerable populations even at low concentrations of pollutants (Sect. 2.4). Tropospheric O3 and PM can also affect plant health (Sect. 2.5). UV-B radiation has beneficial effects by causing the formation of OH, the cleaning agent of the troposphere (Sect. 2.6). Finally, changes in atmospheric circulation and the transport of pollutants affect the tropospheric air quality (Sect. 2.7). A summary of our assessment is provided in Sect. 2.8.
2.1 Background: the UV photochemistry of tropospheric air
The most important UV-induced processes that control air quality in the troposphere are shown in Fig. 1. UV-B radiation is responsible for the formation of the OH radical, the major oxidizing agent in the troposphere. This occurs through the photolysis of O3 and subsequent reaction of an electronically excited oxygen atom with water (H2O). Hydroxyl radicals are lost by reaction with reduced chemicals, including carbon monoxide (CO), methane (CH4), VOCs, sulfur dioxide (SO2), and nitrogen dioxide (NO2) (Fig. 1). Hydroxyl radicals control the atmospheric amounts of these chemicals as well as those of many other important trace gases, e.g., HFCs, HCFCs, HFOs, and very-short-lived substances (VSLSs, e.g., halo-organics with a lifetime of less than or equal to 6 months). Chemicals such as chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) that do not react with OH have the potential to reach the stratosphere in large amounts; the CFCs were, therefore, replaced with chemicals that react with OH (HCFCs, HFCs, HFOs, etc.).
UV-B and UV-A radiation are together responsible for the net production of O3 in the troposphere. This occurs via photo-dissociation of nitrogen dioxide (NO2) to NO and O, mainly by UV-A radiation, and subsequent reaction of the oxygen atom with molecular oxygen (Fig. 1). Nitrogen oxides (NOx = NO + NO2) are emitted primarily as NO, and the NO2 is produced via the re-cycling of the hydroxyl radical (OH) generated from the UV-B photolysis of O3. Due to this autocatalytic production of O3 involving OH, the net production of O3 depends not only on UV-A radiation but also on UV-B radiation. The different effects of UV-B and UV-A radiation are discussed in more detail in Box 1. Note that Fig. 1 is restricted to reactions occurring in the gas phase, while heterogeneous, UV-induced processes involving aerosols are discussed in Sect. 2.3.
1 3
1132
2.2.1 Box
Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences (2023) 22:1129-1176
1 3
Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences (2023) 22:1129-1176
1133
Fig. 1 Simplified schematic of tropospheric photochemistry. UV-C radiation (100-280 nm) in the stratosphere generates ozone, O3, some of which is transported to the troposphere. UV-B radiation initiates tropospheric chemistry by photo-dissociating O3 and generating highly reactive hydroxyl radicals (OH). These react with many compounds emitted by human activities and natural processes, e.g., carbon monoxide, methane, volatile organic compounds including halocarbons, and others, all generalized in the figure as RC (reduced compounds). By removing these compounds, the concentration of OH controls the self-cleaning capacity of the atmosphere. Nitrogen oxides (NOx = NO + NO2) catalyze the photo-oxidation by regenerat-
ing OH via reaction of NO with HO2. This coupling of the NOx and HOx (OH + HO2) cycles also leads to autocatalytic production of O3, often in amounts larger than lost initially via its UV-B photolysis, since NOx and HOx molecules can cycle many times before being removed. The cycles are terminated by reaction with OH to make nitric acid, (HNO3) or by reaction of HO2 to inorganic or organic peroxides, e.g., hydrogen peroxide (H2O2). Other products, depending on the reduced compounds being oxidized by OH, could include partly oxidized organics, secondary organic aerosols (SOA), sulfuric acid (H2SO4), and trifluoroacetic acid (TFA)
Fig. 2 Global tropospheric ozone (Tg) estimated by multi-model assessments (MMM, ACCMIP, TOAR) and observations (OBS, for the year 2000). Future projections are for one Shared Socioeconomic Pathway (SSP370 scenario). From IPCC 2021 Ch. 6 [11]
Fig. 3 Regional and local trends in tropospheric ozone at the surface and lower atmosphere. From IPCC 2021 Ch. 6 [11]
1 3
1134
2.2 UV radiation and groundlevel ozone
Ground-level O3 continues to be a major environmental problem, with costly impacts on human health and vegetation. Most ground-level O3 is produced by the UV photochemical processing of pollutants (see Sect. 2.1), with occasional contributions from downward transport of ozone-rich stratospheric air (see Sect. 2.7). It is generally accepted that concentrations of O3 have increased throughout the global troposphere over the past century, due to increasing emissions of VOCs and NOx. This is borne out in numerical simulations with chemistry-climate models, as shown in Fig. 2. Contributions from stratospheric ozone depletion (1980 to current) and the associated increases in UV-B radiation have been negligible by comparison, at least for the global scale. Future projections tend to show an increasing global burden of tropospheric O3, although the details depend on the assumed scenario of greenhouse gas emissions (only one shown in the figure, SSP370).
Trends in local and regional concentrations of tropospheric O3 vary greatly as shown in Fig. 3. Over the past few decades, concentrations of O3 at ground-level and in the lower atmosphere have been generally decreasing in most developed countries, while increasing greatly in some locations including East and South Asia, in response to changes in emissions of NOx and VOCs. Reductions in emissions of NOx and VOCs will be necessary to reverse the observed increasing trends, but any substantial future changes in UV radiation could modify the effectiveness of such reductions.
The possibility that ground-level O3 can be affected by changes in UV related to depletion of stratospheric ozone was first pointed out by Liu and Trainer [12] and has since been confirmed by several studies using numerical models [13-17], as well as observations at the South Pole [18] and at mid-latitudes [19]. More intense UV-B irradiation generally induces faster chemical reactivity in air parcels (Box 1), leading to faster removal of primary chemicals, but also more rapid and intense build up (and removal) of intermediate or secondary pollutants, such as hetero-organics (e.g., aldehydes, ketones, and organic nitrates) and other by-products including O3, peroxides, and secondary PM. Conversely, reductions in UV radiation decrease chemical reactivity, causing slower production of O3 and other photochemical pollutants near source regions, e.g., urban areas, while slowing the destruction on regional and global scales.
The decreases in UV radiation at the surface, expected from the recovery of stratospheric O3, to 1980 levels are estimated to have only a small impact on ambient O3, as reported previously [14, 15], since reductions of O3 at mid-latitudes have been limited to only a few percent (relative to a 1980 baseline). For the United States, the recovery to 1980 levels will increase the O3 column by 4-6%, and the resulting lower levels of UV radiation will tend to lower ambient O3 over a few large urban areas, while raising it slightly elsewhere, consistent with an overall slower chemical reactivity. However, recent climate model simulations
1 3
Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences (2023) 22:1129-1176
[20-22], also reviewed by Bernhard et al. [23], suggest that under some scenarios of increasing greenhouse gas emissions, stratospheric O3 could exceed the 1980 baseline (the so-called "super-recovery"). By 2100, stratospheric O3 could increase by an additional 10% (above the 1980 levels) under high emission scenarios (SSP3-7.0, SSP4-6.0 and SSP5-8.5; see Fig. 3 of Bernhard et al. [23]). This would decrease tropospheric JO3 by about 14% (Box 2), like the changes used in the sensitivity calculation shown in Box 3. Under these scenarios, the changes in tropospheric O3 (urban declines and regional increases) would be about three times greater than those estimated for recovery limited to 1980 levels [14, 15]. Even at current levels (see Figs. 2 and 3), ground-level O3 damages vegetation and causes economically significant reductions in crop yields (see Sects. 2.4 and 2.5). Additional increases due to the recovery (or superrecovery) of stratospheric O3 are of concern but could be offset by more stringent reductions in emissions of NOx and VOCs.
Much larger changes would have occurred without the implementation of the Montreal Protocol (the "world avoided"), where unabated growth of emissions of CFCs would have resulted in catastrophic global loss of stratospheric O3 [24], with major impacts on UV radiation [25], incidence of skin cancer [26, 27], and reduction of the global carbon sink by damage to vegetation [28]. However, to our knowledge, calculations of the impacts of such large increases in UV radiation on air quality, particularly ambient O3 and secondary aerosols, have not been carried out.
While large changes in UV-B radiation have been avoided by the Montreal Protocol [23], trends and variability in UV radiation exist also for other reasons (especially due to aerosols and clouds), and these changes provide ongoing opportunities to better understand and quantify the representation of UV-driven chemical processes in models for air quality. Reduced emissions have systematically improved air quality in many locations, but this has increased UV radiation near the surface, potentially negating some of the benefits of the reduced emissions. For example, aerosol haze in China was reduced substantially during the last decade due to lower emissions of NOx and SO2. This has led to surface brightening (e.g., by 0.70-1.16 W m-2 year-1 in eastern China over 2014-2019) [29] but also to undesirable increases in ambient O3 [30-33] (e.g., by 2-6 g m-3 year-1 in megacity clusters of Beijing and Shanghai over 2013-2017) [34]. Simulations with numerical models show several possible reasons including increases in UV radiation [31, 33-39], shifts in the VOC/NOx chemical regime resulting in increased production of O3 efficiency [35, 40], higher emissions of biogenic VOC due to rising temperatures [30], and decreased competition for gas-phase radicals by aerosol surfaces [34, 40], with reality likely being a combination of these factors.
Long-term increases in UV radiation at the surface due to improved local air quality have been recorded in many other locations. For example, increasing trends in UV radiation over 1996-2016 were found [41] for stations in Japan and
Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences (2023) 22:1129-1176
Greece, and were attributed to reductions in absorbing aerosols. More recently, Ipia et al. [42] found that the UV Index in Mexico City increased by ca. 20% over 2000-2019 (due to reductions in PM, SO2, O3, and NO2) and estimated that such increases in UV radiation would require an additional 10% reduction in VOC emissions to meet the same groundlevel O3 concentrations had the UV remained constant. Brief
1135
increases in UV radiation at the surface have been observed during the economic slowdowns related to the COVID-19 pandemic, e.g., in Brazil [43], East Asia [44], India [45], and likely in many other locations. Analysis of these data is ongoing and should yield insights on how atmospheric pollution responds to changes in UV radiation under different conditions.
2.2.1 Box
1 3
1136
Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences (2023) 22:1129-1176
1 3
Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences (2023) 22:1129-1176
Fig. 4 Composition of PM2.5 over the contiguous United States calculated with a chemistry-transport model. Particles produced by UV photochemical reactions (secondary aerosols) include sulfate (SO4), ammonium nitrate (NH4NO3) and secondary organic aerosols (SOA) from anthropogenic or biogenic precursors (SOAAVOC and SOABVOC, respectively), and account for more than half of the total PM2.5, compared to directly emitted particles (primary aerosols) such as dust, soot, and sea spray. VOC, volatile organic compounds. From Pye et al. [46]
2.3 UV radiation and particulate matter Particulate matter is a major component of air pollution, and particles smaller than about 2.5 m (PM2.5) are believed to be particularly damaging due to their ability to penetrate deeply into lungs. A large fraction of PM2.5 is formed by UV-initiated photochemistry. While "primary" PM is emitted directly (e.g., dust, black carbon, or sea spray) "secondary" PM is produced in the atmosphere, typically by condensation of gases having low saturation vapor pressures. These condensable gases are mostly produced by reactions of OH with pollutants such as SO2, NO2, or VOCs, to yield sulfate, nitrate, or secondary organic aerosols (SOA), respectively:
OH + NO2 HNO3, OH + SO2 ... H2SO4, OH + VOC ... (various partly oxidised VOCs) SOA,
where the last two reactions involve several intermediate steps. The rate-limiting step in the production of these particles is the reaction of OH with the precursors (NO2, SO2, or VOCs), so that the dependence of OH on UV radiation (see Sect. 2.1) applies directly to the rate of formation of secondary PM as well. Decreases (increases) in stratospheric O3 lead to increases (decreases) in tropospheric UV-B radiation and concentrations of OH radicals, and therefore to faster (slower) formation of these PM. The Montreal Protocol,
1137
through its influence on the amount of UV radiation reaching the troposphere, has direct consequences for the formation of secondary PM. Primary PM, on the other hand, is not expected to depend strongly on UV irradiation.
The relative amounts of primary and secondary PM vary greatly in time and space, and estimates exist only for regions where reliable emission inventories exist. For the contiguous United States (Fig. 4) modeling studies indicate that more than half of the PM2.5 is secondary in origin, and thus directly sensitive to variations in UV radiation [46]. Globally, major contributors to PM2.5 are sulfate, nitrate, organics, ammonium, and black carbon (see Fig. 6.7 of IPCC 2021 [11]). While sulfate and nitrate PM are of secondary origin, for organics the relative global contribution of primary and secondary PM is less clear. Satellite-based observations of aerosol optical properties provide only very limited information about chemical composition [47, 48]. A better understanding of the secondary/primary ratio of PM2.5 in all populated regions is required to fully assess the role of UV radiation and, hence, the relevance of the Montreal Protocol to this global air pollution problem.
An emerging and rapidly evolving topic is the effect of UV radiation on chemical reactions within and on the surface of aerosol particles. These heterogeneous processes are extremely complex and still poorly understood, at least in part because aerosols may be composed of many different chemicals, often mixed within the same particle, and each with different UV-absorbing properties and different photolytic fragments. Depending on the specific particle, several UV-mediated processes have already been identified: (a) photolysis of particle-bound organic chemicals into volatile gases (e.g., CO and CO2), leading to loss of particle mass [49-54]; (b) photolysis of particle-bound inorganic and organic nitrogen into gaseous NO, NO2, or HONO, potentially increasing the oxidizing capacity of the atmosphere [55-58]; (c) conversion of SO2 gas on the surface of particles to particulate sulfate (thus, increasing the mass of the particle) [59-61]; (d) formation of molecular chlorine (Cl2) leading to enhanced reactivity of a daytime suburban atmosphere [62], (e) increased absorption of shortwave radiation (from formation of brown carbon) with consequences for radiative forcing of climate [63-67]; and (f) formation of various reactive oxygen species (ROS), some of which (e.g., peroxides) are sufficiently long-lived that they may persist during inhalation and play a major role in deleterious health effects of air pollution [61, 64, 68-72].
Ultraviolet-induced photo-processes within and on the surface of aerosols can also increase the ability of aerosols to act as cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) [73, 74], which can change cloud properties and therefore indirectly impact climate. UV-B irradiation (~ 4.5 days solar radiation equivalent) of dissolved organic matter (DOM, used as a surrogate
1 3
1138 Table 1 Summary of air quality guidelines in several jurisdictions
Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences (2023) 22:1129-1176
Air pollutant Time frame, h WHO WHO EU
EPA
new
old
USA
China- Grade 1a
China- Grade 2b
PM2.5
24-h
15
25
35
35
75
g m-3
annual
5
10
25
12
15
35
PM10
24-h
45
50
50
150
50
150
g m-3
annual
15
20
40
40
70
NO2
24-h
25
80
80
g m-3
annual
10
40
40
100
40
40
1-h
200 200
190
200
200
SO2 g m-3
24-h annual
40
20
125
50
150
20
60
1-h
350
200
150
500
CO
24-h
4
mg m-3
1 h
4
4
40
10
10
daily, 8-h max
10
10
10
10
O3
1 h
160
200
g m-3
daily,
100
100 120
140
100
160
8-h max
EU European Union, EPA Environmental Protection Agency, PM2.5 particles with a diameter of 2.5 m or less ( PM2.5), PM10, particles with a diameter of 10 m or less ( PM10), NO2 nitrogen dioxide, SO2 sulfur dioxide, CO carbon monoxide, O3 ozone aChina Grade 1 Road: National Highways bChina Grade 2 Roads: Provincial Highway
for organic aerosols) from freshwaters resulted in an increase of hygroscopicity by up to 2.5 times [73]. This is a result of the photo-degradation of DOM into hydrophilic low molecular weight chemicals, a process that has been reported in sunlit surface waters [75, 76]. A similar effect on CCN was also observed upon UV-B irradiation of SOA formed from the oxidation of -pinene and naphthalene [74], which are biogenic and anthropogenic SOA precursors, respectively. Considering that CCN are central to the lifecycle of clouds, this represents a newly recognized and potentially important dependence of the hydrological cycle (and climate in general) on UV radiation.
In most cases, the spectral dependence of these heterogeneous photo-processes is still unknown, so that it is not yet possible to assess reliably how much they would be influenced by changes in UV-B radiation resulting from changes in stratospheric ozone. As more spectral data become available, our understanding of the multiple ways in which UV radiation influences aerosol properties and lifetimes will increase and illuminate what role this plays in the natural and perturbed atmosphere.
In summary, changes in UV radiation affect the formation, transformation, and destruction of PM. Quantification of these effects of UV radiation is still somewhat problematic because it involves complex chemical feedbacks that depend on specific physical and chemical variables, such
as temperature, humidity, and the amounts of VOCs and NOx present. However, despite this uncertainty, even small changes in UV radiation should be of concern, because of the large number of people currently exposed to poor air quality and its significance to human health.
2.4 Health impacts of photochemical smog
Air pollution is a major public health concern. Estimates of the impacts vary but are consistently large. Thus, the World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that 4.2 million deaths every year occur because of exposure to ambient (outdoor) air pollution which includes particulates and gases, such as O3, NOx, etc. [77]. These values are somewhat higher than the values reviewed in our previous assessment, which ranged from 1.75 to 4.3 million depending on year and source of estimates [6]. Regular reports on concentrations of tropospheric O3 and its effects on humans and the environment are published in Tropospheric Ozone Assessment Reports, e.g., [78]. Our previous Quadrennial Assessment [6] provided an overview of the effects of air pollution on human health with much of the information focusing on respiratory and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, although reproductive and neurological effects were also briefly addressed. Information on these and other effects from exposure to air pollution continues to accumulate.
1 3
Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences (2023) 22:1129-1176
An umbrella review (a review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses) [79] evaluated 548 meta-analyses derived from 75 systematic reviews on non-region-specific associations between outdoor air pollution and human health. Of these meta-analyses, 57% (313) were not statistically significant. Of the 235 nominally significant meta-analyses, all but 5 indicated an adverse effect on human health. Analyses were graded as strong (13), highly suggestive (23), suggestive (67) or weak (132). Strong evidence for an association between outdoor air pollution exposure and cardiorespiratory diseases was found for:
(1) an increased risk of stroke-related mortality per 10 g m-3 increase of PM10 and PM2.5 (short-term exposure; relative risk (RR): 1.005 95% CI 1.003-1.007 and RR: 1.014, 95% CI 1.009-1.020, respectively);
(2) hypertension per 10 g m-3 increase of PM2.5 (shortterm exposure; odds ratio (OR) 1.097, 95% CI 1.060- 1.136);
(3) asthma-related admissions per 10 g m-3 increase of PM2.5 and NO2 levels (short-term exposure; OR: 1.022, 95% CI 1.014-1.031 and OR: 1.019, 95% CI 1.1013- 1.024, respectively);
(4) chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma-related admissions of the elderly per 10 g m-3 increase of NO2 (24 h average; RR: 1.386%, 95% CI 1.110-1.661%);
(5) mortality due to pneumonia per 10 g m-3 increase NO2 levels (long-term exposure; Hazard Ratio (HR): 1.077, 95% CI 1.060-1.094).
2.4.1 Health impacts at low concentrations of air pollution
New studies, assessed here, indicate that even relatively low levels of pollution may be detrimental [80-82]. Many countries have acted by regulating concentrations of key pollutants and there has been a remarkable decrease in air pollution levels in almost all countries with developed economies leading to levels below the air pollution standards. With the decrease in concentrations of key pollutants, studies now show the detrimental effects on health at relatively low levels of air pollution. Many show effects at concentrations lower than the current annual average standard. In response to this, the World Health Organization (WHO) updated its 2005 Global Air Quality Guidelines (AQG) in September 2021 [83, 84]. These new air quality guidelines [83] set ambitious goals, which will be difficult to achieve in most countries. They reflect the large impact that air pollution has on health globally. The new guidelines are aiming for annual mean concentrations of PM2.5 not exceeding 5 g m-3 and NO2 not exceeding 10 g m-3, and the peak season mean 8-h O3 concentration not exceeding 60 g m-3 [83]. For comparison, the
1139
corresponding 2005 WHO guideline values for PM2.5 and NO2 were 10 g m-3 and 40 g m-3 with no recommendation issued for long-term concentrations of O3 [85]. Table 1 presents the new WHO guidelines in comparison to standards from the European Union, the EPA (USA) and China. Note that UV radiation is involved in the formation of many of these pollutants, including O3, NO2, and a large fraction of PM10 and PM2.5, including sulfate, nitrate, and secondary organic aerosols. Furthermore, UV radiation may make PM10 and PM2.5 more toxic by generating ROS (Sect. 2.3).
Evidence continues to accumulate demonstrating that exposure to air pollution can have serious effects on nearly all organ systems of the human body. As outlined in our earlier assessment, the health effects of air pollution include cardiovascular and respiratory disease, cancer, effects on the brain and the reproductive system including adverse birth outcomes [6]. Much of the more recent support documenting the effects of low-level exposure has come from the study of large cohorts in Canada [80], Europe [81] and the United States [82], where regulatory efforts have reduced the average level of exposure. These studies have consistently shown that the adverse effects of air pollution are not limited to high exposures; harmful health effects can be observed at very low concentrations (see below), with no observable thresholds below which exposure can be considered safe.
Research conducted as part of the `Effects of Low-Level Air Pollution: A Study in Europe' (ELAPSE) [81, 86-92] examined the mortality and morbidity effects of exposure to low concentrations of four air pollutants: PM2.5, NO2, black carbon (BC), and tropospheric warm season O3, with some of the research also investigating the importance of elemental components of PM2.5 [88, 92-94]. The ELAPSE study consisted of two sets of cohorts: The first was a pooled cohort of up to 15 conventional research cohorts, most of which were in a region with at least one large city with an associated smaller town. This resulted in a rich amount of individual data for up to 325,000 participants. The second set of cohorts comprised seven large administrative cohorts, which were formed by linking census data, population registries, and death registries. These were analyzed individually, and, in some cases, meta-analyses were conducted to produce overall results. The key strength of the administrative cohorts was their large sample size (about 28 million) and national representativeness.
The effect of low-level air pollution exposure in 22 cohorts (a combination of research and administrative cohorts) across Europe was associated with several health outcomes and mortality [81]. Almost all participants had annual average exposures below the European Union guidance values (Table 1) for PM2.5 and NO2, and about 14% had mean annual exposures below the United States National Ambient Air Quality Standards for PM2.5 (12 g m-3). In
1 3
1140
the pooled analysis of the research cohorts, participants had been exposed to 15 g m-3 PM2.5, 1.5 10-5 m-1 black carbon (BC), 25 g m-3 NO2, and 67 g m-3 O3 on average. Among the cohorts, mean concentrations of PM2.5 ranged from 12 to 19 g m-3, except for the Norwegian cohort (8 g m-3). The study followed 325,367 adults and found significant positive associations between even low exposure to PM2.5, BC, and NO2 and mortality from natural-causes as well as cause-specific mortality such as cardiovascular and ischemic heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, respiratory disease, COPD, diabetes, cardiometabolic disease, and lung cancer mortality [91]. An increase of 5 g m-3 in PM2.5 was associated with 13% (95% CI 10.6-15.5%) increase in natural deaths. For participants with exposures below the United States standard of 12 g m-3, an increase of 5 g m-3 PM2.5 was associated with nearly a 30% [29.6% (95% CI 14-47.4%)] increase in natural deaths. For NO2, hazard ratios remained elevated and significant when analyses were restricted to observations below 20 g m-3.
Liu and colleagues [95] analyzed the association between the incidence of asthma and low concentrations of air pollution using three large cohorts from Scandinavia (n = 98,326). They found a hazard ratio of 1.22 (95% CI 1.04-1.43) per 5 g m-3 increase in PM2.5, 1.17 (95% CI 1.10-1.25) per 10 g m-3 for NO2 and 1.15 (95% CI 1.08-1.23) per 0.5 10-5 m-1 for BC. Hazard ratios were larger in cohort subsets with exposure levels below the annual average limits for the European Union and United States (Table 1) and proposed World Health Organization guidelines for PM2.5 and NO2 (Table 1) compared to the hazard ratios in cohorts exposed to levels above the annual limits.
A meta-analysis [96] of 107 studies on the effect of longterm exposure to air pollution on mortality showed that there was strong evidence that exposure to PM2.5 and PM10 is associated with increased mortality from all causes, cardiovascular disease, respiratory disease, and lung cancer. The combined Hazard Ratios (HRs) for natural-cause mortality were 1.08 (95% CI 1.06, 1.09) per 10 g m-3 increase in PM2.5, and 1.04 (95% CI 1.03, 1.06) per 10 g m-3 increase in PM10. This study also indicated that associations with PM2.5 remained relevant below the current WHO standards of 10 g PM2.5 m-3.
2.4.2 Health impacts due to components of particulate matter
Studies are only beginning to link health effects to specific chemicals identified in aerosols. Current guidelines and standards for PM are based on the mass of PM2.5, without consideration of chemical composition of the particles. Although it stands to reason that the chemical composition would be an important determinant of health impacts,
Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences (2023) 22:1129-1176
relatively few studies have examined this specific issue. In the context of the Montreal Protocol, UV-dependent secondary PM (sulfate, nitrate, and secondary organics) is chemically distinct from primary, UV-independent, PM. Thus, the relative health impacts of secondary vs. primary PM are central to this assessment.
Several groups have examined exposure to elemental constituents of aerosols, e.g., Cu, Fe, K, Ni, S, Si, V and Zn in PM2.5 [92, 93, 97]. While most show increases in HRs with increasing atomic abundances, they cannot identify the contribution of secondary particulates, such as secondary organics, sulfates, and nitrates, that depend on UV radiation.
The composition of PM across the United States was modeled recently by Pye et al. [46], using the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model with improved representation of aerosol composition, and was analyzed for associations with mortality data (for 2016) for cardiovascular and respiratory disease. The median county-level cardiovascular and respiratory disease age-adjusted death rate was 320 per 100,000 population across 2708 counties, while the average concentration of PM2.5 was 6.5 g m-3, with organic aerosols (OA) being the most abundant component at 2.9 g m-3. They estimated that, across the United States, for every 1 g m-3 increase in PM2.5, 'there is an increase of 1.4 (95% CI 0.5-2.3) cardiovascular and respiratory deaths per 100,000 people. The sensitivity appears much greater for OA, with increases of 1 g m-3 leading to an increase of 8.1 (95% CI 5.4-11) cardiovascular and respiratory deaths per 100,000 people. Subdivision of OA into primary and secondary types showed greater sensitivity for the latter, especially for PM formed by the OH-initiated oxidation of natural VOCs, such as isoprene and terpenes, commonly emitted by vegetation. The importance of secondary organic PM is consistent with a likely role of ROS in tissue damage (Sect. 2.3).
In conclusion, early indications are that secondary aerosols, including SOA, may be particularly damaging. This is of direct relevance to the Montreal Protocol, since secondary aerosols are generated by UV-driven photochemistry. In many locations (e.g., the contiguous United States, see Fig. 4), secondary aerosols may be the largest and the most detrimental fraction of PM2.5.
2.4.3 Interactions of air pollution and temperature on health
Episodes of air pollution frequently occur in combination with extremes in temperature with synergistic effects on health depending on the pollutant(s) involved, the degree and direction of temperature change, and the characteristics of the geographic area and the populations affected. Reviews and meta-analyses of the adverse health effects from
1 3
Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences (2023) 22:1129-1176
extremes of temperature (both highs and lows) have proliferated in recent years indicating just how much research in this area is being done due to concerns about climate change [98-106].
A study from nine European cities by Analitis et al. [107] reported that the daily number of deaths increases by 2.20% (95% CI 1.28-3.13) on days with high O3 per 1 C increase in temperature. The interaction of temperature with PM10 was significant for cardiovascular causes of death for all ages (2.24% on days with low PM10 (95% CI 1.01-3.47), while it was 2.63% (95% CI 1.57-3.71) on days with high PM10.
In a recent meta-analysis, Areal et al. [108] showed that effects of air pollutants were modified by high temperatures, leading to higher mortality from respiratory diseases and an increase in hospital admissions. The effect of PM10 during higher temperatures increased the risk of mortality by 2.1%, and for hospital admissions the effects increased by 11%. The effects of ground-level O3 during high temperatures were similar [108].
2.4.4 Health impacts of air pollution in vulnerable populations
Air pollution affects people from the beginning to the end of life, causing a wide range of acute and chronic diseases. Sensitive populations include, among others, children, the elderly, and people with existing chronic diseases. Accordingly, people with cardiovascular diseases are more likely to suffer a heart attack, stroke, or death when exposed to air pollution [109].
Ambient air pollution not only contributes to adverse health outcomes in individuals after birth, but it may also have immediate adverse impacts on reproductive processes. Animal and epidemiological evidence demonstrates that air pollution may influence fertility. A large Danish study investigated 10,183 participants between 2007 and 2018 [110] who were trying to conceive. The study showed that higher concentrations of PM10 and PM2.5 were associated with small reductions in fecundability, for example, the reductions in fecundability ratios from a one interquartile range (IQR) increase in PM2.5 (IQR = 3.2 g m-3) and PM10 (IQR = 5.3 g m-3) during each menstrual cycle were 0.93 (95% CI 0.87-0.99) and 0.91 (95% CI 0.84-0.99).
In another study on exposure to air pollution and the risk of pre-term birth, the authors investigated 2.7 million births across the state of California from 2011 to 2017 [111]. This study found an increased risk of pre-term birth with higher concentrations of PM2.5 [adjusted relative risks (aRR) (per interquartile increase)] = 1.04, (95% CI 1.04-1.05) and particulate matter from diesel exhaust, aRR = 1.02 (95% CI
1141
1.01-1.03). Similar results were observed in another study from California, where the authors investigated 196,970 singleton pregnancies between 2007 and 2015. These authors found that, during cold seasons, increased exposure to PM2.5 during the three days prior to the premature birth was associated with 5-6% increased odds of very-early pre-term birth (ORlag3 1.06, 95% CI 1.02-1.11). These studies confirm results from human and other animal studies that air pollutants can enter a pregnant female's circulatory system and exert many deleterious health effects in multiple body organs including the placenta and the developing fetus [111].
In the umbrella review discussed above, Markozannes et al. [79] also found strong associations for a number of pregnancy/birth related outcomes. These included:
(1) a 10 g m-3 increase in PM2.5 for various durations of exposure was associated with an increased risk of having an infant born small for gestational age, (a) long-term exposure entire pregnancy OR: 1.151, 95% CI 1.104-1.200; (b) long-term exposure first trimester: OR: 1.074, 95% CI 1.046-1.103; (c) long-term exposure last trimester: OR: 1.062, 95% CI 1.042-1.083;
(2) a 13 g m-3 increase in SO2, (24 h average) was associated with an increased risk of low birthweight OR: 1.035, 95% CI 1.031-1.049, as was
(3) a 10 g m-3 increase in PM10 (long-term exposure; mean difference 7.42 g, 95% CI 8.10-6.75;
(4) a 10-g m-3 increase in PM2.5 for the third trimester was associated with an increased risk for hypertension during pregnancy OR: 2.177 95% 1.710-2.773.
There is also growing evidence that exposure to air pollutants maybe detrimental to the central nervous system and contribute to deficits in cognitive development, neurodegenerative diseases and dementia [112, 113]. A recent review [113] found that, despite a substantial increase in publications, there is only suggestive evidence that air pollution may influence late-life cognitive health as there is still substantial heterogeneity of findings across the studies. The strongest effect found was with respect to PM2.5 and cognitive decline. The review included two different outcomes, namely, incidence of dementia and abnormal neuroimaging. Since then, a large Canadian study investigated the effect of exposure to air pollution and incidence of dementia in ~ 2.1 million individuals [114]. The study identified 257,816 incident cases of dementia and found a positive association between an interquartile range (IQR) increase in PM2.5 of 4.8 g m-3 and incidence of dementia, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.04 (95% CI 1.03-1.05) and an IQR increase of 26.7 g m-3 in NO2 HR = 1.10 (95% CI 1.08-1.12) over a 5-year period, respectively. A similar large study using
1 3
1142
Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences (2023) 22:1129-1176
Fig. 5 Sites at which air pollution can affect interactions mediated by olfactory or visual cues between plants and their associated community. A Effects of pollutants on signal-emitting organisms. B The degradation of VOCs by air pollutants and formation of reaction prod-
ucts and secondary organic aerosol (SOA). C Effects on the signal receiving organisms, e.g., pollinating insects. In addition, exposure to air pollution can influence the interactions between herbivores and plants. D From [134], reproduced with permission
data from Medicare from the United States examined ~ 2.0 million incidences of dementia cases [115]. Per IQR increase in the 5-year average PM2.5 (3.2 g m-3) and NO2 (22 g m-3), they found an association with the development of dementia HR = 1.060 (95% CI 1.054-1.066) and with exposure to NO2 HR = 1.019 (95% CI 1.012-1.026), respectively. The authors also observed significant associations between exposure to PM2.5 and the development of Alzheimer's disease HR = 1.078 (95% CI 1.070-1.086) and NO2 exposure HR = 1.031 (95% CI 1.023-1.039). The results of these new studies lend support to the theory that there is an association between air pollution and dementia and Alzheimer's disease.
2.5 Effects of tropospheric ozone and particulates on plants
Photochemical air pollution can damage plants, with potentially adverse effects on agriculture and other natural resources. Ground-level ozone is a particular concern, since numerous studies have demonstrated significant damage [78, 116]. Other air pollutants co-produced with O3, e.g., peroxyacetyl nitrate (CH3C(O)O2NO2) are also phytotoxic, although their specific effects are difficult to separate from those of O3 [117]. The understanding of mechanisms and mitigation of these effects has improved, and some effects of particulates on plants are assessed below.
1 3
2.5.1 Effects of tropospheric ozone on health and yields of plants
In the previous Quadrennial Assessment [6], we evaluated the adverse effects of O3 on crop and other plants. We noted that tropospheric O3 could contribute to significant losses in quality and yield of crops, e.g., 10-36% for wheat and 7-24% for rice. The adverse effects of O3 on plants continue to be documented in the literature. A metanalysis of 48 studies on the exposure of soybeans to tropospheric O3 conducted between 1980 and 2019 showed increases in degradation of chlorophyll and foliar injury. Leaf-area was reduced by 21%, biomass of leaves by 14%, shoots by 23%, and roots by 17% [118]. Chronic exposure to O3 of about 150 g m-3 caused a decrease in yield of seed by 28%. In a study in Argentina [119], exposures of soybeans (a sensitive crop) to O3 at a concentration of 274 g m-3 for 7 days resulted in a reduction in below-ground biomass of 25%, a 30% reduction of nodule biomass, and a 21% reduction of biological nitrogen fixation. Effects were more severe in tests with soils of low fertility where production of seed and seed protein was reduced by 10% and 12%, respectively. These effects in soybean exposed to O3 at 160 g m-3 for 7 days were linked to decreases in metabolism of carbon and capacity for detoxification in the roots of soybean [120]. A study on the historical losses to air pollutants in maize and soybean grown in the United States showed that improvements in the control of O3, SO2, PM, and NO2 have improved yields by an average of 20% [121]. Of
Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences (2023) 22:1129-1176
these pollutants, PM and NO2 appeared to cause more damage than O3 and SO2. Overall, the improvement in yields was equivalent to ca US$ 5 billion.
Observations between 2015 and 2018 in the province of Henan in China [122] showed that annual losses in yield of wheat exposed to O3 at concentrations above 80 g m-3 were 12.8, 8.9, 10.8, and 14.1%. These were equivalent to annual losses of US$ 2.14, 1.32, 1.68, and 2.16 billion, respectively. A model was developed to extrapolate these losses to other crops in China [123]. Based on a 4-year average of tropospheric concentration of O3, estimated losses in wheat were 50 million tons per year, mostly in winter wheat (48 million tons); 21 million tons in rice; 18 million tons in maize and 1.6 million tons in soybeans [123]. A separate modeling study estimated that current concentrations of O3 reduced yield by 6.9% for rice and 10.4% for wheat [124]. Clearly, tropospheric O3 has significant adverse effects on food security in some countries and this might be exacerbated in the event of super-recovery of stratospheric ozone.
A modeling study on the effects of measured concentrations of O3 on grapes in the Demarcated Region of Douro in Portugal indicated that, in 2 years of high levels of O3, productivity of grapes was reduced by 27% and sugar content by 32% [125]. Similar effects were echoed in other grapegrowing regions across the globe [126].
Crops are not the only class of plants to suffer reductions in yields from exposure to air pollutants. Forests are important sources of wood and fiber and can be affected by tropospheric air pollutants such as O3. In an analysis of the impacts of O3 on production of forests in Italy, Sacchelli et al. [127] calculated that the average cost of potential O3 damage to forests in Italy in 2005 ranged from 31.6 to 57.1 million (i.e., 10-17 ha-1 year-1). This damage resulted in a 1.1% reduction in the profitable forest areas. Estimated decreases in the annual national production of firewood, timber for poles, roundwood and wood for pulp and paper were 7.5, 7.4, 5.0, and 4.8%, respectively. A study on the effects of O3 on trees in Mediterranean forests in Istria and Dalmatia showed that current levels cause inhibition of growth for two species of oak (Quercus pubescens and Q. ilex) as well as pine (Pinus nigra) [128]. A climatological modeling study in European forests has shown that climate change has lengthened the growing season by ca 7 days decade-1 [129]. Because of this, the total phytotoxic dose of O3 taken up by trees over the season has increased and outweighs the benefits of a decrease in concentration of tropospheric O3 (1.6%) that resulted from measures to control pollution between 2000 and 2014.
Because of their sensitivity, the potential effects of O3 in the environment have been more extensively studied in plants than in animals. However, a recent study has focused on the effects of O3 in amphibians [130]. The authors exposed tadpoles of the midwife toad (Alytes obstetricans) to air-borne O3 at concentration up to 180-220 g m-3 for
1143
Fig. 6 Relative change in global concentrations of tropospheric OH from 1980 to 2020, estimated with three different Earth System Models (ESMs). The net change in OH (rightmost column) has contributions from increased emissions of nitrogen oxides and other precursors of tropospheric ozone (NOx); increased emissions of methane (CH4); accumulation of ozone-depleting substances now regulated under the Montreal Protocol (ODSs); emissions of particulate matter and its precursors (PM); and other undifferentiated changes attributed to underlying climate change (e.g., water vapor), as well as interactions among these separate factors (Other) (modified from [141])
8 h per day from an early stage of development (limbs not yet formed) to metamorphosis. This is equivalent to the maximum concentrations observed in the Sierra de Guadarrama Mountains over a period of 10 years. The measured responses were successful development and infection of the developing tadpoles with the aquatic fungus Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis (Bd), which causes the disease known as chytridiomycosis. Airborne concentrations of O3 were measured in the exposure chambers but not in the water containing the tadpoles, so that actual dose could not be calculated. Results suggested that, at the greatest air-borne exposure, development of the tadpole was delayed and that susceptibility to Bd was increased. This study is preliminary and further work is needed to elucidate potential effects.
In summary, future changes in UV-B radiation will influence ground-level O3 and other pollutants. The recovery of stratospheric O3 to 1980 levels is expected to contribute 1-2 g m-3 to ground-level O3 outside major urban areas [14, 15, 36], but super-recovery under some future climate scenarios could lead to larger increases (Sect. 2.2, and Box 1). This could be offset by further reductions in NO and VOC emissions, so the actual O3 concentrations will depend on local and regional air quality control measures, as well as the impacts of climate change and the Montreal Protocol on stratospheric O3. These impacts could affect both food security and forests. 2.5.2 Toxicological mechanisms
Effects of ozone on plants are mediated by the formation of free radicals in the tissues of the plants. Ozone enters the
1 3
1144
Fig. 7 Interacting effects of UV-B radiation and climate change on tropospheric concentrations of OH and on the lifetime of very-shortlived substances (VSLSs). Effects of climate change include more frequent wildfires and thawing of permafrost soils with the formation of thermokarst lakes, which are important sources of CO and CH4, respectively. Increased emissions of CO and CH4 tend to decrease the tropospheric OH concentration, which in turn results in longer lifetime of VSLSs and, thus, a higher probability of stratospheric ozone depletion
leaf of the plant through the stomata and forms ROS, which include O2-, H2O2, OH, 1O2, as well as reactive carbonyl species such as malondialdehyde and methylglyoxal [131]. These reaction products damage components of the cells but also stimulate signaling systems, such as the release of isoprene [132] to activate defense mechanisms. These defenses include physical actions, such as closure of the stomata, biochemical responses such as the release of superoxide dismutase, catalase, and peroxidases to destroy the ROS, and release of chemical buffers, such as ascorbic acid, glutathione, phenolic chemicals, flavonoids, proline [133], and other amino acids, carotenoids, tocopherols, polyamines, and sugars [131].
Some adverse effects of tropospheric air pollutants on plants are indirect. For example, air pollutants can affect visual and chemical signals that mediate interaction between plants, and organisms that depend on plants or that are needed for the sustainability of plant communities [134] (see Fig. 5). For example, tropospheric O3 can destroy or change biogenic volatile chemicals and, thus, interfere with attraction of pollinators or pests to plants [135]. O3 could also interfere with sensory organs and the ability of pollinators to sense sources of nectar or the ability of biological-control organisms to sense their target hosts [134]. Also, physiological responses to damage from O3 might alter the ratios of pigments in plants, the phenology (seasonal development) of flowers and whole plants [136], or the time of flowering, thus affecting host recognition and pollinators. Pollutants may also affect reproduction in plants by directly damaging
1 3
Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences (2023) 22:1129-1176
air-borne pollen through stimulating repair mechanisms and redirecting resources to cell repair rather than reproduction [137, 138]. In addition, the allergenicity of pollen can be enhanced with implications for human health [137].
2.5.3 Effects of particulates on plants
The effects of PM on plants were previously assessed to be few and minor [5, 6], but new studies suggest they may be important particularly in polluted areas. In a study of water-extractable chemicals collected from PM2.5 samplers on roadsides in Hungary, 13 common roadside plants were tested for sensitivity using the OECD-227 guideline test [139]. Endpoints measured in the study were shoot weight, shoot height, visible symptoms of damage on the plants, growth rate, photosynthetic pigments, and activity of peroxidase enzyme. The authors concluded that particulate pollution derived from traffic added substantial additional stress to communities of plants found on roadsides. The study was conducted during mid-winter and near sources, implying that most of the PM was primary rather than secondary, and hence insensitive to any changes in UV radiation. It is unclear if similar plant damage would have been caused by UV-dependent secondary aerosols.
In another study, the combined effects of ambient atmospheric O3 and particulate matter on wheat were assessed [140]. The cumulative concentration of ambient O3 above the threshold of 80 g m-3 h-1 during the 4-month study was 453 g m-3 h-1. Concentrations of ambient PM2.5 and PM10 ranged between 45-412 g m-3 and 103-580 g m-3, respectively. Controls were cleaned of particulates and were protected from O3 by treatment with ethylene diurea, a mitigator of ozone-stress. Economic yield was reduced 34% in wheat exposed to O3 and PM, 44% in wheat exposed to PM only and 52% in plants exposed to O3 alone. Similar observations were reported in a modeling analysis of the effects of O3 and PM on the yields of wheat and rice in China [124]. Based on current levels of O3 and aerosols, their results indicated that anthropogenic aerosols reduced yield of rice and wheat by 4.6 and 4.7%, respectively. The authors suggested that this was because of the effect of dimming of photosynthetically active radiation by aerosols but that there were some benefits from cooling and nutrients provided via the aerosols. The losses due to both O3 and aerosols were estimated to be 11.3 for rice and 14.6% for wheat. The relative contributions of primary and secondary PM were not reported, so that the sensitivity to changes in UV radiation remains unclear.
Overall, these results indicate that aerosols and tropospheric O3 alone, or in combination, have adverse effects on plants and yields of crops. The loss from O3 is greater than that from aerosols but they do act additively. With few
Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences (2023) 22:1129-1176
1145
Fig. 8 Schematic of the circulation of air into the stratosphere and its return. The general circulation is slow relative to movements in the troposphere. Tropopause folds (shown with a dotted blue line) occur sporadically and inject stratospheric air into the troposphere
studies on this interaction, the potential for additive and/or synergistic effects of O3 and particulates, the significance to crop plants and human activities is uncertain. However, it is likely that these effects will be localized and could be mitigated by increased controls of tropospheric air pollutants.
2.6 Selfcleaning capacity of the atmosphere
The hydroxyl radical (OH) is the major oxidant in the troposphere and its concentration largely determines the lifetime of many tropospheric pollutants. It is produced via UV-B photolysis of O3 (see Fig. 1). Hence, increases in the tropospheric concentration of OH are, in part, a consequence of increasing emissions of ODSs. The tropospheric concentration of OH is a balance between OH production and consumption, where both rates are also affected by climate change.
Global mean concentrations of tropospheric OH have been calculated to have changed little from 1850 to around 1980 [141, 142]. However, in the period 1980-2010 the modeled global tropospheric concentration of OH has increased, mainly because of increasing concentrations of precursors of tropospheric O3, and UV radiation [141]. According to the combined output of three computer models (Fig. 6), there was a net increase in OH of about 8% (mean value of the models). The main precursor of tropospheric O3 is NOx, the tropospheric concentration of which has increased over 1980-2010 (Fig. 6). Global emissions of NOx peaked around 2012, followed by reductions [143]. In addition to NOx, also ODSs and factors underlying climate change such as rising water vapor have contributed to the net increase in modeled OH from 1980 to 2010. Increasing atmospheric CH4 was the main factor counteracting the trend of rising OH (by about - 8%, see Fig. 6) in this period.
Fig. 9 Drivers of tropospheric ozone concentration (redrawn with permission and assistance from Guang Zeng from Fig. 13, in [158]). The deposition amount is directly related to the concentration of O3 at the surface of the Earth. The two panels represent the output of different chemistry-climate models considered in the study. STE, stratospheric-tropospheric exchange
Studies that infer concentrations of OH by the rate of removal of chemicals from the atmosphere have generally indicated a decreasing trend in OH after 2000 [144]. However, the interannual variability in OH from these studies was large, i.e., the difference between modeled and measured OH trends were not statistically significant [141]. For such studies, methyl chloroform (CH3CCl3) is often used [145] to infer concentrations of OH. The drawback of this method is that the emissions (almost entirely anthropogenic) of CH3CCl3 have declined substantially in the last 30 years [145], thus affecting the accuracy and precision of derived amounts of global OH.
Future trends in tropospheric concentrations of OH not only depend on solar UV-B radiation and on the concentration of precursors of OH but also on OH sinks, particularly CO and CH4. As discussed above, the increasing global concentration of CH4 was the main factor counteracting positive modeled OH trends in the period 1980-2010 (Fig. 6). Total global emissions of CH4 are currently ~ 525 Tg year-1 [146]. If emissions of CH4 from anthropogenic and natural sources continue to rise as they have since 2007, this could decrease global mean OH by up to 10% by 2050 [147], increasing the atmospheric lifetime and concentrations of CH4 in a positive
1 3
1146
feedback. Also, emissions of CO, the major sink of OH, may increase as a result of more frequent and longer lasting wildfires related to climate change. A change in the average concentration of OH in the troposphere would have large impacts on the cleaning capacity of the troposphere.
Finally, we note the importance of reactions between tropospheric OH and gases that affect stratospheric ozone (Fig. 7). These include anthropogenic halogenated organics (the HCFCs and HFCs, specifically selected for their reactivity with OH so that they are removed in the troposphere), as well as gases such as CH4 and VSLSs. Hydroxyl radicals control the tropospheric lifetimes of these gases, and hence their ability to reach the stratosphere. VSLSs are important pollutants since they can reach the lower stratosphere, despite their tropospheric lifetime of less than 6 months, and contribute to depletion of stratospheric O3 [148, 149]. These chemicals are not controlled by the Montreal Protocol and include chlorinated, brominated, and iodinated VSLSs (ClVSLSs, Br-VSLSs, and I-VSLSs, respectively). Cl-VSLSs are mostly of anthropogenic origin, while I-VSLSs and BrVSLSs, particularly bromoform (CHBr3) and dibromomethane (CH2Br2) are mainly produced in biotic processes and are affected by climate change, including increased coastal runoff and thawing of permafrost [148]. The contribution of BrVSLSs to the total stratospheric bromine loading was estimated to be 25% (in 2016) [150]. The mixing ratio of Br-VSLS at the tropopause has been measured to increase with latitude in the Northern Hemisphere, particularly during polar winter [149] when photochemically driven losses are smallest. This results (via troposphere-to-stratosphere transport) in higher concentrations of Br-VLSLs in the extratropical lower stratosphere, as compared to those in the tropical lower stratosphere [149].
The major sink of halogenated VSLSs is reaction with OH. Hence, the tropospheric lifetime of VSLSs mainly depends on the tropospheric concentration of OH. For example, Rex et al. [151] found a lifetime of dibromomethane (CH2Br2) as long as 188 days inside an OH minimum zone over the West Pacific, while outside the OH minimum zone, the lifetime of CH2Br2 was 55 days. In addition to CHBr3 and CH2Br2, methyl bromide (CH3Br) is an ODS. Due to the Montreal Protocol and its Amendments, atmospheric mole fractions of CH3Br have declined considerably and, at present, emissions of CH3Br primarily stem from natural sources [152], with some anthropogenic sources related to commercial quarantine and pre-shipment applications. The production of CH3Br in seawater is a biological process mediated by phytoplankton such as diatoms [153]. The interannual variability of atmospheric CH3Br concentrations cannot be solely explained by changes in the biological production of CH3Br due to changes in sea-surface temperatures (SSTs) and stratification [152]. Also, sinks of CH3Br have to be considered, where the major atmospheric sink of CH3Br
1 3
Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences (2023) 22:1129-1176
is reaction with OH. Nicewonger et al. [152] found a strong correlation between the interannual variability of CH3Br and the Oceanic Nio Index (ONI) from 1995 to 2020. About 36% of the variability in global atmospheric CH3Br was explained by the variability in El Nio Southern Ocean (ENSO) during this period, with increases in CH3Br during El Nio and decreases during La Nia [152]. One reason for increases in atmospheric CH3Br concentrations during El Nio years (positive ONI) could be a global reduction in OH during El Nio years. Based on modeling studies for the period 1980 to 2010, Zhao et al. [142] found decreases in global concentrations of OH during El Nio years that were mainly driven by an elevated loss of OH via reaction with CO from enhanced burning of biomass (Fig. 7). The longer the tropospheric lifetime of halogenated VSLSs, the higher is the probability that they reach the stratosphere and contribute to depletion of stratospheric O3 with impacts on ground-level UV-B radiation. Since UV-B radiation, together with tropospheric O3 and water vapor enhance the formation of OH, increased levels of UV-B radiation could counterbalance decreasing concentrations of OH due to wildfires and thawing of permafrost soils (Fig. 7).
2.7 Changes in atmospheric circulation and transport of pollutants
2.7.1 Ozone from the stratosphere
Ozone as an air quality issue has normally been considered as a local or regional issue. However, O3 from the stratosphere is also transported to the troposphere where it contributes an important but variable fraction of O3 at ground level and represents a baseline upon which locally or regionally generated O3 is added. This is known as stratospheric-tropospheric exchange (STE). The magnitude of the contribution of stratospheric O3 to tropospheric O3 is difficult to quantify but important. A comparison of measurements and 3 different models estimated the influence of stratospheric O3 on tropospheric O3, highlighting the challenges of obtaining consistent results [154]. The study estimated the fraction of O3 near the Earth's surface that can be attributed to O3 transported down from the stratosphere. This was found to vary between 10% year-round in the tropics increasing to greater than 50% at mid to high latitudes in winter.
The amount of O3 transported from the stratosphere to the earth's surface is likely to change due to human activities. Stratospheric O3 is transported to the troposphere as part of the Brewer-Dobson circulation, which describes the turnover of stratospheric air (Fig. 8). Part of this is the transport of tropospheric air into the stratosphere in the tropics, and the return of (O3-rich) air in the troposphere of the subtropical regions. Recovery of stratospheric O3 because of decreasing
Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences (2023) 22:1129-1176
release of ODSs would be expected to increase the amount of O3 transported into the troposphere. However, the impact also depends on the strength of the meteorology driving STE, which is sensitive to changes in climate.
Estimates of STE are poorly characterized by observations and atmospheric models. An assessment of amounts of O3 in the troposphere shows that model estimates of STE were around 1000 Tg year-1 O3 for results reported in 1995 but by 2015 models provided estimates approaching 400 Tg year-1, with a multi-model estimate of 535 160 Tg year-1 for the year 2000 [155]. The IPCC AR6 assessment reports a value of 628 800 Tg year-1 for 2010, with the large uncertainty highlighting how poorly this value is known [11]. Other recent estimates include 347 12 Tg year-1 (2007-2010) [156] and 400 60 Tg year-1 (1990-2017) [157].
Typically, the magnitude of the STE is inferred as the difference between the calculated production and loss of O3 (termed the residual) rather than modeling STE transport itself [158]. These production and loss terms are an order of magnitude larger (around 5000 Tg year-1) than the estimated transport [e.g., 159], so that their difference is highly uncertain. A second confounding factor is that models have used different definitions of the upper boundary (tropopause) of the troposphere.
The modeling of the impact of STE on tropospheric O3 for the period 1850-2100 shows a significant decrease in O3 from the stratosphere by the year 2000 [158] (see Fig. 9). A modeling study focusing on the period 1980-2010 calculated a decrease in the transport of O3 from the stratosphere to the troposphere due to the impact of ODSs on stratospheric O3 [160]. The model estimated a 4% decrease (14 Tg O3) in global tropospheric O3 resulting from ODS up until 1994. Another study using measurements of N2O to constrain the atmospheric modeling estimated an average decrease in STE due to the Antarctic ozone hole (1990-2017) of 30 Tg year-1 with a range of 5-55 Tg year-1, depending on year [157].
In contrast, the results of a modeling and observational study of the regional changes in O3 concentration in the troposphere for the period 1980-1990 through to 2000-2010 [154] suggest an increase in the concentration of O3 at the Earth's surface, but the other studies (noted above) found that stratospheric O3 led to a small increase over this period in the Northern Hemisphere and no significant change in the Southern Hemisphere. Clearly more work is needed in this area.
For the period from 2000 to 2100, substantial increases in the amount of O3 transported from the stratosphere to the troposphere are predicted [158]. Estimates using the output from seven atmospheric models and focusing primarily on RCP6.0, [161] suggest a 10-16% increase in the amount of O3 in the troposphere from STE in the twenty-first century.
1147
When assessing the relative importance of changes in GHGs vs ODSs in driving the changes in STE, they did not obtain a consistent picture from the models, although it appears that the two factors are of similar magnitude [161]. However, there is insufficient agreement between models to quantify trends. The net change in the concentration of O3 in the troposphere by 2100 is very dependent on the magnitude of anthropogenic emissions. The decrease in net chemical production (red curve, Fig. 9) is driven by the predicted controls on the emission of air pollutants. Calculations using the RCP8.5 scenario showed a marked increase in the concentration of O3 in the troposphere, with a threefold larger amount of O3 transported from the stratosphere than the RCP6.0 scenario [161]. It is not possible to infer the magnitude of the changes in O3 at ground level from these models, as they report O3 concentrations averaged for the entire vertical extent of the troposphere, and the impact of stratospheric O3 is much larger in the upper troposphere than at the Earth's surface.
Folds in the tropopause have a direct impact on air quality at ground level. These folds are not uniformly distributed longitudinally [162, 163] and are common over the Eastern Mediterranean, where they have been identified as a significant cause of elevated concentrations of O3 at ground level that are greater than the European Union air-quality standards [164]. The equivalent effect is also observed in the Southern Hemisphere over the Indian and Southern Oceans. A modeling study of tropopause folds for the period 1960-2100, using emissions as specified in RCP6.0 and including stratospheric O3 recovery, suggests that folds will increase during this period. Statistically significant changes in the number of tropopause folds of around 3% have been identified in regions that coincide with a calculated increase of 6 g m-3 in O3 near the Earth's surface [165].
Quantifying the transport of O3 from the stratosphere is therefore important to understanding tropospheric air quality but remains difficult. The challenge in measuring and modeling STE of O3 is partially due to the mechanism by which the downward transport occurs. Air rich in O3 is injected into the troposphere at the edges of the tropics via "folds" (Fig. 8), where thin layers of air from the stratosphere are surrounded (vertically) by air from the troposphere and vice versa. These layers then mix. Methods for identifying folds within model output are being improved [e.g., [165] and showing some promising consistency among different models [162].
The modeling of STE is also hampered by the relatively few measurements of the chemical composition and physical structure of the atmosphere in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere. As a result, there is little information that can be used to constrain atmospheric models. Efforts are now underway to use measurements of the chemical composition of air on commercial aircraft to build up a robust
1 3
1148
Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences (2023) 22:1129-1176
Table 2 Key physical, chemical, and biological properties of the linear perfluorinated carboxylic acids from 2 to 8 carbons
Property
Trifluoroacetic acid Perfluoropropanonic Perfluorobutanoic
acid
acid
Perfluoropentanoic acid
Perfluorohexanoic acid
Perfluoroheptanoic acid
Abbreviation CAS# Molecular
formula Number of car-
bon atoms Log KOW Henry's Law
Constant (atm m-3 mol-1) Koc (L kg-1) NOEC most sensitive aquatic plant (ng L-1) NOEC most sensitive aquatic animal (ng L-1) Half-life in humans f
TFA 76-05-1 CF3COOH 2 0.5 1.11 10-7
0.17-20 2.5 106b
LC50 = 7 107d
16 h
PFPrA 422-64-0 CF3CF2COOH
3
1.5a 4.43 10-6 a
12.7 a 1.44 107c
PFBA 375-22-4 CF3(CF2)2-COOH
4
2.43a 0.0051 a
PFPeA 2706-90-3 CF3(CF2)3-COOH
5
3.262a 0.029a
PFHxA 307-24-4 CF3(CF2)4-COOH
6
3.48 0.174a
PFHpA 375-85-9 CF3(CF2)5-COOH
7
5.024 a 1.521a
58 a 6.21 108c
270 a > 1.00 109c
1247 a NA
5761 > 1.02 109c
LC50 = 8.0 107d LC50 = 1.1 108 d LC50 = 1.3 108 d LC50 = 1.4 108 d LC50 > 1.02 106d
NA
72-81 h
NA
14-49 de
1.2-1.5 year
Unless otherwise stated, references are from [190]
NOEC no observed effect concentration, NA not applicable Other sources are: a[191], b[192], c[193], d[194], e[187], f[195]
Perfluorooctanoic acid PFOA 335-67-1 CF3(CF2)6-COOH 8 5.905a 3.044a
30,440 5.80 103c
LC50 = 1.5 108
2.1-10 year
climatology, which can help modeling [166]. Similarly, there are ongoing efforts to improve the use of measurements of O3 by satellites in atmospheric modeling [167], and potentially O3 sondes and in situ measurements. Using observations to constrain models introduces sensitivity to changes in quality and calibration of the input data and this requires careful assessment [167, 168] In future, these data should allow better quantification of the changes in tropospheric O3 that are caused by changes in stratospheric O3.
2.7.2 Effects of circulation changes on extreme weather events and air quality
Air quality is also affected by extreme weather events, such as wildfires. Changes in weather patterns, including extreme weather events, are not only caused by climate change but also by polar stratospheric ozone depletion, which strengthens the stratospheric polar vortex. Changing weather patterns due to the Antarctic ozone hole have been observed in the Southern Hemisphere [23, 169, 170]. For example, anomalies in rainfall and droughts in the Southern Hemisphere are correlated with the duration of the Antarctic Ozone hole [171]. In addition to the strength of the stratospheric polar vortex, the El Nio Southern Oscillation and the Indian Ocean Dipole also affect weather conditions in Australia [172]. Hot and dry weather increases the risk of
wildfires. The severe fire season in Australia 2019-2020 led to significant degradation of air quality within Australia and a smoke plume that was traced around the globe [173-175]. The likelihood of wildfires is increasing globally, a trend that is expected to continue [176]. However, the recovery of stratospheric O3 should decrease the stability of the Antarctic polar vortex, which should lead to wetter conditions in the Southern Hemisphere in the near future for this region.
Similarly to the effects of the atmospheric dynamics of the Antarctic ozone hole, Arctic stratospheric ozone depletion results in a shift of the Arctic Oscillation (AO) to more positive values (e.g., [177]) and a more zonal Northern Hemisphere jet stream. Consequences are colder than normal surface temperatures in southeastern Europe and southern Asia, but warmer than normal surface temperatures in Western Europe, Russia, and northern Asia [178]. For example, a likely consequence of the unprecedented Arctic stratospheric ozone depletion in spring 2020 was the heat wave in Siberia accompanied by wildfires in this region [179]. Whether such events will occur in the future depends on trends in the emissions of ODSs and GHGs, since GHGs affect the Arctic stratosphere via radiative cooling [180]. Hence, the frequency of extreme weather events such as droughts and therefore wildfires in both hemispheres is influenced by direct effects of climate change and by changes in atmospheric circulation and in polar stratospheric O3. Wildfires
1 3
Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences (2023) 22:1129-1176
decrease tropospheric air quality with the emission of PM, CO, and other tropospheric pollutants, which impact human health.
2.8 Conclusions
Changes in stratospheric O3 concentrations, and thus in ground-level UV-B radiation, affect tropospheric air quality. Poor air quality remains a major health problem globally, despite progress in reducing emissions of primary air pollutants. Much of the impact of air pollutants is due to chemicals produced by UV-B-initiated photochemistry, including O3 and PM, i.e., secondary inorganic and organic aerosols. PM and tropospheric O3 pose a significant health risk. Overall, recovery of stratospheric O3, and hence lower intensity of ground-level UV-B radiation, is expected to slightly improve air quality in cities in midlatitudes but slightly worsen air quality in rural areas. For PM, the impacts of changes in UV-B radiation on the amount and chemical composition of PM are still poorly understood.
Transport of O3 from the stratosphere into the troposphere adds to tropospheric O3 concentrations. This transport is expected to increase because of the recovery of stratospheric O3 and changes in global circulation driven by climate change. Given the current state of knowledge, estimating the magnitude of these changes remains a significant challenge.
UV-B radiation is also involved in the formation of OH, the major cleaning agent of the troposphere. Hence, UV-B radiation has some beneficial effects on tropospheric air quality. Reaction with OH drives the atmospheric removal of many problematic tropospheric gases including some pollutants and GHGs such as CH4, and VSLSs (noting also that GHGs and VSLSs affect stratospheric O3). Given current global CH4 emission of ~ 500 Tg year-1, a 1% decrease of the global OH concentration would result in an increase of ~ 1% in tropospheric CH4 concentrations, equivalent to a sustained increase in emissions of CH4 of ~ 5 Tg year-1.
The main sink of OH is reaction with CO. An important natural source of CO is wildfires, which have increased in frequency and intensity due to climate change. Hence, UV-B radiation and climate change affect concentrations of tropospheric OH with potential feedbacks on climate change and on stratospheric ozone.
The impact of poor air quality is not limited to human health; it affects plants and other organisms as well. This has had a substantial impact on food production and forests through exposure to ground-level O3. There is also evidence of reduced food production due to PM. The magnitude of these impacts will be altered by climate change and the future evolution of stratospheric O3.
1149
3 Trifluoroacetic acid in the global environment with relevance to the Montreal Protocol
3.1 Background
Trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) is the terminal breakdown product of many fluorinated chemicals, including those that fall under the purview of the Montreal Protocol and its Amendments. Its properties (discussed below) include very low reactivity, high stability, and recalcitrance to breakdown in the environment. This has raised concerns about the use of fluorinated substitutes for the ozone-depleting and the fluorinated greenhouse gases. The formation, fate, and potential effects of TFA has been the remit of the EEAP for the last two decades, and this overview is a continuation of this activity with a primary focus on new information since the last Quadrennial Assessment [6] to the Parties of the Montreal Protocol.
3.1.1 Classification of trifluoroacetic acid as a per and polyfluoroalkyl chemical
Trifluoroacetic acid CF3-COOH (CAS# 76-05-1) is a perfluorinated chemical, meaning that, aside from its functional group (-COOH), all hydrogen atoms in the molecule have been replaced with fluorine. The European Chemicals Agency has proposed that this chemical be included in a class, the per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) [181]. Others have suggested that the definition of PFAS should exclude TFA and chemicals that degrade to just give TFA [182]. In 2022, there were 4730 chemicals in the PFAS class, which had been expanded to include all chemicals with at least one aliphatic -CF2- or -CF3 moiety. The PFAS class includes gases (such as those under the purview of the Montreal Protocol), low boiling point liquids, high boiling point liquids and lubricants, and solid polymers used in industry, medicine, and domestic equipment. As has been pointed out [183], a small number (about 256) of these PFAS are currently used commercially and "grouping and categorizing PFAS using fundamental classification criteria based on composition and structure can be used to identify appropriate groups of PFAS substances for risk assessment." [183] More recently, a majority of a panel of experts agreed that "all PFAS should not be grouped together, persistence alone is not sufficient for grouping PFAS for the purposes of assessing human health risk, and that the definition of appropriate subgroups can only be defined on a case-bycase manner." [184]. In addition, the majority opinion with respect to toxicology was that "it is inappropriate to assume equal toxicity/potency across the diverse class of PFAS" [184].
1 3
1150
Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences (2023) 22:1129-1176
Fig. 10 Atmospheric degradation pathways and corresponding yields of TFA for HFCF-123 (A), HFC-134a (B) and HFO-1234yf (C) representing three generations of important CFC replacements. Approxi-
mate atmospheric lifetimes for the chemical species involved are indicated in parenthesis. Species marked by an asterisk have significant competing fates in the atmosphere [205, 206]
1 3
Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences (2023) 22:1129-1176
1151
60%
H
Cl
40%
C C + OH
HCFO-1233zd(E)
F HH F C C C Cl
F OH (s)
CF3
H
(43 days)
F HH
F C C C Cl
F OH (s)
O2
F HH F C C C Cl
F OH O2 (mins)
NO
Cl
HCl RH
(mins)
F HH
F C C C OH (mins)
F
F HH NO2 F C C C Cl
F OH O
(s)
F H Cl
FCC +
H
F OH
(s) O2
O (5-15 days)
F HH FC C C
(2-3 days) F H O
h
CO
or
CO
OH
2
+ OH HCHO/COOH
FH
F C C O2 F OH
(mins)
NO2
F NO
FH CCO F OH
(s)
OH
*F
FC
FH
FC C
+ h
* F O
+ OH (2 days)
C
CF3
COF2
HF + CO2
(5-15 days)
F
O
CO
(mins) O2 F
NO2
CF3C(O)OONO2
FC
hv / decomp.
F
(mins)
* O2
C O
NO2 CO2
NO CF3C(O()Os)
+ HO2
OH + O2 CF3C(O)OOH + O2
CF3COOH(g) O3
CF3COOH(aq) (TFA)
Deposition
2-30%
Fig. 11 Atmospheric degradation of HCFO-1233zd. The OH-initiated oxidation of the product, CF3CHO, is a minor source of TFA. Based on [207] and [208]
This same argument applies to the inclusion of TFA, with a two-carbon chain and a single CF3 group, into a class with longer-chain PFAS. These longer-chain PFAS have key chemical, physical, and biological properties that become quite different with increasing length of the carbon chain (Table 2 and Online Resource Table 1). For example (see
Table 2), log KOW (a measure of partitioning between lipids in organisms and water); Henry's Law Constant (a measure of partitioning between water and air); KOC (a measure of adsorption to soil and sediment); and the half-life in humans (related to chronic exposure and chronic toxicity) all vary with changes in the length of the carbon chain. These
1 3
1152 Fig. 12 Yields of TFA from selected individual chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) replacement compounds, and their estimated global emissions. Also included are selected compounds not under the purview of the Montreal Protocol and Amendments. Error bars represent both experimental uncertainties and upper and lower yield ranges due to competing reaction channels that depend on environmental conditions. Yields of TFA from individual compounds are estimated based on evaluations of the available literature as described in Online Resource SI Sect. 4. Note split scale for the emission for HFC-134a, which is much higher than those of other compounds
Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences (2023) 22:1129-1176
relationships are well recognized [185-189] as they are important drivers of adsorption, distribution, and excretion in animals, which are major determinants of adverse effects.
There has been considerable discussion as to the inclusion of TFA in the class PFAS for regulatory purposes [182, 183, 196-199]. Regulatory agencies in North America acknowledge the physical, chemical, and biological properties of chemicals in the class of PFAS [189] and, in particular, the influence of chain length on these properties [188, 189, 200]. A sound assessment of the environmental impact of TFA needs to consider the relevant physical, chemical, and toxicological data and realistic environmental concentrations (see discussion in Sect. 3.2 to 3.6). We are of the opinion that the properties of TFA indicate that it should not be included in this class for the purposes of generic regulatory risk assessment.
The PFAS class also includes other perfluorinated chemicals that are of concern, e.g., perfluorooctanesulfonic acid, (PFOS). PFOS differs from TFA and its homologues because it is a sulfonic acid and is also more toxic than its alkanoic homolog. Therefore, as these chemicals do not fall under the purview of the Montreal Protocol, they have not been included in this discussion or in Table 2.
3.1.2 Properties of trifluoroacetic acid
The physical and chemical properties of TFA are well known [201] but key to assessing environmental risk is that it is a
strong acid with a pKa of 0.3 and is completely miscible with water [190]. In the environment, it forms salts with alkali metals, which are also very soluble in water. These properties indicate that TFA and its salts will not bioaccumulate in organisms other than terrestrial plants and will not biomagnify in food chains. The carbon-fluorine bond is the strongest of all bonds with carbon and TFA and its salts are very recalcitrant in the environment. Studies on degradation by microbiota, including species and strains from contaminated areas, have not shown any evidence of TFA being susceptible to microbiological degradation [202, 203].
3.2 Chemical pathways for degradation of precursors to trifluoroacetic acid
HCFCs and HFCs have found widespread use as replacements in applications that previously used CFCs. More recently, short-chain halogenated alkenes (hydrofluoroolefins, HFOs) are finding increasing use in several commercial applications. For example, E-CF3CH=CHF (HFO1234ze(E)) and E-CF3-CH=CHCl (HCFO-1233zd(E)) are being used for foam blowing and in large chillers, whereas 2,3,3,3-tetrafluoropropene, CF3CF = CH2 (HFO-1234yf) is used as a replacement for 1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane, CF3CH2F (HFC-134a), in vehicle air conditioning units [204]. These chemicals are anthropogenic and there are no known natural sources of HCFCs, HFCs, and HFOs.
1 3
Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences (2023) 22:1129-1176
1153
Table 3 Projected global yields of TFA from HFC-134a and HFO-1234yf and total deposition between 2020 and 2100
HFC-134a
HFO-1234yf
Sum
Annual formation of TFA (a. e., acid equivalents)
2020
0.01-0.03 Tg year-1
2050
0.02-0.05 Tg year-1
2100
0.01-0.02 Tg year-1
Sums of deposited TFA (a. e.)
2020-2050
0.5-1.5 Tg
2020-2100
1.0-2.9 Tg
Concentration of TFA as the sodium salt in the oceans in
0.03-0.03 Tg year-1 0.34-0.49 Tg year-1 0.63-1.03 Tg year-1
5.3-6.6 Tg 30.5-49.0 Tg 2050
2100
0.04-0.06 Tg year-1 0.36-0.54 Tg year-1 0.64-1.05 Tg year-1
5.8-8.1 Tg 31.5-51.9 Tg 244-246 ng L-1
266-284 ng L-1
These data are taken from Table 7.3 of the 2022 report of the Science Assessment Panel [212] and currently are best estimates for the two listed refrigerants. Releases of other potential sources of TFA (see Fig. 12) have not been included but are expected to be much smaller. Estimated future concentration in the oceans is based on the nominal value of 200 ng a.e. L-1 in 2020 and a total volume of 1.36 109 km-3. For comparison to toxicity values, concentrations have been converted to sodium salt
Tropospheric degradation of HCFCs, HFCs and HFOs is initiated by reaction with OH radicals, leading to formation of small terminal degradation products including CO, CO2, and the halo-acids hydrogen fluoride (HF) and hydrogen chloride (HCl). Some of the degradation products are also atmospheric precursors of TFA through hydrolysis of acyl halides, e.g., CF3CFO, or via secondary photochemistry of trifluoroacetaldehyde (CF3CHO) [205, 206]. The chemistry by which the CFC replacements are converted into precursors of TFA has been extensively studied over the last few decades and recently summarized [207, 208]. Figure 10 illustrates how atmospheric degradation of different CFC replacements, belonging to three successive generations of CFC replacements, can lead to the formation of TFA in significantly different yields. For instance, the dominant atmospheric fate of CF3CClO and CF3CFO, generated in the atmospheric processing of HCFC-123 and HFC-134a, respectively, is uptake into cloud water, followed by effective hydrolysis to yield TFA, on a timescale of approximately 5-30 days [205]. However, due to competing fates of the intermediary alkoxy radicals (marked with asterisks in Fig. 10), the effective yields of TFA are significantly different (e.g., ~ 60% for HCFC-123 and 7-20% for HFC-134a). In the case of HFO-1234yf, no significant competition exists in the degradation pathway, and the expected yield of TFA is ~ 100% through the hydrolysis of CF3CFO.
Even if they are not producing acid-halides during their atmospheric degradation, some other CFC replacements can still form TFA in small yields through the formation of trifluoroaldehyde, CF3CHO. This aldehyde is the primary degradation product from several CFC replacements, including HCFCs, HFCs, HFOs and HCFOs, e.g., HCFC234fb (CF3CH2CCl2F, = 45 years), HFC-143a (CF3CH3, = 51 years) and HFO-1234ze(E) (E-CF3CH = CHF,
= 19 days) and HCFO-1233zd(E) (CF3CH = CHCl, = 42 days) [209]. Here is the atmospheric lifetime defined as the reciprocal of the pseudo first-order rate constants for the removal of the chemical species, also sometimes referred to as the "e-folding lifetime".
Figure 11 illustrates the atmospheric degradation of HCFO-1233zd(E), which produces CF3CHO in essentially 100% yield. CF3CHO has three competing fates in the atmosphere. First, it undergoes photolysis (annually averaged diurnal atmospheric lifetime in the troposphere of 2 days at 40 latitude) giving CF3 and HCO radicals [210] (see also Sect. 3.7). Second, oxidation initiated by OH produces acyl peroxy radicals, which can react with HO2, NO, or NO2. Reaction of these acyl peroxy radicals with HO2 radicals can lead to the formation of TFA as a minor product. Third, contact with liquid water produces hydrates, which can react with OH radicals leading to the formation of TFA [211]. The latter two processes are currently thought to be minor fates of CF3CHO. The reaction of the hydrate with OH radicals is an efficient pathway for generating TFA; however, the importance of hydrolysis of CF3CHO to give TFA is uncertain (see Sect. 3.7.3). Due to these competing fates, an estimated 2-30% of atmospheric CF3CHO is converted into TFA (see SI Sect. 4).
3.3 Contribution of chemicals under the purview of the Montreal Protocol to the global load of trifluoroacetic acid
Several CFC replacements give rise to the formation of TFA as an atmospheric oxidation product. Figure 12 provides an overview of estimated molar yields of TFA (%) for CFC replacements, as well as selected chemicals not under the purview of the Montreal Protocol (non-MP). In addition, some replacements such as HCFC-225ca (CF3CF2CHCl2)
1 3
1154 Fig. 13 Concentration of trifluoroacetate in composite precipitation samples from eight sites in Germany from February 2018 to February 2020. The y-axis is on a binary logarithmic scale (log2) and the solid horizontal bar is the median, the box indicates the upper and lower quartiles, the whiskers the upper of lower quartile - or + the interquartile range 1.5, and the data symbols are the outliers. From Fig. 27 in [220]
Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences (2023) 22:1129-1176
yield longer-chain PFCAs, CF2CF2COOH (100%). HFC134a and HFO-1234yf are the two substitutes that have the largest predicted contribution to global TFA concentrations among those gases that fall under the purview of the Montreal Protocol. The Science Assessment Panel (SAP) and the Technology and Economic Assessment Panel (TEAP) of the Montreal Protocol under the United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) have projected future uses and potential releases from 2020 to 2100 for these two substitutes. A summary of the projected yield of TFA from degradation in the troposphere (Fig. 12) is provided in Table 3.
These amounts of TFA are estimated to increase concentrations in the global oceans from the nominal value of 200 ng a.e. L-1 (equivalent to 239 ng TFA sodium salt L-1) estimated by Frank et al. [213] to 266-284 ng sodium salt L-1 in 2100 if evenly distributed across all oceans. If the actual concentrations were less than the nominal value (239 ng TFA sodium salt L-1), the predicted values for 2100 would be smaller. In a recent study in Germany, the contribution of currently used refrigerants to the formation of TFA was estimated [214]. The worst-case annual formation of TFA from refrigerant R134a was estimated at 1050 tons year-1, 1170 tons year-1 from refrigerant R1234yf, and 141 tons year-1 from all other refrigerants. If the proportions of TFA from other refrigerants in Germany are applied to the global estimate of deposition, the maximum value for contributions from all refrigerants would be about 6% greater, i.e., 302 ng sodium salt L-1.
It should be noted that the geographic distribution of TFA released into the atmosphere across the globe has changed with the introduction of refrigerants and blowing agents such as HFOs with short atmospheric lifetimes (days). The longer atmospheric lifetimes of the older generation HFCs allowed wider and more even distribution of parent HFCs and deposition of TFA, across the globe
[215-217]. The HFOs will be degraded by tropospheric OH radicals closer to the source of release with resulting steeper gradients of concentration depending on wind direction and velocity [see examples of modeling of deposition in [217]. As a result of this uneven deposition, concentrations of TFA in surface waters will vary with flow rates and volumes of water. Prediction of concentrations of TFA in surface waters will require the development of hydrologic models, such as those now used to model distribution and concentrations of other pollutants in water. These types of models are available from the USEPA [218] but would need to be modified for modeling of the dispersion of HFOs and TFA once it reaches the surface.
3.4 Trifluoroacetic acid in precipitation
The presence of TFA in precipitation continues to be studied, with several new reports published since the last Quadrennial Assessment [6] Unless otherwise stated, only those studies with complete descriptions of analytical methods have been included. Analysis of rainwater samples collected in 2016 in 28 cities across China showed detectable amounts of TFA in all samples [219]. Concentrations ranged from a low of 9.1 to a high of 320 ng TFA a.e. L-1 and fluxes from 160 to 16,000 ng TFA a.e. m-2 day-1 (Tables SI-7 and SI-8 in [219]). A study on concentrations of TFA present in rainwater samples in eight locations across Germany from February 2018 to 2019 showed a seasonal range of concentrations over 1 year [220]. Across all sites, frequency of detection was greater than 90% except in December, January, and February. The greatest median concentration, 703 ng TFA a.e. L-1, was in June 2018. Over the year, daily fluxes across collection sites showed less variability with the greatest median flux of 774 ng TFA a.e. m-2 day-1 and the smallest of about
1 3
Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences (2023) 22:1129-1176
205 ng m-2 day-1 [Table 2 in [220]. This study was continued for an additional year [214] and a similar pattern was observed (Fig. 13). The source of the TFA was most likely degradation of fluorinated gases in the troposphere and the authors suggest that the seasonality is because of seasonal changes in solar UV radiation and the photochemical formation of OH radicals responsible for production of TFA in the troposphere [220]. Fluxes of TFA in rainwater in Germany [220] were less than those reported from China [219], probably because of the release of more precursors in greater concentrations in the latter location. A recent study on temporal trends in concentrations of TFA in surface waters reported increases in concentrations of sixfold between samples collected in 1998 and those collected in 2021 [221]. Concentrations in samples collected downwind from the San Francisco Bay area were greater in 2021 (up to 2790 ng L-1) than in 1998 (up to 287 ng L-1). The author suggests that these residues of TFA are from the breakdown of fluorinated refrigerants, but fluxes were not reported so the role of reduced precipitation in generating the greater concentrations is unknown. Once reaching the surface, TFA will form salts with alkali metals and mix with surface- or interstitial-water in the soil. These salts can be taken up by plants (see below) and accumulate in plant tissues, particularly leaves. Based on this property, archived samples of various leaves of some species of trees from the German Environmental Specimen Bank were analyzed for the presence of TFA [222]. The leaves collected spanned the period from 1989 to 2020 and showed an increase in concentrations of TFA. For example, concentrations of TFA in leaves of Lombardy poplar increased from ca. 160 g kg-1 (d.w.) in 1991 to ca 970 g kg-1 in 2019. The authors suggest that the sources of TFA are replacements for the CFCs, mostly from precipitation. The authors are likely correct in this conclusion.
Breakdown products of some fluorinated chemicals include hydrofluoric acid (HF) and TFA, which are strong acids. However, the amounts generated from the oxidation of HFOs represent only a small (< 0.5%) contribution to the formation of acid rain in comparison to other sources such as sulfur and nitrogen oxides [223] and this is judged to not be of concern.
3.5 Other sources of trifluoroacetic acid in the global environment
In previous assessments [6, 224, 225], we have discussed other potential sources of TFA that are not related to the chemicals under the purview of the Montreal Protocol. In the global context, there is a paucity of information on these sources, but they fall into some general groupings, inter alia:
1155
Geogenic sources Effluents and releases from the manufacture of fluori-
nated chemicals, including chemicals under the purview of the Montreal Protocol and Amendments Combustion and degradation of fluorinated chemicals in commercial and household waste Biological and environmental degradation of chemicals such as pharmaceuticals and pesticides that contain fluorine atoms, specifically the -CF3 moiety.
These are discussed in more detail below.
3.5.1 Geogenic sources
Since the early reports of the widespread presence of TFA in marine waters [213, 226] and its association with 14C-dated deep waters older than 1000 years [227], it was believed that there are natural sources of TFA. This is consistent with the report that concentrations of TFA increase with proximity to locations of undersea volcanic vents [227, 228].
However, the theory that TFA can be formed from geogenic sources has been challenged [229]. This challenge was partially based on potential analytical errors and lack of information on levels of detection and quantitation, and high variance in concentrations measured in samples at different depths and in different oceanic basins. The authors focused on atmospheric sources of TFA in surface waters and ice, which originates in precipitation and did not consider measurements in other bodies of water such as endorheic lakes and playas located in areas of low precipitation and little fluorochemical industry. One of these locations, the Dead Sea, had a reported concentration of 6400 ng L-1 [226]. The Dead Sea is in a rift valley with a history of geological faulting and with a volume of 114 km3, so that this concentration is equivalent to 730 tons of TFA. That this amount of TFA (measured in the 1990s) is all from anthropogenic sources is very unlikely, and geogenic sources are more plausible.
Another argument put forward that TFA does not originate from geogenic sources is the lack of TFA in older (> 2000-yearold) samples of glacial melt, surface, and ground water. These older waters originated from precipitation from evaporated (distilled) marine and surface waters. Like chloride, TFA from oceans (and possible endorheic lakes) could be carried to land close to the shore. However, this transport would only be for short distances and is unlikely to be a significant source of TFA and other PFAS in precipitation and/or ice cores [220]. While it is possible that TFA could have been released from surficial volcanos, these potential sources lack the combinations of high temperature and high pressures found in thermal vents in the deep ocean. It should be noted that some authors have reported the presence of fluorinated and/or chlorinated short-chain and aromatic carbon compounds (but not TFA) in emissions from surficial volcanos [reviewed in [230, 231].
1 3
1156
The background value of 200 ng TFA L-1 in the oceans as suggested by Frank et al. [213] would be equivalent to 268 106 tons of TFA in the global oceans if well mixed globally. However, based on analyses in several oceanic basins, lesser amounts (a range of 61-205 106 tons equivalent to 45-152 ng L-1) were suggested by Scott et al. [227]. From the total known use and release of HFC-134a, HFC-143a, and HFC-227ea between 1990 and 2015, the total amount of TFA that could theoretically have been produced is 4.5 106 tons. This is very much less than the total based on the range of concentrations measured in the oceans, which, using an estimated ten-fold range, would be equivalent to 27-270 106 tons. Even with this assumption, this is equivalent to a discrepancy of 6 to 60-fold that is much larger than would be explainable by anthropogenic activity in relation to use of the HFCs. This gap is most likely from natural sources.
In the absence of more rigorous and consistent sampling of the oceans, these concentrations and amounts are speculative. For the purposes of comparisons to toxicity values and risk assessment, the EEAP [6, 224, 225, 232] used the larger value to err on the side of caution when estimating further contribution from the chemicals under the purview of the Montreal Protocol to the total load in the global oceans. Another major unknown in characterizing the source of reported concentrations of TFA in the oceans is the degradation half-life of TFA in the environment. As discussed above, TFA is very recalcitrant and is essentially unreactive under normal environmental conditions. If, as seems to be the case, the half-life is likely very long ( centuries), very small amounts could accumulate over time to explain the amounts observed in oceans and endorheic basins.
3.5.2 Manufacturing of fluorinated chemicals
In the 1990s, there was only one manufacturer of TFA in the USA [201] and relatively few manufacturers of fluorinated refrigerants that fall under the purview of the Montreal Protocol. Since that time, the manufacture of fluorinated chemicals has increased, and these facilities are found in many countries around the world. Details on the amounts produced, use, and release of most of these chemicals and by-products are not reported in a way that is accessible to the public or the scientific community such as it is for chemicals under the purview of the Montreal Protocol. Several recent papers have reported measurements of TFA and potential precursors in locations near manufacturing facilities. Here, we focus mostly on publications in the last 4 years.
A study of leachates and effluents from municipal waste disposal sites and landfills in the environs of Tianjin (China), the location of several fluorochemical manufacturing facilities, showed the presence of many PFAS as well as TFA at all sampling sites [233]. Greatest amounts of TFA (60,000 and 50,000 ng a.e. L-1) were measured in leachates from
1 3
Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences (2023) 22:1129-1176
two incineration plants, although leachates from one landfill and one transfer-site had similarly high concentrations approaching 40,000 ng a.e. L-1. TFA was detected in samples of surface water and soils near a fluorochemical complex in Jinan (China) [234]. Concentration of TFA in lotic (flowing) surface waters ranged from 300 to 1000 ng L-1 but two lentic (still water sites) had mean concentrations of 1700 and 2600 ng a.e. L-1. Well- and tap-water had concentrations of about 250 ng a.e. L-1. In the same study, concentrations of TFA in soil samples close to factories ranged from 59 to 2081 ng a.e. kg-1. Uptake of TFA from nutrient solution (containing 2,000,000,000 ng a.e. L-1) by roots and leaves of wheat plants resulted in accumulated concentrations 170,000,000 ng kg-1 in roots and 100,000,000 ng kg-1 in shoots after exposure for 80 h [235]. Given the large and unrealistic concentrations in the nutrient solution, this is not surprising. Other PFAS were also taken up but to a lesser extent than TFA. This study did demonstrate uptake of TFA by plants. As discussed in the previous update report [225], maize and poplar plants take up TFA from contaminated soils [236]. Transport to the leaves was greater than to the stalk or the maize kernels. This is consistent with transport with water to the sites of transpiration and loss of water vapor through the leaves, resulting in accumulation of nonvolatile salts of TFA. The median bioaccumulation factor (soil:leaf) was about 200. When these authors fed maize leaves to herbivores (locusts) the leaf-to-locust transfer factors were < 1 (0.028-0.185), indicative of negative trophic magnification (trophic dilution), most likely because locusts can excrete TFA, as has been demonstrated in mammals [201]. The large concentrations of TFA found in the environments around factories and plants manufacturing fluorinated chemicals indicate large fugitive emissions from some facilities that manufacture these chemicals. Given the small number of studies, the total load to the environment is very uncertain but it is an issue that needs to be addressed regionally, even if it is outside the scope of the Montreal Protocol.
3.5.3 Combustion and thermolysis of fluorinated chemicals
Polymers containing fluorine, such as polytetrafuoroethylene (PTFE) and related products, are heavily used in urban and industrial areas [237]. Data on amounts of fluoropolymers produced each year are not easily obtained; median estimates of value are in the region of 8 billion US dollars; however, there were no data on the mass of the products. When these polymers are subjected to high temperatures, they can degrade to yield TFA or precursors of TFA [238]. When heated to 500 C in the presence of air, PTFE, polychlorotrifluoroethylene (CPTFE), ethylene chlorotrifluoroethylene (ECTFE), and polytetrafluoroethylene-co-tetrafluoroethylene perfluoropropylether (PFEPE) yielded 7.8, 9.5, 6.3, and 2.5% TFA, respectively [238]. A similar study
Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences (2023) 22:1129-1176
on this source of TFA in Beijing (China) indicated yields of TFA from thermolysis of PTFE, poly(vinylidene fluoridehexafluoropropylene) (PVDF-HFP), and poly(vinylidene fluoride-co-chlorotrifluoroethylene) (PVDF-CTFE) were 1.2%, 0.9% and 0.3%, respectively, which was estimated to contribute 0.6-6.1 ng a.e. L-1 to precipitation over this city [239]. These are potential sources of TFA to the environment but little information was found in the literature on the effect of conditions of combustion (ranging from very high incineration temperature of waste to open-burning) on the rates of formation of TFA. However, this does remain a possible, but globally uncertain, source of TFA. A recent laboratory study of degradation of PFCAs [240], has shown that exposure of PFCAs (see Table 2) to sodium hydroxide in a polar aprotic solvent (e.g., dimethyl sulfoxide) resulted in degradation to fluoride ions in yields between 78 and 100% in 24 h. TFA was formed in amounts of 19-39 mol% for PFCAs with 5-9 carbon chains. The authors suggest that this observation might lead to the development of methods for disposing of PFCAs. However, the TFA produced in the process might become a source of TFA to the environment.
3.5.4 Unidentified sources of exposure to trifluoroacetic acid
A review of the global occurrence of PFCs in water from wastewater treatment plants identified only two studies (included in previous reports from the EEAP) that had reported the presence of TFA [241]. Whether the TFA was formed during treatment of the wastewater or was present in the incoming effluent could not be determined; however, the authors speculated that it could have been formed from degradation of longer-chain PFAS precursors.
In a study of the concentrations of PFAS in the serum of staff and support workers in Nankai University in Tianjin (China), a location where fluorochemicals are manufactured, TFA and other PFAS were detected [242]. The frequency of detection of TFA was 97% but 12 other PFAS had greater frequencies of detection. The median concentration of TFA in serum of the volunteers was 8460 ng L-1 and the 75th centile was 12,550 ng a.e. L-1. Given the high solubility in water as noted above (and low Kow, Table 2), this concentration is likely equivalent to a systemic burden of the same values in ng kg-1. These values are 4.4 orders of magnitude less than the NOED (No Observed Effect Dose) for TFA in rats (discussed below) and do not suggest biologically significant risks for humans. Concentrations of PFOS and PFOA were greater than TFA and these chemicals are more toxic than TFA and are retained in the body for longer periods (Table 2). The authors reported an association between the sum of the concentrations of PFAS and biomarkers of diabetes but offered no insight as to causality by a specific chemical or the route of exposure to these chemicals.
1157
Residues of TFA have been found in beverages such as beer and herbal infusions (teas) [243]. Analysis of samples of beer from 23 countries spanning the globe provided a range of concentrations with a median of 6100 ng L-1 and a maximum of 51,000 ng a.e. L-1. The authors opined that the source of TFA in the beer and teas was not the water used to make the beverage, suggesting rather that the barley or the hops and the dried leaf of the tea(s) was the source of the contamination. Measurements of TFA in barley have not yet been reported in the literature but uptake of TFA from soil into maize kernels (discussed above) resulted in accumulations with a range of 40,400 to 102,000 ng a.e. kg-1 [236]. If accumulation in barley is like maize, this is a possible explanation; however, the source of the TFA in the barley is uncertain. It could originate from industrial sources of contamination or pesticides used in agriculture that break down to produce TFA and a terminal residue (see below).
An earlier paper from China [244] had reported the detection of many PFAS in outdoor dust; however, they did not analyze for TFA. Residues of TFA (and other PFAS) have now been detected in indoor and outdoor dust in China [245]. Median concentrations of TFA in outdoor dust from six locations in China ranged from 61,000 to 222,000 g a.e. kg-1 with no consistent differences between rural and urban sites. In urban sites, concentrations of TFA in indoor dust from six locations in China ranged from 117,000 to 470,000 g a.e. kg-1. Concentrations of other PFAS were much smaller [245]. Using procedures from the USEPA, these authors also estimated daily intake values of PFAS of toddlers and adults that could result from ingestion of dust. The 95th centile estimated daily intakes of TFA for toddlers and adults were 5.3 and 0.55 ng a.e. kg-1 body weight, respectively, for indoor dust. The 95th centile estimated daily intakes for toddlers and adults from outdoor dust were 3.2 and 0.33 ng a.e. kg-1 body weight. The original source(s) of the contamination in the dusts are unknown but there were amounts of unknown precursors (37 - 67 mol %) for PFAS in the dust [245].
3.5.5 Pharmaceuticals and pesticides
Fluorine atoms are frequently added to pharmaceuticals and pesticides to enhance or modify their biological properties. The most common use is replacement of a hydrogen with a fluorine atom. The van der Waals radii for hydrogen (0.12 nm) and fluorine (0.14 nm) are similar and small compared to that of other halogens such as chlorine (0.18 nm) [246]. Thus, fluorine-substituted chemicals are more likely to successfully dock with receptor sites than chemicals substituted with larger halogens such as Cl. The C-F bond is one of the strongest in organic chemistry, so this substitution tends to make the molecule more resistant to biochemical breakdown, which prolongs biological activity. In addition,
1 3
1158 Table 4 Potential release of TFA from fluorinated-pesticides used in the USA from 1992 to 2018
Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences (2023) 22:1129-1176
Namea
MWa
Formulaa
Number of C-CF3 moietiesa
Molar yield Estimated
of TFA
tons of
TFA
Acifluorfen
361.657 C14H7ClF3NO5
1
Bicyclopyrone
399.366 C19H20F3NO5
1
Bifenthrin
422.872 C23H22ClF3O2
1
Chlorfenapyr
407.615 C15H11BrClF3N2O 1
Cyflumetofen
447.454 C24H24F3NO4
1
Cyhalothrin-gamma
449.854 C23H19ClF3NO3
1
Cyhalothrin-lambda
449.854 C23H19ClF3NO3
1
Dithiopyr
401.41 C15H16F5NO2S2
1
Ethalfluralin
333.267 C13H14F3N3O4
1
Fipronil
437.141 C12H4Cl2F6N4OS 2
Flonicamid
229.162 C9H6F3N3O
1
Fluazifop
327.259 C15H12F3NO4
1
Fluazinam
465.089 C13H4Cl2F6N4O4 2
Flubendiamide
682.392 C23H22F7IN2O4S 2
Flucarbazone
396.297 C12H11F3N4O6S
1
Flufenacet
363.331 C14H13F4N3O2S
1
Flumetralin
421.733 C16H12ClF4N3O4 1
Fluometuron
232.206 C10H11F3N2O
1
Fluopicolide
383.576 C14H8Cl3F3N2O
1
Fluopyram
396.717 C16H11ClF6N2O
2
Fluridone
329.322 C19H14F3NO
1
Flutolanil
323.315 C17H16F3NO2
1
Fluvalinate
502.918 C26H22ClF3N2O3
1
Fomesafen
438.758 C15H10ClF3N2O6S 1
Isoxaflutole
359.319 C15H12F3NO4S
1
Lactofen
461.774 C19H15ClF3NO7
1
Mesotrione (trembotrione) 440.814 C17H16ClF3O6S
1
Novaluron
492.706 C17H9ClF8N2O4
1
Oxyfluorfen
361.701 C15H11ClF3NO4
1
Prosulfuron
419.379 C15H16F3N5O4S
1
Saflufenacil
500.85 C17H17ClF4N4O5S 1
Tefluthrin
418.736 C17H14ClF7O2
1
Thiazopyr
396.376 C16H17F5N2O2S
1
Trifloxystrobin
408.377 C20H19F3N2O4
1
Trifluralin
335.283 C13H16F3N3O4
1
Triflusulfuron
478.403 C16H17F3N6O6S
1
Total
0.315 0.286 0.270 0.280 0.255 0.253 0.253 0.284 0.342 0.522 0.498 0.348 0.490 0.334 0.288 0.314 0.270 0.491 0.297 0.575 0.346 0.353 0.227 0.260 0.317 0.247 0.259 0.231 0.315 0.272 0.228 0.272 0.288 0.279 0.340 0.238
3332 117 2116 315 28 73 1431 1 11,437 809 168 1887 407 233 105 2623 306 12,618 30 292 27 1229 4 6519 1495 1120 4565 221 3117 151 525 1893 7 1492 65,327 30 122,604
aData from [254]. Data on use of pesticides in the United States are from [257]. See Online Resource Table 2 for annual quantities
substitution of hydrogen with fluorine can change other properties of the chemical, especially of adjacent chemical groups. For example, the F atom is a much stronger withdrawer of electrons than an H atom. As compared to hydrogen with a Hammett sigma value of zero, the Hammett for a single fluorine substituent on a benzene ring is + 0.062 for para-effect and + 0.337 for the meta-affect. For a -CF3 on a benzene ring, the Hammett sigma values are + 0.54 and + 0.43, respectively.
For comparison with the precursors of TFA that are under the purview of the Montreal Protocol, the following discussion is focused on chemicals with a C-CF3 moieties since these could potentially degrade to produce TFA as a terminal residue. It is estimated that about 20% of pharmaceuticals currently in commerce contain one or more fluorine atoms. As of 2020, the number of pharmaceuticals containing fluorine atom(s) was 369 [247] and in 2021, 13 new products containing fluorine were added [248]. Of these, 77 contain
1 3
Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences (2023) 22:1129-1176
1159
Fig. 14 Maximum possible annual emissions of TFA from plant protection products in Germany for active ingredients that can theoretically form TFA. Data based on mean sales volume of each of the active substances over the three years 2016, 2017 and 2018 (Figure from [259])
C-CF3 moieties [from Fig. 4 in [247]]. Some bacteria use fluoxetine (Prozac, CAS# 54,910-89-3) as a sole source of carbon and the terminal metabolite is TFA [249], which is not further metabolized. These authors also reported photolytic defluorination of intermediates formed in the degradation of fluoxetine [Fig. 7 in [249]] but did not specify intensity or wavelength. Whether this photolytic defluorination occurs under environmental conditions is unknown. TFA can also be formed from some fluoro-pharmaceuticals during treatment of water with O3. The molar yield of TFA from fluoxetine solutions treated with O3 at 4 mg L-1 was as large as 40% [202].
Pharmaceuticals are used globally but there is a paucity of information on the amounts produced and used in the treatment of humans and other animals. However, these pharmaceuticals and/or their breakdown products are excreted and, thus, enter the environment. For example, anesthetic procedures involving halothane (CF3CHClBr), isoflurane (CF3CHClOCHF2), and desfluorane (CF3CHFOCHF2) are known to produce TFA as a metabolite in humans. Anesthesia using halothane can result in significant levels of TFA in blood (20,000-110,000 g L-1), which is excreted in urine [250-253]. Those pharmaceuticals that contain the C-CF3 moiety are expected to be a source of TFA in the environment but there are two unknowns, the yield of TFA from the breakdown of the pharmaceutical and the amounts of pharmaceuticals that are used. More publicly available information is needed to even begin to address this uncertainty.
To estimate the contribution of pharmaceuticals to the total global load of TFA would be highly speculative but they are a potential source of TFA.
Some pesticides also contain one or more C-CF3 moieties [254] and are potential sources of TFA in the environment [225]. Breakdown of some of these pesticides to TFA has been investigated. For example, ozonation (4 mg L-1) of solutions of trembotrione (mesotrione, CAS# 104,206-82-8), flufenacet (CAS# 142,459-58-3), flurtamone (CAS# 96,52523-4), and fluopyram (CAS# 658,066-35-4) at 100 g L-1 for times between 5 and 60 min resulted in 5, 20, 43, and 32% production of TFA on a molar basis [Fig. 7 in 202]. Whether ozonation is a good model for the formation of TFA from pesticides in agricultural soils or not is unknown. The yield of TFA from the degradation of pesticides is dependent on the other substituents on the molecule and the environmental conditions. Studies on the photolysis of the lampricide 3-trifluoromethyl-4-nitrophenol (TFM CAS# 88-30-2) used to control the sea lamprey in the North American Great Lakes have shown that photolysis (365 nm) results in the formation of TFA [255]. Yields were dependent on the pH of the solution and ranged from 5 to 18%. Conversion of the nitro-group to an amino-group increased the rate of conversion but not the yield. In another study, yields of TFA from photolysis of the penoxsulam (an herbicide) and sulfoxaflor (an insecticide) exposed to UV radiation in river water were less than 5% under laboratory conditions [256]. Neither of these pesticides were included in Table 4. Yields of TFA
1 3
1160 Fig. 15 A log-probability cumulative frequency plot of no observed effect concentrations (NOEC) of trifluoroacetic acid salt compared to various environmental concentrations in water. The dashed vertical green line indicates the NOEC for TFA-Na salt in microcosms is a toxicology-based criterion
Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences (2023) 22:1129-1176
from penoxsulam were greater in river water than in distilled water at pH 7 (Fig. SI-18 in [256]). This dependence of the formation of TFA on environmental conditions and substituents on the other parts of the molecule likely applies to other pesticides and to pharmaceuticals and other potential precursors of TFA.
Similarly, as for pharmaceuticals, the amounts of pesticides used across the globe are not known at the level of individual chemicals. The Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations collects data on pesticide use by country, but these data are grouped by chemical class of pesticide and information on individual products is not available. However, data on annual estimates of the use of individual pesticides are available in the United States through the database on Estimated Annual Agricultural Pesticide Use, maintained by the US Geological Survey through the National Water-Quality Assessment Project [257].
To obtain a better understanding of the possible contributions of pesticides to the global load of TFA, we estimated the use of those pesticides containing one or more C-CF3 moieties from data available in the United States. Maps and associated estimates of amount of pesticide applied [257] were downloaded and then compiled. As a worst case, upper estimates of use were selected and all data from 1992 to 2018 were collected, summed, and converted to tons of active ingredient. The molar yield of TFA was calculated using the ratio of the molecular weight of TFA (114.02 Daltons) and the pesticide (from Table S3 in [254]). This is a conservative assumption as the actual yield of TFA is dependent on other substituents on the molecule and the primary driver(s) of degradation. The potential total tonnage of TFA released from these pesticides was then calculated. These results are shown in Table 4.
It should be noted that these estimated values are based on worst-case assumption of highest estimated use and complete conversion of all C-CF3 moieties in the chemical to TFA. Global use of pesticides in 2019 was estimated as 4,190,985 tons with 495,475 tons in North America [258], approximately 12% of the global use. Because of selection for resistance and the availability of alternatives, some of the pesticides included in Table 4 are no longer in use and the use-pattern of those currently in use will likely change in the future. For this reason and the lack of data on global pesticide use, the estimates of total global contribution to loads of TFA are uncertain; however, in comparison to future loads of TFA resulting from the release of chemicals under the purview of the Montreal Protocol, the potential contribution from pesticides is small.
A recent analysis of sources of TFA in the environment from the German Environment Agency [214] reported on precursors of TFA and included uses of refrigerants gases and other uses of chemicals for 2016-2018. Most of the TFA was estimated to be sourced from five products. The potential annual production of TFA from use of pesticides in Germany was 504 tons per year (Fig. 14), based on a mean of 3 years) but should not be compared directly with the data from the United States (Table 4), which presents total estimated use over 26 years.
3.6 Human and environmental risks associated with trifluoroacetic acid in the environment
3.6.1 Risks from exposure to TFA in terrestrial animals
Since the last Quadrennial Assessment, only one report on the potential effects of TFA in mammals was found in the literature [260]. This was a report on the effects of exposure
1 3
Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences (2023) 22:1129-1176
to TFA salts via drinking water in male laboratory rats. The tests followed OECD guidelines (Tests 417 and 452 [261]) and exposures were for 90, 370, and 412 days at concentrations in the drinking water of 0 (control), 30, 120, and 600 mg TFA a.e. L-1. The latter concentration was equivalent to a daily intake of 37.8 mg TFA kg-1 (b.m.). Responses measured were activity of the enzymes alanine-amino-transferase (ALT) and glutamate-pyruvate-transferase (GPT) in the blood. No significant effects were observed at 30 mg L-1 for any time of exposure but a significant increase in ALT activity was observed at 120 and 600 mg TFA a.e. L-1 at 370 days but not at 412 days. No effects on GPT were reported. In a second study with exposures for 14, 28, and 90 days to 0, 600, 1200, and 2400 mg TFA a.e. L-1, no significant effects on ALT were observed. Increases in the activity of enzymes in or originating from the liver are considered as compensatory unless accompanied by physiological responses such as loss of weight. This reported effect does not change the conclusion that TFA is of low toxicity in mammals.
An extensive review of the potential effects of TFA in the environment published by the German Environmental Agency [214] did not identify any risks other than the persistence of TFA in the environment, which is a legislative rather than toxicological criterion. The concentrations of TFA in beer and tea discussed above are small when compared to the NOED of TFA in mammals. This indicates that the risk to humans from residues of TFA in beer and tea are de minimis (of little importance).
3.6.2 Risks of exposure to TFA in aquatic organisms
Since the last Quadrennial Assessment, one new toxicity test for an aquatic organism was located. This was a retest of the most sensitive alga (Raphidocelis subcapitata) conducted on behalf of Solvay [192]. The study protocol followed OECD guideline 201 [261]. Effect values were based on growth. A no observed effect concentration (NOEC) of 2.5 mg a.e. L-1 (2,500,000 ng L-1) was reported based on inhibition of growth. Being a more recent study conducted under OECD guidelines, this data point was substituted for the older (1999) study used in the 2016 risk assessment [232] and is illustrated in Fig. 15. Although this new study on R. subcapitata has not been published in the literature, the study was conducted under Good Laboratory Practice Guidelines with Quality Assurance and Quality Control [262]. The detailed report of the study was reviewed by ECHA [263] and was classified as "reliable without restriction", hence it has been used here in the characterization of the toxicity of TFA to aquatic organisms.
The margin of exposure between the distribution of NOECs and the observed and expected concentrations in
1161
the oceans and endorheic basins is several orders of magnitude and is indicative of de minimis risk.
3.6.3 Environmental persistence of TFA as an assessment criterion
Environmental persistence is one of the criteria used to identify persistent organic pollutants (POPs), such as those regulated under the purview of the Stockholm convention. Persistence alone has been suggested to be a criterion for regulatory action [264]. The suggested threshold for this classification is a degradation halflife > 6 months. The stability of TFA and its salts indicates a half-life >> 6 months, but our opinion is that persistence should only be considered as a regulatory criterion for substances that are moderately or highly toxic and/or are bioaccumulative in organisms and/or undergo trophic magnification. TFA does not bioaccumulate nor is it toxic at the low to moderate exposures currently measured in the environment or those predicted in the distant future.
3.7 Other issues relevant to the degradation of fluorinated chemicals and release of TFA
3.7.1 Potential effects of hydrofluorocarbons and hydrofluoroolefins on tropospheric ozone
The photochemistry of CFC replacements, including HFCs and halogenated olefins, could impact air quality through formation of tropospheric O3 on urban or regional scales. The spatial and temporal variation in VOC emissions, nonlinear chemistry of the reacting chemical species, and complex atmospheric mixing and transport factors, all contribute to large uncertainties and thus complicate this assessment. In the past, e.g., [265], the potential impact has been addressed based on the indices of either the photochemical ozone creation potential (POCP) [266] or the Maximum Incremental Reactivity (MIR) index [267]. The MIR index values reflect the mass (grams) of ozone formed relative to the mass (grams) of VOC emitted. The POCP is a relative potential determined from the effect of a small incremental increase in the emission of a chemical on the calculated amount of O3 formed, relative to the effect of an identical mass emission of ethene as a reference chemical. The former was developed with a focus on ozone formation in urban plumes and mainly in a United States urban-scale context. The latter addresses ground-level ozone formation on the regional, multi-day episode scale, as it most often occurs in Europe, here being predominantly a long-range transboundary and transport air quality issue. Both indices require fully speciated emission inventories and non-trivial model calculations. However, the POCP values can also be estimated to a first approximation
1 3
1162
based on structure and reactivity of the VOC, which is especially useful for VOCs for which no full chemical mechanisms have been implemented in atmospheric model studies, i.e., for many of the HFCs and HFOs discussed here.
With the exception of a 3D global modeling study (Geos Chem) of the impact of HCFO-1233zd(E) [215], there have been no new reports of POCPs/MIR values for the HFCs and HFOs/HCFOs in the literature over the last review period. Recently, a methodological update to the original POCP estimation method has become available [268] (see Online Resource, SI Sect. 3 for details). Table SI 3 (Online Resource) lists the updated POCP values for CFCs and their replacements, based on the most recent reactivity evaluations and estimated for both north-west European and United States urban reference conditions. These values now provide index values on the same comparable scale and can be used as an approximate indicator of the potential impact on tropospheric ozone from the CFC replacements. In general, first- and secondgeneration CFC replacements, HCFCs and HFCs, have very small POCP values. Many of the common HFOs, with some exceptions, have POCP values that lie between those for methane (0.57/0.22) and ethane (10.91/4.52). The POCP values for HFOs are generally larger than those for the analogous HFCs, but much smaller than those for the parent alkenes. This is consistent with the few explicit MIR modeling studies of HFOs available in the literature. e.g., [267, 269]. It is clear from these studies, and from the values in Online Resource SI Table 3, that substitution of e.g., HFC-134a emissions for an equal mass of HFO-1234yf emissions, would lead to an increase in POCPweighted emissions (two orders of magnitude). Still, MIR studies and atmospheric modeling studies of HFO-1234yf, have shown that O3 production from HFO-1234yf is indistinguishable from that from ethane (also consistent with Online Resource Table 3), and that replacing HFC-134a in vehicle air conditioning units with HFO-1234yf across the United States has a negligible impact (< 0.01%) on the formation of tropospheric ozone. It is clear from the above, that the small increases in tropospheric ozone formation generated from a transition from HFC emissions to emissions of HFOs would not be of concern.
3.7.2 Relevance of trifluoroacetaldehyde, a precursor of TFA, is increasing
With the transition from HFCs to third-generation alternatives such as HFO-1234ze(E) and HCFO-1233zd(E), the atmospheric abundance of CF3CHO, (estimated 40 latitude, annually averaged diurnal tropospheric lifetime of 2 days [210]) is expected to increase in source regions. Ambient concentrations of HFO-1234ze and HCFO-1233zd(E) have been measured in central Europe (Germany) at urban, semiurban, and remote sites from 2011 onwards [270-272]. As discussed in Sect. 3.2, these chemicals give CF3CHO as an intermediary product of atmospheric degradation, with
1 3
Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences (2023) 22:1129-1176
a yield of 100%. In 2020 the measured mean abundances of HFO-1234ze and HCFO-1233zd(E) in central Europe at Jungfraujoch (remote, 3580 m above sea level) were 0.98 ng/m3 (0.21 pptv) and 1.01 ng/m3 (0.19 pptv), respectively. This is an increase from 0.18 ng/m3 (0.039 pptv) and 0.02 ng m-3 (0.003 pptv) in 2013 at this same measurement station. A recent 3D global chemistry and transport model study [273] suggests significant increases in the abundance of CF3CHO in source regions, as well as in the global background; however, it appears that the model of Wang et al. does not include photolysis of CF3CHO, which is the major tropospheric sink for CF3CHO (see above). They employed a high and a low emissions scenario for HFO-1234ze (12.6 or 124.4 ktonne year-1 by 2050) and predicted annual average mixing ratios of 11 ng m-3 (2.7 pptv) for CF3CHO in China (source region) and 0.7 ng m-3 (0.18 pptv) as a global average for their low emissions scenario. For their high emissions scenario, they predict annual mixing ratios in China of 413 ng m-3 (103 pptv). These values are all significantly larger than those (< 5 pg m-3 level) which can be inferred from a 3D global chemistry model study of the atmospheric degradation of HCFO-1233zd(E) with contemporary emissions estimates (0.5 Gg year-1) [215]. The stark difference in the two studies can be explained by the difference in CF3CHO chemistry employed by the two models. Due to the fast photolysis of CF3CHO, concentrations of CF3CHO are unlikely to build up to ng m-3 levels, locally or globally.
3.7.3 Sinks for CF3CHO: a photolytic source of HFC23 and CF3CHOhydrate formation
The dominant overall sink for CF3CHO is thought to be photolysis [210]. The photolysis can proceed through three principal pathways:
(1a) CF3CHO + h CF3 + HCO, (1b) CF3CHO + h CF3H + CO, (1c) CF3CHO + h CF3CO + H. Chiappero et al. [210] reported a quantum yield of 1a = 0.17 0.03 and no indication of reaction 1b occurring in the 308 nm photolysis of CF3CHO. However, a recent study by Campbell et al. reported that reaction 1b has a quantum yield at 308 nm of 1b = 0.01 0.005, and that in effect 11 5.5% of CF3CHO would undergo reaction via reaction 1b in the atmosphere to yield CF3H (HFC-23) [274]. CF3H is a strong GHG (GWP = 12,690), and its photochemical formation through reaction 1b could, in effect, present an additional and potentially significant contribution to the radiative forcing of climate of the parent CFC alternatives. The study of Campbell et al. 2020 [274] was based on an indirect technique using CO as a marker for pathway 1b and conducted at very low, sub-atmospheric pressure and temperatures. A subsequent chamber study at atmospheric pressures by Sulbaek Andersen and Nielsen [275] using
Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences (2023) 22:1129-1176
broad-band actinic radiation shows no formation of CF3H in the tropospheric photolysis of CF3CHO and an estimated upper limit for the yield of CF3H of 0.3% was established. Whereas the study of Sulbaek Andersen and Nielsen [275] was carried out under tropospheric conditions, none of the past photolytic studies were performed using the same photolysis sources and detection methods. As suggested by Sulbaek Andersen and Nielsen [275], investigations of the photolysis at wavelengths relevant to the upper troposphere/ lower stratosphere would be of interest for a more comprehensive modeling of the atmospheric photolysis of CF3CHO.
The yield of TFA from CF3CHO may depend on whether it remains in gaseous form. It has been reported that formaldehyde is efficiently converted to gaseous formic acid via a multiphase pathway involving a hydrated form of formaldehyde [276]. Earlier, using computational methods, Rayne and Forest [277] suggested that CF3CHO will be dominantly present as the hydrated form in aqueous solution. The reaction of OH radicals with the hydrated form of CF3CHO in the gas phase is known to be an effective route for formation of TFA (100%) [211]; however, to what extent CF3CHO could be removed from the atmosphere through wet scavenging and undergo multiphase chemistry is unknown.
3.7.4 CF3CHO and TFA: Interactions with particle growth and formation of new particles
Recent simulations have shown that both CF3CHO and TFA can participate in particle growth and particle formation processes [278-280]. However, these processes are highly dependent on season and atmospheric conditions. The reaction of CF3CHO/(CH3)2NH/H2O can compete well as a sink for CF3CHO at night (when photolysis is not occurring and concentrations of OH radical are low) if relative humidity and dimethylamine concentrations are high.
TFA enhances the formation rate of new dimethylamine/ sulfuric particles significantly (up to 227-fold [278]), but only under conditions of relatively low temperatures and sulfuric acid concentrations, and relatively high TFA and dimethylamine concentration. With increasingly effective regulations on emissions of sulfur-containing pollutants, the enhancement of new particle formation by TFA may become increasingly important in urban areas where emissions of sulfur are expected to decline.
3.7.5 Potential impact of reactions of TFA with stabilized Criegee intermediates
Stabilized Criegee intermediates (SCI), highly reactive chemicals formed in the atmosphere, react rapidly with PFCAs including TFA, producing hydroperoxyfluoroesters. This is likely the dominant gas-phase fate of PFCAs [281], although this only constitutes a temporary reservoir. SCIs
1163
exist in the greatest concentrations over forested regions, where emissions of biogenic alkene are high. The lifetime of TFA would be as short as 2 days over land areas with significant SCI-mediated loss, such as in tropical forests [216]. However, hydrolysis of the ester products, and reaction with OH, simply regenerates TFA; therefore, reactions of TFA with SCI are unlikely to have a substantial impact on the overall loss of gas-phase TFA [281]. In effect, the SCI-mediated oxidation products were found to have no significant impact on concentrations or distributions of TFA in the atmosphere [216] and this is not a pathway for net destruction of TFA in the environment.
3.8 Conclusions and uncertainties
TFA is a perfluorinated acid that has been included in the class of per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). This class of chemicals contains 4730 substances, of which about 256 are in commercial use. Even in the subclass of perfluorinated alkanoic acids, the physical, chemical, and biological properties of these substances differ widely, mostly in relation to length of the alkyl chain. To regulate these substances as a class (as has been suggested) is not scientifically defensible and TFA should be treated as a unique chemical for the purposes of regulation.
TFA is an acid when formed in the atmosphere but on reaching the surface (soil or water) it forms salts with alkali metals (e.g., sodium, potassium, calcium, etc.). Because of its lack of reactivity, TFA salts are persistent in the environment and estimates of half-life are uncertain but could be in the range of centuries or millennia. This persistence is not a major concern because it does not react with biomolecules. TFA and its salts are easily excreted by animals and do not bioaccumulate in food chains. Salts of TFA have low toxicity to animals and plants and there are very wide margins between current/projected exposures and toxicity values.
One source of TFA in the environment is the degradation of replacements for chemicals that contribute to the destruction of stratospheric O3. These are the HCFCs, HFCs, and HFOs, all of which are replacements for chemicals that fall under the purview of the Montreal Protocol. Some of these are greenhouse gases and contribute to global climate change. Because of this, there is a trend to replace long-lived HCFCs and HFCs with HFOs, which have very short atmospheric lifespans and do not contribute to climate change. The use of these replacements is monitored under the auspices of the Montreal Protocol and estimates of current and future releases of TFA are regularly assessed. These releases will add to the existing load of TFA in the environment but predicted amounts are well below the threshold for concern with respect to human and environmental health.
Initial reactions in the atmospheric degradation of HCFCs, HFCs, and HFOs that lead to TFA are well
1 3
1164
understood. Some uncertainties still exist for the atmospheric fate of CF3CHO. With the transition from HFCs to HFOs, the importance of the degradation product, CF3CHO, in the environment is increasing. Nevertheless, CF3CHO is likely to be only a minor source of TFA. Other than HCFCs, HFCs, and HFOs, there are additional sources of TFA in the environment. TFA is used as a laboratory reagent and is the starting material for many industrial products. It is formed from combustion of fluoropolymers and as a terminal breakdown product of fluorinated pharmaceuticals and pesticides. Fugitive releases have resulted in high levels of contamination near manufacturing facilities and TFA is routinely detected in surface waters. Other than precipitation, which contains TFA formed in the atmosphere, the sources for TFA in surface waters are uncertain. However, preliminary estimates of possible releases from use of pesticides in the United States and Germany suggest that total amounts are less than those from HCFCs, HFCs, and HFOs. Amounts released from degradation of pharmaceuticals are very uncertain and amounts from fugitive releases from manufacturing are completely unknown.
TFA released into the environment will eventually collect in terminal basins such as endorheic lakes or the oceans. Because the HCFCs and HFCs are long-lived in the atmosphere, they distribute globally and TFA from these substances is more evenly deposited. The HFOs and HCFOs have shorter lifetimes in the atmosphere and deposition of TFA from these substances is likely to be more localized. This will result in greater concentrations near the locations of release. This is unlikely to present a risk to humans or the environment in these locations but changes in concentration in surface water (or soil) would respond rapidly to releases. Monitoring of the environment for residues of TFA would provide an early warning if trends in concentration indicate rapid increases.
Presence of TFA in precipitation and flowing waters will be driven by release from precursors and other sources as well as the hydrology and will likely fluctuate. Concentrations in terminal basins such as the oceans will fluctuate less but will be dependent on rates of inputs from precipitation and rivers. Once in the oceans, concentrations will be influenced by rates of input of fresh water as well as currents and mixing in the oceans. Current and projected (to 2100) concentrations of TFA in the oceans provide a very large margin of exposure (thousand-fold) when compared to thresholds of toxicity, and risks to the environment and human health are de minimis. However, there is some uncertainty in the environmental toxicity values because only two marine species are included in the toxicity data set for aquatic species; and marine macrophytes, which are keystone species with respect to habitat, have not been tested.
There are several national and regional programs that monitor and report on concentrations of chemicals such as
1 3
Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences (2023) 22:1129-1176
pesticides in surface water. For example, the National WaterQuality Assessment program in the United States [257] and NAIADES program in France [282]. These programs have the infrastructure to routinely sample flowing waters from many watersheds and analyze these for residues of pesticides. It should not be difficult or costly to include TFA in these analyses. If started soon, these data could be useful in characterizing inputs of TFA from the short-lived HFOs as well as in identifying point-sources of industrial inputs.
4 Knowledge gaps
There have been significant efforts to improve air quality through reductions in VOCs and NOx emissions. However, major uncertainties remain for future emissions scenarios, as well as changes in environmental conditions such as UV-B radiation, temperature, and humidity, which are sensitive to changes in stratospheric O3 and climate. Furthermore, models need to be improved to better characterize the production and destruction of ground-level O3 in complex urban VOC-NOx mixtures, the propensity for producing SOA, and the contribution of the transport of stratospheric O3 to the troposphere.
Knowledge of global OH concentrations and their variability must be enhanced to constrain the estimated atmospheric lifetime of the many gases removed by OH. This will require improved assessment of anthropogenic and natural emissions of species that control the concentration of atmospheric OH, including CO, methane, and NOx. Better methods are needed to estimate global-scale OH concentrations, since the use of methyl chloroform for this purpose has become less reliable due to its rapidly decreasing emissions.
Some uncertainties remain in our understanding of the sources, routes of formation, and environmental fate of TFA. Identification and quantification of potential natural sources of TFA are urgently needed. Similarly, better local/regional emission inventories are needed for short-lived precursors of TFA arising from CFC replacements, as well as characterization of all other anthropogenic sources of TFA. In addition, reliable estimates of yields of TFA are required for current and new replacement compounds and their partially oxidized degradation intermediates. Finally, there is some uncertainty in toxicity values for TFA because of the limited number of marine species tested.
5 Overall conclusions
UV-B radiation has positive and negative impacts on tropospheric air quality. UV-B radiation is essential to the formation of photochemical smog, including ground-level O3, particulate matter, but is also essential for removing pollutants
Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences (2023) 22:1129-1176
from the atmosphere. Thus, changes in UV-B radiation have consequences for both air quality and the lifetime of many gases, including some GHGs and VSLSs. Poor air quality remains a major health problem globally, despite progress in reducing anthropogenic emissions of air pollutants. The Montreal Protocol has prevented large increases in UV-B radiation; however, interactions with climate change complicate predictions. Future changes in UV-B radiation are uncertain but present substantial dangers given the widespread vulnerability of humans to, e.g., photochemical smog.
The Montreal Protocol has led to the replacement of ODSs with fluorinated chemicals, some of which can undergo degradation in the atmosphere to give TFA in various yields. TFA is known to have a long environmental lifetime and accumulates in surface and ground waters. At present, there are large uncertainties associated with the concentrations of TFA in various environmental compartments in some regions, as well as the relative proportion of anthropogenic sources related to the Montreal Protocol, compared to the other anthropogenic and natural sources. There is some uncertainty in toxicity values because of the limited number of marine species tested. Current and predicted concentrations (to year 2100) of TFA in the oceans provide a large margin of exposure (thousand-fold) when compared to thresholds of toxicity.
The topics of this assessment align closely with several of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) [283]. Issues in air-quality (Sect. 2) specifically relate to SDG 3 (Good Health and Well-being), but also inform SDG 2 (Zero Hunger--via damage to crops), SDG 11 (Sustainable Cities and Communities--via impacts on livability), and SDG 13 (Climate Action--via OH controlling the lifetimes of many climate-relevant gases). Atmospheric processing of CFC replacements leading to persistent chemicals such as TFA (Sect. 3) raises concerns about SDG 12 (Responsible Consumption and Production) and in the context of SDG 6 (Clean Water and Sanitation--via accumulation in sources of drinking water).
Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s43630-023-00369-6.
Acknowledgements Generous contributions by UNEP/Ozone Secretariat were provided for the convened author meeting. SM acknowledges partial support by the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) UV-B Monitoring and Research Program, Colorado State University, under USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture Grant 201934263-30552; 2022-34263-38472, and travel support from the U.S. Global Change Research Program. The authors thank T. J. Wallington and many anonymous reviewers for helpful comments.
Author contributions All authors contributed to the conception, assessment, and writing of the content.
1165 Funding Open access was funded by the University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia. Data availability All data generated or analyzed are included or published previously.
Declarations
Conflict of interest The authors have no conflicts of interest. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
References
1. Tang, X., Madronich, S., Wallington, T., & Calamari, D. (1998). Changes in tropospheric composition and air quality. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B-Biology, 46, 83-95. https:// doi.org/10.1016/S1011-1344(98)00187-0
2. Solomon, K. R., Tang, X., Wilson, S. R., Zanis, P., & Bais, A. F. (2003). Changes in tropospheric composition and air quality due to stratospheric ozone depletion. Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences, 2, 62-67. https://doi.org/10.1039/B211086E
3. Wilson, S. R., Solomon, K. R., & Tang, X. (2007). Changes in tropospheric composition and air quality due to stratospheric ozone depletion and climate change. Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences, 6, 301-310. https://doi.org/10.1039/B700022G
4. Tang, X., Wilson, S. R., Solomon, K. R., Shao, M., & Madronich, S. (2011). Changes in tropospheric composition and air quality due to stratospheric ozone depletion and interactions with changes in climate. Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences, 10, 280-291. https://doi.org/10.1039/C0PP90039G
5. Madronich, S., Shao, M., Wilson, S. R., Solomon, K. R., Longstreth, J. D., & Tang, X. Y. (2015). Changes in air quality and tropospheric composition due to depletion of stratospheric ozone and interactions with changing climate: Implications for human and environmental health. Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences, 14, 149-169. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4pp90037e
6. Wilson, S. R., Madronich, S., Longstreth, J. D., & Solomon, K. R. (2019). Interactive effects of changing stratospheric ozone and climate on tropospheric composition and air quality, and the consequences for human and ecosystem health. Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences, 18, 775-803. https://doi.org/10.1039/ c8pp90064g
7. Haagen-Smit, A. J., Bradley, C. E., & Fox, M. M. (1953). Ozone formation in photochemical oxidation of organic substances. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry, 45(9), 2086-2089. https:// doi.org/10.1021/ie50525a044
8. McKenzie, R. L., Aucamp, P. J., Bais, A. F., Bjoern, L. O., Ilyas, M., & Madronich, S. (2011). Ozone depletion and climate change: Impacts on UV radiation. Photochemical &
1 3
1166
Photobiological Sciences, 10(2), 182-198. https://doi.org/10. 1039/c0pp90034f 9. Seinfeld, J. H., & Pandis, S. N. (2016). Atmospheric chemistry and physics: From air pollution to climate change (3rd ed.). Wiley 10. Brasseur, G. P., & Jacob, D. J. (2017). Modeling of atmospheric chemistry. Cambridge University Press 11. Szopa, S., Naik, V., Adhikary, B., Artaxo, P., Berntsen, T., Collins, W. D., Fuzzi, S., Gallardo, L., Scharr, A. K., Klimont, Z., Liao, H., Unger, N., & Zanis, P. (2021). Short-lived climate forcers. In V. Masson-Delmotte, P. Zhai, A. Pirani, S. L. Connors, C. Pan, S. Berger, N. Caud, Y. Chen, L. Goldfarb, M. I. Gomis, M. Huang, K. Leitzell, E. Lonnoy, J. B. R. Matthews, T. K. Maycock, T. Waterfield, O. Yeleki, R. Yu, & B. Zhou (Eds.), Climate Change 2021: The physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press 12. Liu, S. C., & Trainer, M. (1988). Responses of the tropospheric ozone and odd hydrogen radicals to column ozone change. Journal of Atmospheric Chemistry, 6(3), 221-233. https://doi.org/10. 1007/bf00053857 13. Thompson, A. M., Stewart, R. W., Owens, M. A., & Herwehe, J. A. (1989). Sensitivity of tropospheric oxidants to global chemical and climate change. Atmospheric Environment (1967), 23(3), 519-532. https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-6981(89)90001-2 14. Zhang, H., Wu, S., Huang, Y., & Wang, Y. (2014). Effects of stratospheric ozone recovery on photochemistry and ozone air quality in the troposphere. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 14(8), 4079-4086. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-4079-2014 15. Hodzic, A., & Madronich, S. (2018). Response of surface ozone over the continental United States to UV radiation declines from the expected recovery of stratospheric ozone. npj Climate and Atmospheric Science, 1(1), 35. https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41612-018-0045-5 16. Bekki, S., Law, K. S., & Pyle, J. A. (1994). Effect of ozone depletion on atmospheric CH4 and CO concentrations. Nature, 371(6498), 595-597. https://doi.org/10.1038/371595a0 17. Fuglestved, J. S., Jonson, J. E., & Isaksen, I. S. A. (1994). Effects of reductions in stratospheric ozone on tropospheric chemistry through changes in photolysis rates. Tellus B: Chemical and Physical Meteorology, 46(3), 172-192. https://doi.org/10.3402/ tellusb.v46i3.15790 18. Schnell, R. C., Liu, S. C., Oltmans, S. J., Stone, R. S., Hofmann, D. J., Dutton, E. G., Deshler, T., Sturges, W. T., Harder, J. W., Sewell, S. D., Trainer, M., & Harris, J. M. (1991). Decrease of summer tropospheric ozone concentrations in Antarctica. Nature, 351(6329), 726-729. https://doi.org/10.1038/351726a0 19. Isaksen, I. S. A., Zerefos, C., Kourtidis, K., Meleti, C., Dalsren, S. B., Sundet, J. K., Grini, A., Zanis, P., & Balis, D. (2005). Tropospheric ozone changes at unpolluted and semipolluted regions induced by stratospheric ozone changes. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD004618 20. Butler, A. H., Daniel, J. S., Portmann, R. W., Ravishankara, A. R., Young, P. J., Fahey, D. W., & Rosenlof, K. H. (2016). Diverse policy implications for future ozone and surface UV in a changing climate. Environmental Research Letters, 11(6), 064017. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/6/064017 21. Keeble, J., Hassler, B., Banerjee, A., Checa-Garcia, R., Chiodo, G., Davis, S., Eyring, V., Griffiths, P. T., Morgenstern, O., Nowack, P., Zeng, G., Zhang, J., Bodeker, G., Burrows, S., Cameron-Smith, P., Cugnet, D., Danek, C., Deushi, M., Horowitz, L. W., Kubin, A., et al. (2021). Evaluating stratospheric ozone and water vapour changes in CMIP6 models from 1850 to 2100. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 21(6), 5015-5061. https:// doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-5015-2021
1 3
Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences (2023) 22:1129-1176 22. Shepherd, T. G. (2008). Dynamics, stratospheric ozone, and cli-
mate change. Atmosphere-Ocean, 46(1), 117-138. https://doi. org/10.3137/ao.460106 23. Bernhard, G. H., Bais, A. F., Aucamp, P. J., Klekociuk, A. R., Liley, J. B., & McKenzie, R. L. (2023). Stratospheric ozone, UV radiation, and climate interactions. Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43630-023-00371-y 24. Newman, P. A., Oman, L. D., Douglass, A. R., Fleming, E. L., Frith, S. M., Hurwitz, M. M., Kawa, S. R., Jackman, C. H., Krotkov, N. A., Nash, E. R., Nielsen, J. E., Pawson, S., Stolarski, R. S., & Velders, G. J. M. (2009). What would have happened to the ozone layer if chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) had not been regulated? Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 9(6), 2113-2128. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-2113-2009 25. McKenzie, R., Bernhard, G., Liley, B., Disterhoft, P., Rhodes, S., Bais, A., Morgenstern, O., Newman, P., Oman, L., Brogniez, C., & Simic, S. (2019). Success of Montreal Protocol demonstrated by comparing high-quality UV measurements with "World Avoided" calculations from two chemistry-climate models. Scientific Reports, 9, 13. https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41598-019-48625-z 26. van Dijk, A., Slaper, H., den Outer, P. N., Morgenstern, O., Braesicke, P., Pyle, J. A., Garny, H., Stenke, A., Dameris, M., Kazantzidis, A., Tourpali, K., & Bais, A. F. (2013). Skin cancer risks avoided by the Montreal Protocol-worldwide modeling integrating coupled climate-chemistry models with a risk model for UV. Photochemistry & Photobiology, 89(1), 234-246. https:// doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-1097.2012.01223.x 27. Madronich, S., Lee-Taylor, J. M., Wagner, M., Kyle, J., Hu, Z., & Landolfi, R. (2021). Estimation of skin and ocular damage avoided in the United States through implementation of the Montreal Protocol on substances that deplete the ozone layer. ACS Earth and Space Chemistry, 5(8), 1876-1888. https://doi. org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.1c00183 28. Young, P. J., Harper, A. B., Huntingford, C., Paul, N. D., Morgenstern, O., Newman, P. A., Oman, L. D., Madronich, S., & Garcia, R. R. (2021). The Montreal Protocol protects the terrestrial carbon sink. Nature, 596(7872), 384-388. https://doi. org/10.1038/s41586-021-03737-3 29. Shi, H., Zhang, J., Zhao, B., Xia, X., Hu, B., Chen, H., Wei, J., Liu, M., Bian, Y., Fu, D., Gu, Y., & Liou, K.-N. (2021). Surface brightening in Eastern and Central China since the implementation of the Clean Air Action in 2013: Causes and implications. Geophysical Research Letters, 48(3), e2020GL091105. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL091105 30. Ma, M., Gao, Y., Wang, Y., Zhang, S., Leung, L. R., Liu, C., Wang, S., Zhao, B., Chang, X., Su, H., Zhang, T., Sheng, L., Yao, X., & Gao, H. (2019). Substantial ozone enhancement over the North China Plain from increased biogenic emissions due to heat waves and land cover in summer 2017. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 19(19), 12195-12207. https://doi.org/ 10.5194/acp-19-12195-2019 31. Wang, W., Li, X., Shao, M., Hu, M., Zeng, L., Wu, Y., & Tan, T. (2019). The impact of aerosols on photolysis frequencies and ozone production in Beijing during the 4-year period 2012-2015. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 19(14), 9413-9429. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-9413-2019 32. Wang, Y., Gao, W., Wang, S., Song, T., Gong, Z., Ji, D., Wang, L., Liu, Z., Tang, G., Huo, Y., Tian, S., Li, J., Li, M., Yang, Y., Chu, B., Petaja, T., Kerminen, V. M., He, H., Hao, J., Kulmala, M., et al. (2020). Contrasting trends of PM2.5 and surfaceozone concentrations in China from 2013 to 2017. National Science Review, 7, 1331-1339. https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/ nwaa032 33. Wu, J., Bei, N., Hu, B., Liu, S., Wang, Y., Shen, Z., Li, X., Liu, L., Wang, R., Liu, Z., Cao, J., Tie, X., Molina, L. T., & Li, G.
Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences (2023) 22:1129-1176 (2020). Aerosol-photolysis interaction reduces particulate matter during wintertime haze events. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 117(18), 9755-9761. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1916775117
34. Li, K., Jacob, D. J., Liao, H., Shen, L., Zhang, Q., & Bates, K. H. (2019). Anthropogenic drivers of 2013-2017 trends in summer surface ozone in China. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 116(2), 422-427. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1812168116
35. Liu, Y., & Wang, T. (2020). Worsening urban ozone pollution in China from 2013 to 2017 - Part 2: The effects of emission changes and implications for multi-pollutant control. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 20(11), 6323-6337. https://doi. org/10.5194/acp-20-6323-2020
36. Hollaway, M., Wild, O., Yang, T., Sun, Y., Xu, W., Xie, C., Whalley, L., Slater, E., Heard, D., & Liu, D. (2019). Photochemical impacts of haze pollution in an urban environment. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 19(15), 9699-9714. https://doi.org/10. 5194/acp-19-9699-2019
37. Tian, R., Ma, X., Jia, H., Yu, F., Sha, T., & Zan, Y. (2019). Aerosol radiative effects on tropospheric photochemistry with GEOS-Chem simulations. Atmospheric Environment, 208, 82-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.03.032
38. Gao, J., Li, Y., Zhu, B., Hu, B., Wang, L., & Bao, F. (2020). What have we missed when studying the impact of aerosols on surface ozone via changing photolysis rates? Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 20, 10831-10844. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2020-140
39. Gao, J., Li, Y., Xie, Z., Hu, B., Wang, L., Bao, F., & Fan, S. (2022). The impact of the aerosol reduction on the worsening ozone pollution over the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region via influencing photolysis rates. Science of the Total Environment. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153197
40. Ma, X., Huang, J., Zhao, T., Liu, C., Zhao, K., Xing, J., & Xiao, W. (2020). Rapid increase in summer surface ozone over the North China Plain during 2013-2019: A side effect of particulate matters reduction control? Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2020-385
41. Fountoulakis, I., Zerefos, C. S., Bais, A. F., Kapsomenakis, J., Koukouli, M.-E., Ohkawara, N., Fioletov, V., De Backer, H., Lakkala, K., Karppinen, T., & Webb, A. R. (2018). Twenty-five years of spectral UV-B measurements over Canada, Europe and Japan: Trends and effects from changes in ozone, aerosols, clouds, and surface reflectivity. Comptes Rendus de l'Academie d'Geoscience de France, 350(7), 393-402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crte.2018. 07.011
42. Ipia, A., Lpez-Padilla, G., Retama, A., Piacentini, R. D., & Madronich, S. (2021). Ultraviolet radiation environment of a tropical megacity in transition: Mexico City 2000-2019. Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est. 0c08515
43. Becerra-Rondn, A., Ducati, J., & Haag, R. (2021). Partial COVID-19 lockdown effect in atmospheric pollutants and indirect impact in UV radiation in Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Atmsfera. https://doi.org/10.20937/atm.53027
44. Ming, Y., Lin, P., Naik, V., Paulot, F., Horowitz, L. W., Ginoux, P. A., Ramaswamy, V., Loeb, N. G., Shen, Z., Singer, C. E., Ward, R. X., Zhang, Z., & Bellouin, N. (2021). Assessing the influence of COVID-19 on the shortwave radiative fluxes over the East Asian marginal seas. Geophysical Research Letters, 48(3), e2020GL091699. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL091699
45. Bera, B., Bhattacharjee, S., Shit, P. K., Sengupta, N., & Saha, S. (2022). Variation and correlation between ultraviolet index and tropospheric ozone during COVID-19 lockdown over megacities of India. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 36(2), 409-427. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s00477-021-02033-w
1167 46. Pye, H. O. T., Ward-Caviness, C. K., Murphy, B. N., Appel, K.
W., & Seltzer, K. M. (2021). Secondary organic aerosol association with cardiorespiratory disease mortality in the United States. Nature Communications, 12(1), 7215. https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41467-021-27484-1 47. Sowden, M., & Blake, D. (2021). Using infrared geostationary remote sensing to determine particulate matter ground-level composition and concentration. Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-021-01061-3 48. Si, Y., Lu, Q., Zhang, X., Hu, X., Wang, F., Li, L., & Gu, S. (2021). A review of advances in the retrieval of aerosol properties by remote sensing multi-angle technology. Atmospheric Environment, 244, 117928. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv. 2020.117928 49. Hodzic, A., Kasibhatla, P. S., Jo, D. S., Cappa, C. D., Jimenez, J. L., Madronich, S., & Park, R. J. (2016). Rethinking the global secondary organic aerosol (SOA) budget: Stronger production, faster removal, shorter lifetime. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 16(12), 7917-7941. https://doi.org/10.5194/ acp-16-7917-2016 50. O'Brien, R. E., & Kroll, J. H. (2019). Photolytic aging of secondary organic aerosol: Evidence for a substantial photo-recalcitrant fraction. Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, 10(14), 4003- 4009. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.9b01417 51. Baboomian, V. J., Gu, Y., & Nizkorodov, S. A. (2020). Photodegradation of secondary organic aerosols by long-term exposure to solar actinic radiation. ACS Earth and Space Chemistry, 4(7), 1078-1089. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.0c00088 52. Wang, T., Liu, Y., Deng, Y., Cheng, H., Yang, Y., Feng, Y., Zhang, L., Fu, H., & Chen, J. (2020). Photochemical oxidation of water-soluble organic carbon (WSOC) on mineral dust and enhanced organic ammonium formation. Environmental Science & Technology, 54, 15631-15642. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est. 0c04616 53. Zawadowicz, M. A., Lee, B. H., Shrivastava, M., Zelenyuk, A., Zaveri, R. A., Flynn, C., Thornton, J. A., & Shilling, J. E. (2020). Photolysis controls atmospheric budgets of biogenic secondary organic aerosol. Environmental Science & Technology, 54(7), 3861-3870. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b07051 54. Hodzic, A., Madronich, S., Kasibhatla, P. S., Tyndall, G., Aumont, B., Jimenez, J. L., Lee-Taylor, J., & Orlando, J. (2015). Organic photolysis reactions in tropospheric aerosols: Effect on secondary organic aerosol formation and lifetime. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 15(16), 9253-9269. https://doi.org/10. 5194/acp-15-9253-2015 55. Ndour, M., Conchon, P., D'Anna, B., Ka, O., & George, C. (2009). Photochemistry of mineral dust surface as a potential atmospheric renoxification process. Geophysical Research Letters. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008gl036662 56. Tuite, K., Thomas, J. L., Veres, P. R., Roberts, J. M., Stevens, P. S., Griffith, S. M., Dusanter, S., Flynn, J. H., Ahmed, S., Emmons, L., Kim, S. W., Washenfelder, R., Young, C., Tsai, C., Pikelnaya, O., & Stutz, J. (2021). Quantifying nitrous acid formation mechanisms using measured vertical profiles during the CalNex 2010 Campaign and 1D Column Modeling. Journal of Geophysical Research-Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/ 2021jd034689 57. Ye, C., Heard, D. E., & Whalley, L. K. (2017). Evaluation of novel routes for NOx formation in remote regions. Environmental Science & Technology, 51(13), 7442-7449. https://doi.org/10. 1021/acs.est.6b06441 58. Reed, C., Evans, M. J., Crilley, L. R., Bloss, W. J., Sherwen, T., Read, K. A., Lee, J. D., & Carpenter, L. J. (2017). Evidence for renoxification in the tropical marine boundary layer. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 17(6), 4081-4092. https://doi.org/10. 5194/acp-17-4081-2017
1 3
1168 59. Wang, X., Gemayel, R., Hayeck, N., Perrier, S., Charbonnel, N.,
Xu, C., Chen, H., Zhu, C., Zhang, L., Wang, L., Nizkorodov, S. A., Wang, X., Wang, Z., Wang, T., Mellouki, A., Riva, M., Chen, J., & George, C. (2020). Atmospheric photosensitization: A new pathway for sulfate formation. Environmental Science & Technology, 54(6), 3114-3120. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est. 9b06347 60. Chen, Y., Tong, S., Li, W., Liu, Y., Tan, F., Ge, M., Xie, X., & Sun, J. (2021). Photocatalytic oxidation of SO2 by TiO2: Aerosol formation and the key role of gaseous reactive oxygen species. Environmental Science & Technology, 55(14), 9784-9793. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c01608 61. Ye, C., Chen, H., Hoffmann, E. H., Mettke, P., Tilgner, A., He, L., Mutzel, A., Bruggemann, M., Poulain, L., Schaefer, T., Heinold, B., Ma, Z., Liu, P., Xue, C., Zhao, X., Zhang, C., Zhang, F., Sun, H., Li, Q., Wang, L., et al. (2021). Particle-phase photoreactions of HULIS and TMIs establish a strong source of H2O2 and particulate sulfate in the winter North China Plain. Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c00561 62. Chen, Q., Xia, M., Peng, X., Yu, C., Sun, P., Li, Y., Liu, Y., Xu, Z., Xu, Z., & Wu, R. (2022). Large daytime molecular chlorine missing source at a suburban site in East China. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 127(4), e2021JD035796. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JD035796 63. Laskin, A., Laskin, J., & Nizkorodov, S. A. (2015). Chemistry of atmospheric brown carbon. Chemical Reviews, 115(10), 4335- 4382. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr5006167 64. Aiona, P. K., Luek, J. L., Timko, S. A., Powers, L. C., Gonsior, M., & Nizkorodov, S. A. (2018). Effect of photolysis on absorption and fluorescence spectra of light-absorbing secondary organic aerosols. ACS Earth and Space Chemistry, 2(3), 235-245. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.7b00153 65. Walhout, E. Q., Yu, H., Thrasher, C., Shusterman, J. M., & O'Brien, R. E. (2019). Effects of photolysis on the chemical and optical properties of secondary organic material over extended time scales. ACS Earth and Space Chemistry, 3(7), 1226-1236. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.9b001 09 66. Fleming, L. T., Lin, P., Roberts, J. M., Selimovic, V., Yokelson, R., Laskin, J., Laskin, A., & Nizkorodov, S. A. (2020). Molecular composition and photochemical lifetimes of brown carbon chromophores in biomass burning organic aerosol. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 20(2), 1105-1129. https://doi.org/10. 5194/acp-20-1105-2020 67. Vo, L., Legaard, E., Thrasher, C., Jaffe, A., Berden, G., Martens, J., Oomens, J., & O'Brien, R. E. (2021). UV/Vis and IRMPD spectroscopic analysis of the absorption properties of methylglyoxal brown carbon. ACS Earth and Space Chemistry. https:// doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.1c00022 68. Li, N., Xia, T., & Nel, A. E. (2008). The role of oxidative stress in ambient particulate matter-induced lung diseases and its implications in the toxicity of engineered nanoparticles. Free Radical Biology & Medicine, 44(9), 1689-1699. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.freeradbiomed.2008.01.028 69. Bates, J. T., Fang, T., Verma, V., Zeng, L., Weber, R. J., Tolbert, P. E., Abrams, J. Y., Sarnat, S. E., Klein, M., Mulholland, J. A., & Russell, A. G. (2019). Review of acellular assays of ambient particulate matter oxidative potential: Methods and relationships with composition, sources, and health effects. Environmental Science & Technology, 53(8), 4003-4019. https://doi.org/10.1021/ acs.est.8b03430 70. Manfrin, A., Nizkorodov, S. A., Malecha, K. T., Getzinger, G. J., McNeill, K., & Borduas-Dedekind, N. (2019). Reactive oxygen species production from secondary organic aerosols: The importance of singlet oxygen. Environmental Science & Technology, 53(15), 8553-8562. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b01609
1 3
Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences (2023) 22:1129-1176 71. Liu, F., Whitley, J., Ng, N. L. S., & Lu, H. (2020). Time-resolved
single-cell assay for measuring intracellular reactive oxygen species upon exposure to ambient particulate matter. Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c02889 72. Hwang, B., Fang, T., Pham, R., Wei, J., Gronstal, S., Lopez, B., Frederickson, C., Galeazzo, T., Wang, X., Jung, H., & Shiraiwa, M. (2021). Environmentally persistent free radicals, reactive oxygen species generation, and oxidative potential of highway PM2.5. ACS Earth and Space Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsea rthspacechem.1c00135 73. Borduas-Dedekind, N., Ossola, R., David, R. O., Boynton, L. S., Weichlinger, V., Kanji, Z. A., & McNeill, K. (2019). Photomineralization mechanism changes the ability of dissolved organic matter to activate cloud droplets and to nucleate ice crystals. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 19(19), 12397-12412. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-12397-2019 74. Borduas-Dedekind, N., Nizkorodov, S., & McNeill, K. (2020). UVB-irradiated laboratory-generated secondary organic aerosol extracts have increased cloud condensation nuclei abilities: Comparison with dissolved organic matter and implications for the photomineralization mechanism. Chimia (Aarau), 74(3), 142-148. https://doi.org/10.2533/chimia.2020.142 75. Erickson, D. J. I., Sulzberger, B., Zepp, R. G., & Austin, A. T. (2015). Effects of stratospheric ozone depletion, solar UV radiation, and climate change on biogeochemical cycling: interactions and feedbacks. Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences, 14(1), 127-148. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4PP90036G 76. Sulzberger, B., Austin, A. T., Cory, R. M., Zepp, R. G., & Paul, N. D. (2019). Solar UV radiation in a changing world: roles of cryosphere-land-water-atmosphere interfaces in global biogeochemical cycles. Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences, 18(3), 747-774. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8PP90063A 77. WHO. (2022). Air Pollution. https://www.who.int/health-topics/ air-pollution#tab=tab_1. Accessed Apr 2022 78. Lefohn, A. S., Malley, C. S., Smith, L., Wells, B., Hazucha, M., Simon, H., Naik, V., Mills, G., Schultz, M. G., Paoletti, E., De Marco, A., Xu, X., Zhang, L., Wang, T., Neufeld, H. S., Musselman, R. C., Tarasick, D., Brauer, M., Feng, Z., Tang, H., et al. (2018). Tropospheric ozone assessment report: Global ozone metrics for climate change, human health, and crop/ecosystem research. Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene, 6, 27. https:// doi.org/10.1525/elementa.279 79. Markozannes, G., Pantavou, K., Rizos, E. C., Sindosi, O., Tagkas, C., Seyfried, M., Saldanha, I. J., Hatzianastassiou, N., Nikolopoulos, G. K., & Ntzani, E. (2022). Outdoor air quality and human health: An overview of reviews of observational studies. Environmental Pollution, 306, 119309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. envpol.2022.119309 80. Brauer, M., Brook, J. R., Christidis, T., Chu, Y., Crouse, D. L., Erickson, A., Hystad, P., Li, C., Martin, R. V., Meng, J., Pappin, A. J., Pinault, L. L., Tjepkema, M., van Donkelaar, A., Weichenthal, S., & Burnett, R. T. (2019). Mortality-air pollution associations in low-exposure environments (MAPLE): Phase 1. Research Reports: Health Effects Institute, 203, 1-87 81. Brunekreef, B., Strak, M., Chen, J., Andersen, Z. J., Atkinson, R., Bauwelinck, M., Bellander, T., Boutron-Ruault, M. C., Brandt, J., Carey, I., Cesaroni, G., Forastiere, F., Fecht, D., Gulliver, J., Hertel, O., Hoffmann, B., de Hoogh, K., Houthuijs, D., Hvidtfeldt, U. A., & Janssen, N. A. H., et al. (2021). Mortality and morbidity effects of long-term exposure to low-level PM2.5, BC, NO2, and O3: An analysis of European cohorts in the ELAPSE project (Vol. WA 754 R432 No. 208, HEI Report Series): Health Effects Institute 82. Dominici, F., Schwartz, J., Di, Q., Braun, D., Choirat, C., & Zanobetti, A. (Eds.). (2022). Assessing adverse health effects of long-term exposure to low levels of ambient air pollution:
Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences (2023) 22:1129-1176
Phase 1 (2020/01/08 ed., Vol. 211, HEI Research Reports). Berlin: Health Effects Institute 83. WHO. (2021). WHO global air quality guidelines: Particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10), ozone, nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide and carbon monoxide. Geneva: World Health Organization 84. WHO. (2017). Evolution of WHO air quality guidelines: Past, present and future (2017). World Health Organization 85. WHO. (2006). Air Quality guidelines: global update 2005: Particulate matter, ozone, nitrogen dioxide and sulfur dioxide (Vol. EUR/05/5046029). World Health Organization. Regional Office for Europe 86. Liu, S., Jrgensen, J. T., Ljungman, P., Pershagen, G., Bellander, T., Leander, K., Magnusson, P. K. E., Rizzuto, D., Hvidtfeldt, U. A., Raaschou-Nielsen, O., Wolf, K., Hoffmann, B., Brunekreef, B., Strak, M., Chen, J., Mehta, A., Atkinson, R. W., Bauwelinck, M., Varraso, R., Boutron-Ruault, M. C., et al. (2021). Long-term exposure to low-level air pollution and incidence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: The ELAPSE project. Environment International, 146, 106267. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.envint.2020.106267 87. Wolf, K., Hoffmann, B., Andersen, Z. J., Atkinson, R. W., Bauwelinck, M., Bellander, T., Brandt, J., Brunekreef, B., Cesaroni, G., Chen, J., de Faire, U., de Hoogh, K., Fecht, D., Forastiere, F., Gulliver, J., Hertel, O., Hvidtfeldt, U. A., Janssen, N. A. H., Jrgensen, J. T., Katsouyanni, K., et al. (2021). Long-term exposure to low-level ambient air pollution and incidence of stroke and coronary heart disease: A pooled analysis of six European cohorts within the ELAPSE project. Lancet Planet Health, 5(9), e620-e632. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2542-5196(21)00195-9 88. Chen, J., Rodopoulou, S., Strak, M., de Hoogh, K., Taj, T., Poulsen, A. H., Andersen, Z. J., Bellander, T., Brandt, J., Zitt, E., Fecht, D., Forastiere, F., Gulliver, J., Hertel, O., Hoffmann, B., Hvidtfeldt, U. A., Verschuren, W. M. M., Jrgensen, J. T., Katsouyanni, K., Ketzel, M., et al. (2022). Long-term exposure to ambient air pollution and bladder cancer incidence in a pooled European cohort: The ELAPSE project. British Journal of Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-022-01735-4 89. Samoli, E., Rodopoulou, S., Hvidtfeldt, U. A., Wolf, K., Stafoggia, M., Brunekreef, B., Strak, M., Chen, J., Andersen, Z. J., Atkinson, R., Bauwelinck, M., Bellander, T., Brandt, J., Cesaroni, G., Forastiere, F., Fecht, D., Gulliver, J., Hertel, O., Hoffmann, B., de Hoogh, K., et al. (2021). Modeling multilevel survival data in multi-center epidemiological cohort studies: Applications from the ELAPSE project. Environment International, 147, 106371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint. 2020.106371 90. Stafoggia, M., Oftedal, B., Chen, J., Rodopoulou, S., Renzi, M., Atkinson, R. W., Bauwelinck, M., Klompmaker, J. O., Mehta, A., Vienneau, D., Andersen, Z. J., Bellander, T., Brandt, J., Cesaroni, G., de Hoogh, K., Fecht, D., Gulliver, J., Hertel, O., Hoffmann, B., Hvidtfeldt, U. A., et al. (2022). Long-term exposure to low ambient air pollution concentrations and mortality among 28 million people: Results from seven large European cohorts within the ELAPSE project. Lancet Planet Health, 6(1), e9-e18. https:// doi.org/10.1016/s2542-5196(21)00277-1 91. Strak, M., Weinmayr, G., Rodopoulou, S., Chen, J., de Hoogh, K., Andersen, Z. J., Atkinson, R., Bauwelinck, M., Bekkevold, T., Bellander, T., Boutron-Ruault, M. C., Brandt, J., Cesaroni, G., Concin, H., Fecht, D., Forastiere, F., Gulliver, J., Hertel, O., Hoffmann, B., Hvidtfeldt, U. A., et al. (2021). Long term exposure to low level air pollution and mortality in eight European cohorts within the ELAPSE project: Pooled analysis. British Medical Journal, 374, n1904. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n1904 92. Rodopoulou, S., Stafoggia, M., Chen, J., de Hoogh, K., Bauwelinck, M., Mehta, A. J., Klompmaker, J. O., Oftedal, B., Vienneau, D., Janssen, N. A. H., Strak, M., Andersen, Z. J., Renzi,
1169 M., Cesaroni, G., Nordheim, C. F., Bekkevold, T., Atkinson, R., Forastiere, F., Katsouyanni, K., Brunekreef, B., et al. (2022). Long-term exposure to fine particle elemental components and mortality in Europe: Results from six European administrative cohorts within the ELAPSE project. Science of the Total Environment, 809, 152205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021. 152205 93. Chen, J., Rodopoulou, S., de Hoogh, K., Strak, M., Andersen, Z. J., Atkinson, R., Bauwelinck, M., Bellander, T., Brandt, J., Cesaroni, G., Concin, H., Fecht, D., Forastiere, F., Gulliver, J., Hertel, O., Hoffmann, B., Hvidtfeldt, U. A., Janssen, N. A. H., Jckel, K. H., Jrgensen, J., et al. (2021). Long-term exposure to fine particle elemental components and natural and causespecific mortality--A pooled analysis of eight european cohorts within the ELAPSE Project. Environmental Health Perspectives, 129(4), 47009. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp8368 94. So, R., Chen, J., Mehta, A. J., Liu, S., Strak, M., Wolf, K., Hvidtfeldt, U. A., Rodopoulou, S., Stafoggia, M., Klompmaker, J. O., Samoli, E., Raaschou-Nielsen, O., Atkinson, R., Bauwelinck, M., Bellander, T., Boutron-Ruault, M. C., Brandt, J., Brunekreef, B., Cesaroni, G., Concin, H., et al. (2021). Long-term exposure to air pollution and liver cancer incidence in six European cohorts. International Journal of Cancer, 149(11), 1887-1897. https:// doi.org/10.1002/ijc.33743 95. Liu, S., Jrgensen, J. T., Ljungman, P., Pershagen, G., Bellander, T., Leander, K., Magnusson, P. K. E., Rizzuto, D., Hvidtfeldt, U. A., Raaschou-Nielsen, O., Wolf, K., Hoffmann, B., Brunekreef, B., Strak, M., Chen, J., Mehta, A., Atkinson, R. W., Bauwelinck, M., Varraso, R., Boutron-Ruault, M. C., et al. (2021). Long-term exposure to low-level air pollution and incidence of asthma: The ELAPSE project. European Respiratory Journal. https://doi.org/ 10.1183/13993003.03099-2020 96. Chen, J., & Hoek, G. (2020). Long-term exposure to PM and all-cause and cause-specific mortality: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Environment International, 143, 105974. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2020.105974 97. Chowdhury, S., Pozzer, A., Haines, A., Klingmuller, K., Munzel, T., Paasonen, P., Sharma, A., Venkataraman, C., & Lelieveld, J. (2022). Global health burden of ambient PM2.5 and the contribution of anthropogenic black carbon and organic aerosols. Environment International, 159, 107020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. envint.2021.107020 98. Chersich, M. F., Pham, M. D., Areal, A., Haghighi, M. M., Manyuchi, A., Swift, C. P., Wernecke, B., Robinson, M., Hetem, R., Boeckmann, M., Hajat, S., Nakstad, B., Wright, C. Y., Harvey, C., Wang, C., Durusu, D., Scorgie, F., Rees, H., Harden, L., Roos, N., et al. (2020). Associations between high temperatures in pregnancy and risk of preterm birth, low birth weight, and stillbirths: Systematic review and meta-analysis. British Medical Journal, 371, m3811. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m3811 99. Liu, Z., Meng, Y., Xiang, H., Lu, Y., & Liu, S. (2020). Association of short-term exposure to meteorological factors and risk of hand, foot, and mouth disease: A systematic review and metaanalysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17218017 100. Moghadamnia, M. T., Ardalan, A., Mesdaghinia, A., Keshtkar, A., Naddafi, K., & Yekaninejad, M. S. (2017). Ambient temperature and cardiovascular mortality: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PeerJ. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3574 101. Gronlund, C. J., Sullivan, K. P., Kefelegn, Y., Cameron, L., & O'Neill, M. S. (2018). Climate change and temperature extremes: A review of heat- and cold-related morbidity and mortality concerns of municipalities. Maturitas, 114, 54-59. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.maturitas.2018.06.002 102. Ryti, N. R., Guo, Y., & Jaakkola, J. J. (2016). Global association of cold spells and adverse health effects: A systematic review
1 3
1170 and meta-analysis. Environmental Health Perspectives, 124(1), 12-22. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1408104
103. Sharpe, I., & Davison, C. M. (2022). A scoping review of climate change, climate-related disasters, and mental disorders among children in low- and middle-income countries. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. https:// doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19052896
104. Syed, S., O'Sullivan, T. L., & Phillips, K. P. (2022). Extreme heat and pregnancy outcomes: A scoping review of the epidemiological evidence. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19042412
105. Vu, A., Rutherford, S., & Phung, D. (2019). Heat health prevention measures and adaptation in older populations--A systematic review. International Jorunal of Environmental Research and Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16224370
106. Zanobetti, A., & O'Neill, M. S. (2018). Longer-term outdoor temperatures and health effects: A review. Current Epidemiology Reports, 5(2), 125-139. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s40471-018-0150-3
107. Analitis, A., De' Donato, F., Scortichini, M., Lanki, T., Basagana, X., Ballester, F., Astrom, C., Paldy, A., Pascal, M., Gasparrini, A., Michelozzi, P., & Katsouyanni, K. (2018). Synergistic effects of ambient temperature and air pollution on health in Europe: Results from the PHASE Project. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15091856
108. Areal, A. T., Zhao, Q., Wigmann, C., Schneider, A., & Schikowski, T. (2022). The effect of air pollution when modified by temperature on respiratory health outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Science of the Total Environment, 811, 152336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152336
109. Rajagopalan, S., Al-Kindi, S. G., & Brook, R. D. (2018). Air pollution and cardiovascular disease: JACC state-of-the-art review. Journal of the American College of Cardiologists, 72(17), 2054- 2070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2018.07.099
110. Wesselink, A. K., Wang, T. R., Ketzel, M., Mikkelsen, E. M., Brandt, J., Khan, J., Hertel, O., Laursen, A. S. D., Johannesen, B. R., Willis, M. D., Levy, J. I., Rothman, K. J., Srensen, H. T., Wise, L. A., & Hatch, E. E. (2022). Air pollution and fecundability: Results from a Danish preconception cohort study. Pediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 36(1), 57-67. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/ppe.12832
111. Costello, J. M., Steurer, M. A., Baer, R. J., Witte, J. S., & JelliffePawlowski, L. L. (2022). Residential particulate matter, proximity to major roads, traffic density and traffic volume as risk factors for preterm birth in California. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 36(1), 70-79. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppe.12820
112. Tham, R., & Schikowski, T. (2021). The role of traffic-related air pollution on neurodegenerative diseases in older people: An epidemiological perspective. Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, 79(3), 949-959. https://doi.org/10.3233/jad-200813
113. Weuve, J., Bennett, E. E., Ranker, L., Gianattasio, K. Z., Pedde, M., Adar, S. D., Yanosky, J. D., & Power, M. C. (2021). Exposure to air pollution in relation to risk of dementia and related outcomes: An updated systematic review of the epidemiological literature. Environmental Health Perspectives, 129(9), 96001. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP8716
114. Chen, H., Kwong, J. C., Copes, R., Hystad, P., van Donkelaar, A., Tu, K., Brook, J. R., Goldberg, M. S., Martin, R. V., Murray, B. J., Wilton, A. S., Kopp, A., & Burnett, R. T. (2017). Exposure to ambient air pollution and the incidence of dementia: A population-based cohort study. Environment International, 108, 271-277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2017.08.020
115. Shi, L., Steenland, K., Li, H., Liu, P., Zhang, Y., Lyles, R. H., Requia, W. J., Ilango, S. D., Chang, H. H., Wingo, T., Weber, R. J., & Schwartz, J. (2021). A national cohort study (2000-2018) of long-term air pollution exposure and incident dementia in
Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences (2023) 22:1129-1176 older adults in the United States. Nature Communications, 12(1), 6754. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-27049-2 116. Paoletti, E., Feng, Z., De Marco, A., Hoshika, Y., Harmens, H., Agathokleous, E., Domingos, M., Mills, G., Sicard, P., Zhang, L., & Carrari, E. (2020). Challenges, gaps and opportunities in investigating the interactions of ozone pollution and plant ecosystems. Science of the Total Environment, 709, 136188. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136188 117. Gaffney, J. S., & Marley, N. A. (2021). The impacts of peroxyacetyl nitrate in the atmosphere of megacities and large urban areas: A historical perspective. ACS Earth and Space Chemistry, 5(8), 1829-1841 118. Li, C., Gu, X., Wu, Z., Qin, T., Guo, L., Wang, T., Zhang, L., & Jiang, G. (2021). Assessing the effects of elevated ozone on physiology, growth, yield and quality of soybean in the past 40 years: A meta-analysis. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 208, 111644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.111644 119. Biancari, L., Cerrotta, C., Menndez, A. I., Gundel, P. E., & Martnez-Ghersa, M. A. (2021). Episodes of high tropospheric ozone reduce nodulation, seed production and quality in soybean (Glycine max (L.) merr.) on low fertility soils. Environmental Pollution, 269, 116117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020. 116117 120. Tisdale, R. H., Zobel, R. W., & Burkey, K. O. (2021). Tropospheric ozone rapidly decreases root growth by altering carbon metabolism and detoxification capability in growing soybean roots. Science of the Total Environment, 766, 144292. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144292 121. Lobell, D. B., & Burney, J. A. (2021). Cleaner air has contributed one-fifth of US maize and soybean yield gains since 1999. Environmental Research Letters, 16(7), 074049. https://doi.org/ 10.1088/1748-9326/ac0fa4 122. Wang, T., Zhang, L., Zhou, S., Zhang, T., Zhai, S., Yang, Z., Wang, D., & Song, H. (2021). Effects of ground-level ozone pollution on yield and economic losses of winter wheat in Henan, China. Atmospheric Environment, 262, 118654. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118654 123. Wang, Y., Wild, O., Ashworth, K., Chen, X., Wu, Q., Qi, Y., & Wang, Z. (2022). Reductions in crop yields across China from elevated ozone. Environmental Pollution, 292(Pt A), 118218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.118218 124. Zhang, T., Yue, X., Unger, N., Feng, Z., Zheng, B., Li, T., Lei, Y., Zhou, H., Dong, X., & Liu, Y. (2021). Modeling the joint impacts of ozone and aerosols on crop yields in China: An air pollution policy scenario analysis. Atmospheric Environment, 247, 118216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118216 125. Ascenso, A., Gama, C., Blanco-Ward, D., Monteiro, A., Silveira, C., Viceto, C., Rodrigues, V., Rocha, A., Borrego, C., & Lopes, M. (2021). Assessing Douro vineyards exposure to tropospheric ozone. Atmosphere, 12(2), 200. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos 12020200 126. Blanco-Ward, D., Ribeiro, A., Paoletti, E., & Miranda, A. (2021). Assessment of tropospheric ozone phytotoxic effects on the grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.): A review. Atmospheric Environment, 244, 117924. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020. 117924 127. Sacchelli, S., Carrari, E., Paoletti, E., Anav, A., Hoshika, Y., Sicard, P., Screpanti, A., Chirici, G., Cocozza, C., & De Marco, A. (2021). Economic impacts of ambient ozone pollution on wood production in Italy. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 1-9. https:// doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-80516-6 128. Jakovljevic, T., Lovreskov, L., Jelic, G., Anav, A., Popa, I., Fornasier, M. F., Proietti, C., Limic, I., Butorac, L., Vitale, M., & De Marco, A. (2021). Impact of ground-level ozone on Mediterranean forest ecosystems health. Science of the Total Environment, 783, 147063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147063
1 3
Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences (2023) 22:1129-1176 129. Anav, A., De Marco, A., Friedlingstein, P., Savi, F., Sicard, P.,
Sitch, S., Vitale, M., & Paoletti, E. (2019). Growing season extension affects ozone uptake by European forests. Science of the Total Environment, 669, 1043-1052. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.020 130. Bosch, J., Elvira, S., Sausor, C., Bielby, J., Gonzalez-Fernandez, I., Alonso, R., & Bermejo-Bermejo, V. (2021). Increased tropospheric ozone levels enhance pathogen infection levels of amphibians. Science of the Total Environment, 759, 143461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143461 131. Oksanen, E., & Kontunen-Soppela, S. (2021). Plants have different strategies to defend against air pollutants. Current Opinion in Environmental Science & Health, 19, 100222. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.coesh.2020.10.010 132. Li, S., Yuan, X., Feng, Z., Du, Y., Agathokleous, E., & Paoletti, E. (2022). Whole-plant compensatory responses of isoprene emission from hybrid poplar seedlings exposed to elevated ozone. Science of the Total Environment, 806(Pt 4), 150949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150949 133. Boublin, F., Cabassa-Hourton, C., Leymarie, J., & Leitao, L. (2021). Potential involvement of proline and flavonols in plant responses to ozone. Environmental Research, 207, 112214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2021.112214 134. Blande, J. D. (2021). Effects of air pollution on plant-insect interactions mediated by olfactory and visual cues. Current Opinion in Environmental Science & Health, 19, 100228. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.coesh.2020.100228 135. Masui, N., Agathokleous, E., Mochizuki, T., Tani, A., Matsuura, H., & Koike, T. (2021). Ozone disrupts the communication between plants and insects in urban and suburban areas: An updated insight on plant volatiles. Journal of Forest Research, 32, 1337-1349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-020-01287-4 136. Duque, L., Poelman, E. H., & Steffan-Dewenter, I. (2021). Effects of ozone stress on flowering phenology, plant-pollinator interactions and plant reproductive success. Environmental Pollution, 272, 115953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020. 115953 137. Galveias, A., Arriegas, R., Mendes, S., Ribeiro, H., Abreu, I., Costa, A., & Antunes, C. (2021). Air pollutants NO2-and O3-induced Dactylis glomerata L. pollen oxidative defences and enhanced its allergenic potential. Aerobiologia, 37(1), 127-137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10453-020-09676-2 138. Pereira, S., Fernndez-Gonzlez, M., Guedes, A., Abreu, I., & Ribeiro, H. (2021). The strong and the stronger: The effects of increasing ozone and nitrogen dioxide concentrations in pollen of different forest species. Forests, 12(1), 88. https://doi.org/10. 3390/f12010088 139. Kovts, N., Hubai, K., Disi, D., Sainnokhoi, T.-A., Hoffer, A., Tth, ., & Teke, G. (2021). Sensitivity of typical European roadside plants to atmospheric particulate matter. Ecological Indicators, 124, 107428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021. 107428 140. Mina, U., Smiti, K., & Yadav, P. (2021). Thermotolerant wheat cultivar (Triticum aestivum L. var. WR544) response to ozone, EDU, and particulate matter interactive exposure. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 193(6), 1-16. https://doi.org/10. 1007/s10661-021-09079-x 141. Stevenson, D. S., Zhao, A., Naik, V., O'Connor, F. M., Tilmes, S., Zeng, G., Murray, L. T., Collins, W. J., Griffiths, P. T., Shim, S. B., Horowitz, L. W., Sentman, L. T., & Emmons, L. (2020). Trends in global tropospheric hydroxyl radical and methane lifetime since 1850 from AerChemMIP. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 20(21), 12905-12920. https://doi.org/10.5194/ acp-20-12905-2020 142. Zhao, Y. H., Saunois, M., Bousquet, P., Lin, X., Berchet, A., Hegglin, M. I., Canadell, J. G., Jackson, R. B., Deushi, M.,
1171
Jockel, P., Kinnison, D., Kirner, O., Strode, S., Tilmes, S., Dlugokencky, E. J., & Zheng, B. (2020). On the role of trend and variability in the hydroxyl radical (OH) in the global methane budget. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 20(21), 13011- 13022. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-13011-2020 143. McDuffie, E. E., Smith, S. J., O'Rourke, P., Tibrewal, K., Venkataraman, C., Marais, E. A., Zheng, B., Crippa, M., Brauer, M., & Martin, R. V. (2020). A global anthropogenic emission inventory of atmospheric pollutants from sector- And fuel-specific sources (1970-2017): An application of the Community Emissions Data System (CEDS). Earth System Science Data, 12(4), 3413-3442. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-3413-2020 144. Patra, P. K., Krol, M. C., Prinn, R. G., Takigawa, M., Mhle, J., Montzka, S. A., Lal, S., Yamashita, Y., Naus, S., Chandra, N., Weiss, R. F., Krummel, P. B., Fraser, P. J., O'Doherty, S., & Elkins, J. W. (2021). Methyl chloroform continues to constrain the hydroxyl (OH) variability in the troposphere. Journal of Geophysical Research-Atmospheres, 126(4), e2020JD033862. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD033862 145. Naus, S., Montzka, S. A., Patra, P. K., & Krol, M. C. (2021). A three-dimensional-model inversion of methyl chloroform to constrain the atmospheric oxidative capacity. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 21(6), 4809-4824. https://doi.org/10.5194/ acp-21-4809-2021 146. Worden, J. R., Cusworth, D. H., Qu, Z., Yin, Y., Zhang, Y., Bloom, A. A., Ma, S., Byrne, B. K., Scarpelli, T., Maasakkers, J. D., Crisp, D., Duren, R., & Jacob, D. J. (2022). The 2019 methane budget and uncertainties at 1 resolution and each country through Bayesian integration Of GOSAT total column methane data and a priori inventory estimates. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 22(10), 6811-6841. https://doi.org/10.5194/ acp-22-6811-2022 147. Turner, A. J., Frankenberg, C., & Kort, E. A. (2019). Interpreting contemporary trends in atmospheric methane. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 116(8), 2805-2813. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1814297116 148. Fang, X. K., Pyle, J. A., Chipperfield, M. P., Daniel, J. S., Park, S., & Prinn, R. G. (2019). Challenges for the recovery of the ozone layer. Nature Geoscience, 12(8), 592-596. https://doi.org/ 10.1038/s41561-019-0422-7 149. Keber, T., Bonisch, H., Hartick, C., Hauck, M., Lefrancois, F., Obersteiner, F., Ringsdorf, A., Schohl, N., Schuck, T., Hossaini, R., Graf, P., Jockel, P., & Engel, A. (2020). Bromine from shortlived source gases in the extratropical northern hemispheric upper troposphere and lower stratosphere (UTLS). Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 20(7), 4105-4132. https://doi.org/10. 5194/acp-20-4105-2020 150. Engel, A., Rigby, M., Burkholder, J. B., Fernandez, R. P., Froidevaux, L., Hall, B. D., Hossaini, R., Saito, T., Vollmer, M. K., & Yao, B. (2018). Update on Ozone-Depleting Substances (ODS) and Other Gases of Interest to the Montreal Protocol, Chap. 1. Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion: 2018, Global Ozone Research and Monitoring Project-Report No. 58, World Meteorological Organization. World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, Switzerland 151. Rex, M., Wohltmann, I., Ridder, T., Lehmann, R., Rosenlof, K., Wennberg, P., Weisenstein, D., Notholt, J., Kruger, K., Mohr, V., & Tegtmeier, S. (2014). A tropical West Pacific OH minimum and implications for stratospheric composition. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 14(9), 4827-4841. https://doi.org/10. 5194/acp-14-4827-2014 152. Nicewonger, M. R., Saltzman, E. S., & Montzka, S. A. (2022). ENSO-driven fires cause large interannual variability in the naturally emitted, ozone-depleting trace gas CH3Br. Geophysical Research Letters, 49, e2021GL09475. https://doi.org/10.1029/ 2021GL094756
1 3
1172 153. Liu, S. S., Yang, G. P., He, Z., Gao, X. X., & Xu, F. (2021). Oce-
anic emissions of methyl halides and effect of nutrients concentration on their production: A case of the western Pacific Ocean (2 degrees N to 24 degrees N). Science of the Total Environment, 769, 144488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144488 154. Williams, R. S., Hegglin, M. I., Kerridge, B. J., Jckel, P., Latter, B. G., & Plummer, D. A. (2019). Characterising the seasonal and geographical variability in tropospheric ozone, stratospheric influence and recent changes. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 19(6), 3589-3620. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-3589-2019 155. Archibald, A. T., Neu, J. L., Elshorbany, Y. F., Cooper, O. R., Young, P. J., Akiyoshi, H., Cox, R. A., Coyle, M., Derwent, R. G., Deushi, M., Finco, A., Frost, G. J., Galbally, I. E., Gerosa, G., Granier, C., Griffiths, P. T., Hossaini, R., Hu, L., Jckel, P., Josse, B., et al. (2020). Tropospheric Ozone Assessment Report: A critical review of changes in the tropospheric ozone burden and budget from 1850 to 2100. Elementa Science of the Anthropocene, 8(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.2020.034 156. Wang, M., & Fu, Q. (2021). Stratosphere-troposphere exchange of air masses and ozone concentrations based on reanalyses and observations. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 126(18), e2021JD035159. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JD0351 59 157. Ruiz, D. J., & Prather, M. J. (2022). From the middle stratosphere to the surface, using nitrous oxide to constrain the stratosphere-troposphere exchange of ozone. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 22(3), 2079-2093. https://doi.org/10.5194/ acp-22-2079-2022 158. Griffiths, P. T., Murray, L. T., Zeng, G., Shin, Y. M., Abraham, N. L., Archibald, A. T., Deushi, M., Emmons, L. K., Galbally, I. E., Hassler, B., Horowitz, L. W., Keeble, J., Liu, J., Moeini, O., Naik, V., O'Connor, F. M., Oshima, N., Tarasick, D., Tilmes, S., Turnock, S. T., et al. (2021). Tropospheric ozone in CMIP6 simulations. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 21(5), 4187-4218. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-4187-2021 159. Hu, L., Jacob, D. J., Liu, X., Zhang, Y., Zhang, L., Kim, P. S., Sulprizio, M. P., & Yantosca, R. M. (2017). Global budget of tropospheric ozone: Evaluating recent model advances with satellite (OMI), aircraft (IAGOS), and ozonesonde observations. Atmospheric Environment, 167, 323-334. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.08.036 160. Griffiths, P. T., Keeble, J., Shin, Y. M., Abraham, N. L., Archibald, A. T., & Pyle, J. A. (2020). On the changing role of the stratosphere on the tropospheric ozone budget: 1979-2010. Geophysical Research Letters, 47, 9. https://doi.org/10.1029/ 2019gl086901 161. Abalos, M., Orbe, C., Kinnison, D. E., Plummer, D., Oman, L. D., Jckel, P., Morgenstern, O., Garcia, R. R., Zeng, G., Stone, K. A., & Dameris, M. (2020). Future trends in stratosphere-totroposphere transport in CCMI models. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 20(11), 6883-6901. https://doi.org/10.5194/ acp-20-6883-2020 162. Akritidis, D., Pozzer, A., Flemming, J., Inness, A., & Zanis, P. (2021). A global climatology of tropopause folds in CAMS and MERRA-2 reanalyses. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 126(8), e2020JD034115. https://doi.org/10.1029/ 2020JD034115 163. Liu, J. H., Rodriguez, J. M., Oman, L. D., Douglass, A. R., Olsen, M. A., & Hu, L. (2020). Stratospheric impact on the Northern Hemisphere winter and spring ozone interannual variability in the troposphere. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 20(11), 6416-6432. https://doi.org/10.5194/ acp-20-6417-2020 164. Dafka, S., Akritidis, D., Zanis, P., Pozzer, A., Xoplaki, E., Luterbacher, J., & Zerefos, C. (2021). On the link between the Etesian winds, tropopause folds and tropospheric ozone over the Eastern
Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences (2023) 22:1129-1176 Mediterranean during summer. Atmospheric Research. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2020.105161 165. Akritidis, D., Pozzer, A., & Zanis, P. (2019). On the impact of future climate change on tropopause folds and tropospheric ozone. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 19(22), 14387- 14401. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-14387-2019 166. Cohen, Y., Marecal, V., Josse, B., & Thouret, V. (2021). Interpol-IAGOS: A new method for assessing long-term chemistryclimate simulations in the UTLS based on IAGOS data, and its application to the MOCAGE CCMI REF-C1SD simulation. Geoscientific Model Development, 14(5), 2659-2689. https://doi.org/ 10.5194/gmd-14-2659-2021 167. Huijnen, V., Miyazaki, K., Flemming, J., Inness, A., Sekiya, T., & Schultz, M. G. (2020). An intercomparison of tropospheric ozone reanalysis products from CAMS, CAMS interim, TCR-1, and TCR-2. Geoscientific Model Development, 13(3), 1513-1544. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1513-2020 168. Krizan, P., Kozubek, M., & Lastovicka, J. (2019). Discontinuities in the ozone concentration time series from MERRA 2 reanalysis. Atmosphere. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos10120812 169. Barnes, P. W., Robson, T. M., Zepp, R. G., Bornman, J. F., Jansen, M. A. K., Ossola, R., Wang, Q.-W., Robinson, S. A., Foereid, B., Klekociuk, A. R., Martinez-Abaigar, J., Hou, W. C., & Paul, N. D. (2023). Interactive effects of changes in UV radiation and climate on terrestrial ecosystems, biogeochemical cycles, and feedbacks to the climate system. Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43630-023-00376-7 170. Robinson, S. A., & Erickson Iii, D. J. (2015). Not just about sunburn - the ozone hole's profound effect on climate has significant implications for Southern Hemisphere ecosystems. Global Change Biology, 21(2), 515-527. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb. 12739 171. Damiani, A., Cordero, R. R., Llanillo, P. J., Feron, S., Boisier, J. P., Garreaud, R., Rondanelli, R., Irie, H., & Watanabe, S. (2020). Connection between Antarctic Ozone and climate: Interannual precipitation changes in the southern hemisphere. Atmosphere, 11(6), 579. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11060579 172. Lim, E.-P., Hendon, H. H., Boschat, G., Hudson, D., Thompson, D. W. J., Dowdy, A. J., & Arblaster, J. M. (2019). Australian hot and dry extremes induced by weakenings of the stratospheric polar vortex. Nature Geoscience, 12(11), 896-901. https://doi. org/10.1038/s41561-019-0456-x 173. Santee, M. L., Lambert, A., Manney, G. L., Livesey, N. J., Froidevaux, L., Neu, J. L., Schwartz, M. J., Milln, L. F., Werner, F., Read, W. G., Park, M., Fuller, R. A., & Ward, B. M. (2022). Prolonged and pervasive perturbations in the composition of the southern hemisphere midlatitude lower stratosphere from the Australian New Year's fires. Geophysical Research Letters, 49(4), e2021GL096270. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL096270 174. Tenc, F., Jumelet, J., Bekki, S., Khaykin, S., Sarkissian, A., & Keckhut, P. (2022). Australian black summer smoke observed by lidar at the French Antarctic station Dumont d'Urville. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 127(4), e2021JD035349. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JD035349 175. NASA Goddard Space Flight Center. (2021). Global Transport of Australian Bushfire Smoke. https://climate.nasa.gov/climate_ resources/202/global-transport-of-australian-bushfire-smoke/. Accessed 16 Mar 2022 176. Jia, G., Shevliakova, E., Artaxo, P., Noblet-Ducoudr, N. D., Houghton, R., House, J., Kitajima, K., Lennard, C., Popp, A., Sirin, A., Sukumar, R., & Verchot, L. (2019). Land-climate interactions. In: P. R. Shukla, J. Skea, E. C. Buendia, V. MassonDelmotte, H.-O. Prtner, D. C. Roberts, P. Zhai, R. Slade, S. Connors, R. v. Diemen, M. Ferrat, E. Haughey, S. Luz, S. Neogi, M. Pathak, J. Petzold, J. P. Pereira, P. Vyas, E. Huntley, et al. (Eds.), Climate Change and Land: an IPCC special report on
1 3
Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences (2023) 22:1129-1176
climate change, desertification, land degradation, sustainable land management, food security, and greenhouse gas fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems. https://www.ipcc.ch/srccl/. Accessed 1 Jan 2023 177. Lawrence, Z. D., Perlwitz, J., Butler, A. H., Manney, G. L., Newman, P. A., Lee, S. H., & Nash, E. R. (2020). The remarkably strong arctic stratospheric polar vortex of winter 2020: Links to record-breaking Arctic oscillation and ozone loss. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/ 2020jd033271 178. Friedel, M., Chiodo, G., Stenke, A., Domeisen, D. I. V., Fueglistaler, S., Anet, J. G., & Peter, T. (2022). Springtime arctic ozone depletion forces northern hemisphere climate anomalies. Nature Geoscience, 15(7), 541-547. https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41561-022-00974-7 179. Overland, J. E., & Wang, M. Y. (2021). The 2020 Siberian heat wave. [Article]. International Journal of Climatology, 41, E2341-E2346. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.6850 180. von der Gathen, P., Kivi, R., Wohltmann, I., Salawitch, R. J., & Rex, M. (2021). Climate change favours large seasonal loss of Arctic ozone. Nature Communications, 12(1), 1-17. https://doi. org/10.1038/s41467-021-24089-6 181. OECD. (2022). Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). https:// www. oecd. org/ chemi calsa fety/ por t al- per f l uor in atedchemicals/. Accessed 1 Feb 2022 182. Wallington, T. J., Sulbaek Andersen, M. P., & Nielsen, O. J. (2021). The case for a more precise definition of regulated PFAS. Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts, 23(12), 1834-1838. https://doi.org/10.1039/d1em00296a 183. Buck, R. C., Korzeniowski, S. H., Laganis, E., & Adamsky, F. (2021). Identification and classification of commercially relevant per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 17, 1045-1055. https://doi. org/10.1002/ieam.4450 184. Anderson, J. K., Brecher, R. W., Cousins, I. T., DeWitt, J., Fiedler, H., Kannan, K., Kirman, C. R., Lipscomb, J., Priestly, B., Schoeny, R., Seed, J., Verner, M., & Hays, S. M. (2022). Grouping of PFAS for human health risk assessment: Findings from an independent panel of experts. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2022.105226 185. DEPA. (2015). Short-chain polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) (Vol. 1707). Danish Environmental Protection Agency 186. EFSA (2020). Risk to human health related to the presence of perfluoroalkyl substances in food. EFSA Journal, 18(9), e06223. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6223 187. NICNAS. (2016). Short chain perfluorocarboxylic acids and their direct precursors: human health tier II assessment. National Industrial Chemicals Notification and Assessment Scheme (NICNAS) 188. ECCC. (2022). Canada's great lakes strategy for PFOS, PFOA, and LC-PFCAs risk management. Environment and Climate Change Canada 189. USEPA. (2022). PFAS Master List of PFAS Substances. https:// comptox.epa.gov/dashboard/chemical_lists/pfasmaster. Accessed 1 Apr 2022 190. PubChem. (2022). Trifluoroacetic acid. https://pubchem.ncbi. nlm.nih.gov/compound/6422. Accessed 1 Jan 2022 191. RSC. (2022). ChemSpider. http://www.chemspider.com/. Accessed 1 May 2022 192. Chabot, L. (2017). ALGA, GROWTH INHIBITION TEST Effect of the trifuoroacetic acid on the growth of the unicellular alga Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata, according to OECD guideline 201 (Study conducted for RHODIA OPERATIONS - SOLVAY). Vol. 17-005-167094. Verneuil-En-Halatte
1173
193. Boudreau, T. M. (2002). Toxicity of perfluorinated organic acids to selected freshwater organisms under laboratory and field conditions. University of Guelph
194. Wang, Y., Niu, J., Zhang, L., & Shi, J. (2014). Toxicity assessment of perfluorinated carboxylic acids (PFCAs) towards the rotifer Brachionus calyciflorus. Science of the Total Environment, 491-492, 266-270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.02. 028
195. ATSDR. (2021). Toxicological profile for perfluoroalkyls. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry
196. Kwiatkowski, C. F., Andrews, D. Q., Birnbaum, L. S., Bruton, T. A., DeWitt, J. C., Knappe, D. R. U., Maffini, M. V., Miller, M. F., Pelch, K. E., Reade, A., Soehl, A., Trier, X., Venier, M., Wagner, C. C., Wang, Z., & Blum, A. (2020). Scientific basis for managing PFAS as a chemical class. Environmental Science & Technology Letters, 7(8), 532-543. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs. estlett.0c00255
197. Cousins, I. T., Dewitt, J. C., Glge, J., Goldenman, G., Herzke, D., Lohmann, R., Ng, C. A., Scheringer, M., & Wang, Z. (2020). The high persistence of PFAS is sufficient for their management as a chemical class. Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts, 22(12), 2307-2312. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0em0 0355g
198. Singh, R. R., & Papanastasiou, D. K. (2021). Comment on "Scientific basis for managing PFAS as a chemical class." Environmental Science & Technology Letters, 8(2), 192-194. https://doi. org/10.1021/acs.estlett.0c00765
199. Kwiatkowski, C. F., Andrews, D. Q., Birnbaum, L. S., Bruton, T. A., DeWitt, J. C., Knappe, D. R. U., Maffini, M. V., Miller, M. F., Pelch, K. E., Reade, A., Soehl, A., Trier, X., Venier, M., Wagner, C. C., Wang, Z., & Blum, A. (2021). Response to "Comment on scientific basis for managing PFAS as a chemical class." Environmental Science & Technology Letters, 8(2), 195-197. https:// doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.1c00049
200. Hogue, C. (2022). How to define PFAS. Chemical & Engineering News, 100(24), pp. 18-19
201. Boutonnet, J. C., Bingham, P., Calamari, D., Rooij, Cd., Franklin, J., Kawano, T., Libre, J.-M., McCul-Loch, A., Malinverno, G., & Odom, J. M. (1999). Environmental risk assessment of trifluoroacetic acid. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, 5, 59-124. https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039991289644
202. Scheurer, M., Ndler, K., Freeling, F., Janda, J., Happel, O., Riegel, M., Mller, U., Storck, F. R., Fleig, M., Lange, F. T., Brunsch, A., & Brauch, H.-J. (2017). Small, mobile, persistent: Trifluoroacetate in the water cycle--Overlooked sources, pathways, and consequences for drinking water supply. Water Research, 126, 460-471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2017. 09.045
203. Alexandrino, D. A. M., Ribeiro, I., Pinto, L. M., Cambra, R., Oliveira, R. S., Pereira, F., & Carvalho, M. F. (2018). Biodegradation of mono-, di- and trifluoroacetate by microbial cultures with different origins. New Biotechnology, 43, 23-29. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.nbt.2017.08.005
204. Wallington, T. J., Sulbaek Andersen, M. P., & Nielsen, O. J. (2015). Atmospheric chemistry of short-chain haloolefins: Photochemical ozone creation potentials (POCPs), global warming potentials (GWPs), and ozone depletion potentials (ODPs). Chemosphere, 129, 135-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere. 2014.06.092
205. Wallington, T. J., Schneider, W. F., Worsnop, D. R., Nielsen, O. J., Sehested, J., Debruyn, W. J., & Shorter, J. A. (1994). The environmental impact of CFC replacements HFCs and HCFCs. Environmental Science & Technology, 28(7), 320A-326A. https://doi. org/10.1021/es00056a714
1 3
1174
206. Hurley, M. D., Wallington, T. J., Javadi, M. S., & Nielsen, O. J. (2008). Atmospheric chemistry of CF3CFCH2: Products and mechanisms of Cl atom and OH radical initiated oxidation. Chemical Physics Letters, 450(4-6), 263-267. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.cplett.2007.11.051
207. Burkholder, J. B., Cox, R. A., & Ravishankara, A. R. (2015). Atmospheric degradation of ozone depleting substances, their substitutes, and related species. Chemical Reviews, 115(10), 3704-3759. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr5006759
208. Wallington, T. J., Andersen, M. P. S., & Nielsen, O. J. (2017). Atmospheric chemistry of halogenated organic compounds. In J. R. Barker, A. L. Steiner, & T. J. Wallington (Eds.), Advances in atmospheric chemistry (Vol. 2, pp. 305-402). New Jersey: World Scientific. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789813147355_0005
209. IPCC. (2021). Climate change 2021: The physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press
210. Chiappero, M. S., Malanca, F. E., Argello, G. A., Wooldridge, S. T., Hurley, M. D., Ball, J. C., Wallington, T. J., Waterland, R. L., & Buck, R. C. (2006). Atmospheric chemistry of perfluoroaldehydes (CxF2x+1CHO) and fluorotelomer aldehydes (CxF2x+1CH2CHO): Quantification of the important role of photolysis. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 110(43), 11944- 11953. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp064262k
211. Sulbaek Andersen, M. P., Toft, A., Nielsen, O. J., Hurley, M. D., Wallington, T. J., Chishima, H., Tonokura, K., Mabury, S. A., Martin, J. W., & Ellis, D. A. (2006). Atmospheric chemistry of perfluorinated aldehyde hydrates (n-CxF2x+1CH(OH)2, x= 1, 3, 4): Hydration, dehydration, and kinetics and mechanism of Cl atom and OH radical initiated oxidation. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 110(32), 9854-9860. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp060 404z
212. WMO. (2022). Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion: 2022. World Meteorological Organization (WMO). GAW Report No. 278; WMO: Geneva, 2022
213. Frank, H., Christoph, E. H., Holm-Hansen, O., & Bullister, J. L. (2002). Trifluoroacetate in ocean waters. Environmental Science & Technology, 36, 12-15. https://doi.org/10.1021/es0101532
214. UBA. (2021). Persistent degradation products of halogenated refrigerants and blowing agents in the environment: Type, environmental concentrations, and fate with particular regard to new halogenated substitutes with low global warming potential (Vol. FB000452/ENG). Umwelt Bundesamt
215. Sulbaek Andersen, M. P., Schmidt, J. A., Volkova, A., & Wuebbles, D. J. (2018). A three-dimensional model of the atmospheric chemistry of E and Z-CF3CH=CHCl (HCFO-1233(zd) (E/Z)). Atmospheric Environment, 179, 250-259. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.atmosenv.2018.02.018
216. Holland, R., Khan, M. A. H., Driscoll, I., Chhantyal-Pun, R., Derwent, R. G., Taatjes, C. A., Orr-Ewing, A. J., Percival, C. J., & Shallcross, D. E. (2021). Investigation of the production of trifluoroacetic acid from two halocarbons, HFC-134a and HFO1234yf and its fates using a global three-dimensional chemical transport model. ACS Earth and Space Chemistry, 5, 849-857. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.0c00355
217. David, L. M., Barth, M., Hglund-Isaksson, L., Purohit, P., Velders, G. J., Glaser, S., & Ravishankara, A. R. (2021). Trifluoroacetic acid deposition from emissions of HFO-1234yf in India, China, and the Middle East. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 21(19), 14833-14849. https://doi.org/10.5194/ acp-21-14833-2021
218. USEPA. (2020). Models for Pesticide Risk Assessment. https:// www.epa.gov/pesticide-science-and-assessing-pesticide-risks/ models-pesticide-risk-assessment#AgDrift. Accessed 1 Jan 2022
Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences (2023) 22:1129-1176
219. Chen, H., Zhang, L., Li, M., Yao, Y., Zhao, Z., Munoz, G., & Sun, H. (2019). Per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) in precipitation from mainland China: Contributions of unknown precursors and short-chain (C2C3) perfluoroalkyl carboxylic acids. Water Research, 153, 169-177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. watres.2019.01.019
220. Freeling, F., Behringer, D., Heydel, F., Scheurer, M., Ternes, T. A., & Ndler, K. (2020). Trifluoroacetate in precipitation: Deriving a benchmark dataset. Environmental Science & Technology, 54, 11210-11219. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c02910
221. Cahill, T. M. (2022). Increases in trifluoroacetate concentrations in surface waters over two decades. Environmental Science & Technology, 56(13), 9428-9434. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est. 2c01826
222. Freeling, F., Scheurer, M., Koschorreck, J., Hoffmann, G., Ternes, T. A., & Ndler, K. (2022). Levels and temporal trends of trifluoroacetate (TFA) in archived plants: Evidence for increasing emissions of gaseous TFA precursors over the last decades. Environmental Science & Technology Letters, 5, 400-405. https://doi. org/10.1021/acs.estlett.2c00164
223. Lindley, A., McCulloch, A., & Vink, T. (2019). Contribution of hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) and hydrofluoro-olefins (HFOs) atmospheric breakdown products to acidification ("Acid Rain") in the EU at present and in the future. Open Journal of Air Pollution, 8, 81-95. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojap.2019.84004
224. Bernhard, G. H., Neale, R. E., Barnes, P. W., Neale, P. J., Zepp, R. G., Wilson, S. R., Andrade, A. J., Bais, A. F., McKenzie, R. L., Aucamp, P. J., Young, P. J., Liley, B. J., Lucas, R. M., Yazar, S., Rhodes, L. E., Byrne, S. N., Hollestein, L. M., Olsen, L. M., Young, A. R., Robson, T. M., et al. (2020). Environmental effects of stratospheric ozone depletion, UV radiation and interactions with climate change: UNEP Environmental Effects Assessment Panel, update 2019. Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences, 19, 542-584. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0pp90011g
225. Neale, R. E., Barnes, P. W., Robson, T. M., Neale, P. J., Williamson, C. E., Zepp, R. G., Wilson, S. R., Madronich, S., Andrady, A. L., Heikkil, A. M., Bernhard, G. H., Bais, A. F., Aucamp, P. J., Banaszak, A. T., Bornman, J. F., Bruckman, L. S., Byrne, S. N., Foereid, B., Hder, D. P., ... Zhu, M. (2021). Environmental effects of stratospheric ozone depletion, UV radiation, and interactions with climate change: UNEP Environmental Effects Assessment Panel, Update 2020. Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences, 20, 1-67. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s43630-020-00001-x
226. Frank, H., Klein, A., & Renschen, D. (1996). Environmental trifluoroacetate. Nature, 382, 34-34. https://doi.org/10.1038/38203 4a0
227. Scott, B., Macdonald, R., Kannan, K., Fisk, A., Witter, A., Yamashita, N., Durham, L., Spencer, C., & Muir, D. (2005). Trifluoroacetate profiles in the Arctic, Atlantic, and Pacific oceans. Environmental Science & Technology, 39, 6555-6560. https:// doi.org/10.1021/es047975u
228. Scott, B. F., Spencer, C., Martin, J. W., Barra, R., Bootsma, H. A., Jones, K. C., Johnston, A. E., & Muir, D. C. G. (2005). Comparison of haloacetic acids in the environment of the Northern and Southern Hemispheres. Environmental Science & Technology, 39(22), 8664-8670. https://doi.org/10.1021/es050118l
229. Joudan, S., DeSilva, A. O., & Young, C. (2021). Insufficient evidence for the existence of natural trifluoroacetic acid. Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts, 23, 1641-1649. https:// doi.org/10.1039/d1em00306b
230. Klobas, J. E., & Wilmouth, D. M. (2019). Volcanogenic Chlorofluorocarbons and the Recent CFC Anomalies. A white paper prepared at the request of the Scientific Assessment Panel (SAP) of the Montreal Protocol. Boston: Harvard University Library
1 3
Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences (2023) 22:1129-1176 231. Gribble, G. W. (2002). Fluorine in the environment, a review
of its sources and geochemistry. In A. H. Neilson (Ed.), The handbook of environmental chemistry (Vol. 3, pp. 121-136). Springer-Verlag 232. Solomon, K., Velders, G., Wilson, S., Madronich, S., Longstreth, J., Aucamp, P., & Bornman, J. (2016). Sources, fates, toxicity, and risks of trifluoroacetic acid and its salts: Relevance to substances regulated under the Montreal and Kyoto protocols. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health B, 19, 289-304. https://doi.org/10.1080/10937404.2016.1175981 233. Wang, B., Yao, Y., Chen, H., Chang, S., Tian, Y., & Sun, H. (2020). Per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances and the contribution of unknown precursors and short-chain (C2-C3) perfluoroalkyl carboxylic acids at solid waste disposal facilities. Science of the Total Environment, 705, 135832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scito tenv.2019.135832 234. Xie, G., Zhai, Z., & Zhang, J. (2020). Distribution characteristics of trifluoroacetic acid in the environments surrounding fluorochemical production plants in Jinan, China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 983-991. https://doi.org/10. 1007/s11356-019-06689-4 235. Zhang, L., Sun, H., Wang, Q., Chen, H., Yao, Y., Zhao, Z., & Alder, A. C. (2019). Uptake mechanisms of perfluoroalkyl acids with different carbon chain lengths (C2-C8) by wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Science of the Total Environment, 654, 19-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.443 236. Lan, Z., Yao, Y., Xu, J., Chen, H., Ren, C., Fang, X., Zhang, K., Jin, L., Hua, X., & Alder, A. C. (2020). Novel and legacy per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) in a farmland environment: Soil distribution and biomonitoring with plant leaves and locusts. Environmental Pollution, 263, 114487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. envpol.2020.114487 237. Gardiner, J. (2015). Fluoropolymers: Origin, production, and industrial and commercial applications. Australian Journal of Chemistry, 68(1), 13-22. https://doi.org/10.1071/CH14165 238. Ellis, D. A., Mabury, S. A., Martin, J. W., & Muir, D. C. (2001). Thermolysis of fluoropolymers as a potential source of halogenated organic acids in the environment. Nature, 412, 321-324. https://doi.org/10.1038/35085548 239. Cui, J. N., Guo, J. Y., Zhai, Z. H., & Zhang, J. B. (2019). The contribution of fluoropolymer thermolysis to trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) in environmental media. Chemosphere, 222, 637- 644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.01.174 240. Trang, B., Li, Y., Xue, X.-S., Ateia, M., Houk, K. N., & Dichtel, W. R. (2022). Low-temperature mineralization of perfluorocarboxylic acids. Science, 377(6608), 839-845. https:// doi.org/10.1126/science.abm8868 241. Lenka, S. P., Kah, M., & Padhye, L. P. (2021). A review of the occurrence, transformation, and removal of poly- and perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in wastewater treatment plants. Water Research, 199, 117187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres. 2021.117187 242. Duan, Y., Sun, H., Yao, Y., Meng, Y., & Li, Y. (2020). Distribution of novel and legacy per-/polyfluoroalkyl substances in serum and its associations with two glycemic biomarkers among Chinese adult men and women with normal blood glucose levels. Environment International, 134, 105295. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2019.105295 243. Scheurer, M., & Ndler, K. (2021). Ultrashort-chain perfluoroalkyl substance trifluoroacetate (TFA) in beer and tea-An unintended aqueous extraction. Food Chemistry, 351, 129304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.129304 244. Yao, Y., Sun, H., Gan, Z., Hu, H., Zhao, Y., Chang, S., & Zhou, Q. (2016). Nationwide distribution of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in outdoor dust in Mainland China from eastern to
1175
western areas. Environmental Science & Technology, 50(7), 3676-3685. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b00649 245. Wang, B., Yao, Y., Wang, Y., Chen, H., & Sun, H. (2021). Per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances in outdoor and indoor dust from Mainland China: Contributions of unknown precursors and implications for human exposure. Environmental Science & Technology, 56(10), 6036-6045. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs. est.0c08242 246. Siegemund, G., Schwertfeger, W., Feiring, A., Smart, B., Behr, F., Vogel, H., McKusick, B., & Kirsch, P. (2016). Fluorine compounds, organic. In: B. Elvers (Ed.) Ullmann's encyclopedia of industrial chemistry. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co 247. Inoue, M., Sumii, Y., & Shibata, N. (2020). Contribution of organofluorine compounds to pharmaceuticals. ACS Omega, 5(19), 10633-10640. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.0c008 30 248. Yu, Y., Liu, A., Dhawan, G., Mei, H., Zhang, W., Izawa, K., Soloshonok, V. A., & Han, J. (2021). Fluorine-containing pharmaceuticals approved by the FDA in 2020: Synthesis and biological activity. Chinese Chemical Letters. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.cclet.2021.05.042 249. Khan, M. F., & Murphy, C. D. (2021). Bacterial degradation of the anti-depressant drug fluoxetine produces trifluoroacetic acid and fluoride ion. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 105, 9359-9369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-021-11675-3 250. Morio, M., Fujii, K., Takiyama, R., Chikasue, F., Kikuchi, H., & Ribari, L. (1980). Quantitative analysis of trifluoroacetate in the urine and blood by isotachophoresis. Anesthesiology, 53(1), 56-59. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-198007000-00011 251. Mirkov, M. I., Morio, M., Kawahara, M., Yuge, O., Kinoshita, H., & Fujii, K. (1988). Excretion of trifluoroacetic acid as a metabolite of halothane in digestive juices. Journal of Anesthesia, 2(2), 133-138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s0054080020133 252. Sutton, T. S., Koblin, D. D., Gruenke, L. D., Weiskopf, R. B., Rampil, I. J., Waskell, L., & Eger, E., 2nd. (1991). Fluoride metabolites after prolonged exposure of volunteers and patients to desflurane. Anesthesia and Analgesia, 73(2), 180-185. https:// doi.org/10.1213/00000539-199108000-00011 253. Wark, H., Earl, J., Chau, D. D., & Overton, J. (1990). Halothane metabolism in children. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 64, 474-481. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/64.4.474 254. Ogawa, Y., Tokunaga, E., Kobayashi, O., Hirai, K., & Shibata, N. (2020). Current contributions of organofluorine compounds to the agrochemical industry. Iscience, 23, 101467. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.isci.2020.101467 255. Ellis, D. A., & Mabury, S. A. (2000). The aqueous photolysis of TFM and related trifluoromethylphenols. An alternate source of trifluoroacetic acid in the environment. Environmental Science & Technology, 34, 632-637. https://doi.org/10.1021/es990422c 256. Bhat, A. P., Pomerantz, W. C. K., & Arnold, W. A. (2022). Finding fluorine: Photoproduct formation during the photolysis of fluorinated pesticides. Environmental Science & Technology, 56(17), 12336-12346. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c04242 257. NAWQA, U. (2021). National Water-Quality Assessment (NAWQA) Project. Estimated Annual Agricultural Pesticide Use. https:// water. usgs. gov/ nawqa/ pnsp/ usage/ maps/ compo und_ listi ng.php. Accessed Dec 2021 258. FAO STAT. (2021). Pesticide Use. https://www.fao.org/faostat/ en/?#data/RP. Accessed Dec 2021 259. UBA. (2021). Reducing Chemical Input into Water Bodies - Trifluoroacetate (TFA) as a Persistent and Mobile Substance from Many Sources. Umweld Bundesampt German Environment Agency. ISSN 2363-829X 260. UBA. (2019). Ableitung Eines Gesundheitlichen Leitwertes fr Trifluoressigsure (TFA). Umwelt Bundesampt
1 3
1176
261. OECD. (2022). OECD test guidelines for chemicals. https:// www.oecd.org/chemicalsafety/testing/oecdguidelinesforthetesti ngofchemicals.htm. Accessed 1 Apr 2022
262. OECD. (2022). Good Laboratory Practice (GLP). https://www. oecd.org/chemicalsafety/testing/good-laboratory-practiceglp. htm. Accessed 1 Apr 2022
263. ECHA. (2021). Trifluoroacetic acid: Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria. https://echa.europa.eu/registration-dossier/-/ registered-dossier/5203/6/2/6/?documentUUID=9e9959f8-a9944b8c-93d7-de7a1a3c1cfa. Accessed 1 Dec 2021
264. Cousins, I. T., Ng, C. A., Wang, Z., & Scheringer, M. (2019). Why is high persistence alone a major cause of concern? Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts, 21(5), 781-792. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8em00515j
265. IPCC/TEAP. (2005). Special report safeguarding the ozone layer and the global climate system: Issues related to hydrofluorocarbons and perfluorocarbons. World Meteorological Organization (WMO) ; Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; United Nations Environment Programme
266. Derwent, R. G., Jenkin, M. E., & Saunders, S. M. (1996). Photochemical ozone creation potentials for a large number of reactive hydrocarbons under European conditions. Atmospheric Environment, 30(2), 181-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/1352-2310(95) 00303-g
267. Carter, W. P. L. (1994). Development of ozone reactivity scales for volatile organic compounds. Air & Waste, 44, 881-899. https://doi.org/10.1080/1073161X.1994.10467290
268. Jenkin, M. E., Derwent, R. G., & Wallington, T. J. (2017). Photochemical ozone creation potentials for volatile organic compounds: Rationalization and estimation. Atmospheric Environment, 163, 128-137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.05. 024
269. Carter, W. P. L. (2009). Investigation of Atmospheric Ozone Impacts of Trans 2,3,3,3-Tetrafluoropropene, Final Report for Contract UCR-09010016. Center for Environmental Research and Technology, College of Engineering, University of California, Riverside, California
270. Lefrancois, F., Jesswein, M., Thoma, M., Engel, A., Stanley, K., & Schuck, T. (2021). An indirect-calibration method for non-target quantification of trace gases applied to a time series of fourth-generation synthetic halocarbons at the Taunus Observatory (Germany). Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 14(6), 4669-4687. https://doi.org/10.5194/ amt-14-4669-2021
271. Vollmer, M. K., Reimann, S., Hill, M., & Brunner, D. (2015). First observations of the fourth generation synthetic halocarbons HFC-1234yf, HFC-1234ze(E), and HCFC-1233zd(E) in the atmosphere. Environmental Science & Technology, 49(5), 2703-2708. https://doi.org/10.1021/es505123x
272. Vollmer, M. K., Reimann, S., Hill, M., & Brunner, D. (2020). Update to Vollmer, M. K., S. Reimann, M. Hill, D. Brunner, First observations of the fourth generation synthetic halocarbons HFC-1234yf, HFC-1234ze(E), and HCFC-1233zd(E) in the atmosphere. Environ Sci Technol, 49, 2703-2708, https://doi. org/10.1021/es505123x. https://www.empa.ch/documents/56101/
Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences (2023) 22:1129-1176 190047/HFO+update+Report/fe3b26b5-fcb6-4cd9-a6f6-5c39a c01f20a. Accessed 2 July 2022 273. Wang, Y., Wang, Z., Sun, M., Guo, J., & Zhang, J. (2021). Emissions, degradation and impact of HFO-1234ze from China PU foam industry. Science of the Total Environment, 780, 146631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146631 274. Campbell, J. S., Hansen, C. S., & Kable, S. (2020). New HFO refrigerants transform in the atmosphere to ultimately produce problematic old HFCs. In: Paper Presented at the American Geophysical Union Fall Meeting, December 2020 275. Sulbaek Andersen, M. P., & Nielsen, O. J. (2022). Tropospheric photolysis of CF3CHO. Atmospheric Environment, 272, 118935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118935 276. Franco, B., Blumenstock, T., Cho, C., Clarisse, L., Clerbaux, C., Coheur, P. F., De Mazire, M., De Smedt, I., Dorn, H. P., Emmerichs, T., Fuchs, H., Gkatzelis, G., Griffith, D. W. T., Gromov, S., Hannigan, J. W., Hase, F., Hohaus, T., Jones, N., Kerkweg, A., Kiendler-Scharr, A., et al. (2021). Ubiquitous atmospheric production of organic acids mediated by cloud droplets. Nature, 593(7858), 233-237. https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41586-021-03462-x 277. Rayne, S., & Forest, K. (2016). Aqueous phase hydration and hydrate acidity of perfluoroalkyl and n:2 fluorotelomer aldehydes. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A, 51(7), 579-582. https://doi.org/10.1080/10934529.2016.11416 25 278. Liu, L., Yu, F., Tu, K., Yang, Z., & Zhang, X. (2021). Influence of atmospheric conditions on the role of trifluoroacetic acid in atmospheric sulfuric acid-dimethylamine nucleation. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 21(8), 6221-6230. https://doi. org/10.5194/acp-21-6221-2021 279. Lu, Y., Liu, L., Ning, A., Yang, G., Liu, Y., Kurtn, T., Vehkamki, H., Zhang, X., & Wang, L. (2020). Atmospheric sulfuric acid-dimethylamine nucleation enhanced by trifluoroacetic acid. Geophysical Research Letters, 47(2), e2019GL085627. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL085627 280. Dong, Z.-G., Xu, F., Mitchell, E., & Long, B. (2021). Trifluoroacetaldehyde aminolysis catalyzed by a single water molecule: An important sink pathway for trifluoroacetaldehyde and a potential pathway for secondary organic aerosol growth. Atmospheric Environment, 249, 118242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv. 2021.118242 281. Taatjes, C. A., Khan, M. A. H., Eskola, A. J., Percival, C. J., Osborn, D. L., Wallington, T. J., & Shallcross, D. E. (2019). Reaction of perfluorooctanoic acid with Criegee intermediates and implications for the atmospheric fate of perfluorocarboxylic acids. Environmental Science & Technology, 53(3), 1245-1251. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b05073 282. NAIADES. (2022). Donnes sur la qualit des eaux de surface. http://www.naiades.eaufrance.fr/acces-donnees#/physicochimie. Accessed 1 April 2022 283. UN. (2022). Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). https:// www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-developmentgoals/. Accessed 1 September 2022
1 3